Course Evaluation Based on Deep Learning and SSA Hyperparameters Optimization
Sentiment analysis attracts the attention of Egyptian Decision-makers in the education sector. It offers a viable method to assess education quality services based on the students’ feedback as well as that provides an understanding of their needs. As machine learning techniques offer automated strat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers, materials & continua materials & continua, 2022, Vol.71 (1), p.941-959 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 959 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 941 |
container_title | Computers, materials & continua |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush Sinhababu, Nilanjan Nayyar, Anand Masud, Mehedi Choudhury, Prasenjit |
description | Sentiment analysis attracts the attention of Egyptian Decision-makers in the education sector. It offers a viable method to assess education quality services based on the students’ feedback as well as that provides an understanding of their needs. As machine learning techniques offer automated strategies to process big data derived from social media and other digital channels, this research uses a dataset for tweets' sentiments to assess a few machine learning techniques. After dataset preprocessing to remove symbols, necessary stemming and lemmatization is performed for features extraction. This is followed by several machine learning techniques and a proposed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) classifier optimized by the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) and measured the corresponding performance. Then, the validity and accuracy of commonly used classifiers, such as Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression Classifier, and Naive Bayes classifier, were reviewed. Moreover, LSTM based on the SSA classification model was compared with Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB). Finally, as LSTM based SSA achieved the highest accuracy, it was applied to predict the sentiments of students’ feedback and evaluate their association with the course outcome evaluations for education quality purposes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.32604/cmc.2022.021839 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2604992065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2604992065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3580e34aebdee9cd0adafe0ce00196160fd02c1512ac578e79cb93f63108b62a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1piTjjbjRuPpbQUqahDYbYuzgWlaj6wU6Ty15M2DEzvDe_d6f0YuxcQK6lh8ugqF0uQMgYpUmUu2EgkEx1JKfXlP3_NbkLYASitDIzY27w5-EB88Y37A3ZlU_MnDJTz3jwTtXxN6Ouy_uRY53y7nfHVsSXfoseKOvKBb9qurMqfc_eWXRW4D3T3p2P2sVy8z1fRevPyOp-tI6eE6iKVpEBqgpTlRMblgDkWBI4AhNFCQ5GDdCIREl0yTWlqXGZUoZWANNMS1Zg9DHdb33wdKHR218-o-5f2xMIYCTrpUzCknG9C8FTY1pcV-qMVYM_QbA_NnqDZAZr6BXFlX6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604992065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Course Evaluation Based on Deep Learning and SSA Hyperparameters Optimization</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush ; Sinhababu, Nilanjan ; Nayyar, Anand ; Masud, Mehedi ; Choudhury, Prasenjit</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush ; Sinhababu, Nilanjan ; Nayyar, Anand ; Masud, Mehedi ; Choudhury, Prasenjit</creatorcontrib><description>Sentiment analysis attracts the attention of Egyptian Decision-makers in the education sector. It offers a viable method to assess education quality services based on the students’ feedback as well as that provides an understanding of their needs. As machine learning techniques offer automated strategies to process big data derived from social media and other digital channels, this research uses a dataset for tweets' sentiments to assess a few machine learning techniques. After dataset preprocessing to remove symbols, necessary stemming and lemmatization is performed for features extraction. This is followed by several machine learning techniques and a proposed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) classifier optimized by the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) and measured the corresponding performance. Then, the validity and accuracy of commonly used classifiers, such as Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression Classifier, and Naive Bayes classifier, were reviewed. Moreover, LSTM based on the SSA classification model was compared with Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB). Finally, as LSTM based SSA achieved the highest accuracy, it was applied to predict the sentiments of students’ feedback and evaluate their association with the course outcome evaluations for education quality purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-2226</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1546-2218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-2226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.021839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Henderson: Tech Science Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Classifiers ; Data mining ; Datasets ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Deep learning ; Education ; Feature extraction ; Feedback ; Machine learning ; Optimization ; Quality assessment ; Sentiment analysis ; Students ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>Computers, materials & continua, 2022, Vol.71 (1), p.941-959</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3580e34aebdee9cd0adafe0ce00196160fd02c1512ac578e79cb93f63108b62a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3580e34aebdee9cd0adafe0ce00196160fd02c1512ac578e79cb93f63108b62a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinhababu, Nilanjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayyar, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masud, Mehedi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, Prasenjit</creatorcontrib><title>Course Evaluation Based on Deep Learning and SSA Hyperparameters Optimization</title><title>Computers, materials & continua</title><description>Sentiment analysis attracts the attention of Egyptian Decision-makers in the education sector. It offers a viable method to assess education quality services based on the students’ feedback as well as that provides an understanding of their needs. As machine learning techniques offer automated strategies to process big data derived from social media and other digital channels, this research uses a dataset for tweets' sentiments to assess a few machine learning techniques. After dataset preprocessing to remove symbols, necessary stemming and lemmatization is performed for features extraction. This is followed by several machine learning techniques and a proposed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) classifier optimized by the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) and measured the corresponding performance. Then, the validity and accuracy of commonly used classifiers, such as Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression Classifier, and Naive Bayes classifier, were reviewed. Moreover, LSTM based on the SSA classification model was compared with Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB). Finally, as LSTM based SSA achieved the highest accuracy, it was applied to predict the sentiments of students’ feedback and evaluate their association with the course outcome evaluations for education quality purposes.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Sentiment analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>1546-2226</issn><issn>1546-2218</issn><issn>1546-2226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1piTjjbjRuPpbQUqahDYbYuzgWlaj6wU6Ty15M2DEzvDe_d6f0YuxcQK6lh8ugqF0uQMgYpUmUu2EgkEx1JKfXlP3_NbkLYASitDIzY27w5-EB88Y37A3ZlU_MnDJTz3jwTtXxN6Ouy_uRY53y7nfHVsSXfoseKOvKBb9qurMqfc_eWXRW4D3T3p2P2sVy8z1fRevPyOp-tI6eE6iKVpEBqgpTlRMblgDkWBI4AhNFCQ5GDdCIREl0yTWlqXGZUoZWANNMS1Zg9DHdb33wdKHR218-o-5f2xMIYCTrpUzCknG9C8FTY1pcV-qMVYM_QbA_NnqDZAZr6BXFlX6Y</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush</creator><creator>Sinhababu, Nilanjan</creator><creator>Nayyar, Anand</creator><creator>Masud, Mehedi</creator><creator>Choudhury, Prasenjit</creator><general>Tech Science Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Course Evaluation Based on Deep Learning and SSA Hyperparameters Optimization</title><author>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush ; Sinhababu, Nilanjan ; Nayyar, Anand ; Masud, Mehedi ; Choudhury, Prasenjit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3580e34aebdee9cd0adafe0ce00196160fd02c1512ac578e79cb93f63108b62a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Sentiment analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinhababu, Nilanjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayyar, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masud, Mehedi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, Prasenjit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Computers, materials & continua</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Pijush</au><au>Sinhababu, Nilanjan</au><au>Nayyar, Anand</au><au>Masud, Mehedi</au><au>Choudhury, Prasenjit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Course Evaluation Based on Deep Learning and SSA Hyperparameters Optimization</atitle><jtitle>Computers, materials & continua</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>941</spage><epage>959</epage><pages>941-959</pages><issn>1546-2226</issn><issn>1546-2218</issn><eissn>1546-2226</eissn><abstract>Sentiment analysis attracts the attention of Egyptian Decision-makers in the education sector. It offers a viable method to assess education quality services based on the students’ feedback as well as that provides an understanding of their needs. As machine learning techniques offer automated strategies to process big data derived from social media and other digital channels, this research uses a dataset for tweets' sentiments to assess a few machine learning techniques. After dataset preprocessing to remove symbols, necessary stemming and lemmatization is performed for features extraction. This is followed by several machine learning techniques and a proposed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) classifier optimized by the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) and measured the corresponding performance. Then, the validity and accuracy of commonly used classifiers, such as Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression Classifier, and Naive Bayes classifier, were reviewed. Moreover, LSTM based on the SSA classification model was compared with Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB). Finally, as LSTM based SSA achieved the highest accuracy, it was applied to predict the sentiments of students’ feedback and evaluate their association with the course outcome evaluations for education quality purposes.</abstract><cop>Henderson</cop><pub>Tech Science Press</pub><doi>10.32604/cmc.2022.021839</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-2226 |
ispartof | Computers, materials & continua, 2022, Vol.71 (1), p.941-959 |
issn | 1546-2226 1546-2218 1546-2226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2604992065 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Algorithms Classifiers Data mining Datasets Decision analysis Decision making Deep learning Education Feature extraction Feedback Machine learning Optimization Quality assessment Sentiment analysis Students Support vector machines |
title | Course Evaluation Based on Deep Learning and SSA Hyperparameters Optimization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A26%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Course%20Evaluation%20Based%20on%20Deep%20Learning%20and%20SSA%20Hyperparameters%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=Computers,%20materials%20&%20continua&rft.au=Kanti%20Dutta%20Pramanik,%20Pijush&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=941&rft.epage=959&rft.pages=941-959&rft.issn=1546-2226&rft.eissn=1546-2226&rft_id=info:doi/10.32604/cmc.2022.021839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604992065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604992065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |