Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model
Compared with other types of transportation, hazardous chemical transportation is more dangerous and more likely to cause accidents, such as combustion and explosion. To better study the advantages of different accident analysis models and realize the sustainable development of the accident analysis...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.12923 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 22 |
| container_start_page | 12923 |
| container_title | Sustainability |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Jiang, Wei Li, Yun Zhou, Jiankai Huang, Zhishun Wu, Zonghao |
| description | Compared with other types of transportation, hazardous chemical transportation is more dangerous and more likely to cause accidents, such as combustion and explosion. To better study the advantages of different accident analysis models and realize the sustainable development of the accident analysis, this paper compares the 24Model and the cognitive reliability and error analysis method in their analyses of causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents. Regarding their analyses of the causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents, the causal factors of hazardous chemical transportation accidents are obtained. Then the analysis results of the two models are compared on three aspects: the object of accident influence, the module of accident analysis, and the number of accident causes. Gray correlation analysis and regression analysis are used to quantitatively compare and verify the focus of the two models on the cause of the accident. The results show that the 24Model emphasizes the safety culture of the enterprise, the cognitive reliability and error analysis method emphasizes the technology of the enterprise, and the two accident analysis models provide different emphases on preventing accidents to better achieve the goal of sustainable development. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su132212923 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602242799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2602242799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-2870cbdacf4d880eab31342fb9229343f5fc374518b144770286b9a93d2343fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOOau_AMBL6WanGRrc1nKdMKGoNt1SfPhOrqmJqkwf73d5sXOzfl63sPhReiekifGBHkOPWUAFASwKzQCktKEkim5vqhv0SSEHRmCMSrobIR84fad9DLWPwZ_xl4fsLM4bg1eyF_ptesDLrZmXyvZ4LWXbeicjwPuWpwrVWvTRpy3sjkEE_Am1O3XSV18zPMVXjltGixbfZoBP_V36MbKJpjJfx6jzct8XSyS5fvrW5EvEwUiiwlkKVGVlspynWXEyIpRxsFWAkAwzuzUKpbyKc0qynmaEshmlZCCaThuKzZGD-e7nXffvQmx3LneD6-GEmYEgEMqxEA9ninlXQje2LLz9V76Q0lJefS1vPCV_QGu1GlY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602242799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jiang, Wei ; Li, Yun ; Zhou, Jiankai ; Huang, Zhishun ; Wu, Zonghao</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei ; Li, Yun ; Zhou, Jiankai ; Huang, Zhishun ; Wu, Zonghao</creatorcontrib><description>Compared with other types of transportation, hazardous chemical transportation is more dangerous and more likely to cause accidents, such as combustion and explosion. To better study the advantages of different accident analysis models and realize the sustainable development of the accident analysis, this paper compares the 24Model and the cognitive reliability and error analysis method in their analyses of causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents. Regarding their analyses of the causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents, the causal factors of hazardous chemical transportation accidents are obtained. Then the analysis results of the two models are compared on three aspects: the object of accident influence, the module of accident analysis, and the number of accident causes. Gray correlation analysis and regression analysis are used to quantitatively compare and verify the focus of the two models on the cause of the accident. The results show that the 24Model emphasizes the safety culture of the enterprise, the cognitive reliability and error analysis method emphasizes the technology of the enterprise, and the two accident analysis models provide different emphases on preventing accidents to better achieve the goal of sustainable development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su132212923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accident analysis ; Accident investigations ; Accident prevention ; Behavior ; Chemicals ; Classification ; Comparative studies ; Consciousness ; Correlation analysis ; Error analysis ; Fatalities ; Fault diagnosis ; Human error ; Regression analysis ; Reliability analysis ; Safety management ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Transportation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.12923</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-2870cbdacf4d880eab31342fb9229343f5fc374518b144770286b9a93d2343fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-2870cbdacf4d880eab31342fb9229343f5fc374518b144770286b9a93d2343fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiankai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhishun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zonghao</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Compared with other types of transportation, hazardous chemical transportation is more dangerous and more likely to cause accidents, such as combustion and explosion. To better study the advantages