Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT): sources of result variation based on three years of routine testing of symptomatic patients in English primary care

Introduction: We aimed to determine the analytical capabilities of a commonly used faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to detect faecal haemoglobin (Hb) in symptomatic people attending primary care in the context of the English NICE DG30 guidance. Materials and Methods: Data obtained from independent v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of biomedical science 2021-10, Vol.78 (4), p.211-217
Hauptverfasser: James, T, Nicholson, BD, Marr, R, Paddon, M, East, JE, Justice, S, Oke, JL, Shine, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 217
container_issue 4
container_start_page 211
container_title British journal of biomedical science
container_volume 78
creator James, T
Nicholson, BD
Marr, R
Paddon, M
East, JE
Justice, S
Oke, JL
Shine, B
description Introduction: We aimed to determine the analytical capabilities of a commonly used faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to detect faecal haemoglobin (Hb) in symptomatic people attending primary care in the context of the English NICE DG30 guidance. Materials and Methods: Data obtained from independent verification studies and clinical testing of the HM-JACKarc FIT method in routine primary care practice were analysed to derive performance characteristics. Results: Detection capabilities for the FIT method were 0.5 µg/g (limit of blank), 1.3 µg/g (limit of detection) and 3.0 µg/g (limit of quantitation). Of 33 non-homogenized specimens, 31 (93.9%) analysed in triplicate were consistently categorized relative to 10 µg/g, compared to all 33 (100%) homogenized specimens. Imprecision was higher (median 27.8%, (range 20.5% to 48.6%)) in non-homogenized specimens than in homogenized specimens (10.2%, (7.0 to 13.5%)). Considerable variation was observed in sequential clinical specimens from individual patients but no positive or negative trend in specimen degradation was observed over time (p = 0.26). Discussion: The FIT immunoassay evaluated is capable of detecting faecal Hb at concentrations well below the DG30 threshold of 10 µg/g and is suitable for application in this context. The greatest practical challenge to FIT performance is reproducible sampling, the pre-analytical step associated with most variability. Further research should focus on reducing sampling variability, particularly as post-COVID-19 guidance recommends greater FIT utilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09674845.2021.1896204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2604999062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493452200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-60848139b5e71e878a490e46d6b8332d6e685ec64b1ea1b6c2d6053f747310653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4AssWkXmV7_xElYUVUdqFSJTbu2HOem4yqxBzuhmjfhcXE00y5YsLF9r75zfO1DyCcGawY1XEKjKlnLcs2BszWrG8VBviErLitZQC7fktXCFAt0Qk5TegJgDa_Ue3IihOIViGpF_mwMWjNQN46zD3aLo1vKCdPk_CM939zeX3ylKczRYqKhpxHTPEz0t4nOTC542pqEHc2HaRsR6R5NPIBhzhb4apVbaT_upjBmnaW7vKKfEnWe3vjHwaUt3UU3mrin1kT8QN71Zkj48bifkYfNzf31j-Lu5_fb66u7wkrJpkJBLWsmmrbEimFd1UY2gFJ1qq2F4J1CVZdolWwZGtYqm1tQir6SlWCgSnFGzg--uxh-zXlWPbpkcRiMxzAnzWUjZMk5QEa__IM-5X_xeTrNFcimaUDxTJUHysaQUsReH5-lGeglOv0SnV6i08fosu7z0X1uR-xeVS9ZZeDbAXC-D3E0zyEOnZ7Mfgixj8Zbl7T4_x1_AY2RqOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604999062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT): sources of result variation based on three years of routine testing of symptomatic patients in English primary care</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>James, T ; Nicholson, BD ; Marr, R ; Paddon, M ; East, JE ; Justice, S ; Oke, JL ; Shine, B</creator><creatorcontrib>James, T ; Nicholson, BD ; Marr, R ; Paddon, M ; East, JE ; Justice, S ; Oke, JL ; Shine, B</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: We aimed to determine the analytical capabilities of a commonly used faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to detect faecal haemoglobin (Hb) in symptomatic people attending primary care in the context of the English NICE DG30 guidance. Materials and Methods: Data obtained from independent verification studies and clinical testing of the HM-JACKarc FIT method in routine primary care practice were analysed to derive performance characteristics. Results: Detection capabilities for the FIT method were 0.5 µg/g (limit of blank), 1.3 µg/g (limit of detection) and 3.0 µg/g (limit of quantitation). Of 33 non-homogenized specimens, 31 (93.9%) analysed in triplicate were consistently categorized relative to 10 µg/g, compared to all 33 (100%) homogenized specimens. Imprecision was higher (median 27.8%, (range 20.5% to 48.6%)) in non-homogenized specimens than in homogenized specimens (10.2%, (7.0 to 13.5%)). Considerable variation was observed in sequential clinical specimens from