Environmental efficiency analysis of China's coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups

This study conducts an environmental efficiency analysis of 104 coal-fired power plants in China by simultaneously considering multiple undesirable outputs (CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 emissions) generated during the production process and the heterogeneity caused by differences between the five major...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy economics 2021-10, Vol.102, p.105511, Article 105511
Hauptverfasser: Nakaishi, Tomoaki, Takayabu, Hirotaka, Eguchi, Shogo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105511
container_title Energy economics
container_volume 102
creator Nakaishi, Tomoaki
Takayabu, Hirotaka
Eguchi, Shogo
description This study conducts an environmental efficiency analysis of 104 coal-fired power plants in China by simultaneously considering multiple undesirable outputs (CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 emissions) generated during the production process and the heterogeneity caused by differences between the five major power generation companies (Datang, Guodian, Huadian, Huaneng, and Power Investment). In the empirical study, slacks-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed to investigate the “total” and individual CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 “specific” environmental inefficiency scores for each power plant. These scores allow us to identify which undesirable outputs are the main sources of total environmental inefficiency for each company and power plant. The results show that inefficient PM2.5 and SO2 emissions are the main sources of environmental inefficiency for many plants. Furthermore, a meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework is adopted to identify whether the source of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant is due to technological gaps between the five major power generation companies or managerial gaps within the same power generation company. The results imply that, in most cases, managerial gaps within the same power generation company account for a larger proportion of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant. These findings are used to provide comprehensive policy suggestions for government and corporate managers to improve the environmental efficiency of power plants. •Environmental efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants in China was performed.•Slacks-based model and meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework were employed.•Considered multiple undesirable outputs and heterogeneity between power companies.•The relationship between plant inefficiency and undesirable outputs were quantified.•Knowledge sharing and technology spillover can improve environmental efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105511
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2599115706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140988321003935</els_id><sourcerecordid>2599115706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-de09ca3b168977aff5902c86e5c83f7e658125c45e0bd469cfb7dabce63a64273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwC1gsMTCl2EnsJAMDqsqHVIkFZstxnltXqR3stCgj_xyHdGaydHXuk-9B6JaSBSWUP-wWYEG5RUpSGhPGKD1DM1oWWcJpSc_RjNCcJFVZZpfoKoQdIYRxVs7Qz8oejXd2D7aXLQatjTJg1YClle0QTMBO4-XWWHkfsHKyTbTx0ODOfYPHXSttP-Y2mAa8sRu8hR6828QPmX7Axp7IMfCyN85Get9JO-CNd4cuXKMLLdsAN6d3jj6fVx_L12T9_vK2fFonipGiTxoglZJZTXlZFYXUmlUkVSUHpspMFxDX0JSpnAGpm5xXStdFI2sFPJM8T4tsju6mu513XwcIvdi5g48jg0hZVVHKCsIjlU2U8i4ED1p03uylHwQlYnQtduLPtRhdi8l1bD1OLYgDjga8CH8WoYmuVC8aZ_7t_wLw1ov1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599115706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental efficiency analysis of China's coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nakaishi, Tomoaki ; Takayabu, Hirotaka ; Eguchi, Shogo</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakaishi, Tomoaki ; Takayabu, Hirotaka ; Eguchi, Shogo</creatorcontrib><description>This study conducts an environmental efficiency analysis of 104 coal-fired power plants in China by simultaneously considering multiple undesirable outputs (CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 emissions) generated during the production process and the heterogeneity caused by differences between the five major power generation companies (Datang, Guodian, Huadian, Huaneng, and Power Investment). In the empirical study, slacks-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed to investigate the “total” and individual CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 “specific” environmental inefficiency scores for each power plant. These scores allow us to identify which undesirable outputs are the main sources of total environmental inefficiency for each company and power plant. The results show that inefficient PM2.5 and SO2 emissions are the main sources of environmental inefficiency for many plants. Furthermore, a meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework is adopted to identify whether the source of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant is due to technological gaps between the five major power generation companies or managerial gaps within the same power generation company. The results imply that, in most cases, managerial gaps within the same power generation company account for a larger proportion of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant. These findings are used to provide comprehensive policy suggestions for government and corporate managers to improve the environmental efficiency of power plants. •Environmental efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants in China was performed.•Slacks-based model and meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework were employed.•Considered multiple undesirable outputs and heterogeneity between power companies.•The relationship between plant inefficiency and undesirable outputs were quantified.•Knowledge sharing and technology spillover can improve environmental efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Coal ; Coal industry ; Coal-fired power plant ; Coal-fired power plants ; Companies ; Data envelopment analysis ; Efficiency ; Electric power generation ; Emissions ; Empirical analysis ; Energy economics ; Environmental efficiency ; Heterogeneity ; Industrial plant emissions ; Labor process ; Nitrogen oxides ; Particulate matter ; PM2.5 ; Power plants ; SO2 ; Sulfur dioxide</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2021-10, Vol.102, p.105511, Article 105511</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-de09ca3b168977aff5902c86e5c83f7e658125c45e0bd469cfb7dabce63a64273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-de09ca3b168977aff5902c86e5c83f7e658125c45e0bd469cfb7dabce63a64273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105511$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27864,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakaishi, Tomoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takayabu, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Shogo</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental efficiency analysis of China's coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>This study conducts an environmental efficiency analysis of 104 coal-fired power plants in China by simultaneously considering multiple undesirable outputs (CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 emissions) generated during the production