of different accident analysis models and realize the sustainable development of the accident analysis, this paper compares the 24Model and the cognitive reliability and error analysis method in their analyses of causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents. Regarding their analyses of the causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents, the causal factors of hazardous chemical transportation accidents are obtained. Then the analysis results of the two models are compared on three aspects: the object of accident influence, the module of accident analysis, and the number of accident causes. Gray correlation analysis and regression analysis are used to quantitatively compare and verify the focus of the two models on the cause of the accident. The results show that the 24Model emphasizes the safety culture of the enterprise, the cognitive reliability and error analysis method emphasizes the technology of the enterprise, and the two accident analysis models provide different emphases on preventing accidents to better achieve the goal of sustainable development.</description><subject>Accident analysis</subject><subject>Accident investigations</subject><subject>Accident prevention</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Fault diagnosis</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOOau_AMBL6WanGRrc1nKdMKGoNt1SfPhOrqmJqkwf73d5sXOzfl63sPhReiekifGBHkOPWUAFASwKzQCktKEkim5vqhv0SSEHRmCMSrobIR84fad9DLWPwZ_xl4fsLM4bg1eyF_ptesDLrZmXyvZ4LWXbeicjwPuWpwrVWvTRpy3sjkEE_Am1O3XSV18zPMVXjltGixbfZoBP_V36MbKJpjJfx6jzct8XSyS5fvrW5EvEwUiiwlkKVGVlspynWXEyIpRxsFWAkAwzuzUKpbyKc0qynmaEshmlZCCaThuKzZGD-e7nXffvQmx3LneD6-GEmYEgEMqxEA9ninlXQje2LLz9V76Q0lJefS1vPCV_QGu1GlY</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Jiang, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Yun</creator><creator>Zhou, Jiankai</creator><creator>Huang, Zhishun</creator><creator>Wu, Zonghao</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model</title><author>Jiang, Wei ; Li, Yun ; Zhou, Jiankai ; Huang, Zhishun ; Wu, Zonghao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-2870cbdacf4d880eab31342fb9229343f5fc374518b144770286b9a93d2343fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accident analysis</topic><topic>Accident investigations</topic><topic>Accident prevention</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Fault diagnosis</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiankai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhishun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zonghao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Wei</au><au>Li, Yun</au><au>Zhou, Jiankai</au><au>Huang, Zhishun</au><au>Wu, Zonghao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>12923</spage><pages>12923-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Compared with other types of transportation, hazardous chemical transportation is more dangerous and more likely to cause accidents, such as combustion and explosion. To better study the advantages of different accident analysis models and realize the sustainable development of the accident analysis, this paper compares the 24Model and the cognitive reliability and error analysis method in their analyses of causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents. Regarding their analyses of the causes of hazardous chemical transportation accidents, the causal factors of hazardous chemical transportation accidents are obtained. Then the analysis results of the two models are compared on three aspects: the object of accident influence, the module of accident analysis, and the number of accident causes. Gray correlation analysis and regression analysis are used to quantitatively compare and verify the focus of the two models on the cause of the accident. The results show that the 24Model emphasizes the safety culture of the enterprise, the cognitive reliability and error analysis method emphasizes the technology of the enterprise, and the two accident analysis models provide different emphases on preventing accidents to better achieve the goal of sustainable development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su132212923</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
| ispartof | Sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.12923 |
| issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2602242799 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Accident analysis Accident investigations Accident prevention Behavior Chemicals Classification Comparative studies Consciousness Correlation analysis Error analysis Fatalities Fault diagnosis Human error Regression analysis Reliability analysis Safety management Statistical analysis Sustainability Sustainable development Transportation |
| title | Comparative Study of the Hazardous Chemical Transportation Accident Analyses Using the CREAM Model and the 24Model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A02%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20the%20Hazardous%20Chemical%20Transportation%20Accident%20Analyses%20Using%20the%20CREAM%20Model%20and%20the%2024Model&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Jiang,%20Wei&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=12923&rft.pages=12923-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su132212923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602242799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602242799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |