Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models

•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset. Prognostics...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reliability engineering & system safety 2021-12, Vol.216, p.108048, Article 108048
Hauptverfasser: Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan, Lee, Hyunjun, Jung, DaWoon, Brigljevic, Boris, Choi, Yunseok, Lim, Hankwon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108048
container_title Reliability engineering & system safety
container_volume 216
creator Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan
Lee, Hyunjun
Jung, DaWoon
Brigljevic, Boris
Choi, Yunseok
Lim, Hankwon
description •Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset. Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2599940517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0951832021005524</els_id><sourcerecordid>2599940517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA89Yk3ewm4kWKfwoFL3oOs8lsSWmzNUkL-unNUs-eBt7MezPzI-SWsxlnvLnfzCKmNBNM8CIoVqszMuGq1RVT8-acTJiWvFJzwS7JVUobxlitZTshaQF7sD5_U0zZ7yD7IdChpx3kjNFjeqDL0G8PGCyOeo7ggw9r6iBDwkyT_0EKwVHnjxjTmFQSxi51sUiB7uOwDkNJt3Q3ONyma3LRwzbhzV-dks-X54_FW7V6f10unlaVFVLlqlM9lwp43wnoLHZzRMWFbWXLpVa9Fo0GsFKCUI2z6ABE3TY1WtG5joObT8ndKbdc8HUo_5nNcIihrDRCaq1rJnlbpsRpysYhpYi92ccCIn4bzswI12zMCNeMcM0JbjE9nkzlHTx6jCZZPzJyPqLNxg3-P_sviOSGAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599940517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan ; Lee, Hyunjun ; Jung, DaWoon ; Brigljevic, Boris ; Choi, Yunseok ; Lim, Hankwon</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan ; Lee, Hyunjun ; Jung, DaWoon ; Brigljevic, Boris ; Choi, Yunseok ; Lim, Hankwon</creatorcontrib><description>•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset. Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Batteries ; Datasets ; Gaussian process ; Gaussian process regression ; Lithium ; Lithium-ion batteries ; Lithium-ion battery ; Model accuracy ; Neural networks ; Predictions ; Product safety ; Rechargeable batteries ; Reliability engineering ; Remaining useful life ; State estimation ; Statistical analysis ; Training</subject><ispartof>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety, 2021-12, Vol.216, p.108048, Article 108048</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyunjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, DaWoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigljevic, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hankwon</creatorcontrib><title>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</title><title>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</title><description>•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset. Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Gaussian process regression</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Lithium-ion batteries</subject><subject>Lithium-ion battery</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Product safety</subject><subject>Rechargeable batteries</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Remaining useful life</subject><subject>State estimation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0951-8320</issn><issn>1879-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA89Yk3ewm4kWKfwoFL3oOs8lsSWmzNUkL-unNUs-eBt7MezPzI-SWsxlnvLnfzCKmNBNM8CIoVqszMuGq1RVT8-acTJiWvFJzwS7JVUobxlitZTshaQF7sD5_U0zZ7yD7IdChpx3kjNFjeqDL0G8PGCyOeo7ggw9r6iBDwkyT_0EKwVHnjxjTmFQSxi51sUiB7uOwDkNJt3Q3ONyma3LRwzbhzV-dks-X54_FW7V6f10unlaVFVLlqlM9lwp43wnoLHZzRMWFbWXLpVa9Fo0GsFKCUI2z6ABE3TY1WtG5joObT8ndKbdc8HUo_5nNcIihrDRCaq1rJnlbpsRpysYhpYi92ccCIn4bzswI12zMCNeMcM0JbjE9nkzlHTx6jCZZPzJyPqLNxg3-P_sviOSGAQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</creator><creator>Lee, Hyunjun</creator><creator>Jung, DaWoon</creator><creator>Brigljevic, Boris</creator><creator>Choi, Yunseok</creator><creator>Lim, Hankwon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</title><author>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan ; Lee, Hyunjun ; Jung, DaWoon ; Brigljevic, Boris ; Choi, Yunseok ; Lim, Hankwon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-b8f158a1fb2abceb3ee812c7571598f9269aac55a286dcedaa24764ec2bdb1ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Gaussian process regression</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Lithium-ion batteries</topic><topic>Lithium-ion battery</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Product safety</topic><topic>Rechargeable batteries</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Remaining useful life</topic><topic>State estimation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyunjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, DaWoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigljevic, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hankwon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan</au><au>Lee, Hyunjun</au><au>Jung, DaWoon</au><au>Brigljevic, Boris</au><au>Choi, Yunseok</au><au>Lim, Hankwon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models</atitle><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>216</volume><spage>108048</spage><pages>108048-</pages><artnum>108048</artnum><issn>0951-8320</issn><eissn>1879-0836</eissn><abstract>•Comprehensive study of the effect of dataset size on prediction accuracy.•Effect of data diversity on prediction accuracy was studied.•A multi variable, combined multi battery dataset approach is proposed.•GPR and ANN models are compared with the proposed combined multi battery dataset. Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-8320
ispartof Reliability engineering & system safety, 2021-12, Vol.216, p.108048, Article 108048
issn 0951-8320
1879-0836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2599940517
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Artificial neural networks
Batteries
Datasets
Gaussian process
Gaussian process regression
Lithium
Lithium-ion batteries
Lithium-ion battery
Model accuracy
Neural networks
Predictions
Product safety
Rechargeable batteries
Reliability engineering
Remaining useful life
State estimation
Statistical analysis
Training
title Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capacity%20estimation%20of%20batteries:%20Influence%20of%20training%20dataset%20size%20and%20diversity%20on%20data%20driven%20prognostic%20models&rft.jtitle=Reliability%20engineering%20&%20system%20safety&rft.au=Nagulapati,%20Vijay%20Mohan&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=216&rft.spage=108048&rft.pages=108048-&rft.artnum=108048&rft.issn=0951-8320&rft.eissn=1879-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2599940517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599940517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0951832021005524&rfr_iscdi=true