individual patients but no positive or negative trend in specimen degradation was observed over time (p = 0.26). Discussion: The FIT immunoassay evaluated is capable of detecting faecal Hb at concentrations well below the DG30 threshold of 10 µg/g and is suitable for application in this context. The greatest practical challenge to FIT performance is reproducible sampling, the pre-analytical step associated with most variability. Further research should focus on reducing sampling variability, particularly as post-COVID-19 guidance recommends greater FIT utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-4845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2474-0896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09674845.2021.1896204</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33627037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>analytical variation ; COVID-19 ; Faecal immunochemical test ; Hemoglobin ; method performance ; Patients ; preanalytical variation ; Primary care ; Quantitation ; Sampling</subject><ispartof>British journal of biomedical science, 2021-10, Vol.78 (4), p.211-217</ispartof><rights>2021 British Journal of Biomedical Science 2021</rights><rights>2021 British Journal of Biomedical Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-60848139b5e71e878a490e46d6b8332d6e685ec64b1ea1b6c2d6053f747310653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-60848139b5e71e878a490e46d6b8332d6e685ec64b1ea1b6c2d6053f747310653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, BD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marr, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paddon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, JE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justice, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oke, JL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, B</creatorcontrib><title>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT): sources of result variation based on three years of routine testing of symptomatic patients in English primary care</title><title>British journal of biomedical science</title><addtitle>Br J Biomed Sci</addtitle><description>Introduction: We aimed to determine the analytical capabilities of a commonly used faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to detect faecal haemoglobin (Hb) in symptomatic people attending primary care in the context of the English NICE DG30 guidance. Materials and Methods: Data obtained from independent verification studies and clinical testing of the HM-JACKarc FIT method in routine primary care practice were analysed to derive performance characteristics. Results: Detection capabilities for the FIT method were 0.5 µg/g (limit of blank), 1.3 µg/g (limit of detection) and 3.0 µg/g (limit of quantitation). Of 33 non-homogenized specimens, 31 (93.9%) analysed in triplicate were consistently categorized relative to 10 µg/g, compared to all 33 (100%) homogenized specimens. Imprecision was higher (median 27.8%, (range 20.5% to 48.6%)) in non-homogenized specimens than in homogenized specimens (10.2%, (7.0 to 13.5%)). Considerable variation was observed in sequential clinical specimens from individual patients but no positive or negative trend in specimen degradation was observed over time (p = 0.26). Discussion: The FIT immunoassay evaluated is capable of detecting faecal Hb at concentrations well below the DG30 threshold of 10 µg/g and is suitable for application in this context. The greatest practical challenge to FIT performance is reproducible sampling, the pre-analytical step associated with most variability. Further research should focus on reducing sampling variability, particularly as post-COVID-19 guidance recommends greater FIT utilization.</description><subject>analytical variation</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Faecal immunochemical test</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>method performance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>preanalytical variation</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Quantitation</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><issn>0967-4845</issn><issn>2474-0896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4AssWkXmV7_xElYUVUdqFSJTbu2HOem4yqxBzuhmjfhcXE00y5YsLF9r75zfO1DyCcGawY1XEKjKlnLcs2BszWrG8VBviErLitZQC7fktXCFAt0Qk5TegJgDa_Ue3IihOIViGpF_mwMWjNQN46zD3aLo1vKCdPk_CM939zeX3ylKczRYqKhpxHTPEz0t4nOTC542pqEHc2HaRsR6R5NPIBhzhb4apVbaT_upjBmnaW7vKKfEnWe3vjHwaUt3UU3mrin1kT8QN71Zkj48bifkYfNzf31j-Lu5_fb66u7wkrJpkJBLWsmmrbEimFd1UY2gFJ1qq2F4J1CVZdolWwZGtYqm1tQir6SlWCgSnFGzg--uxh-zXlWPbpkcRiMxzAnzWUjZMk5QEa__IM-5X_xeTrNFcimaUDxTJUHysaQUsReH5-lGeglOv0SnV6i08fosu7z0X1uR-xeVS9ZZeDbAXC-D3E0zyEOnZ7Mfgixj8Zbl7T4_x1_AY2RqOg</recordid><startdate>20211002</startdate><enddate>20211002</enddate><creator>James, T</creator><creator>Nicholson, BD</creator><creator>Marr, R</creator><creator>Paddon, M</creator><creator>East, JE</creator><creator>Justice, S</creator><creator>Oke, JL</creator><creator>Shine, B</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211002</creationdate><title>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT): sources of result variation based on three years of routine testing of symptomatic patients in English primary care</title><author>James, T ; Nicholson, BD ; Marr, R ; Paddon, M ; East, JE ; Justice, S ; Oke, JL ; Shine, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-60848139b5e71e878a490e46d6b8332d6e685ec64b1ea1b6c2d6053f747310653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>analytical variation</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Faecal immunochemical test</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>method performance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>preanalytical variation</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Quantitation</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, BD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marr, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paddon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, JE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justice, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oke, JL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of biomedical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, T</au><au>Nicholson, BD</au><au>Marr, R</au><au>Paddon, M</au><au>East, JE</au><au>Justice, S</au><au>Oke, JL</au><au>Shine, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT): sources of result variation based on three years of routine testing of symptomatic patients in English primary care</atitle><jtitle>British journal of biomedical science</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Biomed Sci</addtitle><date>2021-10-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>211-217</pages><issn>0967-4845</issn><eissn>2474-0896</eissn><abstract>Introduction: We aimed to determine the analytical capabilities of a commonly used faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to detect faecal haemoglobin (Hb) in symptomatic people attending primary care in the context of the English NICE DG30 guidance. Materials and Methods: Data obtained from independent verification studies and clinical testing of the HM-JACKarc FIT method in routine primary care practice were analysed to derive performance characteristics. Results: Detection capabilities for the FIT method were 0.5 µg/g (limit of blank), 1.3 µg/g (limit of detection) and 3.0 µg/g (limit of quantitation). Of 33 non-homogenized specimens, 31 (93.9%) analysed in triplicate were consistently categorized relative to 10 µg/g, compared to all 33 (100%) homogenized specimens. Imprecision was higher (median 27.8%, (range 20.5% to 48.6%)) in non-homogenized specimens than in homogenized specimens (10.2%, (7.0 to 13.5%)). Considerable variation was observed in sequential clinical specimens from individual patients but no positive or negative trend in specimen degradation was observed over time (p = 0.26). Discussion: The FIT immunoassay evaluated is capable of detecting faecal Hb at concentrations well below the DG30 threshold of 10 µg/g and is suitable for application in this context. The greatest practical challenge to FIT performance is reproducible sampling, the pre-analytical step associated with most variability. Further research should focus on reducing sampling variability, particularly as post-COVID-19 guidance recommends greater FIT utilization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>33627037</pmid><doi>10.1080/09674845.2021.1896204</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-4845
ispartof British journal of biomedical science, 2021-10, Vol.78 (4), p.211-217
issn 0967-4845
2474-0896
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2604999062
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects analytical variation
COVID-19
Faecal immunochemical test
Hemoglobin
method performance
Patients
preanalytical variation
Primary care
Quantitation
Sampling
title Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT): sources of result variation based on three years of routine testing of symptomatic patients in English primary care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faecal%20immunochemical%20testing%20(FIT):%20sources%20of%20result%20variation%20based%20on%20three%20years%20of%20routine%20testing%20of%20symptomatic%20patients%20in%20English%20primary%20care&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20biomedical%20science&rft.au=James,%20T&rft.date=2021-10-02&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=211-217&rft.issn=0967-4845&rft.eissn=2474-0896&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09674845.2021.1896204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493452200%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604999062&rft_id=info:pmid/33627037&rfr_iscdi=true