Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game

Implementing the overall goal of carbon emission reduction and allocating it to specific enterprises under the premise of coordination of interests is not only an important step and link of the development of carbon trading market but also a necessary guarantee for implementing China's overall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy economics 2021-10, Vol.102, p.105467, Article 105467
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Bangjun, Ji, Feng, Zheng, Jie, Xie, Kejia, Feng, Zhaolei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105467
container_title Energy economics
container_volume 102
creator Wang, Bangjun
Ji, Feng
Zheng, Jie
Xie, Kejia
Feng, Zhaolei
description Implementing the overall goal of carbon emission reduction and allocating it to specific enterprises under the premise of coordination of interests is not only an important step and link of the development of carbon trading market but also a necessary guarantee for implementing China's overall goal of carbon emission reduction. In this paper, total quantity control of and trading conditions for carbon quota for coal-fired power supply chain enterprises were introduced based on the framework of the Stackelberg model and with the carbon quota constraints being taken into account, a coordination game model of carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises was constructed, and a revenue sharing coordination mechanism among supply chain enterprises were designed. In this coordination mechanism, the revenue sharing contract coordination game mechanism in coal-fired power supply chain was designed first on the basis of analyzing the coal production quantity and coal ordering quantity of the coal and electric power enterprises in their decentralized and centralized decision-making and their respective carbon emission reduction and profit situations without contract. And then, the implementation conditions for this revenue sharing contract coordination game was further analyzed, in other words, under the condition that the decision-making level of the coal and electric power enterprises should be equivalent to the centralized decision-making level without contract, it was guaranteed that the profits and carbon emission reduction levels of the coal and electric power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract were greater than under decentralized decision-making without contract, and the global coordination of coal-fired power supply chain was realized. The data calculation examples and parameter sensitivity analysis further verified the results of the theoretical analysis. •Analyzed the total quantity of carbon quota of the coal-fired power supply chain enterprises based on Stackelberg model.•The coordination game model was applied to benefit sharing among coal-fired power supply chain enterprises.•Guaranteed the carbon emission reduction of the coal-fired power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract mechanism.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105467
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2599116075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140988321003534</els_id><sourcerecordid>2599116075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39c2b7f9f64e5fb483167568e4b85e141614fad2e27203f18684e30a93d875ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAjaRWKfYcew4SCxQxZ9UCRawthxn3Lpq7WAnRT0Dl8ZtWLPyaDzfG81D6JrgGcGE365n4ED7WYELkjqs5NUJmhBR0ZwTQU7RBJMS57UQ9BxdxLjGGDPOxAT9zFVovMtga2O0qQjQDro_VN5k2qtNbmzqZZ3_hpDFoes2-0yvlE0Z10Pogo0Qs8G16btfQQLswA2QxZUK1i0Tw_VB6f4ue4cQO0jwHYxwH1rr1HHZUm3hEp0ZtYlw9fdO0efT48f8JV-8Pb_OHxa5pjXvc1rroqlMbXgJzDSloIRXjAsoG8GAlIST0qi2gKIqMDVEcFECxaqmragYGDpFNyO3C_5rgNjLtR-CSytlweqaEI4rlqboOKWDjzGAkenUrQp7SbA8WJdrebQuD9blaD2l7scUpAN2FoKM2oLT0CaLupett__mfwFBGo5z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599116075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Wang, Bangjun ; Ji, Feng ; Zheng, Jie ; Xie, Kejia ; Feng, Zhaolei</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bangjun ; Ji, Feng ; Zheng, Jie ; Xie, Kejia ; Feng, Zhaolei</creatorcontrib><description>Implementing the overall goal of carbon emission reduction and allocating it to specific enterprises under the premise of coordination of interests is not only an important step and link of the development of carbon trading market but also a necessary guarantee for implementing China's overall goal of carbon emission reduction. In this paper, total quantity control of and trading conditions for carbon quota for coal-fired power supply chain enterprises were introduced based on the framework of the Stackelberg model and with the carbon quota constraints being taken into account, a coordination game model of carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises was constructed, and a revenue sharing coordination mechanism among supply chain enterprises were designed. In this coordination mechanism, the revenue sharing contract coordination game mechanism in coal-fired power supply chain was designed first on the basis of analyzing the coal production quantity and coal ordering quantity of the coal and electric power enterprises in their decentralized and centralized decision-making and their respective carbon emission reduction and profit situations without contract. And then, the implementation conditions for this revenue sharing contract coordination game was further analyzed, in other words, under the condition that the decision-making level of the coal and electric power enterprises should be equivalent to the centralized decision-making level without contract, it was guaranteed that the profits and carbon emission reduction levels of the coal and electric power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract were greater than under decentralized decision-making without contract, and the global coordination of coal-fired power supply chain was realized. The data calculation examples and parameter sensitivity analysis further verified the results of the theoretical analysis. •Analyzed the total quantity of carbon quota of the coal-fired power supply chain enterprises based on Stackelberg model.•The coordination game model was applied to benefit sharing among coal-fired power supply chain enterprises.•Guaranteed the carbon emission reduction of the coal-fired power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Carbon quota and carbon emission reduction ; Centralization ; Coal ; Coal-fired power plants ; Coal-fired power supply chain enterprise ; Constraint modelling ; Contracts ; Coordination ; Coordination game ; Decentralization ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Electric power ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Emissions trading ; Energy economics ; Games ; Parameter sensitivity ; Power ; Power supply ; Profits ; Revenue ; Revenue sharing ; Revenue sharing contract ; Sensitivity analysis ; Supply ; Supply chains ; Theoretical analysis ; Trading</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2021-10, Vol.102, p.105467, Article 105467</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39c2b7f9f64e5fb483167568e4b85e141614fad2e27203f18684e30a93d875ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39c2b7f9f64e5fb483167568e4b85e141614fad2e27203f18684e30a93d875ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bangjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Kejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Zhaolei</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>Implementing the overall goal of carbon emission reduction and allocating it to specific enterprises under the premise of coordination of interests is not only an important step and link of the development of carbon trading market but also a necessary guarantee for implementing China's overall goal of carbon emission reduction. In this paper, total quantity control of and trading conditions for carbon quota for coal-fired power supply chain enterprises were introduced based on the framework of the Stackelberg model and with the carbon quota constraints being taken into account, a coordination game model of carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises was constructed, and a revenue sharing coordination mechanism among supply chain enterprises were designed. In this coordination mechanism, the revenue sharing contract coordination game mechanism in coal-fired power supply chain was designed first on the basis of analyzing the coal production quantity and coal ordering quantity of the coal and electric power enterprises in their decentralized and centralized decision-making and their respective carbon emission reduction and profit situations without contract. And then, the implementation conditions for this revenue sharing contract coordination game was further analyzed, in other words, under the condition that the decision-making level of the coal and electric power enterprises should be equivalent to the centralized decision-making level without contract, it was guaranteed that the profits and carbon emission reduction levels of the coal and electric power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract were greater than under decentralized decision-making without contract, and the global coordination of coal-fired power supply chain was realized. The data calculation examples and parameter sensitivity analysis further verified the results of the theoretical analysis. •Analyzed the total quantity of carbon quota of the coal-fired power supply chain enterprises based on Stackelberg model.•The coordination game model was applied to benefit sharing among coal-fired power supply chain enterprises.•Guaranteed the carbon emission reduction of the coal-fired power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract mechanism.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon quota and carbon emission reduction</subject><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Coal-fired power supply chain enterprise</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Coordination game</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power supply</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Revenue sharing contract</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Theoretical analysis</subject><subject>Trading</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAjaRWKfYcew4SCxQxZ9UCRawthxn3Lpq7WAnRT0Dl8ZtWLPyaDzfG81D6JrgGcGE365n4ED7WYELkjqs5NUJmhBR0ZwTQU7RBJMS57UQ9BxdxLjGGDPOxAT9zFVovMtga2O0qQjQDro_VN5k2qtNbmzqZZ3_hpDFoes2-0yvlE0Z10Pogo0Qs8G16btfQQLswA2QxZUK1i0Tw_VB6f4ue4cQO0jwHYxwH1rr1HHZUm3hEp0ZtYlw9fdO0efT48f8JV-8Pb_OHxa5pjXvc1rroqlMbXgJzDSloIRXjAsoG8GAlIST0qi2gKIqMDVEcFECxaqmragYGDpFNyO3C_5rgNjLtR-CSytlweqaEI4rlqboOKWDjzGAkenUrQp7SbA8WJdrebQuD9blaD2l7scUpAN2FoKM2oLT0CaLupett__mfwFBGo5z</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Wang, Bangjun</creator><creator>Ji, Feng</creator><creator>Zheng, Jie</creator><creator>Xie, Kejia</creator><creator>Feng, Zhaolei</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game</title><author>Wang, Bangjun ; Ji, Feng ; Zheng, Jie ; Xie, Kejia ; Feng, Zhaolei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39c2b7f9f64e5fb483167568e4b85e141614fad2e27203f18684e30a93d875ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon quota and carbon emission reduction</topic><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Coal-fired power supply chain enterprise</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Coordination game</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power supply</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Revenue sharing contract</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Theoretical analysis</topic><topic>Trading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bangjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Kejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Zhaolei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Bangjun</au><au>Ji, Feng</au><au>Zheng, Jie</au><au>Xie, Kejia</au><au>Feng, Zhaolei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>105467</spage><pages>105467-</pages><artnum>105467</artnum><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>Implementing the overall goal of carbon emission reduction and allocating it to specific enterprises under the premise of coordination of interests is not only an important step and link of the development of carbon trading market but also a necessary guarantee for implementing China's overall goal of carbon emission reduction. In this paper, total quantity control of and trading conditions for carbon quota for coal-fired power supply chain enterprises were introduced based on the framework of the Stackelberg model and with the carbon quota constraints being taken into account, a coordination game model of carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises was constructed, and a revenue sharing coordination mechanism among supply chain enterprises were designed. In this coordination mechanism, the revenue sharing contract coordination game mechanism in coal-fired power supply chain was designed first on the basis of analyzing the coal production quantity and coal ordering quantity of the coal and electric power enterprises in their decentralized and centralized decision-making and their respective carbon emission reduction and profit situations without contract. And then, the implementation conditions for this revenue sharing contract coordination game was further analyzed, in other words, under the condition that the decision-making level of the coal and electric power enterprises should be equivalent to the centralized decision-making level without contract, it was guaranteed that the profits and carbon emission reduction levels of the coal and electric power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract were greater than under decentralized decision-making without contract, and the global coordination of coal-fired power supply chain was realized. The data calculation examples and parameter sensitivity analysis further verified the results of the theoretical analysis. •Analyzed the total quantity of carbon quota of the coal-fired power supply chain enterprises based on Stackelberg model.•The coordination game model was applied to benefit sharing among coal-fired power supply chain enterprises.•Guaranteed the carbon emission reduction of the coal-fired power enterprises under the revenue sharing contract mechanism.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105467</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-9883
ispartof Energy economics, 2021-10, Vol.102, p.105467, Article 105467
issn 0140-9883
1873-6181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2599116075
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Carbon
Carbon quota and carbon emission reduction
Centralization
Coal
Coal-fired power plants
Coal-fired power supply chain enterprise
Constraint modelling
Contracts
Coordination
Coordination game
Decentralization
Decision analysis
Decision making
Electric power
Electricity
Emissions
Emissions control
Emissions trading
Energy economics
Games
Parameter sensitivity
Power
Power supply
Profits
Revenue
Revenue sharing
Revenue sharing contract
Sensitivity analysis
Supply
Supply chains
Theoretical analysis
Trading
title Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A04%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20emission%20reduction%20of%20coal-fired%20power%20supply%20chain%20enterprises%20under%20the%20revenue%20sharing%20contract:%20Perspective%20of%20coordination%20game&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Wang,%20Bangjun&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=105467&rft.pages=105467-&rft.artnum=105467&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2599116075%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599116075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140988321003534&rfr_iscdi=true