process and the heterogeneity caused by differences between the five major power generation companies (Datang, Guodian, Huadian, Huaneng, and Power Investment). In the empirical study, slacks-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed to investigate the “total” and individual CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 “specific” environmental inefficiency scores for each power plant. These scores allow us to identify which undesirable outputs are the main sources of total environmental inefficiency for each company and power plant. The results show that inefficient PM2.5 and SO2 emissions are the main sources of environmental inefficiency for many plants. Furthermore, a meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework is adopted to identify whether the source of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant is due to technological gaps between the five major power generation companies or managerial gaps within the same power generation company. The results imply that, in most cases, managerial gaps within the same power generation company account for a larger proportion of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant. These findings are used to provide comprehensive policy suggestions for government and corporate managers to improve the environmental efficiency of power plants. •Environmental efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants in China was performed.•Slacks-based model and meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework were employed.•Considered multiple undesirable outputs and heterogeneity between power companies.•The relationship between plant inefficiency and undesirable outputs were quantified.•Knowledge sharing and technology spillover can improve environmental efficiency.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal industry</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plant</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Environmental efficiency</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Labor process</subject><subject>Nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>PM2.5</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>SO2</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwC1gsMTCl2EnsJAMDqsqHVIkFZstxnltXqR3stCgj_xyHdGaydHXuk-9B6JaSBSWUP-wWYEG5RUpSGhPGKD1DM1oWWcJpSc_RjNCcJFVZZpfoKoQdIYRxVs7Qz8oejXd2D7aXLQatjTJg1YClle0QTMBO4-XWWHkfsHKyTbTx0ODOfYPHXSttP-Y2mAa8sRu8hR6828QPmX7Axp7IMfCyN85Get9JO-CNd4cuXKMLLdsAN6d3jj6fVx_L12T9_vK2fFonipGiTxoglZJZTXlZFYXUmlUkVSUHpspMFxDX0JSpnAGpm5xXStdFI2sFPJM8T4tsju6mu513XwcIvdi5g48jg0hZVVHKCsIjlU2U8i4ED1p03uylHwQlYnQtduLPtRhdi8l1bD1OLYgDjga8CH8WoYmuVC8aZ_7t_wLw1ov1</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Nakaishi, Tomoaki</creator><creator>Takayabu, Hirotaka</creator><creator>Eguchi, Shogo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Environmental efficiency analysis of China's coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups</title><author>Nakaishi, Tomoaki ; Takayabu, Hirotaka ; Eguchi, Shogo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-de09ca3b168977aff5902c86e5c83f7e658125c45e0bd469cfb7dabce63a64273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal industry</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plant</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Environmental efficiency</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Labor process</topic><topic>Nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>PM2.5</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>SO2</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakaishi, Tomoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takayabu, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Shogo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakaishi, Tomoaki</au><au>Takayabu, Hirotaka</au><au>Eguchi, Shogo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental efficiency analysis of China's coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>105511</spage><pages>105511-</pages><artnum>105511</artnum><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>This study conducts an environmental efficiency analysis of 104 coal-fired power plants in China by simultaneously considering multiple undesirable outputs (CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 emissions) generated during the production process and the heterogeneity caused by differences between the five major power generation companies (Datang, Guodian, Huadian, Huaneng, and Power Investment). In the empirical study, slacks-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed to investigate the “total” and individual CO2, SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 “specific” environmental inefficiency scores for each power plant. These scores allow us to identify which undesirable outputs are the main sources of total environmental inefficiency for each company and power plant. The results show that inefficient PM2.5 and SO2 emissions are the main sources of environmental inefficiency for many plants. Furthermore, a meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework is adopted to identify whether the source of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant is due to technological gaps between the five major power generation companies or managerial gaps within the same power generation company. The results imply that, in most cases, managerial gaps within the same power generation company account for a larger proportion of total environmental inefficiency for each power plant. These findings are used to provide comprehensive policy suggestions for government and corporate managers to improve the environmental efficiency of power plants. •Environmental efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants in China was performed.•Slacks-based model and meta-frontier DEA decomposition framework were employed.•Considered multiple undesirable outputs and heterogeneity between power companies.•The relationship between plant inefficiency and undesirable outputs were quantified.•Knowledge sharing and technology spillover can improve environmental efficiency.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105511</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-9883
ispartof Energy economics, 2021-10, Vol.102, p.105511, Article 105511
issn 0140-9883
1873-6181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2599115706
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Carbon dioxide
Coal
Coal industry
Coal-fired power plant
Coal-fired power plants
Companies
Data envelopment analysis
Efficiency
Electric power generation
Emissions
Empirical analysis
Energy economics
Environmental efficiency
Heterogeneity
Industrial plant emissions
Labor process
Nitrogen oxides
Particulate matter
PM2.5
Power plants
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
title Environmental efficiency analysis of China's coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T06%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20efficiency%20analysis%20of%20China's%20coal-fired%20power%20plants%20considering%20heterogeneity%20in%20power%20generation%20company%20groups&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Nakaishi,%20Tomoaki&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=105511&rft.pages=105511-&rft.artnum=105511&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2599115706%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599115706&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140988321003935&rfr_iscdi=true