Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial
This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Phytotherapy research 2021-11, Vol.35 (11), p.6369-6376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 6369 |
container_title | Phytotherapy research |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Paknejad, Maryam Sadat Eftekhari, Kambiz Rahimi, Roja Vigeh, Mohsen Naghizadeh, Ayeh Karimi, Mehrdad |
description | This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ptr.7288 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2601111235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2601111235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI6CjxBwMy46Ju20Td0N4h-MKDKCu5ImNzMZ0qYmLVpXgi_gM_okto5b7-aDy-G73IPQMSVTSkh4VjdumoaM7aARJVkW0DiNdtGIZDENZpQ976MD7zeEkCwksxH6vOtcYwBPhmw9FrYs20p7vJieYuVa3WDfubbGyjq84r5xFryt13wF3GAHyrRvWGoP3APWFRZrbaSD6hzPsbRtYeD746swupLY8UraUr-DxKJfaNEXNE5zc4j2FDcejv5yjJ6uLpcXN8Hi_vr2Yr4IRBQmLGAJzQRXkoCkMiIRi4QqQhkDUYpBEgEUnMiYMiJ4rMKEFjMWCwZc8jRJizgao5Ntb-3sSwu-yTe2dVV_Mg8TQvsJo4GabCnhrPf9h3ntdMldl1OSD4rzXnE-KO7RYIu-agPdv1z-sHz85X8AEbWBEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2601111235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat ; Eftekhari, Kambiz ; Rahimi, Roja ; Vigeh, Mohsen ; Naghizadeh, Ayeh ; Karimi, Mehrdad</creator><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat ; Eftekhari, Kambiz ; Rahimi, Roja ; Vigeh, Mohsen ; Naghizadeh, Ayeh ; Karimi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><description>This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-418X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>appetite ; child ; Children ; Double-blind studies ; Fruits ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; herbal medicine ; medicinal plant ; myrtle ; Myrtus communis ; Omeprazole ; Patients ; Persian medicine ; Placebos ; Statistical analysis ; Syrup ; Syrups</subject><ispartof>Phytotherapy research, 2021-11, Vol.35 (11), p.6369-6376</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8637-4350 ; 0000-0001-5395-819X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fptr.7288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fptr.7288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftekhari, Kambiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Roja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><title>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</title><title>Phytotherapy research</title><description>This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.</description><subject>appetite</subject><subject>child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>herbal medicine</subject><subject>medicinal plant</subject><subject>myrtle</subject><subject>Myrtus communis</subject><subject>Omeprazole</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Persian medicine</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Syrup</subject><subject>Syrups</subject><issn>0951-418X</issn><issn>1099-1573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI6CjxBwMy46Ju20Td0N4h-MKDKCu5ImNzMZ0qYmLVpXgi_gM_okto5b7-aDy-G73IPQMSVTSkh4VjdumoaM7aARJVkW0DiNdtGIZDENZpQ976MD7zeEkCwksxH6vOtcYwBPhmw9FrYs20p7vJieYuVa3WDfubbGyjq84r5xFryt13wF3GAHyrRvWGoP3APWFRZrbaSD6hzPsbRtYeD746swupLY8UraUr-DxKJfaNEXNE5zc4j2FDcejv5yjJ6uLpcXN8Hi_vr2Yr4IRBQmLGAJzQRXkoCkMiIRi4QqQhkDUYpBEgEUnMiYMiJ4rMKEFjMWCwZc8jRJizgao5Ntb-3sSwu-yTe2dVV_Mg8TQvsJo4GabCnhrPf9h3ntdMldl1OSD4rzXnE-KO7RYIu-agPdv1z-sHz85X8AEbWBEA</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</creator><creator>Eftekhari, Kambiz</creator><creator>Rahimi, Roja</creator><creator>Vigeh, Mohsen</creator><creator>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</creator><creator>Karimi, Mehrdad</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-4350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-819X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</title><author>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat ; Eftekhari, Kambiz ; Rahimi, Roja ; Vigeh, Mohsen ; Naghizadeh, Ayeh ; Karimi, Mehrdad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>appetite</topic><topic>child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>herbal medicine</topic><topic>medicinal plant</topic><topic>myrtle</topic><topic>Myrtus communis</topic><topic>Omeprazole</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Persian medicine</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Syrup</topic><topic>Syrups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftekhari, Kambiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Roja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</au><au>Eftekhari, Kambiz</au><au>Rahimi, Roja</au><au>Vigeh, Mohsen</au><au>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</au><au>Karimi, Mehrdad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6369</spage><epage>6376</epage><pages>6369-6376</pages><issn>0951-418X</issn><eissn>1099-1573</eissn><abstract>This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ptr.7288</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-4350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-819X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-418X |
ispartof | Phytotherapy research, 2021-11, Vol.35 (11), p.6369-6376 |
issn | 0951-418X 1099-1573 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2601111235 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | appetite child Children Double-blind studies Fruits Gastroesophageal reflux herbal medicine medicinal plant myrtle Myrtus communis Omeprazole Patients Persian medicine Placebos Statistical analysis Syrup Syrups |
title | Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A02%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myrtle%20(Myrtus%20communis%20L.)%20fruit%20syrup%20for%20gastroesophageal%20reflux%20disease%20in%20children:%20A%20double%E2%80%90blind%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Phytotherapy%20research&rft.au=Paknejad,%20Maryam%20Sadat&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6369&rft.epage=6376&rft.pages=6369-6376&rft.issn=0951-418X&rft.eissn=1099-1573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ptr.7288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2601111235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2601111235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |