Methods for measuring friction-independent flow stress curve to large strains using hyperbolic shaped compression specimen

The accurate measurement of flow stress curve to large strains using cylindrical compression specimen is always a great challenge due to the influence of friction. Recently, the present authors designed a hyperbolic shaped compression (HSC) specimen which can yield an average true stress- strain cur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strain analysis for engineering design 2022-01, Vol.57 (1), p.23-37
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Junfu, Guan, Zhiping, Xing, Jingsheng, Song, Jiawang, Gao, Dan, Ren, Mingwen, Zhao, Po
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Journal of strain analysis for engineering design
container_volume 57
creator Chen, Junfu
Guan, Zhiping
Xing, Jingsheng
Song, Jiawang
Gao, Dan
Ren, Mingwen
Zhao, Po
description The accurate measurement of flow stress curve to large strains using cylindrical compression specimen is always a great challenge due to the influence of friction. Recently, the present authors designed a hyperbolic shaped compression (HSC) specimen which can yield an average true stress- strain curve independent of friction and proposed a stress correction function for fast estimation of flow stress curve to large strains. The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, to investigate whether the analytical method for stress correction of tensile necking can, or cannot, be extended to HSC specimen for correcting average true stress into flow stress. Secondly, to develop an inverse method based on Kriging surrogate model for identifying the optimal parameters of modified Voce model using HSC specimen. Lastly, the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods were compared and the recommendations for application were also discussed. The results show that the analytical method is more suitable to the stress correction for material with higher n-value but shows worse capability for correcting flow stress related to large strains for material with lower n-value. For Q420 steel, the maximum strain achieved by HSC specimen (0.8) is far higher than that achieved by cylindrical tension specimen (0.55). The analytical method can correct the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.5 effectively but underestimating the flow stress in the strain range of 0.5–0.8 due to its low n-value. Both inverse method and stress correction function can determine the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.8 successfully. Thus, for isotropic material with tension–compression yield symmetry, it is recommended to use the HSC specimen instead of conventional tension and compression tests of cylindrical specimens to determine the flow stress curve to large strains.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0309324721995679
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2604801639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0309324721995679</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2604801639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4a94cca83f906602e98ca6f8a85a1f6da53d2ecabd3f0cb3c3a607c40fb4fbdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQY8V5MmTZujLH7Bihc9lzSd7GZpm5pplfWvt2UFQfAyA_Pe780whFxyds15nt8wwbRIZZ5yrTOV6yOySJnkieCCHZPFLCezfkrOEHeM8TyT6YJ8PcOwDTVSFyJtweAYfbehLno7-NAlvquhh6l0A3VN-KQ4RECkdowfQIdAGxM3ME-N75COONPbfQ-xCo23FLemh5ra0PYzN0VS7MH6FrpzcuJMg3Dx05fk7f7udfWYrF8enla368RONw-JNFpaawrhNFOKpaALa5QrTJEZ7lRtMlGnYE1VC8dsJawwiuVWMldJV9VOLMnVIbeP4X0EHMpdGGM3rSxTxWTBuBJ6crGDy8aAGMGVffStifuSs3L-cPn3wxOSHBA0G_gN_df_DRfKfx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604801639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for measuring friction-independent flow stress curve to large strains using hyperbolic shaped compression specimen</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Chen, Junfu ; Guan, Zhiping ; Xing, Jingsheng ; Song, Jiawang ; Gao, Dan ; Ren, Mingwen ; Zhao, Po</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junfu ; Guan, Zhiping ; Xing, Jingsheng ; Song, Jiawang ; Gao, Dan ; Ren, Mingwen ; Zhao, Po</creatorcontrib><description>The accurate measurement of flow stress curve to large strains using cylindrical compression specimen is always a great challenge due to the influence of friction. Recently, the present authors designed a hyperbolic shaped compression (HSC) specimen which can yield an average true stress- strain curve independent of friction and proposed a stress correction function for fast estimation of flow stress curve to large strains. The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, to investigate whether the analytical method for stress correction of tensile necking can, or cannot, be extended to HSC specimen for correcting average true stress into flow stress. Secondly, to develop an inverse method based on Kriging surrogate model for identifying the optimal parameters of modified Voce model using HSC specimen. Lastly, the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods were compared and the recommendations for application were also discussed. The results show that the analytical method is more suitable to the stress correction for