Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe

The management of material stock is central for reducing emissions and for optimizing natural resource use. Construction materials are particularly the key because of their role in emission, resource use, and waste management concerns. However, the role of governance and spatial planning in the mana...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2021-10, Vol.109, p.105682, Article 105682
1. Verfasser: Dombi, Mihály
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105682
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 109
creator Dombi, Mihály
description The management of material stock is central for reducing emissions and for optimizing natural resource use. Construction materials are particularly the key because of their role in emission, resource use, and waste management concerns. However, the role of governance and spatial planning in the management of construction minerals is unclear. Based on a panel dataset of 35 European countries for 1995–2017, this study assesses the effect of governance and spatial planning factors, as well as of core socio-economic indicators (namely, GDP per capita, urbanization, and economic structure) at the national level According to the results, the types of spatial governance and planning systems significantly shape the effects on construction material use. Such effects range from − 67–215% relative to the most widespread system, i.e., the conformative system. Economic structure and urbanization have a positive feedback effect on the accumulation process at any level of development. In addition, the ability to resist excess material accumulation encoded by urbanization and economic transition is determined by spatial governance and planning systems. Additionally, a specific planning culture employing a moderate amount of construction material compared to other spatial governance and planning systems, i.e., the neo-performative system, is identified as a promising means to reduce significantly resource demand both in market- and state-led planning contexts. •Neo-performative spatial planning accompanies reduced use of construction material.•Economic growth, share of services, and urbanization reinforce stock accumulation.•The effect of the accumulation process’ drivers vary among spatial planning systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105682
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2600349263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837721004051</els_id><sourcerecordid>2600349263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-34d5f62e72439416d24c1a4f66e949209cc3bfd98a06793218c0f5ee3a6bb44b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMoOI7-h4Drjvlq2robxS8Q3Og6ZNIXydBpal472H9vhhFcugpJ7j28dwihnK044_pmu-ps304IQ-xWggmen0tdixOy4HUli7Iq1SlZMKFVUcuqOicXiFvGmG64WJDwPg-ANHo6ZE4f-k-KM46wQ5qxFLwHN-b_nrrY45gmN4Z82dkRUrAd3cdu2gHe0nVP4fvAsGNMcy7bbsaANPT0YUpxgEty5m2HcPV7LsnH48P7_XPx-vb0cr9-LZxs9FhI1ZZeC6iEko3iuhXKcau81tCoRrDGObnxbVNbpqtGCl475ksAafVmo9RGLsn1kTuk-DUBjmYbp5THQSM0YzJDtMyp-phyKSIm8GZIYWfTbDgzB7Fma_7EmoNYcxSbq3fHKuQt9gGSQRegd9CGlGWZNob_IT9M7Yg9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600349263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Dombi, Mihály</creator><creatorcontrib>Dombi, Mihály</creatorcontrib><description>The management of material stock is central for reducing emissions and for optimizing natural resource use. Construction materials are particularly the key because of their role in emission, resource use, and waste management concerns. However, the role of governance and spatial planning in the management of construction minerals is unclear. Based on a panel dataset of 35 European countries for 1995–2017, this study assesses the effect of governance and spatial planning factors, as well as of core socio-economic indicators (namely, GDP per capita, urbanization, and economic structure) at the national level According to the results, the types of spatial governance and planning systems significantly shape the effects on construction material use. Such effects range from − 67–215% relative to the most widespread system, i.e., the conformative system. Economic structure and urbanization have a positive feedback effect on the accumulation process at any level of development. In addition, the ability to resist excess material accumulation encoded by urbanization and economic transition is determined by spatial governance and planning systems. Additionally, a specific planning culture employing a moderate amount of construction material compared to other spatial governance and planning systems, i.e., the neo-performative system, is identified as a promising means to reduce significantly resource demand both in market- and state-led planning contexts. •Neo-performative spatial planning accompanies reduced use of construction material.•Economic growth, share of services, and urbanization reinforce stock accumulation.•The effect of the accumulation process’ drivers vary among spatial planning systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Construction ; Construction management ; Construction materials ; Construction minerals ; Economic indicators ; Economic structure ; Economics ; Emissions control ; Governance ; Land use ; Material stock accumulation ; Minerals ; Natural resources ; Planning ; Positive feedback ; Shape effects ; Socioeconomic factors ; Spatial planning ; Systems ; Urbanization ; Waste management</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2021-10, Vol.109, p.105682, Article 105682</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-34d5f62e72439416d24c1a4f66e949209cc3bfd98a06793218c0f5ee3a6bb44b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-34d5f62e72439416d24c1a4f66e949209cc3bfd98a06793218c0f5ee3a6bb44b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3386-0889</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105682$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dombi, Mihály</creatorcontrib><title>Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>The management of material stock is central for reducing emissions and for optimizing natural resource use. Construction materials are particularly the key because of their role in emission, resource use, and waste management concerns. However, the role of governance and spatial planning in the management of construction minerals is unclear. Based on a panel dataset of 35 European countries for 1995–2017, this study assesses the effect of governance and spatial planning factors, as well as of core socio-economic indicators (namely, GDP per capita, urbanization, and economic structure) at the national level According to the results, the types of spatial governance and planning systems significantly shape the effects on construction material use. Such effects range from − 67–215% relative to the most widespread system, i.e., the conformative system. Economic structure and urbanization have a positive feedback effect on the accumulation process at any level of development. In addition, the ability to resist excess material accumulation encoded by urbanization and economic transition is determined by spatial governance and planning systems. Additionally, a specific planning culture employing a moderate amount of construction material compared to other spatial governance and planning systems, i.e., the neo-performative system, is identified as a promising means to reduce significantly resource demand both in market- and state-led planning contexts. •Neo-performative spatial planning accompanies reduced use of construction material.•Economic growth, share of services, and urbanization reinforce stock accumulation.•The effect of the accumulation process’ drivers vary among spatial planning systems.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction management</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Construction minerals</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Economic structure</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Material stock accumulation</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Positive feedback</subject><subject>Shape effects</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Spatial planning</subject><subject>Systems</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMoOI7-h4Drjvlq2robxS8Q3Og6ZNIXydBpal472H9vhhFcugpJ7j28dwihnK044_pmu-ps304IQ-xWggmen0tdixOy4HUli7Iq1SlZMKFVUcuqOicXiFvGmG64WJDwPg-ANHo6ZE4f-k-KM46wQ5qxFLwHN-b_nrrY45gmN4Z82dkRUrAd3cdu2gHe0nVP4fvAsGNMcy7bbsaANPT0YUpxgEty5m2HcPV7LsnH48P7_XPx-vb0cr9-LZxs9FhI1ZZeC6iEko3iuhXKcau81tCoRrDGObnxbVNbpqtGCl475ksAafVmo9RGLsn1kTuk-DUBjmYbp5THQSM0YzJDtMyp-phyKSIm8GZIYWfTbDgzB7Fma_7EmoNYcxSbq3fHKuQt9gGSQRegd9CGlGWZNob_IT9M7Yg9</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Dombi, Mihály</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-0889</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe</title><author>Dombi, Mihály</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-34d5f62e72439416d24c1a4f66e949209cc3bfd98a06793218c0f5ee3a6bb44b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction management</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Construction minerals</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Economic structure</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Material stock accumulation</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Positive feedback</topic><topic>Shape effects</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Spatial planning</topic><topic>Systems</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dombi, Mihály</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dombi, Mihály</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>109</volume><spage>105682</spage><pages>105682-</pages><artnum>105682</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>The management of material stock is central for reducing emissions and for optimizing natural resource use. Construction materials are particularly the key because of their role in emission, resource use, and waste management concerns. However, the role of governance and spatial planning in the management of construction minerals is unclear. Based on a panel dataset of 35 European countries for 1995–2017, this study assesses the effect of governance and spatial planning factors, as well as of core socio-economic indicators (namely, GDP per capita, urbanization, and economic structure) at the national level According to the results, the types of spatial governance and planning systems significantly shape the effects on construction material use. Such effects range from − 67–215% relative to the most widespread system, i.e., the conformative system. Economic structure and urbanization have a positive feedback effect on the accumulation process at any level of development. In addition, the ability to resist excess material accumulation encoded by urbanization and economic transition is determined by spatial governance and planning systems. Additionally, a specific planning culture employing a moderate amount of construction material compared to other spatial governance and planning systems, i.e., the neo-performative system, is identified as a promising means to reduce significantly resource demand both in market- and state-led planning contexts. •Neo-performative spatial planning accompanies reduced use of construction material.•Economic growth, share of services, and urbanization reinforce stock accumulation.•The effect of the accumulation process’ drivers vary among spatial planning systems.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105682</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-0889</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2021-10, Vol.109, p.105682, Article 105682
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2600349263
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Accumulation
Construction
Construction management
Construction materials
Construction minerals
Economic indicators
Economic structure
Economics
Emissions control
Governance
Land use
Material stock accumulation
Minerals
Natural resources
Planning
Positive feedback
Shape effects
Socioeconomic factors
Spatial planning
Systems
Urbanization
Waste management
title Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A33%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Types%20of%20planning%20systems%20and%20effects%20on%20construction%20material%20volumes:%20An%20explanatory%20analysis%20in%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Dombi,%20Mih%C3%A1ly&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=109&rft.spage=105682&rft.pages=105682-&rft.artnum=105682&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2600349263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600349263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837721004051&rfr_iscdi=true