Episodic Nutrient Addition Affects Water Column Nutrient Processing Rates in River‐to‐Lake Transitional Zones

Storm‐driven nutrient loading from tributaries can fuel eutrophication in nearshore and open water areas of lentic ecosystems. However, nutrient processing in river‐to‐lake transitional zones can substantially alter the amount and composition of nutrients transported to lakes from upstream surface w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Pearce, Nolan J. T., Larson, James H., Evans, Mary Anne, Frost, Paul C., Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 126
creator Pearce, Nolan J. T.
Larson, James H.
Evans, Mary Anne
Frost, Paul C.
Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.
description Storm‐driven nutrient loading from tributaries can fuel eutrophication in nearshore and open water areas of lentic ecosystems. However, nutrient processing in river‐to‐lake transitional zones can substantially alter the amount and composition of nutrients transported to lakes from upstream surface waters. We measured the removal of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from the water column in the Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) to evaluate the response of rivermouth plankton to episodic nutrient enrichment. Light and dark water column incubations (8–12 hr) were conducted on four occasions from April through September to measure changes in dissolved nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and DOC concentrations in three locations along the Fox rivermouth. Two incubation experiments were conducted on consecutive days, (a) under ambient nutrient concentrations, and (b) under experimentally enriched N and P concentrations. Spatial and temporal variation was observed in nutrient uptake rates, but light incubations consistently had higher nutrient uptake rates than dark incubations. Nutrient enrichment increased total dissolved P and total dissolved N uptake and DOC release in light incubations, but only increased total dissolved P uptake in dark incubations. Moreover, nutrient uptake ratios (N:P) decreased from ambient to nutrient enriched conditions and indicated preferential P uptake by phytoplankton communities in light conditions. Our study substantiates that rivermouths can process nutrients bound for downstream ecosystems and demonstrates the potential of plankton communities to dynamically increase net uptake rates in response to episodic nutrient enrichment. Plain Language Summary Nutrients washed into lakes from human activities (e.g., fertilizer application and livestock waste) can trigger the excessive growth of algae and harm nearshore ecosystems. Areas where large rivers enter lakes, also known as rivermouths, can capture these nutrients coming from the landscape and make them less available to algae in nearshore ecosystems. Yet, nutrients washed into rivermouths from rain events are only present for a short period of time and we do not know how much of these brief nutrient inputs can be removed through biological processes. Our study compared biological nutrient uptake rates in Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) under background conditions to those that mimicked a rapid increase in nutrients from a rain event. We found that biologic
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021JG006374
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2600969730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2600969730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3070-8beb92718d891acd91bb551cd3247e47314ec7e5bc20ea9cf25e85b5c3b092b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1Kw0AQAOBFFCy1Nx9gwavR_ckm2WMptVqKSqkIXsLuZiJb02y7myi9-Qg-o09itKKenMPMMHwMwyB0TMkZJUyeM8LodEJIwtN4D_UYTWSUyYTu__SCH6JBCEvSRdaNKO2hzXhtgyuswddt4y3UDR4WhW2sq_GwLME0Ad-rBjweuapd1b_s1jsDIdj6Ec87ELCt8dw-g39_fWtcl2bqCfDCqzp8rVMVfnA1hCN0UKoqwOC79tHdxXgxuoxmN5Or0XAWGU5SEmUatGQpzYpMUmUKSbUWgpqCsziFOOU0BpOC0IYRUNKUTEAmtDBcE8k05X10stu79m7TQmjypWt9d0bIWUKITGTKSadOd8p4F4KHMl97u1J-m1OSf_41__vXjvMdf7EVbP-1-XQynzBGBOEfPx97yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600969730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Episodic Nutrient Addition Affects Water Column Nutrient Processing Rates in River‐to‐Lake Transitional Zones</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pearce, Nolan J. T. ; Larson, James H. ; Evans, Mary Anne ; Frost, Paul C. ; Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Nolan J. T. ; Larson, James H. ; Evans, Mary Anne ; Frost, Paul C. ; Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</creatorcontrib><description>Storm‐driven nutrient loading from tributaries can fuel eutrophication in nearshore and open water areas of lentic ecosystems. However, nutrient processing in river‐to‐lake transitional zones can substantially alter the amount and composition of nutrients transported to lakes from upstream surface waters. We measured the removal of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from the water column in the Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) to evaluate the response of rivermouth plankton to episodic nutrient enrichment. Light and