Training and Employment for Correctional Populations
Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 2021-11, Vol.20 (4), p.40-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Duwe, Grant Henry-Nickie, Makada |
description | Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15365042211058124 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605154881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15365042211058124</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2605154881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcF1x1z8-5SyugIA7oY1yVNk6FD29SkXcy_t7WCC3F1H3zncO9B6B7wBkDKR-BUcMwIAcBcAWEXaDXtZCowJ5ffvUhn4BrdxHjCGDiXZIXYIei6q7tjorsq2bZ948-t7YbE-ZDkPgRrhtp3uknefT82eh7iLbpyuon27qeu0cfz9pDv0v3by2v-tE8NcMlSQpRhrsRUSk1lyTOtMqiqTGPGKlOJklLJsBVZxkqcEaMYVxa0c9ToCpyga_Sw-PbBf442DsXJj2E6JhZk-gs4UwomChbKBB9jsK7oQ93qcC4AF3M4xZ9wJs1m0UR9tL-u_wu-ALrKYoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605154881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Duwe, Grant ; Henry-Nickie, Makada</creator><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Grant ; Henry-Nickie, Makada</creatorcontrib><description>Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15365042211058124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Antisocial behavior ; Barriers ; Citizens ; Correctional institutions ; Deviance ; Educational attainment ; Educational programs ; Employers ; Employment ; Imprisonment ; Job training ; Labor market ; Policy making ; Recidivism ; Reforms ; Risk factors ; Tests ; Training ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.), 2021-11, Vol.20 (4), p.40-45</ispartof><rights>2021 American Sociological Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15365042211058124$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15365042211058124$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27847,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry-Nickie, Makada</creatorcontrib><title>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</title><title>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><description>Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Antisocial behavior</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Correctional institutions</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Job training</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1536-5042</issn><issn>1537-6052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcF1x1z8-5SyugIA7oY1yVNk6FD29SkXcy_t7WCC3F1H3zncO9B6B7wBkDKR-BUcMwIAcBcAWEXaDXtZCowJ5ffvUhn4BrdxHjCGDiXZIXYIei6q7tjorsq2bZ948-t7YbE-ZDkPgRrhtp3uknefT82eh7iLbpyuon27qeu0cfz9pDv0v3by2v-tE8NcMlSQpRhrsRUSk1lyTOtMqiqTGPGKlOJklLJsBVZxkqcEaMYVxa0c9ToCpyga_Sw-PbBf442DsXJj2E6JhZk-gs4UwomChbKBB9jsK7oQ93qcC4AF3M4xZ9wJs1m0UR9tL-u_wu-ALrKYoE</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Duwe, Grant</creator><creator>Henry-Nickie, Makada</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</title><author>Duwe, Grant ; Henry-Nickie, Makada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1574-228c4fb0377a37b59a891dd9a044dcd6b33740e6994b092c8458e1aff3cad1f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Antisocial behavior</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Correctional institutions</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Job training</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duwe, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry-Nickie, Makada</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duwe, Grant</au><au>Henry-Nickie, Makada</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Training and Employment for Correctional Populations</atitle><jtitle>Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>40-45</pages><issn>1536-5042</issn><eissn>1537-6052</eissn><abstract>Education and employment are both moderate risk factors for recidivism. There is a well-documented relationship between low educational achievement and antisocial behaviors. Education programming in correctional facilities is crucial for improving the educational attainment of incarcerated and re-integrating populations. A brief discussion situates policy reform efforts against a backdrop of extensive research that has documented the interaction between employment and increased educational attainment as pivotal to reducing an individual’s propensity to recidivate. The policies then focus on three pillars that reduce employment barriers for returning citizens: workforce training, educational upgrading, and regulatory employment barriers. In the short-term, policymakers should study and address systemic remedial educational needs in tandem with increasing access to and occupational skills-based training that builds a skill base congruent with the current labor market for incarcerated students. In the mid-term, it is essential to match policy support with the intersecting barriers faced by returning citizens. As an example of federal policies that can help center the public workforce development system around the need to improve quality employment outcomes for returning citizens, the DOL’s dormant pilot Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP). Finally, policymakers should target other consequential screening barriers, such as the accuracy of criminal records that employers can check and have been shown to adversely affect employment prospects.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/15365042211058124</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1536-5042 |
ispartof | Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.), 2021-11, Vol.20 (4), p.40-45 |
issn | 1536-5042 1537-6052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2605154881 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Academic achievement Antisocial behavior Barriers Citizens Correctional institutions Deviance Educational attainment Educational programs Employers Employment Imprisonment Job training Labor market Policy making Recidivism Reforms Risk factors Tests Training Workforce |
title | Training and Employment for Correctional Populations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Training%20and%20Employment%20for%20Correctional%20Populations&rft.jtitle=Contexts%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Duwe,%20Grant&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=40-45&rft.issn=1536-5042&rft.eissn=1537-6052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15365042211058124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605154881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605154881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15365042211058124&rfr_iscdi=true |