Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?
Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | River research and applications 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1494-1509 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1509 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1494 |
container_title | River research and applications |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Moore, Harriet Elizabeth Mercer, Theresa G. Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi Beagley, Sam Naura, Marc Bryden, Alexandra |
description | Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rra.3867 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605513679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605513679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLwzAYBuAgCs4p-BMCXrx0Jk2bNF5kDHXiQBjuHNIm3TK2ZCZdx_DPm67izVPywpMvyQvALUYjjFD64L0ckYKyMzDAOckTnFF2_rfP-SW4CmGNEGYFLwbgexyCDsHYJWxWGu68W_qYoauhN632MKbGedkYZ6GxJ7R4f4RTGWBp3G51DKaSG1g5q0yPtnFIqxV03fHm4KDSlVT6NNPYRvtW204-XYOLWm6Cvvldh2Dx8vw5mSazj9e3yXiWVCRlLCmqEmEska5rRXGaK17ylBNGKcklZSpjKI0Bq4xwFRHlqqRFRiqNClkjRIbgrp8bH_a1j_8Ra7f3Nl4pUoryHBPKeFT3vaq8C8HrWuy82Up_FBiJrloRqxVdtZEmPT2YjT7-68R8Pj75H9awe8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605513679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth ; Mercer, Theresa G. ; Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi ; Beagley, Sam ; Naura, Marc ; Bryden, Alexandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth ; Mercer, Theresa G. ; Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi ; Beagley, Sam ; Naura, Marc ; Bryden, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Comparative analysis ; Environmental policy ; Environmental quality ; Environmental restoration ; habitat condition ; Habitats ; Identification ; International policies ; International policy ; monitoring and assessment ; observational data ; Regions ; Restoration ; River restoration ; River systems ; Rivers ; Spatial analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surveying ; water framework directive ; Water management ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1494-1509</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1941-6471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3867$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3867$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Theresa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beagley, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naura, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryden, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>habitat condition</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>International policies</subject><subject>International policy</subject><subject>monitoring and assessment</subject><subject>observational data</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>River restoration</subject><subject>River systems</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>water framework directive</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EFLwzAYBuAgCs4p-BMCXrx0Jk2bNF5kDHXiQBjuHNIm3TK2ZCZdx_DPm67izVPywpMvyQvALUYjjFD64L0ckYKyMzDAOckTnFF2_rfP-SW4CmGNEGYFLwbgexyCDsHYJWxWGu68W_qYoauhN632MKbGedkYZ6GxJ7R4f4RTGWBp3G51DKaSG1g5q0yPtnFIqxV03fHm4KDSlVT6NNPYRvtW204-XYOLWm6Cvvldh2Dx8vw5mSazj9e3yXiWVCRlLCmqEmEska5rRXGaK17ylBNGKcklZSpjKI0Bq4xwFRHlqqRFRiqNClkjRIbgrp8bH_a1j_8Ra7f3Nl4pUoryHBPKeFT3vaq8C8HrWuy82Up_FBiJrloRqxVdtZEmPT2YjT7-68R8Pj75H9awe8w</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</creator><creator>Mercer, Theresa G.</creator><creator>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</creator><creator>Beagley, Sam</creator><creator>Naura, Marc</creator><creator>Bryden, Alexandra</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-6471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</title><author>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth ; Mercer, Theresa G. ; Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi ; Beagley, Sam ; Naura, Marc ; Bryden, Alexandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-8cb011a0effd6125d9b929376635a67d47027661d439deff69db6843ce08af003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>habitat condition</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>International policies</topic><topic>International policy</topic><topic>monitoring and assessment</topic><topic>observational data</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>River restoration</topic><topic>River systems</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>water framework directive</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Theresa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beagley, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naura, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryden, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Harriet Elizabeth</au><au>Mercer, Theresa G.</au><au>Alwis Pitts, Dilkushi</au><au>Beagley, Sam</au><au>Naura, Marc</au><au>Bryden, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention?</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1494</spage><epage>1509</epage><pages>1494-1509</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Biophysical condition is one indicator of the immediate success of efforts to restore degraded rivers as well as longer‐term progress towards improving water quality. In the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the biophysical condition of river systems in the UK also reflects how well international environmental policy translates into improved river management domestically. We assess whether the condition of river systems in the UK has improved or declined over the past two decades, whether regions identified by the first WFD assessment have improved or declined, and thus, how effectively international policy has been implemented nationally. Methods include: statistical and spatial analysis of more than 25,000 habitat condition records collated in the River Habitat Survey over the 1990s and 2000s; computing of an Index of Change for Local Authorities; and comparison of Indices of Change with a sub‐sample of 1,727 WFD assessments conducted in 258 Local Authorities. Findings include that three of four measures indicate that biophysical quality has declined, although only the decline in one measure (habitat quality) was statistically significant. Riparian quality has improved, although measures do not consider invasive compared to native coverage. In total, 27 regions were identified with the worst declining quality. Comparative analysis of regions suggests that condition has declined most substantially in regions that were previously in “good” condition. Priorities for future investment include improving degraded sites, protecting high quality sites, and increasing monitoring of “data poor” regions. Our methodology offers an approach for utilising “messy” routinely collated data like the RHS. However, guidelines are needed to support the use of similar datasets for the international river restoration community.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3867</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-6471</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-1459 |
ispartof | River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1494-1509 |
issn | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2605513679 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aquatic habitats Comparative analysis Environmental policy Environmental quality Environmental restoration habitat condition Habitats Identification International policies International policy monitoring and assessment observational data Regions Restoration River restoration River systems Rivers Spatial analysis Statistical analysis Statistical methods Surveying water framework directive Water management Water quality |
title | Assessing the progress of river restoration in the UK: Has biophysical condition improved over two decades of intervention? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A44%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20progress%20of%20river%20restoration%20in%20the%20UK:%20Has%20biophysical%20condition%20improved%20over%20two%20decades%20of%20intervention?&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Moore,%20Harriet%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1494&rft.epage=1509&rft.pages=1494-1509&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3867&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605513679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605513679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |