Comparison of Modelling Strategies of R.C Walls for Seismic Analysis

Reinforced concrete walls are being widely adopted as lateral load resisting systems for high rise structures. The current practice among design engineers for modelling of such walls is by idealizing the same as ‘wide’ columns, which is uncertain from safety as well as economy point of view. The mos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2021-11, Vol.1197 (1), p.12067
Hauptverfasser: Jeelani, Syed Hamim, Akhtar, Salim, Lingeshwaran, N, Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar, Mohammed Aslam, M A, Nallusamy, Babu, Rizvi, Syed Shams
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12067
container_title IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering
container_volume 1197
creator Jeelani, Syed Hamim
Akhtar, Salim
Lingeshwaran, N
Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar
Mohammed Aslam, M A
Nallusamy, Babu
Rizvi, Syed Shams
description Reinforced concrete walls are being widely adopted as lateral load resisting systems for high rise structures. The current practice among design engineers for modelling of such walls is by idealizing the same as ‘wide’ columns, which is uncertain from safety as well as economy point of view. The most efficient modelling strategy of RC walls involves use of shell elements. Such an approach can be computationally much intensive, especially from a seismic analysis perspective. The present study utilizes an equivalent strut approach for modelling RC walls. The modelling strategy is demonstrated on a G + 15 storey residential apartment located in Calicut city. The proposed methodology will be compared with the traditional ‘wide’ column method as well as the one with shell element discretization. Comparison of modal properties such as frequencies and vibration modes from the various models are initially made to assess the model accuracy. Various seismic analyses viz. Equivalent static approach, Response spectrum approach and the assessment the storey shear, inter storey drifts as well as computation times using various models were performed using time history analysis. From preliminary results, it is understood that the modelling strategy could serve as an efficient alternative to more robust and computationally demanding scheme involving use of shell elements.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1757-899X/1197/1/012067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2604490609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2604490609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2037-f707e896efcfb69b25e52f069a685fe59dddd42339fb429d069617d5a0177573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKefwYJPPnS9SdukeRx1_oENwQ70LWRtMjK6pSbbw769KZWJIHhf7uXecw6XH0K3GCYYiiLBLGdxwflHgjFnCU4AE6DsDI1Ol_PTXOBLdOX9BoIiy2CEHkq77aQz3u4iq6OFbVTbmt06qvZO7tXaKN_v3yZl9C7b1kfauqhSxm9NHU13sj1646_RhZatVzfffYyWj7Nl-RzPX59eyuk8rgmkLNYMmCo4VbrWK8pXJFc50UC5pEWuVc6bUBlJU65XGeFNuFDMmlwCZuH9dIzuhtjO2c-D8nuxsQcXfvCCUMgyDhR4ULFBVTvrvVNadM5spTsKDKInJnoWouciemICi4FYcKaD09juJ_p_1_0frkU1-60TXaPTL_7LecM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604490609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Modelling Strategies of R.C Walls for Seismic Analysis</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jeelani, Syed Hamim ; Akhtar, Salim ; Lingeshwaran, N ; Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar ; Mohammed Aslam, M A ; Nallusamy, Babu ; Rizvi, Syed Shams</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeelani, Syed Hamim ; Akhtar, Salim ; Lingeshwaran, N ; Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar ; Mohammed Aslam, M A ; Nallusamy, Babu ; Rizvi, Syed Shams</creatorcontrib><description>Reinforced concrete walls are being widely adopted as lateral load resisting systems for high rise structures. The current practice among design engineers for modelling of such walls is by idealizing the same as ‘wide’ columns, which is uncertain from safety as well as economy point of view. The most efficient modelling strategy of RC walls involves use of shell elements. Such an approach can be computationally much intensive, especially from a seismic analysis perspective. The present study utilizes an equivalent strut approach for modelling RC walls. The modelling strategy is demonstrated on a G + 15 storey residential apartment located in Calicut city. The proposed methodology will be compared with the traditional ‘wide’ column method as well as the one with shell element discretization. Comparison of modal properties such as frequencies and vibration modes from the various models are initially made to assess the model accuracy. Various seismic analyses viz. Equivalent static approach, Response spectrum approach and the assessment the storey shear, inter storey drifts as well as computation times using various models were performed using time history analysis. From preliminary results, it is understood that the modelling strategy could serve as an efficient alternative to more robust and computationally demanding scheme involving use of shell elements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1197/1/012067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Base shear ; Columns (structural) ; Equivalence ; High rise buildings ; Lateral loads ; Model accuracy ; Reinforced concrete ; Residential location ; Response Spectra ; Seismic analysis ; Storey drift ; Time history analysis ; Vibration mode ; Walls</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2021-11, Vol.1197 (1), p.12067</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2037-f707e896efcfb69b25e52f069a685fe59dddd42339fb429d069617d5a0177573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/1197/1/012067/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,38867,38889,53839,53866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeelani, Syed Hamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhtar, Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lingeshwaran, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed Aslam, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nallusamy, Babu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, Syed Shams</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Modelling Strategies of R.C Walls for Seismic Analysis</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>Reinforced concrete walls are being widely adopted as lateral load resisting systems for high rise structures. The current practice among design engineers for modelling of such walls is by idealizing the same as ‘wide’ columns, which is uncertain from safety