New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Cretaceous Tectonic Framework of the Antarctic Peninsula

Understanding the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula is hindered by a paucity of paleomagnetic data from key locations. In this study, we present paleomagnetic data from the South Shetland Islands, to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula, which provides valuable paleoposition constrai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Liang, Pei, Junling, Zhao, Yue, Yang, Zhenyu, Riley, Teal R., Liu, Xiaochun, Zhang, Shuan‐Hong, Liu, Jian‐Min
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 126
creator Gao, Liang
Pei, Junling
Zhao, Yue
Yang, Zhenyu
Riley, Teal R.
Liu, Xiaochun
Zhang, Shuan‐Hong
Liu, Jian‐Min
description Understanding the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula is hindered by a paucity of paleomagnetic data from key locations. In this study, we present paleomagnetic data from the South Shetland Islands, to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula, which provides valuable paleoposition constraints on the Western domain of the Antarctic Peninsula. We report a key reliable paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from Livingston Island in the South Shetland Islands at ∼102 Ma. Plate reconstruction models from the Early Cretaceous attach the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes at ∼140 Ma. The South Shetland Islands then experienced southward translation to its current position to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula following counterclockwise rotation during ∼100–90 Ma. A similar counterclockwise rotation has also been identified from southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes but is absent in the Antarctic Peninsula, suggesting a direct affinity between the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the consistent, almost northward Cretaceous paleomagnetic declination in the Antarctic Peninsula, and the near‐synchronous tectonic‐magmatic history between the Antarctic Peninsula and the southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes support an autochthonous continental subduction model for most of the Antarctic Peninsula. Plain Language Summary In this study, we applied paleomagnetic constraints on the autochthonous continental subduction model and allochthonous terrane accretion model in the explanation of the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula. Our new data reveal a consistent counterclockwise rotation occurred both at the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during ∼100–90 Ma, suggesting the affinity of these places. This is supported by the previous reported ∼140 Ma plate reconstruction, which attached the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the lack of significant tectonic rotation suggests that most parts of the Antarctic Peninsula were formed during the Pacific plate subduction and support an autochthonous continental subduction model. Key Points We have obtained a key mid‐Cretaceous paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from the Byers Peninsula, South Shetland Islands South Shetland Islands located at the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during the Early to mid‐Cretaceous Consistent almost
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021JB022503
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2601376195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2601376195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3304-602ce5c2424c3ce5c34b9cf713de91d6ef1867d04dfd77a184a79ec605264a483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1Lw0AQBuBFFCy1N39AwKvR_U722AatlqJF6lHCuploarpbdzeU_ntTK-LJuczL8DADg9A5wVcEU3VNMSWzCaZUYHaEBpRIlSom5PFvJuwUjUJY4b7yfkT4AL08wDZZ6BbcWr9ZiI1JCmdD9LqxMSTOJvEdksJD1AZcF5IlmOhsz269XsPW-Y_E1d9obKP2Zr9hAbaxoWv1GTqpdRtg9NOH6Pn2ZlncpfPH6X0xnqeaMcxTiakBYSin3LB9YvxVmTojrAJFKgk1yWVWYV7VVZZpknOdKTASCyq55jkboovD3o13nx2EWK5c521_sqQSE5ZJokSvLg_KeBeCh7rc-Gat_a4kuNz_sPz7w56zA982Lez-teVs-jQRggrOvgD363ID</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2601376195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Cretaceous Tectonic Framework of the Antarctic Peninsula</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gao, Liang ; Pei, Junling ; Zhao, Yue ; Yang, Zhenyu ; Riley, Teal R. ; Liu, Xiaochun ; Zhang, Shuan‐Hong ; Liu, Jian‐Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liang ; Pei, Junling ; Zhao, Yue ; Yang, Zhenyu ; Riley, Teal R. ; Liu, Xiaochun ; Zhang, Shuan‐Hong ; Liu, Jian‐Min</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula is hindered by a paucity of paleomagnetic data from key locations. In this study, we present paleomagnetic data from the South Shetland Islands, to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula, which provides valuable paleoposition constraints on the Western domain of the Antarctic Peninsula. We report a key reliable paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from Livingston Island in the South Shetland Islands at ∼102 Ma. Plate reconstruction models from the Early Cretaceous attach the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes at ∼140 Ma. The South Shetland Islands then experienced southward translation to its current position to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula following counterclockwise rotation during ∼100–90 Ma. A similar counterclockwise rotation has also been identified from southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes but is absent in the Antarctic Peninsula, suggesting a direct affinity between the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the consistent, almost northward Cretaceous paleomagnetic declination in the Antarctic Peninsula, and the near‐synchronous tectonic‐magmatic history between the Antarctic Peninsula and the southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes support an autochthonous continental subduction model for most of the Antarctic Peninsula. Plain Language Summary In this study, we applied paleomagnetic constraints on the autochthonous continental subduction model and allochthonous terrane accretion model in the explanation of the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula. Our new data reveal a consistent counterclockwise rotation occurred both at the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during ∼100–90 Ma, suggesting the affinity of these places. This is supported by the previous reported ∼140 Ma plate reconstruction, which attached the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the lack of significant tectonic rotation suggests that most parts of the Antarctic Peninsula were formed during the Pacific plate subduction and support an autochthonous continental subduction model. Key Points We have obtained a key mid‐Cretaceous paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from the Byers Peninsula, South Shetland Islands South Shetland Islands located at the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during the Early to mid‐Cretaceous Consistent almost northward paleomagnetic declination support an autochthonous model for most part of the Antarctic Peninsula</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JB022503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accretion ; Affinity ; Allochthonous deposits ; Antarctic Peninsula ; Constraint modelling ; Cretaceous ; Declination ; Deposition ; Frameworks ; Geophysics ; Islands ; Livingston Island ; mid‐Cretaceous ; Modelling ; Palaeomagnetism ; Paleomagnetism ; Plates ; Plates (tectonics) ; Reconstruction ; Rotation ; South Shetland Islands ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Tectonics ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3304-602ce5c2424c3ce5c34b9cf713de91d6ef1867d04dfd77a184a79ec605264a483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3304-602ce5c2424c3ce5c34b9cf713de91d6ef1867d04dfd77a184a79ec605264a483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2177-9039 ; 0000-0003-4046-3432 ; 0000-0003-1388-2519 ; 0000-0003-3741-9377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JB022503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JB022503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Teal R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaochun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuan‐Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jian‐Min</creatorcontrib><title>New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Cretaceous Tectonic Framework of the Antarctic Peninsula</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>Understanding the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula is hindered by a paucity of paleomagnetic data from key locations. In this study, we present paleomagnetic data from the South Shetland Islands, to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula, which provides valuable paleoposition constraints on the Western domain of the Antarctic Peninsula. We report a key reliable paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from Livingston Island in the South Shetland Islands at ∼102 Ma. Plate reconstruction models from the Early Cretaceous attach the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes at ∼140 Ma. The South Shetland Islands then experienced southward translation to its current position to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula following counterclockwise rotation during ∼100–90 Ma. A similar counterclockwise rotation has also been identified from southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes but is absent in the Antarctic Peninsula, suggesting a direct affinity between the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the consistent, almost northward Cretaceous paleomagnetic declination in the Antarctic Peninsula, and the near‐synchronous tectonic‐magmatic history between the Antarctic Peninsula and the southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes support an autochthonous continental subduction model for most of the Antarctic Peninsula. Plain Language Summary In this study, we applied paleomagnetic constraints on the autochthonous continental subduction model and allochthonous terrane accretion model in the explanation of the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula. Our new data reveal a consistent counterclockwise rotation occurred both at the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during ∼100–90 Ma, suggesting the affinity of these places. This is supported by the previous reported ∼140 Ma plate reconstruction, which attached the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the lack of significant tectonic rotation suggests that most parts of the Antarctic Peninsula were formed during the Pacific plate subduction and support an autochthonous continental subduction model. Key Points We have obtained a key mid‐Cretaceous paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from the Byers Peninsula, South Shetland Islands South Shetland Islands located at the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during the Early to mid‐Cretaceous Consistent almost northward paleomagnetic declination support an autochthonous model for most part of the Antarctic Peninsula</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Allochthonous deposits</subject><subject>Antarctic Peninsula</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Cretaceous</subject><subject>Declination</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Livingston Island</subject><subject>mid‐Cretaceous</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Palaeomagnetism</subject><subject>Paleomagnetism</subject><subject>Plates</subject><subject>Plates (tectonics)</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>South Shetland Islands</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1Lw0AQBuBFFCy1N39AwKvR_U722AatlqJF6lHCuploarpbdzeU_ntTK-LJuczL8DADg9A5wVcEU3VNMSWzCaZUYHaEBpRIlSom5PFvJuwUjUJY4b7yfkT4AL08wDZZ6BbcWr9ZiI1JCmdD9LqxMSTOJvEdksJD1AZcF5IlmOhsz269XsPW-Y_E1d9obKP2Zr9hAbaxoWv1GTqpdRtg9NOH6Pn2ZlncpfPH6X0xnqeaMcxTiakBYSin3LB9YvxVmTojrAJFKgk1yWVWYV7VVZZpknOdKTASCyq55jkboovD3o13nx2EWK5c521_sqQSE5ZJokSvLg_KeBeCh7rc-Gat_a4kuNz_sPz7w56zA982Lez-teVs-jQRggrOvgD363ID</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Gao, Liang</creator><creator>Pei, Junling</creator><creator>Zhao, Yue</creator><creator>Yang, Zhenyu</creator><creator>Riley, Teal R.