Effects of Imazapyr on Spartina alterniflora and Soil Bacterial Communities in a Mangrove Wetland

The invasion of Spartina alterniflora (S. alterniflora) has caused serious damage to coastal wetland ecosystems in China, especially the mangrove wetlands in South China. This study aimed to validate the effect of imazapyr on S. alterniflora and soil. The controlled experiment was conducted in May 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.3277
Hauptverfasser: Mo, Xue, Dong, Panpan, Xie, Lumeng, Xiu, Yujiao, Wang, Yanqi, Wu, Bo, Liu, Jiakai, Song, Xiuhua, Zhang, Mingxiang, Zhang, Zhenming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 22
container_start_page 3277
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Mo, Xue
Dong, Panpan
Xie, Lumeng
Xiu, Yujiao
Wang, Yanqi
Wu, Bo
Liu, Jiakai
Song, Xiuhua
Zhang, Mingxiang
Zhang, Zhenming
description The invasion of Spartina alterniflora (S. alterniflora) has caused serious damage to coastal wetland ecosystems in China, especially the mangrove wetlands in South China. This study aimed to validate the effect of imazapyr on S. alterniflora and soil. The controlled experiment was conducted in May 2021 at the Zhangjiangkou Mangrove Wetland Reserve. In the experiment, 25% (W) imazapyr was used, and six treatments were set up: 3035, 6070, and 9105 mL/acre 25% imazapyr and 1299, 2604, and 5202 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The results showed no side effects on mangrove plants in the spraying area. The highest control efficiency (95.9%) was given by 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The residues of imazapyr in different soils were reduced to 0.10–0.59 mg/kg. The sequencing results showed no significant difference in the overall bacterial communities under different treatments (p > 0.05). The soil bacterial diversity in the samples with adjuvant was higher than that in the samples without adjuvant, while the abundance values were the opposite. There were 10 main communities (>0.3%) at phylum level in all soil samples, among which Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloflexi, and Actinobacteria were the dominant communities, and the latter four’s abundance changed significantly (p < 0.05). There were significant abundance differences between the groups of oligotrophic and eutrophic bacteria. The redundancy analysis and Monte Carlo tests showed that the total organic carbon (TOC), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), ammonia nitrogen, and total nitrogen were the main factors affecting soil bacterial diversity. At the same time, TOC, AP, and TP were the most critical factors affecting the overall characteristics of soil bacterial communities in different treatments, while soil residues had no significant effect on bacteria. This might be due to the addition and degradation of imazapyr and the coverage of S. alterniflora. The best recommendation is 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr to be applied in China’s mangrove wetland reserves and coastal wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w13223277
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602201410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2602201410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6fc783733f3f9fe545511d7cd5f8804ae78715fe7a9c0663905b478693fc3a853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePKzmc5M9aqlaUDxU8biMaSIpu8mapEr99a5UxLm8meHNe8xD6JSSC84bcvlJOWOcKXWAJowoXgkh6OG__hjNct6QsUSjtSQTBAvnrCkZR4eXPXzBsEs4BrwaIBUfAENXbAredTGNQ1jjVfQdvgYzrj10eB77fht88TZjHzDgBwhvKX5Y_GJLNx6coCMHXbazX5yi55vF0_yuun-8Xc6v7ivDGlaq2hmlueLccdc4K4WUlK6VWUunNRFglVZUOqugMaSux3flq1C6brgzHLTkU3S21x1SfN_aXNpN3KYwWrasJowRKigZWed7lkkx52RdOyTfQ9q1lLQ_IbZ_IfJvzlxi0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602201410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Imazapyr on Spartina alterniflora and Soil Bacterial Communities in a Mangrove Wetland</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Mo, Xue ; Dong, Panpan ; Xie, Lumeng ; Xiu, Yujiao ; Wang, Yanqi ; Wu, Bo ; Liu, Jiakai ; Song, Xiuhua ; Zhang, Mingxiang ; Zhang, Zhenming</creator><creatorcontrib>Mo, Xue ; Dong, Panpan ; Xie, Lumeng ; Xiu, Yujiao ; Wang, Yanqi ; Wu, Bo ; Liu, Jiakai ; Song, Xiuhua ; Zhang, Mingxiang ; Zhang, Zhenming</creatorcontrib><description>The invasion of Spartina alterniflora (S. alterniflora) has caused serious damage to coastal wetland ecosystems in China, especially the mangrove wetlands in South China. This study aimed to validate the effect of imazapyr on S. alterniflora and soil. The controlled experiment was conducted in May 2021 at the Zhangjiangkou Mangrove Wetland Reserve. In the experiment, 25% (W) imazapyr was used, and six treatments were set up: 3035, 6070, and 9105 mL/acre 25% imazapyr and 1299, 2604, and 5202 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The results showed no side effects on mangrove plants in the spraying area. The highest control efficiency (95.9%) was given by 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The residues of imazapyr in different soils were reduced to 0.10–0.59 mg/kg. The sequencing results showed no significant difference in the overall bacterial communities under different treatments (p &gt; 0.05). The soil bacterial diversity in the samples with adjuvant was higher than that in the samples without adjuvant, while the abundance values were the opposite. There were 10 main communities (&gt;0.3%) at phylum level in all soil samples, among which Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloflexi, and Actinobacteria were the dominant communities, and the latter four’s abundance changed significantly (p &lt; 0.05). There were significant abundance differences between the groups of oligotrophic and eutrophic bacteria. The redundancy analysis and Monte Carlo tests showed that the total organic carbon (TOC), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), ammonia nitrogen, and total nitrogen were the main factors affecting soil bacterial diversity. At the same time, TOC, AP, and TP were the most critical factors affecting the overall characteristics of soil bacterial communities in different treatments, while soil residues had no significant effect on bacteria. This might be due to the addition and degradation of imazapyr and the coverage of S. alterniflora. The best recommendation is 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr to be applied in China’s mangrove wetland reserves and coastal wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w13223277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Ammonia ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic plants ; Bacteria ; Biodegradation ; Biodiversity ; Carbon ; Coasts ; Coverage ; Ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Estuaries ; Eutrophication ; Genetic testing ; Herbicides ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Nitrogen ; Organic carbon ; Organic phosphorus ; Phosphorus ; Residues ; Soil microorganisms ; Soils ; Spartina alterniflora ; Spraying ; Total organic carbon ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.3277</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6fc783733f3f9fe545511d7cd5f8804ae78715fe7a9c0663905b478693fc3a853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6fc783733f3f9fe545511d7cd5f8804ae78715fe7a9c0663905b478693fc3a853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5619-1609</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mo, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Panpan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Lumeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiu, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiakai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xiuhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mingxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhenming</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Imazapyr on Spartina alterniflora and Soil Bacterial Communities in a Mangrove Wetland</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>The invasion of Spartina alterniflora (S. alterniflora) has caused serious damage to coastal wetland ecosystems in China, especially the mangrove wetlands in South China. This study aimed to validate the effect of imazapyr on S. alterniflora and soil. The controlled experiment was conducted in May 2021 at the Zhangjiangkou Mangrove Wetland Reserve. In the experiment, 25% (W) imazapyr was used, and six treatments were set up: 3035, 6070, and 9105 mL/acre 25% imazapyr and 1299, 2604, and 5202 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The results showed no side effects on mangrove plants in the spraying area. The highest control efficiency (95.9%) was given by 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The residues of imazapyr in different soils were reduced to 0.10–0.59 mg/kg. The sequencing results showed no significant difference in the overall bacterial communities under different treatments (p &gt; 0.05). The soil bacterial diversity in the samples with adjuvant was higher than that in the samples without adjuvant, while the abundance values were the opposite. There were 10 main communities (&gt;0.3%) at phylum level in all soil samples, among which Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloflexi, and Actinobacteria were the dominant communities, and the latter four’s abundance changed significantly (p &lt; 0.05). There were significant abundance differences between the groups of oligotrophic and eutrophic bacteria. The redundancy analysis and Monte Carlo tests showed that the total organic carbon (TOC), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), ammonia nitrogen, and total nitrogen were the main factors affecting soil bacterial diversity. At the same time, TOC, AP, and TP were the most critical factors affecting the overall characteristics of soil bacterial communities in different treatments, while soil residues had no significant effect on bacteria. This might be due to the addition and degradation of imazapyr and the coverage of S. alterniflora. The best recommendation is 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr to be applied in China’s mangrove wetland reserves and coastal wetlands.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Coverage</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Spartina alterniflora</subject><subject>Spraying</subject><subject>Total organic carbon</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePKzmc5M9aqlaUDxU8biMaSIpu8mapEr99a5UxLm8meHNe8xD6JSSC84bcvlJOWOcKXWAJowoXgkh6OG__hjNct6QsUSjtSQTBAvnrCkZR4eXPXzBsEs4BrwaIBUfAENXbAredTGNQ1jjVfQdvgYzrj10eB77fht88TZjHzDgBwhvKX5Y_GJLNx6coCMHXbazX5yi55vF0_yuun-8Xc6v7ivDGlaq2hmlueLccdc4K4WUlK6VWUunNRFglVZUOqugMaSux3flq1C6brgzHLTkU3S21x1SfN_aXNpN3KYwWrasJowRKigZWed7lkkx52RdOyTfQ9q1lLQ_IbZ_IfJvzlxi0A</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Mo, Xue</creator><creator>Dong, Panpan</creator><creator>Xie, Lumeng</creator><creator>Xiu, Yujiao</creator><creator>Wang, Yanqi</creator><creator>Wu, Bo</creator><creator>Liu, Jiakai</creator><creator>Song, Xiuhua</creator><creator>Zhang, Mingxiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhenming</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5619-1609</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Effects of Imazapyr on Spartina alterniflora and Soil Bacterial Communities in a Mangrove Wetland</title><author>Mo, Xue ; Dong, Panpan ; Xie, Lumeng ; Xiu, Yujiao ; Wang, Yanqi ; Wu, Bo ; Liu, Jiakai ; Song, Xiuhua ; Zhang, Mingxiang ; Zhang, Zhenming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6fc783733f3f9fe545511d7cd5f8804ae78715fe7a9c0663905b478693fc3a853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Coverage</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Spartina alterniflora</topic><topic>Spraying</topic><topic>Total organic carbon</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mo, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Panpan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Lumeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiu, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiakai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xiuhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mingxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhenming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mo, Xue</au><au>Dong, Panpan</au><au>Xie, Lumeng</au><au>Xiu, Yujiao</au><au>Wang, Yanqi</au><au>Wu, Bo</au><au>Liu, Jiakai</au><au>Song, Xiuhua</au><au>Zhang, Mingxiang</au><au>Zhang, Zhenming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Imazapyr on Spartina alterniflora and Soil Bacterial Communities in a Mangrove Wetland</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>3277</spage><pages>3277-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>The invasion of Spartina alterniflora (S. alterniflora) has caused serious damage to coastal wetland ecosystems in China, especially the mangrove wetlands in South China. This study aimed to validate the effect of imazapyr on S. alterniflora and soil. The controlled experiment was conducted in May 2021 at the Zhangjiangkou Mangrove Wetland Reserve. In the experiment, 25% (W) imazapyr was used, and six treatments were set up: 3035, 6070, and 9105 mL/acre 25% imazapyr and 1299, 2604, and 5202 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The results showed no side effects on mangrove plants in the spraying area. The highest control efficiency (95.9%) was given by 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr. The residues of imazapyr in different soils were reduced to 0.10–0.59 mg/kg. The sequencing results showed no significant difference in the overall bacterial communities under different treatments (p &gt; 0.05). The soil bacterial diversity in the samples with adjuvant was higher than that in the samples without adjuvant, while the abundance values were the opposite. There were 10 main communities (&gt;0.3%) at phylum level in all soil samples, among which Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloflexi, and Actinobacteria were the dominant communities, and the latter four’s abundance changed significantly (p &lt; 0.05). There were significant abundance differences between the groups of oligotrophic and eutrophic bacteria. The redundancy analysis and Monte Carlo tests showed that the total organic carbon (TOC), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), ammonia nitrogen, and total nitrogen were the main factors affecting soil bacterial diversity. At the same time, TOC, AP, and TP were the most critical factors affecting the overall characteristics of soil bacterial communities in different treatments, while soil residues had no significant effect on bacteria. This might be due to the addition and degradation of imazapyr and the coverage of S. alterniflora. The best recommendation is 2604 mL/acre of AGE 809 + 6070 mL/acre 25% imazapyr to be applied in China’s mangrove wetland reserves and coastal wetlands.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w13223277</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5619-1609</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.3277
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2602201410
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Abundance
Ammonia
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic plants
Bacteria
Biodegradation
Biodiversity
Carbon
Coasts
Coverage
Ecosystems
Efficiency
Estuaries
Eutrophication
Genetic testing
Herbicides
Laboratories
Methods
Nitrogen
Organic carbon
Organic phosphorus
Phosphorus
Residues
Soil microorganisms
Soils
Spartina alterniflora
Spraying
Total organic carbon
Wetlands
title Effects of Imazapyr on Spartina alterniflora and Soil Bacterial Communities in a Mangrove Wetland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Imazapyr%20on%20Spartina%20alterniflora%20and%20Soil%20Bacterial%20Communities%20in%20a%20Mangrove%20Wetland&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Mo,%20Xue&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=3277&rft.pages=3277-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w13223277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602201410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602201410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true