Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Credit Risk Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach

This paper examines the prediction accuracy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for firm credit risk. It marks the first attempt to leverage data on corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) to better predict credit risk in an ML context. Even though the literature on default and credit risk i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Credit and capital markets (Berlin) 2020, Vol.53 (4), p.513-554
Hauptverfasser: Fauser, Daniel V, Gruener, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 554
container_issue 4
container_start_page 513
container_title Credit and capital markets (Berlin)
container_volume 53
creator Fauser, Daniel V
Gruener, Andreas
description This paper examines the prediction accuracy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for firm credit risk. It marks the first attempt to leverage data on corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) to better predict credit risk in an ML context. Even though the literature on default and credit risk is vast, the potential explanatory power of CSI for firm credit risk prediction remains unexplored. Previous research has shown that CSI may jeopardize firm survival and thus potentially comes into play in predicting credit risk. We find that prediction accuracy varies considerably between algorithms, with advanced machine learning algorithms (e.?g. random forests) outperforming traditional ones (e.?g. linear regression). Random forest regression achieves an out-of-sample prediction accuracy of 89.75% for adjusted R2 due to the ability of capturing non-linearity and complex interaction effects in the data. We further show that including information on CSI in firm credit risk prediction does not consistently increase prediction accuracy. One possible interpretation of this result is that CSI does not (yet) seem to be systematically reflected in credit ratings, despite prior literature indicating that CSI increases credit risk. Our study contributes to improving firm credit risk predictions using a machine learning design and to exploring how CSI is reflected in credit risk ratings.
doi_str_mv 10.3790/ccm.53.4.513
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2600625061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2600625061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-c541fcf92e4af8f0ff84ecee75a8cda4123b5997fe699a56ebd519f833476b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWGpvXoWAV3fNxya78VYWPwoVRXvxFLLZRFPbZE22h_57U-rB0wwvDzMvA8AlRiWtBbrVelsyWlYlw_QETAgWosCEstN__hzMUlojhDBrOBPNBHy0IQ4hqtHA96Cd2sBFjCYNwSfXuY0b91D5HrbR9G6Eby59w9eD16ML_g7O4bPSX84buDQqeuc_4XwYYsjHC3Bm1SaZ2Z9OwerhftU-FcuXx0U7XxaacDYWmlXYaiuIqZRtLLK2qYw2pmaq0b2q8tsdE6K2hguhGDddz7CwDaVVzTtCp-D6GJtbf3YmjXIddtHnRkk4QpwwxHGmbo6UjiGlaKwcotuquJcYycN8Ms8nGZWVzPNl_OqIGx28S_IgaQxREkEFwvQXDGhtMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600625061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Credit Risk Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fauser, Daniel V ; Gruener, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Fauser, Daniel V ; Gruener, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the prediction accuracy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for firm credit risk. It marks the first attempt to leverage data on corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) to better predict credit risk in an ML context. Even though the literature on default and credit risk is vast, the potential explanatory power of CSI for firm credit risk prediction remains unexplored. Previous research has shown that CSI may jeopardize firm survival and thus potentially comes into play in predicting credit risk. We find that prediction accuracy varies considerably between algorithms, with advanced machine learning algorithms (e.?g. random forests) outperforming traditional ones (e.?g. linear regression). Random forest regression achieves an out-of-sample prediction accuracy of 89.75% for adjusted R2 due to the ability of capturing non-linearity and complex interaction effects in the data. We further show that including information on CSI in firm credit risk prediction does not consistently increase prediction accuracy. One possible interpretation of this result is that CSI does not (yet) seem to be systematically reflected in credit ratings, despite prior literature indicating that CSI increases credit risk. Our study contributes to improving firm credit risk predictions using a machine learning design and to exploring how CSI is reflected in credit risk ratings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-1235</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2199-1227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-1235</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3790/ccm.53.4.513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Duncker &amp; Humblot</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Classification ; Cognitive style ; Corporate Social Irresponsibility ; Credit ratings ; Credit Risk ; ESG ; Forests ; Machine Learning ; Random Forests ; Regression</subject><ispartof>Credit and capital markets (Berlin), 2020, Vol.53 (4), p.513-554</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020, Duncker &amp; Humblot GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-c541fcf92e4af8f0ff84ecee75a8cda4123b5997fe699a56ebd519f833476b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-c541fcf92e4af8f0ff84ecee75a8cda4123b5997fe699a56ebd519f833476b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fauser, Daniel V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruener, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Credit Risk Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach</title><title>Credit and capital markets (Berlin)</title><description>This paper examines the prediction accuracy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for firm credit risk. It marks the first attempt to leverage data on corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) to better predict credit risk in an ML context. Even though the literature on default and credit risk is vast, the potential explanatory power of CSI for firm credit risk prediction remains unexplored. Previous research has shown that CSI may jeopardize firm survival and thus potentially comes into play in predicting credit risk. We find that prediction accuracy varies considerably between algorithms, with advanced machine learning algorithms (e.?g. random forests) outperforming traditional ones (e.?g. linear regression). Random forest regression achieves an out-of-sample prediction accuracy of 89.75% for adjusted R2 due to the ability of capturing non-linearity and complex interaction effects in the data. We further show that including information on CSI in firm credit risk prediction does not consistently increase prediction accuracy. One possible interpretation of this result is that CSI does not (yet) seem to be systematically reflected in credit ratings, despite prior literature indicating that CSI increases credit risk. Our study contributes to improving firm credit risk predictions using a machine learning design and to exploring how CSI is reflected in credit risk ratings.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Corporate Social Irresponsibility</subject><subject>Credit ratings</subject><subject>Credit Risk</subject><subject>ESG</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Random Forests</subject><subject>Regression</subject><issn>2199-1235</issn><issn>2199-1227</issn><issn>2199-1235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWGpvXoWAV3fNxya78VYWPwoVRXvxFLLZRFPbZE22h_57U-rB0wwvDzMvA8AlRiWtBbrVelsyWlYlw_QETAgWosCEstN__hzMUlojhDBrOBPNBHy0IQ4hqtHA96Cd2sBFjCYNwSfXuY0b91D5HrbR9G6Eby59w9eD16ML_g7O4bPSX84buDQqeuc_4XwYYsjHC3Bm1SaZ2Z9OwerhftU-FcuXx0U7XxaacDYWmlXYaiuIqZRtLLK2qYw2pmaq0b2q8tsdE6K2hguhGDddz7CwDaVVzTtCp-D6GJtbf3YmjXIddtHnRkk4QpwwxHGmbo6UjiGlaKwcotuquJcYycN8Ms8nGZWVzPNl_OqIGx28S_IgaQxREkEFwvQXDGhtMw</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Fauser, Daniel V</creator><creator>Gruener, Andreas</creator><general>Duncker &amp; Humblot</general><general>Duncker &amp; Humblot Gmbh</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Credit Risk Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach</title><author>Fauser, Daniel V ; Gruener, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-c541fcf92e4af8f0ff84ecee75a8cda4123b5997fe699a56ebd519f833476b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Corporate Social Irresponsibility</topic><topic>Credit ratings</topic><topic>Credit Risk</topic><topic>ESG</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Random Forests</topic><topic>Regression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fauser, Daniel V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruener, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Credit and capital markets (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fauser, Daniel V</au><au>Gruener, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Credit Risk Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach</atitle><jtitle>Credit and capital markets (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>513-554</pages><issn>2199-1235</issn><issn>2199-1227</issn><eissn>2199-1235</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the prediction accuracy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for firm credit risk. It marks the first attempt to leverage data on corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) to better predict credit risk in an ML context. Even though the literature on default and credit risk is vast, the potential explanatory power of CSI for firm credit risk prediction remains unexplored. Previous research has shown that CSI may jeopardize firm survival and thus potentially comes into play in predicting credit risk. We find that prediction accuracy varies considerably between algorithms, with advanced machine learning algorithms (e.?g. random forests) outperforming traditional ones (e.?g. linear regression). Random forest regression achieves an out-of-sample prediction accuracy of 89.75% for adjusted R2 due to the ability of capturing non-linearity and complex interaction effects in the data. We further show that including information on CSI in firm credit risk prediction does not consistently increase prediction accuracy. One possible interpretation of this result is that CSI does not (yet) seem to be systematically reflected in credit ratings, despite prior literature indicating that CSI increases credit risk. Our study contributes to improving firm credit risk predictions using a machine learning design and to exploring how CSI is reflected in credit risk ratings.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Duncker &amp; Humblot</pub><doi>10.3790/ccm.53.4.513</doi><tpages>42</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-1235
ispartof Credit and capital markets (Berlin), 2020, Vol.53 (4), p.513-554
issn 2199-1235
2199-1227
2199-1235
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2600625061
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Classification
Cognitive style
Corporate Social Irresponsibility
Credit ratings
Credit Risk
ESG
Forests
Machine Learning
Random Forests
Regression
title Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Credit Risk Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A35%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corporate%20Social%20Irresponsibility%20and%20Credit%20Risk%20Prediction:%20A%20Machine%20Learning%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Credit%20and%20capital%20markets%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Fauser,%20Daniel%20V&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=513-554&rft.issn=2199-1235&rft.eissn=2199-1235&rft_id=info:doi/10.3790/ccm.53.4.513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2600625061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600625061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true