Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries

The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Empirical economics 2021-12, Vol.61 (6), p.2931-2962
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Zhang, Chong, Terence Tai-Leung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2962
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2931
container_title Empirical economics
container_volume 61
creator Wu, Zhang
Chong, Terence Tai-Leung
description The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2597013459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597013459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6M48SPFUKlPKQKFtC1lboTSGnjYruV8vc4BKk7FtbYmnvneg4hlwyuGYC8CQBMsQxy6A-wjB-RESt4mSmds2MyAi5lJjnPT8lZCCsA4KosRuTl3mGg8RPpprLeoXWt23TpESN6Gl26-S-MdO_WVWzWTexu6XTfLLG1SGvvNnT-Rpt2uQvRNxjOyUldrQNe_NUxmT9M3ydP2ez18XlyN8tsATpmhUifVCVHC4ulhAK4WOQLobWuFJeV1apksgJha5CsEEKDEKIWSjKLDFDxMbka5m69-95hiGbldr5NkSYvtQTGi1InVT6o0mYheKzN1jdpoc4wMD03M3AziZn55WZ4MtHB1LNowsEipdRcctWn80ESUrP9QH9I_2fwD9RSeOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597013459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Zhang ; Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhang ; Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creatorcontrib><description>The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-7332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-8921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Econometrics ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Finance ; Housing ; Housing starts ; Insurance ; Macroeconomics ; Management ; Recessions ; Securities markets ; Statistics for Business ; Unemployment ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Empirical economics, 2021-12, Vol.61 (6), p.2931-2962</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creatorcontrib><title>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</title><title>Empirical economics</title><addtitle>Empir Econ</addtitle><description>The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.</description><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing starts</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0377-7332</issn><issn>1435-8921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6M48SPFUKlPKQKFtC1lboTSGnjYruV8vc4BKk7FtbYmnvneg4hlwyuGYC8CQBMsQxy6A-wjB-RESt4mSmds2MyAi5lJjnPT8lZCCsA4KosRuTl3mGg8RPpprLeoXWt23TpESN6Gl26-S-MdO_WVWzWTexu6XTfLLG1SGvvNnT-Rpt2uQvRNxjOyUldrQNe_NUxmT9M3ydP2ez18XlyN8tsATpmhUifVCVHC4ulhAK4WOQLobWuFJeV1apksgJha5CsEEKDEKIWSjKLDFDxMbka5m69-95hiGbldr5NkSYvtQTGi1InVT6o0mYheKzN1jdpoc4wMD03M3AziZn55WZ4MtHB1LNowsEipdRcctWn80ESUrP9QH9I_2fwD9RSeOU</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Wu, Zhang</creator><creator>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</title><author>Wu, Zhang ; Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing starts</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Empirical economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Zhang</au><au>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</atitle><jtitle>Empirical economics</jtitle><stitle>Empir Econ</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2931</spage><epage>2962</epage><pages>2931-2962</pages><issn>0377-7332</issn><eissn>1435-8921</eissn><abstract>The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-7332
ispartof Empirical economics, 2021-12, Vol.61 (6), p.2931-2962
issn 0377-7332
1435-8921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2597013459
source Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Econometrics
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Finance
Housing
Housing starts
Insurance
Macroeconomics
Management
Recessions
Securities markets
Statistics for Business
Unemployment
Volatility
title Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20macroeconomy%20matter%20to%20market%20volatility?%20Evidence%20from%20US%20industries&rft.jtitle=Empirical%20economics&rft.au=Wu,%20Zhang&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2931&rft.epage=2962&rft.pages=2931-2962&rft.issn=0377-7332&rft.eissn=1435-8921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597013459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597013459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true