Disparities in the control of Diabetes type 2 and incidence of cardiovascular events. The APNA study

Background In Spain, the care of patients with DM2 is carried out in primary care by General Practitioners (GP) in Primary Health Care Centers. There is considerable variability among GPs following these patients. The objective of his study is to analyze the influences of variability in the control...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2021-10, Vol.31 (Supplement_3)
Hauptverfasser: Guillen Grima, F, Guillen Aguinaga, S, Brugos Larumbe, A, Forga Llenas, L, Guillen Aguinaga, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 31
creator Guillen Grima, F
Guillen Aguinaga, S
Brugos Larumbe, A
Forga Llenas, L
Guillen Aguinaga, L
description Background In Spain, the care of patients with DM2 is carried out in primary care by General Practitioners (GP) in Primary Health Care Centers. There is considerable variability among GPs following these patients. The objective of his study is to analyze the influences of variability in the control of the cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients in t cardiovascular events. Methods APNA is a dynamic cohort study that includes all the inhabitants of Navarra, a region of Spain with a population of 661.023 inhabitants. We studied 385 GPs and selected all DM2 patients over 17 years of age-old and performed 5 years follow-up. We collect clinical variables, visits to GPs, and analytical data from the clinical records, hospital admissions for cardiovascular events and stroke for each patient and GP we computed 4 indicators of DM2 quality of care, HbA1c < 7% (I1); % HbA1c > = 9% (I2); % BP < 140/90 mmHg (I3); % cLDL 9% control with a HR of 1.15 (CI 95% 1.03-1.29) Conclusions Adjusting by risk factors, and control variables for type 2 diabetes mellitus being attended by GP in the worst indicator cluster adds an additional 15% risk of having a cardiovascular event requiring hospitalization. Efforts should be made to improve quality of DM2 care and to reduce the disparities among GPs. Key messages There is great variability in the quality of health care for patients with type II diabetes specially in the proportion of diabetics with HbA1c higher or equal to 9% that differs greatly among GPs. Diabetic type 2 patients cared for by general practitioners in the worst quality group have a 15%.higher likelihood of having a cardiovascular event.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2597247119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2597247119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1537-aa15f3f22ca2ab37b296b78f4ec948c136ffd153e9836bc89953067b3bee766a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgetpcZpLJsrTeoKiLCu5CkkkwtU7GJFPo25tSH8DVOXC-_z_wAXCL0QwjQed2jMOo5-ZLacyaGUH8DExwzeqKMvRxXnaMcIUJI5fgKqUtQqjhLZmAbuXToKLP3iboe5g_LTShzzHsYHBw5ZW2uZzyYbCQQNV3hTK-s72xR8Co2PmwV8mMOxWh3ds-pxnclJrF28sCpjx2h2tw4dQu2Zu_OQXvD_eb5VO1fn18Xi7WlcEN5ZVSuHHUEWIUUZpyTQTTvHW1NaJuDabMua6QVrSUadMK0VDEuKbaWs6YolNwd-odYvgZbcpyG8bYl5eSNIKTmmMsCkVOlIkhpWidHKL_VvEgMZJHm_JkU_7ZlMVmCVWnUBiH__C_VIJ6JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597247119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disparities in the control of Diabetes type 2 and incidence of cardiovascular events. The APNA study</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Guillen Grima, F ; Guillen Aguinaga, S ; Brugos Larumbe, A ; Forga Llenas, L ; Guillen Aguinaga, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Guillen Grima, F ; Guillen Aguinaga, S ; Brugos Larumbe, A ; Forga Llenas, L ; Guillen Aguinaga, L</creatorcontrib><description>Background In Spain, the care of patients with DM2 is carried out in primary care by General Practitioners (GP) in Primary Health Care Centers. There is considerable variability among GPs following these patients. The objective of his study is to analyze the influences of variability in the control of the cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients in t cardiovascular events. Methods APNA is a dynamic cohort study that includes all the inhabitants of Navarra, a region of Spain with a population of 661.023 inhabitants. We studied 385 GPs and selected all DM2 patients over 17 years of age-old and performed 5 years follow-up. We collect clinical variables, visits to GPs, and analytical data from the clinical records, hospital admissions for cardiovascular events and stroke for each patient and GP we computed 4 indicators of DM2 quality of care, HbA1c &lt; 7% (I1); % HbA1c &gt; = 9% (I2); % BP &lt; 140/90 mmHg (I3); % cLDL &lt;100 mg/dl (I4). Using K-means cluster analysis GPs were classified in 2 groups according to their performance in the indicators. We computed Cox regression. Results At the beginning of the follow up we identified 19603 DM2 the prevalence of DM2 was 4.14% (95% CI 4.08- 4.20). The average for I1, I2, I3 and I4 was 51.7%, 9.0%, 46.8% and 35.3%. The coefficient of variation of GPs for I1, I2, I3 and I4 were 24.3, 60.6, 26.7 and 33,1. In the Cox regression model, the risk of hospital admission for a cardiovascular event adjusting by age, gender, income, smoking, BMI, antecedents of cardiovascular events, I1, I2, I3, and I4 was higher when the patient was cared by a GP in the worst cluster of HbA1C &gt; 9% control with a HR of 1.15 (CI 95% 1.03-1.29) Conclusions Adjusting by risk factors, and control variables for type 2 diabetes mellitus being attended by GP in the worst indicator cluster adds an additional 15% risk of having a cardiovascular event requiring hospitalization. Efforts should be made to improve quality of DM2 care and to reduce the disparities among GPs. Key messages There is great variability in the quality of health care for patients with type II diabetes specially in the proportion of diabetics with HbA1c higher or equal to 9% that differs greatly among GPs. Diabetic type 2 patients cared for by general practitioners in the worst quality group have a 15%.higher likelihood of having a cardiovascular event.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular diseases ; Cardiovascular system ; Cluster analysis ; Coefficient of variation ; Computation ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Health care ; Health risks ; Indicators ; Inhabitants ; Patients ; Primary care ; Public health ; Quality of care ; Regression models ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Risk management ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2021-10, Vol.31 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guillen Grima, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillen Aguinaga, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugos Larumbe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forga Llenas, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillen Aguinaga, L</creatorcontrib><title>Disparities in the control of Diabetes type 2 and incidence of cardiovascular events. The APNA study</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Background In Spain, the care of patients with DM2 is carried out in primary care by General Practitioners (GP) in Primary Health Care Centers. There is considerable variability among GPs following these patients. The objective of his study is to analyze the influences of variability in the control of the cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients in t cardiovascular events. Methods APNA is a dynamic cohort study that includes all the inhabitants of Navarra, a region of Spain with a population of 661.023 inhabitants. We studied 385 GPs and selected all DM2 patients over 17 years of age-old and performed 5 years follow-up. We collect clinical variables, visits to GPs, and analytical data from the clinical records, hospital admissions for cardiovascular events and stroke for each patient and GP we computed 4 indicators of DM2 quality of care, HbA1c &lt; 7% (I1); % HbA1c &gt; = 9% (I2); % BP &lt; 140/90 mmHg (I3); % cLDL &lt;100 mg/dl (I4). Using K-means cluster analysis GPs were classified in 2 groups according to their performance in the indicators. We computed Cox regression. Results At the beginning of the follow up we identified 19603 DM2 the prevalence of DM2 was 4.14% (95% CI 4.08- 4.20). The average for I1, I2, I3 and I4 was 51.7%, 9.0%, 46.8% and 35.3%. The coefficient of variation of GPs for I1, I2, I3 and I4 were 24.3, 60.6, 26.7 and 33,1. In the Cox regression model, the risk of hospital admission for a cardiovascular event adjusting by age, gender, income, smoking, BMI, antecedents of cardiovascular events, I1, I2, I3, and I4 was higher when the patient was cared by a GP in the worst cluster of HbA1C &gt; 9% control with a HR of 1.15 (CI 95% 1.03-1.29) Conclusions Adjusting by risk factors, and control variables for type 2 diabetes mellitus being attended by GP in the worst indicator cluster adds an additional 15% risk of having a cardiovascular event requiring hospitalization. Efforts should be made to improve quality of DM2 care and to reduce the disparities among GPs. Key messages There is great variability in the quality of health care for patients with type II diabetes specially in the proportion of diabetics with HbA1c higher or equal to 9% that differs greatly among GPs. Diabetic type 2 patients cared for by general practitioners in the worst quality group have a 15%.higher likelihood of having a cardiovascular event.