dark water column incubations (8–12 hr) were conducted on four occasions from April through September to measure changes in dissolved nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and DOC concentrations in three locations along the Fox rivermouth. Two incubation experiments were conducted on consecutive days, (a) under ambient nutrient concentrations, and (b) under experimentally enriched N and P concentrations. Spatial and temporal variation was observed in nutrient uptake rates, but light incubations consistently had higher nutrient uptake rates than dark incubations. Nutrient enrichment increased total dissolved P and total dissolved N uptake and DOC release in light incubations, but only increased total dissolved P uptake in dark incubations. Moreover, nutrient uptake ratios (N:P) decreased from ambient to nutrient enriched conditions and indicated preferential P uptake by phytoplankton communities in light conditions. Our study substantiates that rivermouths can process nutrients bound for downstream ecosystems and demonstrates the potential of plankton communities to dynamically increase net uptake rates in response to episodic nutrient enrichment. Plain Language Summary Nutrients washed into lakes from human activities (e.g., fertilizer application and livestock waste) can trigger the excessive growth of algae and harm nearshore ecosystems. Areas where large rivers enter lakes, also known as rivermouths, can capture these nutrients coming from the landscape and make them less available to algae in nearshore ecosystems. Yet, nutrients washed into rivermouths from rain events are only present for a short period of time and we do not know how much of these brief nutrient inputs can be removed through biological processes. Our study compared biological nutrient uptake rates in Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) under background conditions to those that mimicked a rapid increase in nutrients from a rain event. We found that biological nutrient uptake immediately increased when nutrients were added to the water column and changed the balance of the different types of nutrients captured by the rivermouth. Our study shows the potential for biological processes to capture additional nutrients when delivered to rivermouths in an episodic manner and at the same time transport more organic carbon downstream as a by‐product of increased biological activity. Key Points Nutrient enrichment experiments were conducted to assess potential effects of climate‐induced storm events on rivermouth nutrient uptake Nutrient enrichment resulted in increased N and P uptake and dissolved organic carbon release in the water column Biological activity in light incubations had greater influence on water column nutrient dynamics than in dark incubations</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JG006374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural runoff ; Agricultural wastes ; Algae ; Animal wastes ; Biological activity ; Carbon ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Downstream ; Ecosystems ; Eutrophication ; Fertilizer application ; Fertilizers ; Incubation period ; Lakes ; Light ; Livestock ; Mineral nutrients ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen enrichment ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrient enrichment ; Nutrient loading ; Nutrient removal ; Nutrient uptake ; Nutrients ; Phosphorus ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Rain ; rivermouth ; Rivers ; Storms ; Surface water ; Temporal variations ; Tributaries ; Uptake ; Water circulation ; Water column</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3070-8beb92718d891acd91bb551cd3247e47314ec7e5bc20ea9cf25e85b5c3b092b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3070-8beb92718d891acd91bb551cd3247e47314ec7e5bc20ea9cf25e85b5c3b092b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6414-9758 ; 0000-0003-2307-948X ; 0000-0001-6600-5275 ; 0000-0002-1627-7210 ; 0000-0002-8267-1726</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JG006374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JG006374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,27926,27927,45576,45577,46411,46835</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Nolan J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</creatorcontrib><title>Episodic Nutrient Addition Affects Water Column Nutrient Processing Rates in River‐to‐Lake Transitional Zones</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Storm‐driven nutrient loading from tributaries can fuel eutrophication in nearshore and open water areas of lentic ecosystems. However, nutrient processing in river‐to‐lake transitional zones can substantially alter the amount and composition of nutrients transported to lakes from upstream surface waters. We measured the removal of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from the water column in the Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) to evaluate the response of rivermouth plankton to episodic nutrient enrichment. Light and dark water column incubations (8–12 hr) were conducted on four occasions from April through September to