Teachers’ knowledge of student mathematical thinking in written instructional products
The successful use of lesson plans as the primary vehicle for storing and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge in Japan has given impetus to calls by US researchers for the development of a system for sharing teachers’ knowledge through instructional products to improve teachers’ capacity to im...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mathematics teacher education 2021-12, Vol.24 (6), p.613-639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 639 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | Journal of mathematics teacher education |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Corey, Douglas Lyman Williams, Steven Monroe, Eula Ewing Wagner, Michelle |
description | The successful use of lesson plans as the primary vehicle for storing and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge in Japan has given impetus to calls by US researchers for the development of a system for sharing teachers’ knowledge through instructional products to improve teachers’ capacity to implement high-quality instruction and to build a knowledge base for instruction. These products would be created by, and for, teachers to use in guiding instruction, thus building and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge. In this study, we try to characterize one aspect of teacher knowledge that is central in building a knowledge base for instruction, knowledge of student mathematical thinking. We analyze ten written instructional products from the USA and Japan to better understand what knowledge of student mathematical thinking can be shared in such products. We also look at how knowledge of student mathematical thinking is used to guide and justify instructional decisions. One key finding is that the knowledge of student mathematical thinking shared in the top written instructional products is
specific
to a task or mathematical topic,
varied
with descriptions of multiple solutions or ways of reasoning, and sufficiently
detailed
to make the knowledge usable for teachers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2598102069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1319414</ericid><sourcerecordid>2598102069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9538d5afd5128a441f353eef51953b931d7accdd2c423e6d330b0cf752e49e883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrf6AIAy4juYmk3kspdQXBTcV3IVpcqdNHzM1yVC68zf8Pb_E6Iju3NwH53Evh5BzYFfAWH7tgRUyp4wzyso0z-j-gAxA5oJCwdlhnEWR0TSF7JiceL9kDDJewoC8TLHSC3T-4-09WTXtbo1mjklbJz50BpuQbKqwwFisrtZJWNhmZZt5Yptk52wI2MTRB9fpYNsmMrauNXHxp-SortYez376kDzfjqejezp5unsY3UyoTlkeaClFYWRVGwm8qOKDtZACsZYQkVkpwOSV1sZwnXKBmRGCzZiuc8kxLbEoxJBc9r7x8GuHPqhl27n4iVdclgXESLIysnjP0q713mGtts5uKrdXwNRXgqpPUEW6-k5Q7aPoohehs_pXMH4EAWUKacRFj_uINXN0f6f_cf0EuMSAPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2598102069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teachers’ knowledge of student mathematical thinking in written instructional products</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Corey, Douglas Lyman ; Williams, Steven ; Monroe, Eula Ewing ; Wagner, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Corey, Douglas Lyman ; Williams, Steven ; Monroe, Eula Ewing ; Wagner, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>The successful use of lesson plans as the primary vehicle for storing and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge in Japan has given impetus to calls by US researchers for the development of a system for sharing teachers’ knowledge through instructional products to improve teachers’ capacity to implement high-quality instruction and to build a knowledge base for instruction. These products would be created by, and for, teachers to use in guiding instruction, thus building and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge. In this study, we try to characterize one aspect of teacher knowledge that is central in building a knowledge base for instruction, knowledge of student mathematical thinking. We analyze ten written instructional products from the USA and Japan to better understand what knowledge of student mathematical thinking can be shared in such products. We also look at how knowledge of student mathematical thinking is used to guide and justify instructional decisions. One key finding is that the knowledge of student mathematical thinking shared in the top written instructional products is
specific
to a task or mathematical topic,
varied
with descriptions of multiple solutions or ways of reasoning, and sufficiently
detailed
to make the knowledge usable for teachers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-4416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Materials ; Knowledge ; Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Skills ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Philosophy of Education ; Student Evaluation ; Teachers ; Teaching and Teacher Education ; Thinking Skills ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>Journal of mathematics teacher education, 2021-12, Vol.24 (6), p.613-639</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9538d5afd5128a441f353eef51953b931d7accdd2c423e6d330b0cf752e49e883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9538d5afd5128a441f353eef51953b931d7accdd2c423e6d330b0cf752e49e883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8699-7571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1319414$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corey, Douglas Lyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroe, Eula Ewing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>Teachers’ knowledge of student mathematical thinking in written instructional products</title><title>Journal of mathematics teacher education</title><addtitle>J Math Teacher Educ</addtitle><description>The successful use of lesson plans as the primary vehicle for storing and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge in Japan has given impetus to calls by US researchers for the development of a system for sharing teachers’ knowledge through instructional products to improve teachers’ capacity to implement high-quality instruction and to build a knowledge base for instruction. These products would be created by, and for, teachers to use in guiding instruction, thus building and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge. In this study, we try to characterize one aspect of teacher knowledge that is central in building a knowledge base for instruction, knowledge of student mathematical thinking. We analyze ten written instructional products from the USA and Japan to better understand what knowledge of student mathematical thinking can be shared in such products. We also look at how knowledge of student mathematical thinking is used to guide and justify instructional decisions. One key finding is that the knowledge of student mathematical thinking shared in the top written instructional products is
specific
to a task or mathematical topic,
varied
with descriptions of multiple solutions or ways of reasoning, and sufficiently
detailed
to make the knowledge usable for teachers.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Philosophy of Education</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching and Teacher Education</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>1386-4416</issn><issn>1573-1820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrf6AIAy4juYmk3kspdQXBTcV3IVpcqdNHzM1yVC68zf8Pb_E6Iju3NwH53Evh5BzYFfAWH7tgRUyp4wzyso0z-j-gAxA5oJCwdlhnEWR0TSF7JiceL9kDDJewoC8TLHSC3T-4-09WTXtbo1mjklbJz50BpuQbKqwwFisrtZJWNhmZZt5Yptk52wI2MTRB9fpYNsmMrauNXHxp-SortYez376kDzfjqejezp5unsY3UyoTlkeaClFYWRVGwm8qOKDtZACsZYQkVkpwOSV1sZwnXKBmRGCzZiuc8kxLbEoxJBc9r7x8GuHPqhl27n4iVdclgXESLIysnjP0q713mGtts5uKrdXwNRXgqpPUEW6-k5Q7aPoohehs_pXMH4EAWUKacRFj_uINXN0f6f_cf0EuMSAPw</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Corey, Douglas Lyman</creator><creator>Williams, Steven</creator><creator>Monroe, Eula Ewing</creator><creator>Wagner, Michelle</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8699-7571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Teachers’ knowledge of student mathematical thinking in written instructional products</title><author>Corey, Douglas Lyman ; Williams, Steven ; Monroe, Eula Ewing ; Wagner, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9538d5afd5128a441f353eef51953b931d7accdd2c423e6d330b0cf752e49e883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Philosophy of Education</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching and Teacher Education</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corey, Douglas Lyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroe, Eula Ewing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of mathematics teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corey, Douglas Lyman</au><au>Williams, Steven</au><au>Monroe, Eula Ewing</au><au>Wagner, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1319414</ericid><atitle>Teachers’ knowledge of student mathematical thinking in written instructional products</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mathematics teacher education</jtitle><stitle>J Math Teacher Educ</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>613-639</pages><issn>1386-4416</issn><eissn>1573-1820</eissn><abstract>The successful use of lesson plans as the primary vehicle for storing and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge in Japan has given impetus to calls by US researchers for the development of a system for sharing teachers’ knowledge through instructional products to improve teachers’ capacity to implement high-quality instruction and to build a knowledge base for instruction. These products would be created by, and for, teachers to use in guiding instruction, thus building and sharing teachers’ instructional knowledge. In this study, we try to characterize one aspect of teacher knowledge that is central in building a knowledge base for instruction, knowledge of student mathematical thinking. We analyze ten written instructional products from the USA and Japan to better understand what knowledge of student mathematical thinking can be shared in such products. We also look at how knowledge of student mathematical thinking is used to guide and justify instructional decisions. One key finding is that the knowledge of student mathematical thinking shared in the top written instructional products is
specific
to a task or mathematical topic,
varied
with descriptions of multiple solutions or ways of reasoning, and sufficiently
detailed
to make the knowledge usable for teachers.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8699-7571</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-4416 |
ispartof | Journal of mathematics teacher education, 2021-12, Vol.24 (6), p.613-639 |
issn | 1386-4416 1573-1820 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2598102069 |
source | Education Source (EBSCOhost); SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Education Foreign Countries Instructional Materials Knowledge Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) Mathematical analysis Mathematics Education Mathematics Skills Pedagogical Content Knowledge Philosophy of Education Student Evaluation Teachers Teaching and Teacher Education Thinking Skills Written Language |
title | Teachers’ knowledge of student mathematical thinking in written instructional products |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T07%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teachers%E2%80%99%20knowledge%20of%20student%20mathematical%20thinking%20in%20written%20instructional%20products&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mathematics%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Corey,%20Douglas%20Lyman&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=613-639&rft.issn=1386-4416&rft.eissn=1573-1820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2598102069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2598102069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1319414&rfr_iscdi=true |