Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?

Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1494-1509
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Harriet Elizabeth, Mercer, Theresa G., Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi, Beagley, Sam, Naura, Marc, Bryden, Alexandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1509
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1494
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 37
creator Moore, Harriet Elizabeth
Mercer, Theresa G.
Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi
Beagley, Sam
Naura, Marc
Bryden, Alexandra
description Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.3867
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605513679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605513679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLwzAYBuAgCs4p-BMCXrx0Jk2bNF5kDHXiQBjuHNIm3TK2ZCZdx_DPm67izVPywpMvyQvALUYjjFD64L0ckYKyMzDAOckTnFF2_rfP-SW4CmGNEGYFLwbgexyCDsHYJWxWGu68W_qYoauhN632MKbGedkYZ6GxJ7R4f4RTGWBp3G51DKaSG1g5q0yPtnFIqxV03fHm4KDSlVT6NNPYRvtW204-XYOLWm6Cvvldh2Dx8vw5mSazj9e3yXiWVCRlLCmqEmEska5rRXGaK17ylBNGKcklZSpjKI0Bq4xwFRHlqqRFRiqNClkjRIbgrp8bH_a1j_8Ra7f3Nl4pUoryHBPKeFT3vaq8C8HrWuy82Up_FBiJrloRqxVdtZEmPT2YjT7-68R8Pj75H9awe8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605513679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth ; Mercer, Theresa G. ; Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi ; Beagley, Sam ; Naura, Marc ; Bryden, Alexandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth ; Mercer, Theresa G. ; Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi ; Beagley, Sam ; Naura, Marc ; Bryden, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Comparative analysis ; Environmental policy ; Environmental quality ; Environmental restoration ; habitat condition ; Habitats ; Identification ; International policies ; International policy ; monitoring and assessment ; observational data ; Regions ; Restoration ; River restoration ; River systems ; Rivers ; Spatial analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surveying ; water framework directive ; Water management ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1494-1509</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1941-6471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3867$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3867$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Theresa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beagley, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naura, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryden, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>habitat condition</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>International policies</subject><subject>International policy</subject><subject>monitoring and assessment</subject><subject>observational data</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>River restoration</subject><subject>River systems</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>water framework directive</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EFLwzAYBuAgCs4p-BMCXrx0Jk2bNF5kDHXiQBjuHNIm3TK2ZCZdx_DPm67izVPywpMvyQvALUYjjFD64L0ckYKyMzDAOckTnFF2_rfP-SW4CmGNEGYFLwbgexyCDsHYJWxWGu68W_qYoauhN632MKbGedkYZ6GxJ7R4f4RTGWBp3G51DKaSG1g5q0yPtnFIqxV03fHm4KDSlVT6NNPYRvtW204-XYOLWm6Cvvldh2Dx8vw5mSazj9e3yXiWVCRlLCmqEmEska5rRXGaK17ylBNGKcklZSpjKI0Bq4xwFRHlqqRFRiqNClkjRIbgrp8bH_a1j_8Ra7f3Nl4pUoryHBPKeFT3vaq8C8HrWuy82Up_FBiJrloRqxVdtZEmPT2YjT7-68R8Pj75H9awe8w</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</creator><creator>Mercer, Theresa G.</creator><creator>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</creator><creator>Beagley, Sam</creator><creator>Naura, Marc</creator><creator>Bryden, Alexandra</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-6471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</title><author>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth ; Mercer, Theresa G. ; Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi ; Beagley, Sam ; Naura, Marc ; Bryden, Alexandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>habitat condition</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>International policies</topic><topic>International policy</topic><topic>monitoring and assessment</topic><topic>observational data</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>River restoration</topic><topic>River systems</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>water framework directive</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Theresa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beagley, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naura, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryden, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</au><au>Mercer, Theresa G.</au><au>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</au><au>Beagley, Sam</au><au>Naura, Marc</au><au>Bryden, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1494</spage><epage>1509</epage><pages>1494-1509</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3867</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-6471</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1494-1509
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2605513679
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aquatic habitats
Comparative analysis
Environmental policy
Environmental quality
Environmental restoration
habitat condition
Habitats
Identification
International policies
International policy
monitoring and assessment
observational data
Regions
Restoration
River restoration
River systems
Rivers
Spatial analysis
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Surveying
water framework directive
Water management
Water quality
title Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A44%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20progress%20of%20river%20restoration%20in%20the%20UK:%20Has%20biophysical%20condition%20improved%20over%20two%20decades%20of%20intervention?&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Moore,%20Harriet%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1494&rft.epage=1509&rft.pages=1494-1509&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3867&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605513679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605513679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true