Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Evidence of the effects of lactation on maternal risk of type 2 diabetes is conflicting, with some studies suggesting a protective effect, whereas others report no association. This study aimed to investigate the association between lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes. We did a systematic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2021-11, Vol.398, p.S70-S70 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S70 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | S70 |
| container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
| container_volume | 398 |
| creator | Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina Morelli, Georgia Jones, Alexandra Woodward, Mark |
| description | Evidence of the effects of lactation on maternal risk of type 2 diabetes is conflicting, with some studies suggesting a protective effect, whereas others report no association. This study aimed to investigate the association between lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes.
We did a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the association between lactation (irrespective of duration, intensity, or mode) and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes. Bibliographic databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to Feb 28, 2021, with MeSH terms for lactation, breastfeeding, and type 2 diabetes. No restrictions were applied to type of study or language. This search was complemented with hand-searching of reference lists of relevant studies. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and tested using Cochran's Q test. Eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had published data on the outcomes of interest in each analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221183.
Our search identified 1161 studies, of which 22 (17 cohort and five cross-sectional) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review (8739 participants), and 16 contributed to the meta-analysis (4372 participants). The studies were conducted in populations from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, including multi-ethnic populations and variable sample sizes (range 100–83 000). The five studies that investigated the association of lactation with risk of type 2 diabetes in the first months after birth in women with gestational diabetes reported conflicting results. The 17 studies with longer follow-up (>3 months) showed an incremental (dose–response) protective association between lactation and risk of type 2 diabetes, with a potentially larger risk reduction in women with gestational diabetes than in those without gestational diabetes (risk ratio [RR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·52–0·85] for ever vs never lactation for women with gestational diabetes, and RR 0·81 [0·67–0·98] for ever vs never lactation for women without gestational diabetes; p=0·032 for heterogeneity). Overall, ever versus never lactation was associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·65–0·83; I2=69%, p=0·010). Each additional month of lactation was associated with a 1% lower risk of type 2 d |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02613-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602584039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673621026131</els_id><sourcerecordid>2602584039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1771-1d3f604baf888a5eacb174b979c8509d9698868bac3f2e98c8ef4e9cd81efba93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCHgRQ_VpE3T1IvI4hcseFDBW0jTKWbdbdZMdpde_O22u-LV0zDM874wDyGnnF1yxuXVC-OCJbLI5HnKL1gqeZbwPTLiohBJLor3fTL6Qw7JEeKMMSYky0fk-xbRW2ei8y31DZ0bG3fLxsUPujARQmvmNDj8HO6xWwJNae1MBRHwmhqKHUboQWdpgLWDDTVtTRcQTWL6aIcOh6SvEMJ62933YVzVDvCYHDRmjnDyO8fk7f7udfKYTJ8fnia308TyouAJr7NGMlGZRillcjC24oWoyqK0KmdlXcpSKakqY7MmhVJZBY2A0taKQ1OZMhuTs13vMvivFWDUM78aHkOdSpbmSrBsoPIdZYNHDNDoZXALEzrNmR5U661qPXjUKddb1Zr3uZtdDvoXegNBo3XQWqhdABt17d0_DT9bX4hE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602584039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina ; Morelli, Georgia ; Jones, Alexandra ; Woodward, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina ; Morelli, Georgia ; Jones, Alexandra ; Woodward, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence of the effects of lactation on maternal risk of type 2 diabetes is conflicting, with some studies suggesting a protective effect, whereas others report no association. This study aimed to investigate the association between lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes.
We did a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the association between lactation (irrespective of duration, intensity, or mode) and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes. Bibliographic databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to Feb 28, 2021, with MeSH terms for lactation, breastfeeding, and type 2 diabetes. No restrictions were applied to type of study or language. This search was complemented with hand-searching of reference lists of relevant studies. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and tested using Cochran's Q test. Eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had published data on the outcomes of interest in each analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221183.
Our search identified 1161 studies, of which 22 (17 cohort and five cross-sectional) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review (8739 participants), and 16 contributed to the meta-analysis (4372 participants). The studies were conducted in populations from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, including multi-ethnic populations and variable sample sizes (range 100–83 000). The five studies that investigated the association of lactation with risk of type 2 diabetes in the first months after birth in women with gestational diabetes reported conflicting results. The 17 studies with longer follow-up (>3 months) showed an incremental (dose–response) protective association between lactation and risk of type 2 diabetes, with a potentially larger risk reduction in women with gestational diabetes than in those without gestational diabetes (risk ratio [RR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·52–0·85] for ever vs never lactation for women with gestational diabetes, and RR 0·81 [0·67–0·98] for ever vs never lactation for women without gestational diabetes; p=0·032 for heterogeneity). Overall, ever versus never lactation was associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·65–0·83; I2=69%, p=0·010). Each additional month of lactation was associated with a 1% lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·99, 0·98–0·99), irrespective of gestational diabetes. The overall quality of the studies was modest.
Lactation is associated with a significantly lower risk of maternal type 2 diabetes, particularly in women with gestational diabetes. The protective effect seems to increase with longer duration of lactation. Further research is warranted to understand whether this association is modified by exposure to other risk factors, such as obesity. Breastfeeding-friendly policies might help to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes among women.
None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02613-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast feeding ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Gestational diabetes ; Heterogeneity ; Lactation ; Meta-analysis ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Observational studies ; Population studies ; Populations ; Reviews ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2021-11, Vol.398, p.S70-S70</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673621026131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Evidence of the effects of lactation on maternal risk of type 2 diabetes is conflicting, with some studies suggesting a protective effect, whereas others report no association. This study aimed to investigate the association between lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes.
