Are Gifted Students Adapting Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes When Experiencing Challenging Tasks?

Self-regulated learning (SRL) promotes both current and future academic achievement and must be adapted based on task demands. To develop SRL, gifted students must have opportunities to experience optimally challenging tasks. Gifted students’ past experiences (or lack thereof) with challenging tasks...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Gifted child quarterly 2022-01, Vol.66 (1), p.3-22
Hauptverfasser: Ridgley, Lisa M., DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa, Callan, Gregory L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title The Gifted child quarterly
container_volume 66
creator Ridgley, Lisa M.
DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa
Callan, Gregory L.
description Self-regulated learning (SRL) promotes both current and future academic achievement and must be adapted based on task demands. To develop SRL, gifted students must have opportunities to experience optimally challenging tasks. Gifted students’ past experiences (or lack thereof) with challenging tasks affects how they approach current tasks, which affects how they will approach challenges in the future. The current study used a two-stage approach to examine the extent to which Honors College students are able to adjust their SRL approaches based on task demands. Stage 1 provided baseline data on which types of Graduate Record Examination data analysis problems each student found to be difficult or easy. Then, in Stage 2, students were provided individually designed, easy and difficult problems. The students reported their SRL processes while engaging with the problems. When students were solving difficult problems, they demonstrated lower self-efficacy, lower performance evaluations, and lower effort. Furthermore, students reported using more surface level strategies when solving a difficult task, compared with their deeper strategic approach employed when engaging with the easy task. These findings suggest that, although gifted students may be aware of deeper, more effective strategies, they may not transfer these skills to difficult learning tasks. Thus, one recommendation would be to provide gifted students with more opportunities to practice building and transferring adaptive SRL processes when faced with a challenging task.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00169862211025452
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2604789577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1321185</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00169862211025452</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2604789577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-d4c200e2e9d02bcf34d4307e083da2b6d7cdd4bb1061969188ca4839ec0a46593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAch4Dl1v5LsnqSUWpWCYisew2Z3kkZjEncT0H_vxogexNMwPM-8wwxCpwTPCEmSC4xJLEVMKSGYRjyie2hCJOOhxJzso8nAw0E4REfOPftWSIonqJxbCFZl3oEJNl1voO5cMDeq7cq6CLY7KG2wgSoPH6DoKzVoa1C2Hui9bTQ4By542kEdLN9bsCXUemCLnaoqqIuvFOVe3OUxOshV5eDku07R49Vyu7gO13erm8V8HWrGeBcarinGQEEaTDOdM244wwlgwYyiWWwSbQzPMoJjImNJhNCKCyZBY8XjSLIpOh9zW9u89eC69Lnpbe1XpjTGPBEyShJvkdHStnHOQp62tnxV9iMlOB0-mv75qJ85G2f8mfrHX94S5h0ReT4buVMF_G79P_ATtwF-4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604789577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Gifted Students Adapting Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes When Experiencing Challenging Tasks?</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Ridgley, Lisa M. ; DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa ; Callan, Gregory L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ridgley, Lisa M. ; DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa ; Callan, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><description>Self-regulated learning (SRL) promotes both current and future academic achievement and must be adapted based on task demands. To develop SRL, gifted students must have opportunities to experience optimally challenging tasks. Gifted students’ past experiences (or lack thereof) with challenging tasks affects how they approach current tasks, which affects how they will approach challenges in the future. The current study used a two-stage approach to examine the extent to which Honors College students are able to adjust their SRL approaches based on task demands. Stage 1 provided baseline data on which types of Graduate Record Examination data analysis problems each student found to be difficult or easy. Then, in Stage 2, students were provided individually designed, easy and difficult problems. The students reported their SRL processes while engaging with the problems. When students were solving difficult problems, they demonstrated lower self-efficacy, lower performance evaluations, and lower effort. Furthermore, students reported using more surface level strategies when solving a difficult task, compared with their deeper strategic approach employed when engaging with the easy task. These findings suggest that, although gifted students may be aware of deeper, more effective strategies, they may not transfer these skills to difficult learning tasks. Thus, one recommendation would be to provide gifted students with more opportunities to practice building and transferring adaptive SRL processes when faced with a challenging task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9862</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1934-9041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-9041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00169862211025452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academically Gifted ; College Students ; Data Analysis ; Difficulty Level ; Gifted ; Gifted children ; Honors Curriculum ; Independent study ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning Strategies ; Problem Solving ; Reflection ; Self Efficacy ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Self regulation ; Student Adjustment ; Student Interests ; Students</subject><ispartof>The Gifted child quarterly, 2022-01, Vol.66 (1), p.3-22</ispartof><rights>2021 National Association for Gifted Children</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-d4c200e2e9d02bcf34d4307e083da2b6d7cdd4bb1061969188ca4839ec0a46593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-d4c200e2e9d02bcf34d4307e083da2b6d7cdd4bb1061969188ca4839ec0a46593</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0945-8387 ; 0000-0002-0990-7325</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00169862211025452$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00169862211025452$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1321185$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ridgley, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Gifted Students Adapting Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes When Experiencing Challenging Tasks?