</description><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Inhabitants</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgetpcZpLJsrTeoKiLCu5CkkkwtU7GJFPo25tSH8DVOXC-_z_wAXCL0QwjQed2jMOo5-ZLacyaGUH8DExwzeqKMvRxXnaMcIUJI5fgKqUtQqjhLZmAbuXToKLP3iboe5g_LTShzzHsYHBw5ZW2uZzyYbCQQNV3hTK-s72xR8Co2PmwV8mMOxWh3ds-pxnclJrF28sCpjx2h2tw4dQu2Zu_OQXvD_eb5VO1fn18Xi7WlcEN5ZVSuHHUEWIUUZpyTQTTvHW1NaJuDabMua6QVrSUadMK0VDEuKbaWs6YolNwd-odYvgZbcpyG8bYl5eSNIKTmmMsCkVOlIkhpWidHKL_VvEgMZJHm_JkU_7ZlMVmCVWnUBiH__C_VIJ6JQ</recordid><startdate>20211020</startdate><enddate>20211020</enddate><creator>Guillen Grima, F</creator><creator>Guillen Aguinaga, S</creator><creator>Brugos Larumbe, A</creator><creator>Forga Llenas, L</creator><creator>Guillen Aguinaga, L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211020</creationdate><title>Disparities in the control of Diabetes type 2 and incidence of cardiovascular events. The APNA study</title><author>Guillen Grima, F ; Guillen Aguinaga, S ; Brugos Larumbe, A ; Forga Llenas, L ; Guillen Aguinaga, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1537-aa15f3f22ca2ab37b296b78f4ec948c136ffd153e9836bc89953067b3bee766a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Inhabitants</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guillen Grima, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillen Aguinaga, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugos Larumbe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forga Llenas, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillen Aguinaga, L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guillen Grima, F</au><au>Guillen Aguinaga, S</au><au>Brugos Larumbe, A</au><au>Forga Llenas, L</au><au>Guillen Aguinaga, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disparities in the control of Diabetes type 2 and incidence of cardiovascular events. The APNA study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2021-10-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Background In Spain, the care of patients with DM2 is carried out in primary care by General Practitioners (GP) in Primary Health Care Centers. There is considerable variability among GPs following these patients. The objective of his study is to analyze the influences of variability in the control of the cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients in t cardiovascular events. Methods APNA is a dynamic cohort study that includes all the inhabitants of Navarra, a region of Spain with a population of 661.023 inhabitants. We studied 385 GPs and selected all DM2 patients over 17 years of age-old and performed 5 years follow-up. We collect clinical variables, visits to GPs, and analytical data from the clinical records, hospital admissions for cardiovascular events and stroke for each patient and GP we computed 4 indicators of DM2 quality of care, HbA1c &lt; 7% (I1); % HbA1c &gt; = 9% (I2); % BP &lt; 140/90 mmHg (I3); % cLDL &lt;100 mg/dl (I4). Using K-means cluster analysis GPs were classified in 2 groups according to their performance in the indicators. We computed Cox regression. Results At the beginning of the follow up we identified 19603 DM2 the prevalence of DM2 was 4.14% (95% CI 4.08- 4.20). The average for I1, I2, I3 and I4 was 51.7%, 9.0%, 46.8% and 35.3%. The coefficient of variation of GPs for I1, I2, I3 and I4 were 24.3, 60.6, 26.7 and 33,1. In the Cox regression model, the risk of hospital admission for a cardiovascular event adjusting by age, gender, income, smoking, BMI, antecedents of cardiovascular events, I1, I2, I3, and I4 was higher when the patient was cared by a GP in the worst cluster of HbA1C &gt; 9% control with a HR of 1.15 (CI 95% 1.03-1.29) Conclusions Adjusting by risk factors, and control variables for type 2 diabetes mellitus being attended by GP in the worst indicator cluster adds an additional 15% risk of having a cardiovascular event requiring hospitalization. Efforts should be made to improve quality of DM2 care and to reduce the disparities among GPs. Key messages There is great variability in the quality of health care for patients with type II diabetes specially in the proportion of diabetics with HbA1c higher or equal to 9% that differs greatly among GPs. Diabetic type 2 patients cared for by general practitioners in the worst quality group have a 15%.higher likelihood of having a cardiovascular event.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2021-10, Vol.31 (Supplement_3)
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2597247119
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Cardiovascular diseases
Cardiovascular system
Cluster analysis
Coefficient of variation
Computation
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Health care
Health risks
Indicators
Inhabitants
Patients
Primary care
Public health
Quality of care
Regression models
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Risk management
Smoking
title Disparities in the control of Diabetes type 2 and incidence of cardiovascular events. The APNA study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T23%3A58%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disparities%20in%20the%20control%20of%20Diabetes%20type%202%20and%20incidence%20of%20cardiovascular%20events.%20The%20APNA%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Guillen%20Grima,%20F&rft.date=2021-10-20&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2597247119%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597247119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.207&rfr_iscdi=true