Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models
•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset. Prognostics...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reliability engineering & system safety 2021-12, Vol.216, p.108048, Article 108048 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108048 |
container_title | Reliability engineering & system safety |
container_volume | 216 |
creator | Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan Lee, Hyunjun Jung, DaWoon Brigljevic, Boris Choi, Yunseok Lim, Hankwon |
description | •Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset.
Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2599940517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0951832021005524</els_id><sourcerecordid>2599940517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA89Yk3ewm4kWKfwoFL3oOs8lsSWmzNUkL-unNUs-eBt7MezPzI-SWsxlnvLnfzCKmNBNM8CIoVqszMuGq1RVT8-acTJiWvFJzwS7JVUobxlitZTshaQF7sD5_U0zZ7yD7IdChpx3kjNFjeqDL0G8PGCyOeo7ggw9r6iBDwkyT_0EKwVHnjxjTmFQSxi51sUiB7uOwDkNJt3Q3ONyma3LRwzbhzV-dks-X54_FW7V6f10unlaVFVLlqlM9lwp43wnoLHZzRMWFbWXLpVa9Fo0GsFKCUI2z6ABE3TY1WtG5joObT8ndKbdc8HUo_5nNcIihrDRCaq1rJnlbpsRpysYhpYi92ccCIn4bzswI12zMCNeMcM0JbjE9nkzlHTx6jCZZPzJyPqLNxg3-P_sviOSGAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599940517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan ; Lee, Hyunjun ; Jung, DaWoon ; Brigljevic, Boris ; Choi, Yunseok ; Lim, Hankwon</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan ; Lee, Hyunjun ; Jung, DaWoon ; Brigljevic, Boris ; Choi, Yunseok ; Lim, Hankwon</creatorcontrib><description>•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset.
Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Batteries ; Datasets ; Gaussian process ; Gaussian process regression ; Lithium ; Lithium-ion batteries ; Lithium-ion battery ; Model accuracy ; Neural networks ; Predictions ; Product safety ; Rechargeable batteries ; Reliability engineering ; Remaining useful life ; State estimation ; Statistical analysis ; Training</subject><ispartof>Reliability engineering & system safety, 2021-12, Vol.216, p.108048, Article 108048</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyunjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, DaWoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigljevic, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hankwon</creatorcontrib><title>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</title><title>Reliability engineering & system safety</title><description>•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset.
Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Gaussian process regression</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Lithium-ion batteries</subject><subject>Lithium-ion battery</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Product safety</subject><subject>Rechargeable batteries</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Remaining useful life</subject><subject>State estimation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0951-8320</issn><issn>1879-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA89Yk3ewm4kWKfwoFL3oOs8lsSWmzNUkL-unNUs-eBt7MezPzI-SWsxlnvLnfzCKmNBNM8CIoVqszMuGq1RVT8-acTJiWvFJzwS7JVUobxlitZTshaQF7sD5_U0zZ7yD7IdChpx3kjNFjeqDL0G8PGCyOeo7ggw9r6iBDwkyT_0EKwVHnjxjTmFQSxi51sUiB7uOwDkNJt3Q3ONyma3LRwzbhzV-dks-X54_FW7V6f10unlaVFVLlqlM9lwp43wnoLHZzRMWFbWXLpVa9Fo0GsFKCUI2z6ABE3TY1WtG5joObT8ndKbdc8HUo_5nNcIihrDRCaq1rJnlbpsRpysYhpYi92ccCIn4bzswI12zMCNeMcM0JbjE9nkzlHTx6jCZZPzJyPqLNxg3-P_sviOSGAQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</creator><creator>Lee, Hyunjun</creator><creator>Jung, DaWoon</creator><creator>Brigljevic, Boris</creator><creator>Choi, Yunseok</creator><creator>Lim, Hankwon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</title><author>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan ; Lee, Hyunjun ; Jung, DaWoon ; Brigljevic, Boris ; Choi, Yunseok ; Lim, Hankwon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Gaussian process regression</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Lithium-ion batteries</topic><topic>Lithium-ion battery</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Product safety</topic><topic>Rechargeable batteries</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Remaining useful life</topic><topic>State estimation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyunjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, DaWoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigljevic, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hankwon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Reliability engineering & system safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</au><au>Lee, Hyunjun</au><au>Jung, DaWoon</au><au>Brigljevic, Boris</au><au>Choi, Yunseok</au><au>Lim, Hankwon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</atitle><jtitle>Reliability engineering & system safety</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>216</volume><spage>108048</spage><pages>108048-</pages><artnum>108048</artnum><issn>0951-8320</issn><eissn>1879-0836</eissn><abstract>•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset.
Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048.
[Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-8320 |
ispartof | Reliability engineering & system safety, 2021-12, Vol.216, p.108048, Article 108048 |
issn | 0951-8320 1879-0836 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2599940517 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Batteries Datasets Gaussian process Gaussian process regression Lithium Lithium-ion batteries Lithium-ion battery Model accuracy Neural networks Predictions Product safety Rechargeable batteries Reliability engineering Remaining useful life State estimation Statistical analysis Training |
title | Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capacity%20estimation%20of%20batteries:%20Influence%20of%20training%20dataset%20size%20and%20diversity%20on%20data%20driven%20prognostic%20models&rft.jtitle=Reliability%20engineering%20&%20system%20safety&rft.au=Nagulapati,%20Vijay%20Mohan&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=216&rft.spage=108048&rft.pages=108048-&rft.artnum=108048&rft.issn=0951-8320&rft.eissn=1879-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2599940517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599940517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0951832021005524&rfr_iscdi=true |