measure changes in dissolved nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and DOC concentrations in three locations along the Fox rivermouth. Two incubation experiments were conducted on consecutive days, (a) under ambient nutrient concentrations, and (b) under experimentally enriched N and P concentrations. Spatial and temporal variation was observed in nutrient uptake rates, but light incubations consistently had higher nutrient uptake rates than dark incubations. Nutrient enrichment increased total dissolved P and total dissolved N uptake and DOC release in light incubations, but only increased total dissolved P uptake in dark incubations. Moreover, nutrient uptake ratios (N:P) decreased from ambient to nutrient enriched conditions and indicated preferential P uptake by phytoplankton communities in light conditions. Our study substantiates that rivermouths can process nutrients bound for downstream ecosystems and demonstrates the potential of plankton communities to dynamically increase net uptake rates in response to episodic nutrient enrichment. Plain Language Summary Nutrients washed into lakes from human activities (e.g., fertilizer application and livestock waste) can trigger the excessive growth of algae and harm nearshore ecosystems. Areas where large rivers enter lakes, also known as rivermouths, can capture these nutrients coming from the landscape and make them less available to algae in nearshore ecosystems. Yet, nutrients washed into rivermouths from rain events are only present for a short period of time and we do not know how much of these brief nutrient inputs can be removed through biological processes. Our study compared biological nutrient uptake rates in Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) under background conditions to those that mimicked a rapid increase in nutrients from a rain event. We found that biological nutrient uptake immediately increased when nutrients were added to the water column and changed the balance of the different types of nutrients captured by the rivermouth. Our study shows the potential for biological processes to capture additional nutrients when delivered to rivermouths in an episodic manner and at the same time transport more organic carbon downstream as a by‐product of increased biological activity. Key Points Nutrient enrichment experiments were conducted to assess potential effects of climate‐induced storm events on rivermouth nutrient uptake Nutrient enrichment resulted in increased N and P uptake and dissolved organic carbon release in the water column Biological activity in light incubations had greater influence on water column nutrient dynamics than in dark incubations</description><subject>Agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fertilizer application</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Incubation period</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen enrichment</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrient enrichment</subject><subject>Nutrient loading</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Nutrient uptake</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>rivermouth</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1Kw0AQAOBFFCy1Nx9gwavR_ckm2WMptVqKSqkIXsLuZiJb02y7myi9-Qg-o09itKKenMPMMHwMwyB0TMkZJUyeM8LodEJIwtN4D_UYTWSUyYTu__SCH6JBCEvSRdaNKO2hzXhtgyuswddt4y3UDR4WhW2sq_GwLME0Ad-rBjweuapd1b_s1jsDIdj6Ec87ELCt8dw-g39_fWtcl2bqCfDCqzp8rVMVfnA1hCN0UKoqwOC79tHdxXgxuoxmN5Or0XAWGU5SEmUatGQpzYpMUmUKSbUWgpqCsziFOOU0BpOC0IYRUNKUTEAmtDBcE8k05X10stu79m7TQmjypWt9d0bIWUKITGTKSadOd8p4F4KHMl97u1J-m1OSf_41__vXjvMdf7EVbP-1-XQynzBGBOEfPx97yg</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Pearce, Nolan J. T.</creator><creator>Larson, James H.</creator><creator>Evans, Mary Anne</creator><creator>Frost, Paul C.</creator><creator>Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2307-948X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-5275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1627-7210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-1726</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Episodic Nutrient Addition Affects Water Column Nutrient Processing Rates in River‐to‐Lake Transitional Zones</title><author>Pearce, Nolan J. T. ; Larson, James H. ; Evans, Mary Anne ; Frost, Paul C. ; Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3070-8beb92718d891acd91bb551cd3247e47314ec7e5bc20ea9cf25e85b5c3b092b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fertilizer application</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Incubation period</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen enrichment</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrient enrichment</topic><topic>Nutrient loading</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Nutrient uptake</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>rivermouth</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Nolan J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearce, Nolan J. T.</au><au>Larson, James H.</au><au>Evans, Mary Anne</au><au>Frost, Paul C.