Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens
In an application of the personality dynamics framework, we advance understanding on the relationship between baseline leader humility and team psychological safety by exploring the roles of humility variability and attractor strength. Specifically, we examine how the (in)consistency (i.e., variabil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2021-12, Vol.174 (3), p.669-686 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 686 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 669 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 174 |
creator | Rego, Arménio Melo, Ana I. Bluhm, Dustin J. Pina e Cunha, Miguel Reis, Dálcio |
description | In an application of the personality dynamics framework, we advance understanding on the relationship between baseline leader humility and team psychological safety by exploring the roles of humility variability and attractor strength. Specifically, we examine how the (in)consistency (i.e., variability) of leader-expressed humility across team members operates as a boundary condition in the relationship between leader-expressed humility and team psychological safety. We also explore how the agreement between leader self-reported humility and leader-expressed humility (i.e., self-other agreement, SOA) operates as an attractor to predict such a consistency. We test the hypothesized model through a sample of 85 teams, rated by 354 team members. The findings suggest that consistency reinforces, while inconsistency weakens, the effect of leader-expressed humility on team psychological safety. The findings also reveal that SOA relates to the consistency of leader-expressed humility, depending on the level at which the (dis)agreement occurs. We conclude that to better understand the outcomes of humble leadership, it is necessary to take into account not only the baseline of humility expressed by the leader (as most studies do), but also his/her humility variability and the strength of the attractor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2599276787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45406486</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45406486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-f78fa80bd541f33563c7dff15e9e1c553ce0b8fae85d4f1e1ddea7a09e0e0edd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AUFo0GvcSuer29uyru7CgAOuJw8hm1TGDDPdY6pH7H9vdlvcm6lDDnmeqvAWY68FvBcA9pwEaC04tMBBmbbl4glbCW0lB9Pbp2wFwliutFLP2QuiHdSjhVqx72v0EQu_-n0sSISxuT4d8j5Pc7MpGHOY8rBtbtEfmg3N4ce4H7c5-H3z1Sec5g_NRbPBQuPgH5yP8-APOVCzxoFesmfJ7wlf_b3P2LdPV7eX13z95fPN5cWaB2Vg4sl2yXdwF7USSUptZLAxJaGxRxG0lgHhriLY6aiSQBEjeuuhR6gVozxjb5e-xzL-PCFNbjeeSv0RuVb3fWuN7Wyl2oUKZSQqmNyx5IMvsxPg7kN0S4iuhugeQnSiSs0iYRiHTI-K7VoBqhWmInJBqD4OWyyP0__b-N1ileD90RX8lWny94qCaiknhZKqYm8WbEfTWP6Nr4sEozoj_wAA0JUy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599276787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens</title><source>Education Source</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Rego, Arménio ; Melo, Ana I. ; Bluhm, Dustin J. ; Pina e Cunha, Miguel ; Reis, Dálcio</creator><creatorcontrib>Rego, Arménio ; Melo, Ana I. ; Bluhm, Dustin J. ; Pina e Cunha, Miguel ; Reis, Dálcio</creatorcontrib><description>In an application of the personality dynamics framework, we advance understanding on the relationship between baseline leader humility and team psychological safety by exploring the roles of humility variability and attractor strength. Specifically, we examine how the (in)consistency (i.e., variability) of leader-expressed humility across team members operates as a boundary condition in the relationship between leader-expressed humility and team psychological safety. We also explore how the agreement between leader self-reported humility and leader-expressed humility (i.e., self-other agreement, SOA) operates as an attractor to predict such a consistency. We test the hypothesized model through a sample of 85 teams, rated by 354 team members. The findings suggest that consistency reinforces, while inconsistency weakens, the effect of leader-expressed humility on team psychological safety. The findings also reveal that SOA relates to the consistency of leader-expressed humility, depending on the level at which the (dis)agreement occurs. We conclude that to better understand the outcomes of humble leadership, it is necessary to take into account not only the baseline of humility expressed by the leader (as most studies do), but also his/her humility variability and the strength of the attractor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Attractor ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Education ; Ethics ; Humility in leaders ; Inconsistency ; Influence ; Leadership ; Management ; Original Paper ; Personality ; Personality dynamics ; Philosophy ; Psychological safety ; Quality of Life Research ; Safety ; Self awareness ; Self-Other comparison ; Team psychological safety ; Teams ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2021-12, Vol.174 (3), p.669-686</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-f78fa80bd541f33563c7dff15e9e1c553ce0b8fae85d4f1e1ddea7a09e0e0edd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-f78fa80bd541f33563c7dff15e9e1c553ce0b8fae85d4f1e1ddea7a09e0e0edd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9655-4523 ; 0000-0003-3518-8034 ; 0000-0003-0883-0511 ; 0000-0002-8856-6177 ; 0000-0001-6724-2440</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rego, Arménio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Dustin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pina e Cunha, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Dálcio</creatorcontrib><title>Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>In an application of the personality dynamics framework, we advance understanding on the relationship between baseline leader humility and team psychological safety by exploring the roles of humility variability and attractor strength. Specifically, we examine how the (in)consistency (i.e., variability) of leader-expressed humility across team members operates as a boundary condition in the relationship between leader-expressed humility and team psychological safety. We also explore how the agreement between leader self-reported humility and leader-expressed humility (i.e., self-other agreement, SOA) operates as an attractor to predict such a consistency. We test the hypothesized model through a sample of 85 teams, rated by 354 team members. The findings suggest that consistency reinforces, while inconsistency weakens, the effect of leader-expressed humility on team psychological safety. The findings also reveal that SOA relates to the consistency of leader-expressed humility, depending on the level at which the (dis)agreement occurs. We conclude that to better understand the outcomes of humble leadership, it is necessary to take into account not only the baseline of humility expressed by the leader (as most studies do), but also his/her humility variability and the strength of the attractor.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Attractor</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Humility in leaders</subject><subject>Inconsistency</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality dynamics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychological safety</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Self awareness</subject><subject>Self-Other comparison</subject><subject>Team psychological safety</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AUFo0GvcSuer29uyru7CgAOuJw8hm1TGDDPdY6pH7H9vdlvcm6lDDnmeqvAWY68FvBcA9pwEaC04tMBBmbbl4glbCW0lB9Pbp2wFwliutFLP2QuiHdSjhVqx72v0EQu_-n0sSISxuT4d8j5Pc7MpGHOY8rBtbtEfmg3N4ce4H7c5-H3z1Sec5g_NRbPBQuPgH5yP8-APOVCzxoFesmfJ7wlf_b3P2LdPV7eX13z95fPN5cWaB2Vg4sl2yXdwF7USSUptZLAxJaGxRxG0lgHhriLY6aiSQBEjeuuhR6gVozxjb5e-xzL-PCFNbjeeSv0RuVb3fWuN7Wyl2oUKZSQqmNyx5IMvsxPg7kN0S4iuhugeQnSiSs0iYRiHTI-K7VoBqhWmInJBqD4OWyyP0__b-N1ileD90RX8lWny94qCaiknhZKqYm8WbEfTWP6Nr4sEozoj_wAA0JUy</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Rego, Arménio</creator><creator>Melo, Ana I.</creator><creator>Bluhm, Dustin J.</creator><creator>Pina e Cunha, Miguel</creator><creator>Reis, Dálcio</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-4523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3518-8034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-0511</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-6177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-2440</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens</title><author>Rego, Arménio ; Melo, Ana I. ; Bluhm, Dustin J. ; Pina e Cunha, Miguel ; Reis, Dálcio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-f78fa80bd541f33563c7dff15e9e1c553ce0b8fae85d4f1e1ddea7a09e0e0edd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Attractor</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Humility in leaders</topic><topic>Inconsistency</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality dynamics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychological safety</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Self awareness</topic><topic>Self-Other comparison</topic><topic>Team psychological safety</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rego, Arménio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Dustin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pina e Cunha, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Dálcio</creatorcontrib><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rego, Arménio</au><au>Melo, Ana I.</au><au>Bluhm, Dustin J.</au><au>Pina e Cunha, Miguel</au><au>Reis, Dálcio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>669</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>669-686</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>In an application of the personality dynamics framework, we advance understanding on the relationship between baseline leader humility and team psychological safety by exploring the roles of humility variability and attractor strength. Specifically, we examine how the (in)consistency (i.e., variability) of leader-expressed humility across team members operates as a boundary condition in the relationship between leader-expressed humility and team psychological safety. We also explore how the agreement between leader self-reported humility and leader-expressed humility (i.e., self-other agreement, SOA) operates as an attractor to predict such a consistency. We test the hypothesized model through a sample of 85 teams, rated by 354 team members. The findings suggest that consistency reinforces, while inconsistency weakens, the effect of leader-expressed humility on team psychological safety. The findings also reveal that SOA relates to the consistency of leader-expressed humility, depending on the level at which the (dis)agreement occurs. We conclude that to better understand the outcomes of humble leadership, it is necessary to take into account not only the baseline of humility expressed by the leader (as most studies do), but also his/her humility variability and the strength of the attractor.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-4523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3518-8034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-0511</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-6177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-2440</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2021-12, Vol.174 (3), p.669-686 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2599276787 |
source | Education Source; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Agreements Attractor Business and Management Business Ethics Education Ethics Humility in leaders Inconsistency Influence Leadership Management Original Paper Personality Personality dynamics Philosophy Psychological safety Quality of Life Research Safety Self awareness Self-Other comparison Team psychological safety Teams Variability |
title | Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leader-Expressed%20Humility%20Predicting%20Team%20Psychological%20Safety:%20A%20Personality%20Dynamics%20Lens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Rego,%20Arm%C3%A9nio&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=669-686&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45406486%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599276787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45406486&rfr_iscdi=true |