We did a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the association between lactation (irrespective of duration, intensity, or mode) and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes. Bibliographic databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to Feb 28, 2021, with MeSH terms for lactation, breastfeeding, and type 2 diabetes. No restrictions were applied to type of study or language. This search was complemented with hand-searching of reference lists of relevant studies. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and tested using Cochran's Q test. Eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had published data on the outcomes of interest in each analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221183.
Our search identified 1161 studies, of which 22 (17 cohort and five cross-sectional) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review (8739 participants), and 16 contributed to the meta-analysis (4372 participants). The studies were conducted in populations from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, including multi-ethnic populations and variable sample sizes (range 100–83 000). The five studies that investigated the association of lactation with risk of type 2 diabetes in the first months after birth in women with gestational diabetes reported conflicting results. The 17 studies with longer follow-up (>3 months) showed an incremental (dose–response) protective association between lactation and risk of type 2 diabetes, with a potentially larger risk reduction in women with gestational diabetes than in those without gestational diabetes (risk ratio [RR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·52–0·85] for ever vs never lactation for women with gestational diabetes, and RR 0·81 [0·67–0·98] for ever vs never lactation for women without gestational diabetes; p=0·032 for heterogeneity). Overall, ever versus never lactation was associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·65–0·83; I2=69%, p=0·010). Each additional month of lactation was associated with a 1% lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·99, 0·98–0·99), irrespective of gestational diabetes. The overall quality of the studies was modest.
Lactation is associated with a significantly lower risk of maternal type 2 diabetes, particularly in women with gestational diabetes. The protective effect seems to increase with longer duration of lactation. Further research is warranted to understand whether this association is modified by exposure to other risk factors, such as obesity. Breastfeeding-friendly policies might help to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes among women.
None.</description><subject>Breast feeding</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCHgRQ_VpE3T1IvI4hcseFDBW0jTKWbdbdZMdpde_O22u-LV0zDM874wDyGnnF1yxuXVC-OCJbLI5HnKL1gqeZbwPTLiohBJLor3fTL6Qw7JEeKMMSYky0fk-xbRW2ei8y31DZ0bG3fLxsUPujARQmvmNDj8HO6xWwJNae1MBRHwmhqKHUboQWdpgLWDDTVtTRcQTWL6aIcOh6SvEMJ62933YVzVDvCYHDRmjnDyO8fk7f7udfKYTJ8fnia308TyouAJr7NGMlGZRillcjC24oWoyqK0KmdlXcpSKakqY7MmhVJZBY2A0taKQ1OZMhuTs13vMvivFWDUM78aHkOdSpbmSrBsoPIdZYNHDNDoZXALEzrNmR5U661qPXjUKddb1Zr3uZtdDvoXegNBo3XQWqhdABt17d0_DT9bX4hE</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina</creator><creator>Morelli, Georgia</creator><creator>Jones, Alexandra</creator><creator>Woodward, Mark</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies</title><author>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina ; Morelli, Georgia ; Jones, Alexandra ; Woodward, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1771-1d3f604baf888a5eacb174b979c8509d9698868bac3f2e98c8ef4e9cd81efba93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Breast feeding</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina</au><au>Morelli, Georgia</au><au>Jones, Alexandra</au><au>Woodward, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>398</volume><spage>S70</spage><epage>S70</epage><pages>S70-S70</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>Evidence of the effects of lactation on maternal risk of type 2 diabetes is conflicting, with some studies suggesting a protective effect, whereas others report no association. This study aimed to investigate the association between lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes.
We did a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the association between lactation (irrespective of duration, intensity, or mode) and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes. Bibliographic databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to Feb 28, 2021, with MeSH terms for lactation, breastfeeding, and type 2 diabetes. No restrictions were applied to type of study or language. This search was complemented with hand-searching of reference lists of relevant studies. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and tested using Cochran's Q test. Eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had published data on the outcomes of interest in each analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221183.
Our search identified 1161 studies, of which 22 (17 cohort and five cross-sectional) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review (8739 participants), and 16 contributed to the meta-analysis (4372 participants). The studies were conducted in populations from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, including multi-ethnic populations and variable sample sizes (range 100–83 000). The five studies that investigated the association of lactation with risk of type 2 diabetes in the first months after birth in women with gestational diabetes reported conflicting results. The 17 studies with longer follow-up (>3 months) showed an incremental (dose–response) protective association between lactation and risk of type 2 diabetes, with a potentially larger risk reduction in women with gestational diabetes than in those without gestational diabetes (risk ratio [RR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·52–0·85] for ever vs never lactation for women with gestational diabetes, and RR 0·81 [0·67–0·98] for ever vs never lactation for women without gestational diabetes; p=0·032 for heterogeneity). Overall, ever versus never lactation was associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·65–0·83; I2=69%, p=0·010). Each additional month of lactation was associated with a 1% lower risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0·99, 0·98–0·99), irrespective of gestational diabetes. The overall quality of the studies was modest.
Lactation is associated with a significantly lower risk of maternal type 2 diabetes, particularly in women with gestational diabetes. The protective effect seems to increase with longer duration of lactation. Further research is warranted to understand whether this association is modified by exposure to other risk factors, such as obesity. Breastfeeding-friendly policies might help to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes among women.
None.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02613-1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
| ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2021-11, Vol.398, p.S70-S70 |
| issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2602584039 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Breast feeding Breastfeeding & lactation Diabetes Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) Gestational diabetes Heterogeneity Lactation Meta-analysis Minority & ethnic groups Observational studies Population studies Populations Reviews Risk analysis Risk factors Risk management Risk reduction Systematic review |
| title | Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A07%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20lactation%20with%20maternal%20risk%20of%20type%202%20diabetes:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Pinho-Gomes,%20Ana-Catarina&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=398&rft.spage=S70&rft.epage=S70&rft.pages=S70-S70&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02613-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602584039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602584039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673621026131&rfr_iscdi=true |