Accounting for surface waves improves gas flux estimation at high wind speed in a large lake
The gas transfer velocity (k) is a major source of uncertainty when assessing the magnitude of lake gas exchange with the atmosphere. For the diversity of existing empirical and process-based k models, the transfer velocity increases with the level of turbulence near the air-water interface. However...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth system dynamics 2021-11, Vol.12 (4), p.1169-1189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1189 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1169 |
container_title | Earth system dynamics |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Perolo, Pascal Castro, Bieito Fernandez Escoffier, Nicolas Lambert, Thibault Bouffard, Damien Perga, Marie-Elodie |
description | The gas transfer velocity (k) is a major source of uncertainty when assessing the magnitude of lake gas exchange with the atmosphere. For the diversity of existing empirical and process-based k models, the transfer velocity increases with the level of turbulence near the air-water interface. However, predictions for k can vary by a factor of 2 among different models. Near-surface turbulence results from the action of wind shear, surface waves, and buoyancy-driven convection. Wind shear has long been identified as a key driver, but recent lake studies have shifted the focus towards the role of convection, particularly in small lakes. In large lakes, wind fetch can, however, be long enough to generate surface waves and contribute to enhance gas transfer, as widely recognised in oceanographic studies. Here, field values for gas transfer velocity were computed in a large hard-water lake, Lake Geneva, from CO2 fluxes measured with an automated (forced diffusion) flux chamber and CO2 partial pressure measured with high-frequency sensors. k estimates were compared to a set of reference limnological and oceanic k models. Our analysis reveals that accounting for surface waves generated during windy events significantly improves the accuracy of k estimates in this large lake. The improved k model is then used to compute k over a 1-year time period. Results show that episodic extreme events with surface waves (6% occurrence, significant wave height > 0.4 m) can generate more than 20% of annual cumulative k and more than 25% of annual net CO2Y fluxes in Lake Geneva. We conclude that for lakes whose fetch can exceed 15 km, k models need to integrate the effect of surface waves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/esd-12-1169-2021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2597731497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A682753796</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3561adb274634a748c9f1888bb4af4e1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A682753796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c87b4c30ee87bc904f8da9ccf42fff536c36078f294df7f4a5a4039e4e1d0b223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2LFDEUbETBZd27x4AnkV7z1Z3kOAx-DCwIftyEkE6_9Gac6axJ98767329IyMDHkwgeTyqildJVdVLRq8bZuRbKH3NeM1Ya2pOOXtSXXBmaC2NVk9PtTLPq6tSthRX03Imm4vq-8r7NI9THAcSUiZlzsF5IAd3D4XE_V1OSzG4QsJufiBQprh3U0wjcRO5jcMtOcSxJ-UOoCcRu2Tn8gB4_oAX1bPgdgWu_tyX1bf3776uP9Y3nz5s1qub2ktNp9pr1UkvKAAW3lAZdO-M90HyEEIjWi9aqnTgRvZBBekaJ6kwIIH1tONcXFabo26f3NbeZZww_7LJRfvYSHmwLk_R78CKpmWu77iSrZBOSe1NYFrrrpMuoCBqvTpqofOfM9q12zTnEce3vDFKCYYP-Rc1OBSNY0hTdn4fi7erVnPVCGVaRF3_A4W7h330aYQQsX9GeH1GQMwED9Pg5lLs5svncyw9Yn1OpWQIJ-OM2iUVFlNhGbdLKuySCqToI-UAXQrFRxg9nGiYCsWpaJVYAsLWcXr85_USD6S--X-q-A3rjMim</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597731497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accounting for surface waves improves gas flux estimation at high wind speed in a large lake</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Perolo, Pascal ; Castro, Bieito Fernandez ; Escoffier, Nicolas ; Lambert, Thibault ; Bouffard, Damien ; Perga, Marie-Elodie</creator><creatorcontrib>Perolo, Pascal ; Castro, Bieito Fernandez ; Escoffier, Nicolas ; Lambert, Thibault ; Bouffard, Damien ; Perga, Marie-Elodie</creatorcontrib><description>The gas transfer velocity (k) is a major source of uncertainty when assessing the magnitude of lake gas exchange with the atmosphere. For the diversity of existing empirical and process-based k models, the transfer velocity increases with the level of turbulence near the air-water interface. However, predictions for k can vary by a factor of 2 among different models. Near-surface turbulence results from the action of wind shear, surface waves, and buoyancy-driven convection. Wind shear has long been identified as a key driver, but recent lake studies have shifted the focus towards the role of convection, particularly in small lakes. In large lakes, wind fetch can, however, be long enough to generate surface waves and contribute to enhance gas transfer, as widely recognised in oceanographic studies. Here, field values for gas transfer velocity were computed in a large hard-water lake, Lake Geneva, from CO2 fluxes measured with an automated (forced diffusion) flux chamber and CO2 partial pressure measured with high-frequency sensors. k estimates were compared to a set of reference limnological and oceanic k models. Our analysis reveals that accounting for surface waves generated during windy events significantly improves the accuracy of k estimates in this large lake. The improved k model is then used to compute k over a 1-year time period. Results show that episodic extreme events with surface waves (6% occurrence, significant wave height > 0.4 m) can generate more than 20% of annual cumulative k and more than 25% of annual net CO2Y fluxes in Lake Geneva. We conclude that for lakes whose fetch can exceed 15 km, k models need to integrate the effect of surface waves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-4979</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2190-4987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-4987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/esd-12-1169-2021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>GOTTINGEN: Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh</publisher><subject>Air-water interface ; Analysis ; Atmospheric models ; Buoyancy driven convection ; Calibration ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide flux ; Convection ; Emissions ; Empirical analysis ; Estimates ; Fetch ; Fluxes ; Gas exchange ; Gas fields ; Geology ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ; Lakes ; Ocean models ; Oceanographic studies ; Oceanography ; Partial pressure ; Physical Sciences ; Science & Technology ; Significant wave height ; Surface waves ; Turbulence ; Velocity ; Wave height ; Wind ; Wind shear ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Earth system dynamics, 2021-11, Vol.12 (4), p.1169-1189</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>8</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000720367300001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c87b4c30ee87bc904f8da9ccf42fff536c36078f294df7f4a5a4039e4e1d0b223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c87b4c30ee87bc904f8da9ccf42fff536c36078f294df7f4a5a4039e4e1d0b223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7372-1181 ; 0000-0002-9003-0769 ; 0000-0002-2005-9718 ; 0000-0002-7666-5370 ; 0000-0001-7797-854X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2103,2115,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perolo, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Bieito Fernandez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escoffier, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perga, Marie-Elodie</creatorcontrib><title>Accounting for surface waves improves gas flux estimation at high wind speed in a large lake</title><title>Earth system dynamics</title><addtitle>EARTH SYST DYNAM</addtitle><description>The gas transfer velocity (k) is a major source of uncertainty when assessing the magnitude of lake gas exchange with the atmosphere. For the diversity of existing empirical and process-based k models, the transfer velocity increases with the level of turbulence near the air-water interface. However, predictions for k can vary by a factor of 2 among different models. Near-surface turbulence results from the action of wind shear, surface waves, and buoyancy-driven convection. Wind shear has long been identified as a key driver, but recent lake studies have shifted the focus towards the role of convection, particularly in small lakes. In large lakes, wind fetch can, however, be long enough to generate surface waves and contribute to enhance gas transfer, as widely recognised in oceanographic studies. Here, field values for gas transfer velocity were computed in a large hard-water lake, Lake Geneva, from CO2 fluxes measured with an automated (forced diffusion) flux chamber and CO2 partial pressure measured with high-frequency sensors. k estimates were compared to a set of reference limnological and oceanic k models. Our analysis reveals that accounting for surface waves generated during windy events significantly improves the accuracy of k estimates in this large lake. The improved k model is then used to compute k over a 1-year time period. Results show that episodic extreme events with surface waves (6% occurrence, significant wave height > 0.4 m) can generate more than 20% of annual cumulative k and more than 25% of annual net CO2Y fluxes in Lake Geneva. We conclude that for lakes whose fetch can exceed 15 km, k models need to integrate the effect of surface waves.</description><subject>Air-water interface</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Buoyancy driven convection</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide flux</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fetch</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>Gas fields</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geosciences, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Oceanographic studies</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Partial pressure</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Significant wave height</subject><subject>Surface waves</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wave height</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind shear</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>2190-4979</issn><issn>2190-4987</issn><issn>2190-4987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2LFDEUbETBZd27x4AnkV7z1Z3kOAx-DCwIftyEkE6_9Gac6axJ98767329IyMDHkwgeTyqildJVdVLRq8bZuRbKH3NeM1Ya2pOOXtSXXBmaC2NVk9PtTLPq6tSthRX03Imm4vq-8r7NI9THAcSUiZlzsF5IAd3D4XE_V1OSzG4QsJufiBQprh3U0wjcRO5jcMtOcSxJ-UOoCcRu2Tn8gB4_oAX1bPgdgWu_tyX1bf3776uP9Y3nz5s1qub2ktNp9pr1UkvKAAW3lAZdO-M90HyEEIjWi9aqnTgRvZBBekaJ6kwIIH1tONcXFabo26f3NbeZZww_7LJRfvYSHmwLk_R78CKpmWu77iSrZBOSe1NYFrrrpMuoCBqvTpqofOfM9q12zTnEce3vDFKCYYP-Rc1OBSNY0hTdn4fi7erVnPVCGVaRF3_A4W7h330aYQQsX9GeH1GQMwED9Pg5lLs5svncyw9Yn1OpWQIJ-OM2iUVFlNhGbdLKuySCqToI-UAXQrFRxg9nGiYCsWpaJVYAsLWcXr85_USD6S--X-q-A3rjMim</recordid><startdate>20211116</startdate><enddate>20211116</enddate><creator>Perolo, Pascal</creator><creator>Castro, Bieito Fernandez</creator><creator>Escoffier, Nicolas</creator><creator>Lambert, Thibault</creator><creator>Bouffard, Damien</creator><creator>Perga, Marie-Elodie</creator><general>Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh</general><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-1181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-0769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-9718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-854X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211116</creationdate><title>Accounting for surface waves improves gas flux estimation at high wind speed in a large lake</title><author>Perolo, Pascal ; Castro, Bieito Fernandez ; Escoffier, Nicolas ; Lambert, Thibault ; Bouffard, Damien ; Perga, Marie-Elodie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c87b4c30ee87bc904f8da9ccf42fff536c36078f294df7f4a5a4039e4e1d0b223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air-water interface</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Buoyancy driven convection</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide flux</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fetch</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>Gas fields</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geosciences, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Oceanographic studies</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Partial pressure</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Significant wave height</topic><topic>Surface waves</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wave height</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind shear</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perolo, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Bieito Fernandez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escoffier, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perga, Marie-Elodie</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Earth system dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perolo, Pascal</au><au>Castro, Bieito Fernandez</au><au>Escoffier, Nicolas</au><au>Lambert, Thibault</au><au>Bouffard, Damien</au><au>Perga, Marie-Elodie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accounting for surface waves improves gas flux estimation at high wind speed in a large lake</atitle><jtitle>Earth system dynamics</jtitle><stitle>EARTH SYST DYNAM</stitle><date>2021-11-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1169</spage><epage>1189</epage><pages>1169-1189</pages><issn>2190-4979</issn><issn>2190-4987</issn><eissn>2190-4987</eissn><abstract>The gas transfer velocity (k) is a major source of uncertainty when assessing the magnitude of lake gas exchange with the atmosphere. For the diversity of existing empirical and process-based k models, the transfer velocity increases with the level of turbulence near the air-water interface. However, predictions for k can vary by a factor of 2 among different models. Near-surface turbulence results from the action of wind shear, surface waves, and buoyancy-driven convection. Wind shear has long been identified as a key driver, but recent lake studies have shifted the focus towards the role of convection, particularly in small lakes. In large lakes, wind fetch can, however, be long enough to generate surface waves and contribute to enhance gas transfer, as widely recognised in oceanographic studies. Here, field values for gas transfer velocity were computed in a large hard-water lake, Lake Geneva, from CO2 fluxes measured with an automated (forced diffusion) flux chamber and CO2 partial pressure measured with high-frequency sensors. k estimates were compared to a set of reference limnological and oceanic k models. Our analysis reveals that accounting for surface waves generated during windy events significantly improves the accuracy of k estimates in this large lake. The improved k model is then used to compute k over a 1-year time period. Results show that episodic extreme events with surface waves (6% occurrence, significant wave height > 0.4 m) can generate more than 20% of annual cumulative k and more than 25% of annual net CO2Y fluxes in Lake Geneva. We conclude that for lakes whose fetch can exceed 15 km, k models need to integrate the effect of surface waves.</abstract><cop>GOTTINGEN</cop><pub>Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh</pub><doi>10.5194/esd-12-1169-2021</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-1181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-0769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-9718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-854X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2190-4979 |
ispartof | Earth system dynamics, 2021-11, Vol.12 (4), p.1169-1189 |
issn | 2190-4979 2190-4987 2190-4987 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2597731497 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Air-water interface Analysis Atmospheric models Buoyancy driven convection Calibration Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide flux Convection Emissions Empirical analysis Estimates Fetch Fluxes Gas exchange Gas fields Geology Geosciences, Multidisciplinary Lakes Ocean models Oceanographic studies Oceanography Partial pressure Physical Sciences Science & Technology Significant wave height Surface waves Turbulence Velocity Wave height Wind Wind shear Wind speed |
title | Accounting for surface waves improves gas flux estimation at high wind speed in a large lake |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T12%3A05%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accounting%20for%20surface%20waves%20improves%20gas%20flux%20estimation%20at%20high%20wind%20speed%20in%20a%20large%20lake&rft.jtitle=Earth%20system%20dynamics&rft.au=Perolo,%20Pascal&rft.date=2021-11-16&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1169&rft.epage=1189&rft.pages=1169-1189&rft.issn=2190-4979&rft.eissn=2190-4987&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/esd-12-1169-2021&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA682753796%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597731497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A682753796&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3561adb274634a748c9f1888bb4af4e1&rfr_iscdi=true |