Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment

In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.12574
Hauptverfasser: Do Thi, Huyen Trang, Mizsey, Peter, Toth, Andras Jozsef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 22
container_start_page 12574
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 13
creator Do Thi, Huyen Trang
Mizsey, Peter
Toth, Andras Jozsef
description In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from the used face masks pollute the environment, cause a negative impact on human health and the natural ecosystem, as well as increase landfill and medical waste. The presented paper focuses on providing an overview of the application of membrane technology in face mask products as well as the development of protection mechanisms in the future. The authors performed an environmental analysis of reusable (cloth) masks and disposable masks (surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators) using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess the impacts on the environment, human health, and ecosystem. IMPACT 2002+ V2.14, ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.02, IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03 methods were applied using specialized software (SimaPro V9.1). The disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, though they also carry several multiple environmental burdens. Conversely, reusable masks improve environmental performance, reduce 85% of waste, have a 3.39 times lower impact on climate change, and are 3.7 times cheaper than disposable masks.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su132212574
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602242166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2602242166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-e527faae9b9a73f49553adbb45299d68d0d95ce00cc8f72e419aebfc94277a633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKUnfsASRxTwI4_6WAVakFqBEJwjx1kLlyQO3gTUMz9OSjl0L7OjmdmVhpBLzm6kVOwWBy6F4CLJ4hMyESzjEWcJOz3az8kMccvGkZIrnk7Iz6Lramd06WrX76i3dANNGXQLSF1Ln4PvwfTuC-hSG6AbjR9IdVvR3DedDg59uw-9wIC6rOFPunPY-QM9Cn27_p2unQWa78woLRABsYG2vyBnVtcIs3-ckrfl_Wv-EK2fVo_5Yh0ZoeZ9BInIrNagSqUzaWOVJFJXZRknQqkqnVesUokBxoyZ20xAzJWG0hoViyzTqZRTcnW42wX_OQD2xdYPoR1fFiJlQsSCp-nouj64TPCIAWzRBdfosCs4K_ZFF0dFy1_b3XFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602242166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Do Thi, Huyen Trang ; Mizsey, Peter ; Toth, Andras Jozsef</creator><creatorcontrib>Do Thi, Huyen Trang ; Mizsey, Peter ; Toth, Andras Jozsef</creatorcontrib><description>In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from the used face masks pollute the environment, cause a negative impact on human health and the natural ecosystem, as well as increase landfill and medical waste. The presented paper focuses on providing an overview of the application of membrane technology in face mask products as well as the development of protection mechanisms in the future. The authors performed an environmental analysis of reusable (cloth) masks and disposable masks (surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators) using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess the impacts on the environment, human health, and ecosystem. IMPACT 2002+ V2.14, ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.02, IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03 methods were applied using specialized software (SimaPro V9.1). The disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, though they also carry several multiple environmental burdens. Conversely, reusable masks improve environmental performance, reduce 85% of waste, have a 3.39 times lower impact on climate change, and are 3.7 times cheaper than disposable masks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su132212574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Barriers ; Climate change ; Coronaviruses ; Cotton ; COVID-19 ; Disease transmission ; Efficiency ; Filtrate ; Global warming ; Gravity ; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ; Landfills ; Masks ; Medical wastes ; Membranes ; Microplastics ; Nanoparticles ; Pandemics ; Particle size ; Personal protective equipment ; Plastic pollution ; Polyesters ; Polyethylene ; Protective equipment ; Respirators ; Sedimentation &amp; deposition ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Viruses ; Waste disposal sites</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.12574</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-e527faae9b9a73f49553adbb45299d68d0d95ce00cc8f72e419aebfc94277a633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-e527faae9b9a73f49553adbb45299d68d0d95ce00cc8f72e419aebfc94277a633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5787-8557</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Do Thi, Huyen Trang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizsey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toth, Andras Jozsef</creatorcontrib><title>Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from the used face masks pollute the environment, cause a negative impact on human health and the natural ecosystem, as well as increase landfill and medical waste. The presented paper focuses on providing an overview of the application of membrane technology in face mask products as well as the development of protection mechanisms in the future. The authors performed an environmental analysis of reusable (cloth) masks and disposable masks (surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators) using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess the impacts on the environment, human health, and ecosystem. IMPACT 2002+ V2.14, ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.02, IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03 methods were applied using specialized software (SimaPro V9.1). The disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, though they also carry several multiple environmental burdens. Conversely, reusable masks improve environmental performance, reduce 85% of waste, have a 3.39 times lower impact on climate change, and are 3.7 times cheaper than disposable masks.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Filtrate</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Masks</subject><subject>Medical wastes</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Plastic pollution</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Protective equipment</subject><subject>Respirators</subject><subject>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKUnfsASRxTwI4_6WAVakFqBEJwjx1kLlyQO3gTUMz9OSjl0L7OjmdmVhpBLzm6kVOwWBy6F4CLJ4hMyESzjEWcJOz3az8kMccvGkZIrnk7Iz6Lramd06WrX76i3dANNGXQLSF1Ln4PvwfTuC-hSG6AbjR9IdVvR3DedDg59uw-9wIC6rOFPunPY-QM9Cn27_p2unQWa78woLRABsYG2vyBnVtcIs3-ckrfl_Wv-EK2fVo_5Yh0ZoeZ9BInIrNagSqUzaWOVJFJXZRknQqkqnVesUokBxoyZ20xAzJWG0hoViyzTqZRTcnW42wX_OQD2xdYPoR1fFiJlQsSCp-nouj64TPCIAWzRBdfosCs4K_ZFF0dFy1_b3XFM</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Do Thi, Huyen Trang</creator><creator>Mizsey, Peter</creator><creator>Toth, Andras Jozsef</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-8557</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment</title><author>Do Thi, Huyen Trang ; Mizsey, Peter ; Toth, Andras Jozsef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-e527faae9b9a73f49553adbb45299d68d0d95ce00cc8f72e419aebfc94277a633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Filtrate</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Masks</topic><topic>Medical wastes</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Plastic pollution</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Protective equipment</topic><topic>Respirators</topic><topic>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Do Thi, Huyen Trang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizsey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toth, Andras Jozsef</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Do Thi, Huyen Trang</au><au>Mizsey, Peter</au><au>Toth, Andras Jozsef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>12574</spage><pages>12574-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from the used face masks pollute the environment, cause a negative impact on human health and the natural ecosystem, as well as increase landfill and medical waste. The presented paper focuses on providing an overview of the application of membrane technology in face mask products as well as the development of protection mechanisms in the future. The authors performed an environmental analysis of reusable (cloth) masks and disposable masks (surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators) using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess the impacts on the environment, human health, and ecosystem. IMPACT 2002+ V2.14, ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.02, IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03 methods were applied using specialized software (SimaPro V9.1). The disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, though they also carry several multiple environmental burdens. Conversely, reusable masks improve environmental performance, reduce 85% of waste, have a 3.39 times lower impact on climate change, and are 3.7 times cheaper than disposable masks.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su132212574</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-8557</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.12574
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2602242166
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aerosols
Barriers
Climate change
Coronaviruses
Cotton
COVID-19
Disease transmission
Efficiency
Filtrate
Global warming
Gravity
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Landfills
Masks
Medical wastes
Membranes
Microplastics
Nanoparticles
Pandemics
Particle size
Personal protective equipment
Plastic pollution
Polyesters
Polyethylene
Protective equipment
Respirators
Sedimentation & deposition
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Viruses
Waste disposal sites
title Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A15%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applicability%20of%20Membranes%20in%20Protective%20Face%20Masks%20and%20Comparison%20of%20Reusable%20and%20Disposable%20Face%20Masks%20with%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Do%20Thi,%20Huyen%20Trang&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=12574&rft.pages=12574-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su132212574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602242166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602242166&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true