</title><title>The Gifted child quarterly</title><description>Self-regulated learning (SRL) promotes both current and future academic achievement and must be adapted based on task demands. To develop SRL, gifted students must have opportunities to experience optimally challenging tasks. Gifted students’ past experiences (or lack thereof) with challenging tasks affects how they approach current tasks, which affects how they will approach challenges in the future. The current study used a two-stage approach to examine the extent to which Honors College students are able to adjust their SRL approaches based on task demands. Stage 1 provided baseline data on which types of Graduate Record Examination data analysis problems each student found to be difficult or easy. Then, in Stage 2, students were provided individually designed, easy and difficult problems. The students reported their SRL processes while engaging with the problems. When students were solving difficult problems, they demonstrated lower self-efficacy, lower performance evaluations, and lower effort. Furthermore, students reported using more surface level strategies when solving a difficult task, compared with their deeper strategic approach employed when engaging with the easy task. These findings suggest that, although gifted students may be aware of deeper, more effective strategies, they may not transfer these skills to difficult learning tasks. Thus, one recommendation would be to provide gifted students with more opportunities to practice building and transferring adaptive SRL processes when faced with a challenging task.</description><subject>Academically Gifted</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Gifted</subject><subject>Gifted children</subject><subject>Honors Curriculum</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><subject>Student Adjustment</subject><subject>Student Interests</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0016-9862</issn><issn>1934-9041</issn><issn>1934-9041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAch4Dl1v5LsnqSUWpWCYisew2Z3kkZjEncT0H_vxogexNMwPM-8wwxCpwTPCEmSC4xJLEVMKSGYRjyie2hCJOOhxJzso8nAw0E4REfOPftWSIonqJxbCFZl3oEJNl1voO5cMDeq7cq6CLY7KG2wgSoPH6DoKzVoa1C2Hui9bTQ4By542kEdLN9bsCXUemCLnaoqqIuvFOVe3OUxOshV5eDku07R49Vyu7gO13erm8V8HWrGeBcarinGQEEaTDOdM244wwlgwYyiWWwSbQzPMoJjImNJhNCKCyZBY8XjSLIpOh9zW9u89eC69Lnpbe1XpjTGPBEyShJvkdHStnHOQp62tnxV9iMlOB0-mv75qJ85G2f8mfrHX94S5h0ReT4buVMF_G79P_ATtwF-4A</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Ridgley, Lisa M.</creator><creator>DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa</creator><creator>Callan, Gregory L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0945-8387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0990-7325</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Are Gifted Students Adapting Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes When Experiencing Challenging Tasks?</title><author>Ridgley, Lisa M. ; DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa ; Callan, Gregory L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-d4c200e2e9d02bcf34d4307e083da2b6d7cdd4bb1061969188ca4839ec0a46593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academically Gifted</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Gifted</topic><topic>Gifted children</topic><topic>Honors Curriculum</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><topic>Student Adjustment</topic><topic>Student Interests</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ridgley, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>The Gifted child quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ridgley, Lisa M.</au><au>DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa</au><au>Callan, Gregory L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1321185</ericid><atitle>Are Gifted Students Adapting Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes When Experiencing Challenging Tasks?</atitle><jtitle>The Gifted child quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>3-22</pages><issn>0016-9862</issn><issn>1934-9041</issn><eissn>1934-9041</eissn><abstract>Self-regulated learning (SRL) promotes both current and future academic achievement and must be adapted based on task demands. To develop SRL, gifted students must have opportunities to experience optimally challenging tasks. Gifted students’ past experiences (or lack thereof) with challenging tasks affects how they approach current tasks, which affects how they will approach challenges in the future. The current study used a two-stage approach to examine the extent to which Honors College students are able to adjust their SRL approaches based on task demands. Stage 1 provided baseline data on which types of Graduate Record Examination data analysis problems each student found to be difficult or easy. Then, in Stage 2, students were provided individually designed, easy and difficult problems. The students reported their SRL processes while engaging with the problems. When students were solving difficult problems, they demonstrated lower self-efficacy, lower performance evaluations, and lower effort. Furthermore, students reported using more surface level strategies when solving a difficult task, compared with their deeper strategic approach employed when engaging with the easy task. These findings suggest that, although gifted students may be aware of deeper, more effective strategies, they may not transfer these skills to difficult learning tasks. Thus, one recommendation would be to provide gifted students with more opportunities to practice building and transferring adaptive SRL processes when faced with a challenging task.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00169862211025452</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0945-8387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0990-7325</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-9862
ispartof The Gifted child quarterly, 2022-01, Vol.66 (1), p.3-22
issn 0016-9862
1934-9041
1934-9041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2604789577
source SAGE Journals
subjects Academically Gifted
College Students
Data Analysis
Difficulty Level
Gifted
Gifted children
Honors Curriculum
Independent study
Learning
Learning Processes
Learning Strategies
Problem Solving
Reflection
Self Efficacy
Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Self regulation
Student Adjustment
Student Interests
Students
title Are Gifted Students Adapting Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes When Experiencing Challenging Tasks?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A39%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Gifted%20Students%20Adapting%20Their%20Self-Regulated%20Learning%20Processes%20When%20Experiencing%20Challenging%20Tasks?&rft.jtitle=The%20Gifted%20child%20quarterly&rft.au=Ridgley,%20Lisa%20M.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=3-22&rft.issn=0016-9862&rft.eissn=1934-9041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00169862211025452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604789577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604789577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1321185&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00169862211025452&rfr_iscdi=true