material with higher n-value but shows worse capability for correcting flow stress related to large strains for material with lower n-value. For Q420 steel, the maximum strain achieved by HSC specimen (0.8) is far higher than that achieved by cylindrical tension specimen (0.55). The analytical method can correct the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.5 effectively but underestimating the flow stress in the strain range of 0.5–0.8 due to its low n-value. Both inverse method and stress correction function can determine the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.8 successfully. Thus, for isotropic material with tension–compression yield symmetry, it is recommended to use the HSC specimen instead of conventional tension and compression tests of cylindrical specimens to determine the flow stress curve to large strains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-3247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-3130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309324721995679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Compression tests ; Friction ; Heat treating ; Inverse method ; Isotropic material ; Measurement methods ; Necking ; Parameter identification ; Parameter modification ; Strain ; True stress ; Yield strength</subject><ispartof>Journal of strain analysis for engineering design, 2022-01, Vol.57 (1), p.23-37</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4a94cca83f906602e98ca6f8a85a1f6da53d2ecabd3f0cb3c3a607c40fb4fbdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4a94cca83f906602e98ca6f8a85a1f6da53d2ecabd3f0cb3c3a607c40fb4fbdf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5988-9850 ; 0000-0002-0274-9731</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309324721995679$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309324721995679$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Jingsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Jiawang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Mingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Po</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for measuring friction-independent flow stress curve to large strains using hyperbolic shaped compression specimen</title><title>Journal of strain analysis for engineering design</title><description>The accurate measurement of flow stress curve to large strains using cylindrical compression specimen is always a great challenge due to the influence of friction. Recently, the present authors designed a hyperbolic shaped compression (HSC) specimen which can yield an average true stress- strain curve independent of friction and proposed a stress correction function for fast estimation of flow stress curve to large strains. The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, to investigate whether the analytical method for stress correction of tensile necking can, or cannot, be extended to HSC specimen for correcting average true stress into flow stress. Secondly, to develop an inverse method based on Kriging surrogate model for identifying the optimal parameters of modified Voce model using HSC specimen. Lastly, the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods were compared and the recommendations for application were also discussed. The results show that the analytical method is more suitable to the stress correction for material with higher n-value but shows worse capability for correcting flow stress related to large strains for material with lower n-value. For Q420 steel, the maximum strain achieved by HSC specimen (0.8) is far higher than that achieved by cylindrical tension specimen (0.55). The analytical method can correct the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.5 effectively but underestimating the flow stress in the strain range of 0.5–0.8 due to its low n-value. Both inverse method and stress correction function can determine the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.8 successfully. Thus, for isotropic material with tension–compression yield symmetry, it is recommended to use the HSC specimen instead of conventional tension and compression tests of cylindrical specimens to determine the flow stress curve to large strains.</description><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Heat treating</subject><subject>Inverse method</subject><subject>Isotropic material</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Necking</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Parameter modification</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>True stress</subject><subject>Yield strength</subject><issn>0309-3247</issn><issn>2041-3130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQY8V5MmTZujLH7Bihc9lzSd7GZpm5pplfWvt2UFQfAyA_Pe780whFxyds15nt8wwbRIZZ5yrTOV6yOySJnkieCCHZPFLCezfkrOEHeM8TyT6YJ8PcOwDTVSFyJtweAYfbehLno7-NAlvquhh6l0A3VN-KQ4RECkdowfQIdAGxM3ME-N75COONPbfQ-xCo23FLemh5ra0PYzN0VS7MH6FrpzcuJMg3Dx05fk7f7udfWYrF8enla368RONw-JNFpaawrhNFOKpaALa5QrTJEZ7lRtMlGnYE1VC8dsJawwiuVWMldJV9VOLMnVIbeP4X0EHMpdGGM3rSxTxWTBuBJ6crGDy8aAGMGVffStifuSs3L-cPn3wxOSHBA0G_gN_df_DRfKfx0</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Chen, Junfu</creator><creator>Guan, Zhiping</creator><creator>Xing, Jingsheng</creator><creator>Song, Jiawang</creator><creator>Gao, Dan</creator><creator>Ren, Mingwen</creator><creator>Zhao, Po</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-9850</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-9731</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Methods for measuring friction-independent flow stress curve to large strains using hyperbolic shaped compression specimen</title><author>Chen, Junfu ; Guan, Zhiping ; Xing, Jingsheng ; Song, Jiawang ; Gao, Dan ; Ren, Mingwen ; Zhao, Po</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4a94cca83f906602e98ca6f8a85a1f6da53d2ecabd3f0cb3c3a607c40fb4fbdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Heat treating</topic><topic>Inverse method</topic><topic>Isotropic material</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Necking</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Parameter modification</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>True stress</topic><topic>Yield strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Jingsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Jiawang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Mingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Po</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of strain analysis for engineering design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Junfu</au><au>Guan, Zhiping</au><au>Xing, Jingsheng</au><au>Song, Jiawang</au><au>Gao, Dan</au><au>Ren, Mingwen</au><au>Zhao, Po</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for measuring friction-independent flow stress curve to large strains using hyperbolic shaped compression specimen</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strain analysis for engineering design</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>23-37</pages><issn>0309-3247</issn><eissn>2041-3130</eissn><abstract>The accurate measurement of flow stress curve to large strains using cylindrical compression specimen is always a great challenge due to the influence of friction. Recently, the present authors designed a hyperbolic shaped compression (HSC) specimen which can yield an average true stress- strain curve independent of friction and proposed a stress correction function for fast estimation of flow stress curve to large strains. The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, to investigate whether the analytical method for stress correction of tensile necking can, or cannot, be extended to HSC specimen for correcting average true stress into flow stress. Secondly, to develop an inverse method based on Kriging surrogate model for identifying the optimal parameters of modified Voce model using HSC specimen. Lastly, the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods were compared and the recommendations for application were also discussed. The results show that the analytical method is more suitable to the stress correction for material with higher n-value but shows worse capability for correcting flow stress related to large strains for material with lower n-value. For Q420 steel, the maximum strain achieved by HSC specimen (0.8) is far higher than that achieved by cylindrical tension specimen (0.55). The analytical method can correct the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.5 effectively but underestimating the flow stress in the strain range of 0.5–0.8 due to its low n-value. Both inverse method and stress correction function can determine the flow stress in the strain range of 0–0.8 successfully. Thus, for isotropic material with tension–compression yield symmetry, it is recommended to use the HSC specimen instead of conventional tension and compression tests of cylindrical specimens to determine the flow stress curve to large strains.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0309324721995679</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-9850</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-9731</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-3247
ispartof Journal of strain analysis for engineering design, 2022-01, Vol.57 (1), p.23-37
issn 0309-3247
2041-3130
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2604801639
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Compression tests
Friction
Heat treating
Inverse method
Isotropic material
Measurement methods
Necking
Parameter identification
Parameter modification
Strain
True stress
Yield strength
title Methods for measuring friction-independent flow stress curve to large strains using hyperbolic shaped compression specimen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20measuring%20friction-independent%20flow%20stress%20curve%20to%20large%20strains%20using%20hyperbolic%20shaped%20compression%20specimen&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strain%20analysis%20for%20engineering%20design&rft.au=Chen,%20Junfu&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=23-37&rft.issn=0309-3247&rft.eissn=2041-3130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309324721995679&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604801639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604801639&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0309324721995679&rfr_iscdi=true