</au><au>Xenopoulos, Marguerite A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Episodic Nutrient Addition Affects Water Column Nutrient Processing Rates in River‐to‐Lake Transitional Zones</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Storm‐driven nutrient loading from tributaries can fuel eutrophication in nearshore and open water areas of lentic ecosystems. However, nutrient processing in river‐to‐lake transitional zones can substantially alter the amount and composition of nutrients transported to lakes from upstream surface waters. We measured the removal of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from the water column in the Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) to evaluate the response of rivermouth plankton to episodic nutrient enrichment. Light and dark water column incubations (8–12 hr) were conducted on four occasions from April through September to measure changes in dissolved nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and DOC concentrations in three locations along the Fox rivermouth. Two incubation experiments were conducted on consecutive days, (a) under ambient nutrient concentrations, and (b) under experimentally enriched N and P concentrations. Spatial and temporal variation was observed in nutrient uptake rates, but light incubations consistently had higher nutrient uptake rates than dark incubations. Nutrient enrichment increased total dissolved P and total dissolved N uptake and DOC release in light incubations, but only increased total dissolved P uptake in dark incubations. Moreover, nutrient uptake ratios (N:P) decreased from ambient to nutrient enriched conditions and indicated preferential P uptake by phytoplankton communities in light conditions. Our study substantiates that rivermouths can process nutrients bound for downstream ecosystems and demonstrates the potential of plankton communities to dynamically increase net uptake rates in response to episodic nutrient enrichment. Plain Language Summary Nutrients washed into lakes from human activities (e.g., fertilizer application and livestock waste) can trigger the excessive growth of algae and harm nearshore ecosystems. Areas where large rivers enter lakes, also known as rivermouths, can capture these nutrients coming from the landscape and make them less available to algae in nearshore ecosystems. Yet, nutrients washed into rivermouths from rain events are only present for a short period of time and we do not know how much of these brief nutrient inputs can be removed through biological processes. Our study compared biological nutrient uptake rates in Fox rivermouth (Green Bay, Lake Michigan) under background conditions to those that mimicked a rapid increase in nutrients from a rain event. We found that biological nutrient uptake immediately increased when nutrients were added to the water column and changed the balance of the different types of nutrients captured by the rivermouth. Our study shows the potential for biological processes to capture additional nutrients when delivered to rivermouths in an episodic manner and at the same time transport more organic carbon downstream as a by‐product of increased biological activity. Key Points Nutrient enrichment experiments were conducted to assess potential effects of climate‐induced storm events on rivermouth nutrient uptake Nutrient enrichment resulted in increased N and P uptake and dissolved organic carbon release in the water column Biological activity in light incubations had greater influence on water column nutrient dynamics than in dark incubations</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JG006374</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2307-948X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-5275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1627-7210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-1726</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2600969730
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agricultural runoff
Agricultural wastes
Algae
Animal wastes
Biological activity
Carbon
Dissolved organic carbon
Downstream
Ecosystems
Eutrophication
Fertilizer application
Fertilizers
Incubation period
Lakes
Light
Livestock
Mineral nutrients
Nitrogen
Nitrogen enrichment
Nutrient concentrations
Nutrient enrichment
Nutrient loading
Nutrient removal
Nutrient uptake
Nutrients
Phosphorus
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Rain
rivermouth
Rivers
Storms
Surface water
Temporal variations
Tributaries
Uptake
Water circulation
Water column
title Episodic Nutrient Addition Affects Water Column Nutrient Processing Rates in River‐to‐Lake Transitional Zones
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Episodic%20Nutrient%20Addition%20Affects%20Water%20Column%20Nutrient%20Processing%20Rates%20in%20River%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90Lake%20Transitional%20Zones&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Pearce,%20Nolan%20J.%20T.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JG006374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2600969730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600969730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true