Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands
This contribution discusses the development of the Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA), a framework for reviewing government data projects that considers their social impact, the embedded values and the government’s responsibilities in times of data-driven public management. Drawing from distinct qualit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ethics and information technology 2021-09, Vol.23 (3), p.551-567 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 567 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 551 |
| container_title | Ethics and information technology |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Franzke, Aline Shakti Muis, Iris Schäfer, Mirko Tobias |
| description | This contribution discusses the development of the Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA), a framework for reviewing government data projects that considers their social impact, the embedded values and the government’s responsibilities in times of data-driven public management. Drawing from distinct qualitative research approaches, the DEDA framework was developed in an iterative process (2016–2018) and has since then been applied by various Dutch municipalities, the Association of Dutch Municipalities, and the Ministry of General Affairs (NL). We present the DEDA framework as an effective process to moderate case-deliberation and advance the development of responsible data practices. In addition, by thoroughly documenting the deliberation process, the DEDA framework establishes accountability. First, this paper sheds light on the necessity for data ethical case deliberation. Second, it describes the prototypes, the final design of the framework, and its evaluation. After a comparison with other frameworks, and a discussion of the findings, the paper concludes by arguing that the DEDA framework is a useful process for ethical evaluation of data projects for public management and an effective tool for creating awareness of ethical issues in data practices. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602864161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2602864161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8409c85f233858a077af029c9a7e70e344838d76e37d6e9eec1a3972d978c8f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULtOwzAUtRBIlMIPMFligSHgR-IHW0UKVKpggdmyHLt1SePWTkH9e1yCxMZ0r-553KMDwCVGtxghfpcwYpwViKACyYrzojoCI1xxUoiSyuO8UyEKnKFTcJbSCiFUccxH4LPWvYbTfulNgrU1PvnQwYlv4HU9rSc391DDxus2LLzRLXRRr-1XiB_QhQjtQZavvtvufNzD4OBkBnXXwObguolhZU2fMg77pYUvmW9jm_F0Dk6cbpO9-J1j8P44fXt4LuavT7OHybwwlNE-h0fSiMoRSkUlNOJcO0SkkZpbjiwtS0FFw5mlvGFWWmuwppKTRnJhhKN0DK4G35xlu7OpV6uwi11-qQhDRLASM5xZZGCZGFKK1qlN9Gsd9wojdehXDf2q3K_66VdVWUQHUcrkbmHjn_U_qm-ueXwx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602864161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Franzke, Aline Shakti ; Muis, Iris ; Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Franzke, Aline Shakti ; Muis, Iris ; Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>This contribution discusses the development of the Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA), a framework for reviewing government data projects that considers their social impact, the embedded values and the government’s responsibilities in times of data-driven public management. Drawing from distinct qualitative research approaches, the DEDA framework was developed in an iterative process (2016–2018) and has since then been applied by various Dutch municipalities, the Association of Dutch Municipalities, and the Ministry of General Affairs (NL). We present the DEDA framework as an effective process to moderate case-deliberation and advance the development of responsible data practices. In addition, by thoroughly documenting the deliberation process, the DEDA framework establishes accountability. First, this paper sheds light on the necessity for data ethical case deliberation. Second, it describes the prototypes, the final design of the framework, and its evaluation. After a comparison with other frameworks, and a discussion of the findings, the paper concludes by arguing that the DEDA framework is a useful process for ethical evaluation of data projects for public management and an effective tool for creating awareness of ethical issues in data practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-1957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8439</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Computer Science ; Ethics ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Library Science ; Management of Computing and Information Systems ; Municipalities ; Project management ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Research ethics ; Review Paper ; Social impact ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><ispartof>Ethics and information technology, 2021-09, Vol.23 (3), p.551-567</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8409c85f233858a077af029c9a7e70e344838d76e37d6e9eec1a3972d978c8f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8409c85f233858a077af029c9a7e70e344838d76e37d6e9eec1a3972d978c8f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7577-0964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franzke, Aline Shakti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muis, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands</title><title>Ethics and information technology</title><addtitle>Ethics Inf Technol</addtitle><description>This contribution discusses