</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaochun</creator><creator>Zhang, Shuan‐Hong</creator><creator>Liu, Jian‐Min</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-9039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-3432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-2519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-9377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Cretaceous Tectonic Framework of the Antarctic Peninsula</title><author>Gao, Liang ; Pei, Junling ; Zhao, Yue ; Yang, Zhenyu ; Riley, Teal R. ; Liu, Xiaochun ; Zhang, Shuan‐Hong ; Liu, Jian‐Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3304-602ce5c2424c3ce5c34b9cf713de91d6ef1867d04dfd77a184a79ec605264a483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Allochthonous deposits</topic><topic>Antarctic Peninsula</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Cretaceous</topic><topic>Declination</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Livingston Island</topic><topic>mid‐Cretaceous</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Palaeomagnetism</topic><topic>Paleomagnetism</topic><topic>Plates</topic><topic>Plates (tectonics)</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>South Shetland Islands</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Teal R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaochun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuan‐Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jian‐Min</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Liang</au><au>Pei, Junling</au><au>Zhao, Yue</au><au>Yang, Zhenyu</au><au>Riley, Teal R.</au><au>Liu, Xiaochun</au><au>Zhang, Shuan‐Hong</au><au>Liu, Jian‐Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Cretaceous Tectonic Framework of the Antarctic Peninsula</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Understanding the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula is hindered by a paucity of paleomagnetic data from key locations. In this study, we present paleomagnetic data from the South Shetland Islands, to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula, which provides valuable paleoposition constraints on the Western domain of the Antarctic Peninsula. We report a key reliable paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from Livingston Island in the South Shetland Islands at ∼102 Ma. Plate reconstruction models from the Early Cretaceous attach the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes at ∼140 Ma. The South Shetland Islands then experienced southward translation to its current position to the northwest of the Antarctic Peninsula following counterclockwise rotation during ∼100–90 Ma. A similar counterclockwise rotation has also been identified from southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes but is absent in the Antarctic Peninsula, suggesting a direct affinity between the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the consistent, almost northward Cretaceous paleomagnetic declination in the Antarctic Peninsula, and the near‐synchronous tectonic‐magmatic history between the Antarctic Peninsula and the southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes support an autochthonous continental subduction model for most of the Antarctic Peninsula. Plain Language Summary In this study, we applied paleomagnetic constraints on the autochthonous continental subduction model and allochthonous terrane accretion model in the explanation of the tectonic framework of the Antarctic Peninsula. Our new data reveal a consistent counterclockwise rotation occurred both at the South Shetland Islands and southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during ∼100–90 Ma, suggesting the affinity of these places. This is supported by the previous reported ∼140 Ma plate reconstruction, which attached the South Shetland Islands to the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes. However, the lack of significant tectonic rotation suggests that most parts of the Antarctic Peninsula were formed during the Pacific plate subduction and support an autochthonous continental subduction model. Key Points We have obtained a key mid‐Cretaceous paleopole (58.1°S, 354.3°E, A95 = 6.3°) from the Byers Peninsula, South Shetland Islands South Shetland Islands located at the Pacific margin of southern Patagonia‐Fuegian Andes during the Early to mid‐Cretaceous Consistent almost northward paleomagnetic declination support an autochthonous model for most part of the Antarctic Peninsula</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JB022503</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-9039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-3432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-2519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-9377</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2601376195
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accretion
Affinity
Allochthonous deposits
Antarctic Peninsula
Constraint modelling
Cretaceous
Declination
Deposition
Frameworks
Geophysics
Islands
Livingston Island
mid‐Cretaceous
Modelling
Palaeomagnetism
Paleomagnetism
Plates
Plates (tectonics)
Reconstruction
Rotation
South Shetland Islands
Subduction
Subduction (geology)
Tectonics
Temperature
title New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Cretaceous Tectonic Framework of the Antarctic Peninsula
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A41%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Paleomagnetic%20Constraints%20on%20the%20Cretaceous%20Tectonic%20Framework%20of%20the%20Antarctic%20Peninsula&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Gao,%20Liang&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JB022503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2601376195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2601376195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true