Training and Employment for Correctional Populations

Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 2021-11, Vol.20 (4), p.40-45
Hauptverfasser: Duwe, Grant, Henry-Nickie, Makada
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 4
container_start_page 40
container_title Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)
container_volume 20
creator Duwe, Grant
Henry-Nickie, Makada
description Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15365042211058124
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605154881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15365042211058124</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2605154881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcF1x1z8-5SyugIA7oY1yVNk6FD29SkXcy_t7WCC3F1H3zncO9B6B7wBkDKR-BUcMwIAcBcAWEXaDXtZCowJ5ffvUhn4BrdxHjCGDiXZIXYIei6q7tjorsq2bZ948-t7YbE-ZDkPgRrhtp3uknefT82eh7iLbpyuon27qeu0cfz9pDv0v3by2v-tE8NcMlSQpRhrsRUSk1lyTOtMqiqTGPGKlOJklLJsBVZxkqcEaMYVxa0c9ToCpyga_Sw-PbBf442DsXJj2E6JhZk-gs4UwomChbKBB9jsK7oQ93qcC4AF3M4xZ9wJs1m0UR9tL-u_wu-ALrKYoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605154881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Duwe, Grant ; Henry-Nickie, Makada</creator><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Grant ; Henry-Nickie, Makada</creatorcontrib><description>Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15365042211058124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Antisocial behavior ; Barriers ; Citizens ; Correctional institutions ; Deviance ; Educational attainment ; Educational programs ; Employers ; Employment ; Imprisonment ; Job training ; Labor market ; Policy making ; Recidivism ; Reforms ; Risk factors ; Tests ; Training ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.), 2021-11, Vol.20 (4), p.40-45</ispartof><rights>2021 American Sociological Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15365042211058124$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15365042211058124$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27847,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry-Nickie, Makada</creatorcontrib><title>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</title><title>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><description>Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Antisocial behavior</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Correctional institutions</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Job training</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1536-5042</issn><issn>1537-6052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcF1x1z8-5SyugIA7oY1yVNk6FD29SkXcy_t7WCC3F1H3zncO9B6B7wBkDKR-BUcMwIAcBcAWEXaDXtZCowJ5ffvUhn4BrdxHjCGDiXZIXYIei6q7tjorsq2bZ948-t7YbE-ZDkPgRrhtp3uknefT82eh7iLbpyuon27qeu0cfz9pDv0v3by2v-tE8NcMlSQpRhrsRUSk1lyTOtMqiqTGPGKlOJklLJsBVZxkqcEaMYVxa0c9ToCpyga_Sw-PbBf442DsXJj2E6JhZk-gs4UwomChbKBB9jsK7oQ93qcC4AF3M4xZ9wJs1m0UR9tL-u_wu-ALrKYoE</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Duwe, Grant</creator><creator>Henry-Nickie, Makada</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</title><author>Duwe, Grant ; Henry-Nickie, Makada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Antisocial behavior</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Correctional institutions</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Job training</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry-Nickie, Makada</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duwe, Grant</au><au>Henry-Nickie, Makada</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</atitle><jtitle>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>40-45</pages><issn>1536-5042</issn><eissn>1537-6052</eissn><abstract>Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/15365042211058124</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-5042
ispartof Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.), 2021-11, Vol.20 (4), p.40-45
issn 1536-5042
1537-6052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2605154881
source PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Academic achievement
Antisocial behavior
Barriers
Citizens
Correctional institutions
Deviance
Educational attainment
Educational programs
Employers
Employment
Imprisonment
Job training
Labor market
Policy making
Recidivism
Reforms
Risk factors
Tests
Training
Workforce
title Training and Employment for Correctional Populations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Training%20and%20Employment%20for%20Correctional%20Populations&rft.jtitle=Contexts%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Duwe,%20Grant&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=40-45&rft.issn=1536-5042&rft.eissn=1537-6052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15365042211058124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605154881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605154881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15365042211058124&rfr_iscdi=true