as well as economy point of view. The most efficient modelling strategy of RC walls involves use of shell elements. Such an approach can be computationally much intensive, especially from a seismic analysis perspective. The present study utilizes an equivalent strut approach for modelling RC walls. The modelling strategy is demonstrated on a G + 15 storey residential apartment located in Calicut city. The proposed methodology will be compared with the traditional ‘wide’ column method as well as the one with shell element discretization. Comparison of modal properties such as frequencies and vibration modes from the various models are initially made to assess the model accuracy. Various seismic analyses viz. Equivalent static approach, Response spectrum approach and the assessment the storey shear, inter storey drifts as well as computation times using various models were performed using time history analysis. From preliminary results, it is understood that the modelling strategy could serve as an efficient alternative to more robust and computationally demanding scheme involving use of shell elements.</description><subject>Base shear</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>High rise buildings</subject><subject>Lateral loads</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Residential location</subject><subject>Response Spectra</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Storey drift</subject><subject>Time history analysis</subject><subject>Vibration mode</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKefwYJPPnS9SdukeRx1_oENwQ70LWRtMjK6pSbbw769KZWJIHhf7uXecw6XH0K3GCYYiiLBLGdxwflHgjFnCU4AE6DsDI1Ol_PTXOBLdOX9BoIiy2CEHkq77aQz3u4iq6OFbVTbmt06qvZO7tXaKN_v3yZl9C7b1kfauqhSxm9NHU13sj1646_RhZatVzfffYyWj7Nl-RzPX59eyuk8rgmkLNYMmCo4VbrWK8pXJFc50UC5pEWuVc6bUBlJU65XGeFNuFDMmlwCZuH9dIzuhtjO2c-D8nuxsQcXfvCCUMgyDhR4ULFBVTvrvVNadM5spTsKDKInJnoWouciemICi4FYcKaD09juJ_p_1_0frkU1-60TXaPTL_7LecM</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Jeelani, Syed Hamim</creator><creator>Akhtar, Salim</creator><creator>Lingeshwaran, N</creator><creator>Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar</creator><creator>Mohammed Aslam, M A</creator><creator>Nallusamy, Babu</creator><creator>Rizvi, Syed Shams</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Modelling Strategies of R.C Walls for Seismic Analysis</title><author>Jeelani, Syed Hamim ; Akhtar, Salim ; Lingeshwaran, N ; Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar ; Mohammed Aslam, M A ; Nallusamy, Babu ; Rizvi, Syed Shams</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2037-f707e896efcfb69b25e52f069a685fe59dddd42339fb429d069617d5a0177573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Base shear</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>High rise buildings</topic><topic>Lateral loads</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Residential location</topic><topic>Response Spectra</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Storey drift</topic><topic>Time history analysis</topic><topic>Vibration mode</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeelani, Syed Hamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhtar, Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lingeshwaran, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed Aslam, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nallusamy, Babu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, Syed Shams</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeelani, Syed Hamim</au><au>Akhtar, Salim</au><au>Lingeshwaran, N</au><au>Jagarapu, Durga Chaitanya Kumar</au><au>Mohammed Aslam, M A</au><au>Nallusamy, Babu</au><au>Rizvi, Syed Shams</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Modelling Strategies of R.C Walls for Seismic Analysis</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>1197</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12067</spage><pages>12067-</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>Reinforced concrete walls are being widely adopted as lateral load resisting systems for high rise structures. The current practice among design engineers for modelling of such walls is by idealizing the same as ‘wide’ columns, which is uncertain from safety as well as economy point of view. The most efficient modelling strategy of RC walls involves use of shell elements. Such an approach can be computationally much intensive, especially from a seismic analysis perspective. The present study utilizes an equivalent strut approach for modelling RC walls. The modelling strategy is demonstrated on a G + 15 storey residential apartment located in Calicut city. The proposed methodology will be compared with the traditional ‘wide’ column method as well as the one with shell element discretization. Comparison of modal properties such as frequencies and vibration modes from the various models are initially made to assess the model accuracy. Various seismic analyses viz. Equivalent static approach, Response spectrum approach and the assessment the storey shear, inter storey drifts as well as computation times using various models were performed using time history analysis. From preliminary results, it is understood that the modelling strategy could serve as an efficient alternative to more robust and computationally demanding scheme involving use of shell elements.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/1197/1/012067</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1757-8981
ispartof IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2021-11, Vol.1197 (1), p.12067
issn 1757-8981
1757-899X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2604490609
source IOP Publishing Free Content; Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Base shear
Columns (structural)
Equivalence
High rise buildings
Lateral loads
Model accuracy
Reinforced concrete
Residential location
Response Spectra
Seismic analysis
Storey drift
Time history analysis
Vibration mode
Walls
title Comparison of Modelling Strategies of R.C Walls for Seismic Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Modelling%20Strategies%20of%20R.C%20Walls%20for%20Seismic%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Jeelani,%20Syed%20Hamim&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=1197&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12067&rft.pages=12067-&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/1197/1/012067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604490609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604490609&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true