the development of the Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA), a framework for reviewing government data projects that considers their social impact, the embedded values and the government’s responsibilities in times of data-driven public management. Drawing from distinct qualitative research approaches, the DEDA framework was developed in an iterative process (2016–2018) and has since then been applied by various Dutch municipalities, the Association of Dutch Municipalities, and the Ministry of General Affairs (NL). We present the DEDA framework as an effective process to moderate case-deliberation and advance the development of responsible data practices. In addition, by thoroughly documenting the deliberation process, the DEDA framework establishes accountability. First, this paper sheds light on the necessity for data ethical case deliberation. Second, it describes the prototypes, the final design of the framework, and its evaluation. After a comparison with other frameworks, and a discussion of the findings, the paper concludes by arguing that the DEDA framework is a useful process for ethical evaluation of data projects for public management and an effective tool for creating awareness of ethical issues in data practices.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Management of Computing and Information Systems</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><issn>1388-1957</issn><issn>1572-8439</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ULtOwzAUtRBIlMIPMFligSHgR-IHW0UKVKpggdmyHLt1SePWTkH9e1yCxMZ0r-553KMDwCVGtxghfpcwYpwViKACyYrzojoCI1xxUoiSyuO8UyEKnKFTcJbSCiFUccxH4LPWvYbTfulNgrU1PvnQwYlv4HU9rSc391DDxus2LLzRLXRRr-1XiB_QhQjtQZavvtvufNzD4OBkBnXXwObguolhZU2fMg77pYUvmW9jm_F0Dk6cbpO9-J1j8P44fXt4LuavT7OHybwwlNE-h0fSiMoRSkUlNOJcO0SkkZpbjiwtS0FFw5mlvGFWWmuwppKTRnJhhKN0DK4G35xlu7OpV6uwi11-qQhDRLASM5xZZGCZGFKK1qlN9Gsd9wojdehXDf2q3K_66VdVWUQHUcrkbmHjn_U_qm-ueXwx</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Franzke, Aline Shakti</creator><creator>Muis, Iris</creator><creator>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-0964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands</title><author>Franzke, Aline Shakti ; Muis, Iris ; Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8409c85f233858a077af029c9a7e70e344838d76e37d6e9eec1a3972d978c8f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Management of Computing and Information Systems</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franzke, Aline Shakti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muis, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Ethics and information technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franzke, Aline Shakti</au><au>Muis, Iris</au><au>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Ethics and information technology</jtitle><stitle>Ethics Inf Technol</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>551-567</pages><issn>1388-1957</issn><eissn>1572-8439</eissn><abstract>This contribution discusses the development of the Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA), a framework for reviewing government data projects that considers their social impact, the embedded values and the government’s responsibilities in times of data-driven public management. Drawing from distinct qualitative research approaches, the DEDA framework was developed in an iterative process (2016–2018) and has since then been applied by various Dutch municipalities, the Association of Dutch Municipalities, and the Ministry of General Affairs (NL). We present the DEDA framework as an effective process to moderate case-deliberation and advance the development of responsible data practices. In addition, by thoroughly documenting the deliberation process, the DEDA framework establishes accountability. First, this paper sheds light on the necessity for data ethical case deliberation. Second, it describes the prototypes, the final design of the framework, and its evaluation. After a comparison with other frameworks, and a discussion of the findings, the paper concludes by arguing that the DEDA framework is a useful process for ethical evaluation of data projects for public management and an effective tool for creating awareness of ethical issues in data practices.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-0964</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1388-1957 |
| ispartof | Ethics and information technology, 2021-09, Vol.23 (3), p.551-567 |
| issn | 1388-1957 1572-8439 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2602864161 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Artificial intelligence Computer Science Ethics Innovation/Technology Management Library Science Management of Computing and Information Systems Municipalities Project management Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Research ethics Review Paper Social impact User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction |
| title | Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20Ethics%20Decision%20Aid%20(DEDA):%20a%20dialogical%20framework%20for%20ethical%20inquiry%20of%20AI%20and%20data%20projects%20in%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Ethics%20and%20information%20technology&rft.au=Franzke,%20Aline%20Shakti&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=551-567&rft.issn=1388-1957&rft.eissn=1572-8439&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602864161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602864161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |