Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial

This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytotherapy research 2021-11, Vol.35 (11), p.6369-6376
Hauptverfasser: Paknejad, Maryam Sadat, Eftekhari, Kambiz, Rahimi, Roja, Vigeh, Mohsen, Naghizadeh, Ayeh, Karimi, Mehrdad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6376
container_issue 11
container_start_page 6369
container_title Phytotherapy research
container_volume 35
creator Paknejad, Maryam Sadat
Eftekhari, Kambiz
Rahimi, Roja
Vigeh, Mohsen
Naghizadeh, Ayeh
Karimi, Mehrdad
description This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ptr.7288
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2601111235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2601111235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI6CjxBwMy46Ju20Td0N4h-MKDKCu5ImNzMZ0qYmLVpXgi_gM_okto5b7-aDy-G73IPQMSVTSkh4VjdumoaM7aARJVkW0DiNdtGIZDENZpQ976MD7zeEkCwksxH6vOtcYwBPhmw9FrYs20p7vJieYuVa3WDfubbGyjq84r5xFryt13wF3GAHyrRvWGoP3APWFRZrbaSD6hzPsbRtYeD746swupLY8UraUr-DxKJfaNEXNE5zc4j2FDcejv5yjJ6uLpcXN8Hi_vr2Yr4IRBQmLGAJzQRXkoCkMiIRi4QqQhkDUYpBEgEUnMiYMiJ4rMKEFjMWCwZc8jRJizgao5Ntb-3sSwu-yTe2dVV_Mg8TQvsJo4GabCnhrPf9h3ntdMldl1OSD4rzXnE-KO7RYIu-agPdv1z-sHz85X8AEbWBEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2601111235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat ; Eftekhari, Kambiz ; Rahimi, Roja ; Vigeh, Mohsen ; Naghizadeh, Ayeh ; Karimi, Mehrdad</creator><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat ; Eftekhari, Kambiz ; Rahimi, Roja ; Vigeh, Mohsen ; Naghizadeh, Ayeh ; Karimi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><description>This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-418X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>appetite ; child ; Children ; Double-blind studies ; Fruits ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; herbal medicine ; medicinal plant ; myrtle ; Myrtus communis ; Omeprazole ; Patients ; Persian medicine ; Placebos ; Statistical analysis ; Syrup ; Syrups</subject><ispartof>Phytotherapy research, 2021-11, Vol.35 (11), p.6369-6376</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8637-4350 ; 0000-0001-5395-819X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fptr.7288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fptr.7288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftekhari, Kambiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Roja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><title>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</title><title>Phytotherapy research</title><description>This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.</description><subject>appetite</subject><subject>child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>herbal medicine</subject><subject>medicinal plant</subject><subject>myrtle</subject><subject>Myrtus communis</subject><subject>Omeprazole</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Persian medicine</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Syrup</subject><subject>Syrups</subject><issn>0951-418X</issn><issn>1099-1573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI6CjxBwMy46Ju20Td0N4h-MKDKCu5ImNzMZ0qYmLVpXgi_gM_okto5b7-aDy-G73IPQMSVTSkh4VjdumoaM7aARJVkW0DiNdtGIZDENZpQ976MD7zeEkCwksxH6vOtcYwBPhmw9FrYs20p7vJieYuVa3WDfubbGyjq84r5xFryt13wF3GAHyrRvWGoP3APWFRZrbaSD6hzPsbRtYeD746swupLY8UraUr-DxKJfaNEXNE5zc4j2FDcejv5yjJ6uLpcXN8Hi_vr2Yr4IRBQmLGAJzQRXkoCkMiIRi4QqQhkDUYpBEgEUnMiYMiJ4rMKEFjMWCwZc8jRJizgao5Ntb-3sSwu-yTe2dVV_Mg8TQvsJo4GabCnhrPf9h3ntdMldl1OSD4rzXnE-KO7RYIu-agPdv1z-sHz85X8AEbWBEA</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</creator><creator>Eftekhari, Kambiz</creator><creator>Rahimi, Roja</creator><creator>Vigeh, Mohsen</creator><creator>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</creator><creator>Karimi, Mehrdad</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-4350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-819X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</title><author>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat ; Eftekhari, Kambiz ; Rahimi, Roja ; Vigeh, Mohsen ; Naghizadeh, Ayeh ; Karimi, Mehrdad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3268-8619cafd0ed1d30383cfb2d5e0ff8e63eeba0d5180ca5f261b485c8eada767b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>appetite</topic><topic>child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>herbal medicine</topic><topic>medicinal plant</topic><topic>myrtle</topic><topic>Myrtus communis</topic><topic>Omeprazole</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Persian medicine</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Syrup</topic><topic>Syrups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftekhari, Kambiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Roja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paknejad, Maryam Sadat</au><au>Eftekhari, Kambiz</au><au>Rahimi, Roja</au><au>Vigeh, Mohsen</au><au>Naghizadeh, Ayeh</au><au>Karimi, Mehrdad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6369</spage><epage>6376</epage><pages>6369-6376</pages><issn>0951-418X</issn><eissn>1099-1573</eissn><abstract>This double‐blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a syrup made from Myrtus communis L. fruit on children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Children aged 1–7 years old, diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were randomly allocated to either intervention group (omeprazole and “myrtle fruit syrup”) or control group (omeprazole and placebo syrup). GERD symptom questionnaire for young children (GSQ‐YC) was filled out for each patient at zeroth and eighth week, and also 4 weeks after cessation of intervention. No statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of GERD score was reported neither in 8th nor in 12th week assessments. During the 4 weeks of the drug‐free period, patients in myrtle group did not experience a large shift in GERD score, while patients in placebo syrup group experienced an increase of as much as 19.4. However, this difference was not statistically significant, although it could be significant clinically. For achieving more conclusive results, more studies are needed. The symptom “refusal to eat” in the intervention group was less than in placebo group after 8 weeks (p = .018) and at the end of the study (p = .042). So myrtle fruit syrup may be considered for children with low appetite.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ptr.7288</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-4350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-819X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-418X
ispartof Phytotherapy research, 2021-11, Vol.35 (11), p.6369-6376
issn 0951-418X
1099-1573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2601111235
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects appetite
child
Children
Double-blind studies
Fruits
Gastroesophageal reflux
herbal medicine
medicinal plant
myrtle
Myrtus communis
Omeprazole
Patients
Persian medicine
Placebos
Statistical analysis
Syrup
Syrups
title Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruit syrup for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A02%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myrtle%20(Myrtus%20communis%20L.)%20fruit%20syrup%20for%20gastroesophageal%20reflux%20disease%20in%20children:%20A%20double%E2%80%90blind%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Phytotherapy%20research&rft.au=Paknejad,%20Maryam%20Sadat&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6369&rft.epage=6376&rft.pages=6369-6376&rft.issn=0951-418X&rft.eissn=1099-1573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ptr.7288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2601111235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2601111235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true