Differential effects of driver sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior

•Differential effects of alertness, sleepiness and post-sleep inertia on driving behavior are compared in a simulated 10-min driving task.•Lane- and speed-keeping is unstable for drivers under the state of sleepiness and sleep inertia.•After napping, lane-keeping performance recovers rapidly while n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2021-10, Vol.82, p.111-120
Hauptverfasser: Wörle, Johanna, Metz, Barbara, Steinborn, Michael B., Huestegge, Lynn, Baumann, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue
container_start_page 111
container_title Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour
container_volume 82
creator Wörle, Johanna
Metz, Barbara
Steinborn, Michael B.
Huestegge, Lynn
Baumann, Martin
description •Differential effects of alertness, sleepiness and post-sleep inertia on driving behavior are compared in a simulated 10-min driving task.•Lane- and speed-keeping is unstable for drivers under the state of sleepiness and sleep inertia.•After napping, lane-keeping performance recovers rapidly while no recovery is evident under the state of sleepiness.•Under the state of sleep inertia, drivers compensate for impairments by reducing driving speed. No such compensation is evident for drivers under the state of sleepiness.•Performance decrements after awakening have to be taken into account when designing automated driving technology. Driver sleepiness is one of the major safety issues in conventional driving and sleep inertia emerges as a driver state in automated driving. The aim of the present study was to assess the differential impacts of sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior. 61 participants completed a 10-min manual driving task during an otherwise automated drive. They completed the task (a) under an alert state, (b) under a sleepy state, and (c) after EEG-confirmed sleep. Driving performance was assessed with the parameters lane-keeping, speed choice, and speed-keeping. The eye-blink-based sleepiness measure PERCLOS (the proportion of time with eyes closed) was compared for the three driver states. Lane- and speed-keeping performance were impaired under the sleepy state and after sleep, relative to the alert state. After sleep, lane-keeping behavior recovered rapidly and speed-keeping recovered by trend. Under the sleepy state, performance deteriorated. After sleep, the mean speed was lower than in the sleepy state and in the alert state. PERCLOS was increased after sleep and under the sleepy state, relative to the alert state. Although sleep inertia had detrimental effects on driving parameters similar to sleepiness, this effect rapidly vanished. Hence, while brief naps might be suitable to restore alertness in general, the minimal time needed to regain full capacity after napping should be a focus of future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605304551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369847821001765</els_id><sourcerecordid>2605304551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-23904cf5f3b16a0021f2fad2de934fb77514dddd54880134f6f66af7b79c5e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAewssU4YJ3aciBUqT6lSN91bTjIGR8UpdlqJv2dKWOON51r3zowPYzcCcgGiuhvyKbq8gELkUOcA4oQtRK3LTCmhT6kuqyarpa7P2UVKAwDIQugFWz965zBimLzdcqS6mxIfHe-jP2DkaYu48wFT4jb0s-SkI_n5GH5tPrzzFj_swY_xip05u014_Xdfss3z02b5mq3WL2_Lh1XWSammrCgbkJ1TrmxFZYHWdoWzfdFjU0rXaq2E7OkoWdcg6KlyVWWdbnXTKYTykt3ObXdx_Npjmsww7mOgiaaoQJUg6d_kErOri2NKEZ3ZRf9p47cRYI7YzGAImzliM1AbwkaZ-zmDtP3BYzSp8xg67H0kNqYf_T_pH6MMdaU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605304551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of driver sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wörle, Johanna ; Metz, Barbara ; Steinborn, Michael B. ; Huestegge, Lynn ; Baumann, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wörle, Johanna ; Metz, Barbara ; Steinborn, Michael B. ; Huestegge, Lynn ; Baumann, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>•Differential effects of alertness, sleepiness and post-sleep inertia on driving behavior are compared in a simulated 10-min driving task.•Lane- and speed-keeping is unstable for drivers under the state of sleepiness and sleep inertia.•After napping, lane-keeping performance recovers rapidly while no recovery is evident under the state of sleepiness.•Under the state of sleep inertia, drivers compensate for impairments by reducing driving speed. No such compensation is evident for drivers under the state of sleepiness.•Performance decrements after awakening have to be taken into account when designing automated driving technology. Driver sleepiness is one of the major safety issues in conventional driving and sleep inertia emerges as a driver state in automated driving. The aim of the present study was to assess the differential impacts of sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior. 61 participants completed a 10-min manual driving task during an otherwise automated drive. They completed the task (a) under an alert state, (b) under a sleepy state, and (c) after EEG-confirmed sleep. Driving performance was assessed with the parameters lane-keeping, speed choice, and speed-keeping. The eye-blink-based sleepiness measure PERCLOS (the proportion of time with eyes closed) was compared for the three driver states. Lane- and speed-keeping performance were impaired under the sleepy state and after sleep, relative to the alert state. After sleep, lane-keeping behavior recovered rapidly and speed-keeping recovered by trend. Under the sleepy state, performance deteriorated. After sleep, the mean speed was lower than in the sleepy state and in the alert state. PERCLOS was increased after sleep and under the sleepy state, relative to the alert state. Although sleep inertia had detrimental effects on driving parameters similar to sleepiness, this effect rapidly vanished. Hence, while brief naps might be suitable to restore alertness in general, the minimal time needed to regain full capacity after napping should be a focus of future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alertness ; Automated driving ; Automation ; Automobile drivers ; Automobile driving ; Driver fatigue ; Driver state ; Driving behaviour ; Inertia ; Lane keeping ; Parameters ; PERCLOS ; Sleep ; Sleep inertia ; Sleepiness</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2021-10, Vol.82, p.111-120</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-23904cf5f3b16a0021f2fad2de934fb77514dddd54880134f6f66af7b79c5e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-23904cf5f3b16a0021f2fad2de934fb77514dddd54880134f6f66af7b79c5e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847821001765$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wörle, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metz, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinborn, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of driver sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior</title><title>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</title><description>•Differential effects of alertness, sleepiness and post-sleep inertia on driving behavior are compared in a simulated 10-min driving task.•Lane- and speed-keeping is unstable for drivers under the state of sleepiness and sleep inertia.•After napping, lane-keeping performance recovers rapidly while no recovery is evident under the state of sleepiness.•Under the state of sleep inertia, drivers compensate for impairments by reducing driving speed. No such compensation is evident for drivers under the state of sleepiness.•Performance decrements after awakening have to be taken into account when designing automated driving technology. Driver sleepiness is one of the major safety issues in conventional driving and sleep inertia emerges as a driver state in automated driving. The aim of the present study was to assess the differential impacts of sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior. 61 participants completed a 10-min manual driving task during an otherwise automated drive. They completed the task (a) under an alert state, (b) under a sleepy state, and (c) after EEG-confirmed sleep. Driving performance was assessed with the parameters lane-keeping, speed choice, and speed-keeping. The eye-blink-based sleepiness measure PERCLOS (the proportion of time with eyes closed) was compared for the three driver states. Lane- and speed-keeping performance were impaired under the sleepy state and after sleep, relative to the alert state. After sleep, lane-keeping behavior recovered rapidly and speed-keeping recovered by trend. Under the sleepy state, performance deteriorated. After sleep, the mean speed was lower than in the sleepy state and in the alert state. PERCLOS was increased after sleep and under the sleepy state, relative to the alert state. Although sleep inertia had detrimental effects on driving parameters similar to sleepiness, this effect rapidly vanished. Hence, while brief naps might be suitable to restore alertness in general, the minimal time needed to regain full capacity after napping should be a focus of future research.</description><subject>Alertness</subject><subject>Automated driving</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Automobile driving</subject><subject>Driver fatigue</subject><subject>Driver state</subject><subject>Driving behaviour</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>Lane keeping</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>PERCLOS</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Sleep inertia</subject><subject>Sleepiness</subject><issn>1369-8478</issn><issn>1873-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAewssU4YJ3aciBUqT6lSN91bTjIGR8UpdlqJv2dKWOON51r3zowPYzcCcgGiuhvyKbq8gELkUOcA4oQtRK3LTCmhT6kuqyarpa7P2UVKAwDIQugFWz965zBimLzdcqS6mxIfHe-jP2DkaYu48wFT4jb0s-SkI_n5GH5tPrzzFj_swY_xip05u014_Xdfss3z02b5mq3WL2_Lh1XWSammrCgbkJ1TrmxFZYHWdoWzfdFjU0rXaq2E7OkoWdcg6KlyVWWdbnXTKYTykt3ObXdx_Npjmsww7mOgiaaoQJUg6d_kErOri2NKEZ3ZRf9p47cRYI7YzGAImzliM1AbwkaZ-zmDtP3BYzSp8xg67H0kNqYf_T_pH6MMdaU</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Wörle, Johanna</creator><creator>Metz, Barbara</creator><creator>Steinborn, Michael B.</creator><creator>Huestegge, Lynn</creator><creator>Baumann, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Differential effects of driver sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior</title><author>Wörle, Johanna ; Metz, Barbara ; Steinborn, Michael B. ; Huestegge, Lynn ; Baumann, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-23904cf5f3b16a0021f2fad2de934fb77514dddd54880134f6f66af7b79c5e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alertness</topic><topic>Automated driving</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Automobile driving</topic><topic>Driver fatigue</topic><topic>Driver state</topic><topic>Driving behaviour</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>Lane keeping</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>PERCLOS</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Sleep inertia</topic><topic>Sleepiness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wörle, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metz, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinborn, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wörle, Johanna</au><au>Metz, Barbara</au><au>Steinborn, Michael B.</au><au>Huestegge, Lynn</au><au>Baumann, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of driver sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>111</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>111-120</pages><issn>1369-8478</issn><eissn>1873-5517</eissn><abstract>•Differential effects of alertness, sleepiness and post-sleep inertia on driving behavior are compared in a simulated 10-min driving task.•Lane- and speed-keeping is unstable for drivers under the state of sleepiness and sleep inertia.•After napping, lane-keeping performance recovers rapidly while no recovery is evident under the state of sleepiness.•Under the state of sleep inertia, drivers compensate for impairments by reducing driving speed. No such compensation is evident for drivers under the state of sleepiness.•Performance decrements after awakening have to be taken into account when designing automated driving technology. Driver sleepiness is one of the major safety issues in conventional driving and sleep inertia emerges as a driver state in automated driving. The aim of the present study was to assess the differential impacts of sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior. 61 participants completed a 10-min manual driving task during an otherwise automated drive. They completed the task (a) under an alert state, (b) under a sleepy state, and (c) after EEG-confirmed sleep. Driving performance was assessed with the parameters lane-keeping, speed choice, and speed-keeping. The eye-blink-based sleepiness measure PERCLOS (the proportion of time with eyes closed) was compared for the three driver states. Lane- and speed-keeping performance were impaired under the sleepy state and after sleep, relative to the alert state. After sleep, lane-keeping behavior recovered rapidly and speed-keeping recovered by trend. Under the sleepy state, performance deteriorated. After sleep, the mean speed was lower than in the sleepy state and in the alert state. PERCLOS was increased after sleep and under the sleepy state, relative to the alert state. Although sleep inertia had detrimental effects on driving parameters similar to sleepiness, this effect rapidly vanished. Hence, while brief naps might be suitable to restore alertness in general, the minimal time needed to regain full capacity after napping should be a focus of future research.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-8478
ispartof Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2021-10, Vol.82, p.111-120
issn 1369-8478
1873-5517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2605304551
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alertness
Automated driving
Automation
Automobile drivers
Automobile driving
Driver fatigue
Driver state
Driving behaviour
Inertia
Lane keeping
Parameters
PERCLOS
Sleep
Sleep inertia
Sleepiness
title Differential effects of driver sleepiness and sleep inertia on driving behavior
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A48%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20driver%20sleepiness%20and%20sleep%20inertia%20on%20driving%20behavior&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20F,%20Traffic%20psychology%20and%20behaviour&rft.au=W%C3%B6rle,%20Johanna&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=111-120&rft.issn=1369-8478&rft.eissn=1873-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605304551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605304551&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1369847821001765&rfr_iscdi=true