Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries
The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Empirical economics 2021-12, Vol.61 (6), p.2931-2962 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2962 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2931 |
container_title | Empirical economics |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Wu, Zhang Chong, Terence Tai-Leung |
description | The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2597013459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597013459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6M48SPFUKlPKQKFtC1lboTSGnjYruV8vc4BKk7FtbYmnvneg4hlwyuGYC8CQBMsQxy6A-wjB-RESt4mSmds2MyAi5lJjnPT8lZCCsA4KosRuTl3mGg8RPpprLeoXWt23TpESN6Gl26-S-MdO_WVWzWTexu6XTfLLG1SGvvNnT-Rpt2uQvRNxjOyUldrQNe_NUxmT9M3ydP2ez18XlyN8tsATpmhUifVCVHC4ulhAK4WOQLobWuFJeV1apksgJha5CsEEKDEKIWSjKLDFDxMbka5m69-95hiGbldr5NkSYvtQTGi1InVT6o0mYheKzN1jdpoc4wMD03M3AziZn55WZ4MtHB1LNowsEipdRcctWn80ESUrP9QH9I_2fwD9RSeOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597013459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Zhang ; Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhang ; Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creatorcontrib><description>The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-7332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-8921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Econometrics ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Finance ; Housing ; Housing starts ; Insurance ; Macroeconomics ; Management ; Recessions ; Securities markets ; Statistics for Business ; Unemployment ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Empirical economics, 2021-12, Vol.61 (6), p.2931-2962</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creatorcontrib><title>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</title><title>Empirical economics</title><addtitle>Empir Econ</addtitle><description>The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.</description><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing starts</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0377-7332</issn><issn>1435-8921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6M48SPFUKlPKQKFtC1lboTSGnjYruV8vc4BKk7FtbYmnvneg4hlwyuGYC8CQBMsQxy6A-wjB-RESt4mSmds2MyAi5lJjnPT8lZCCsA4KosRuTl3mGg8RPpprLeoXWt23TpESN6Gl26-S-MdO_WVWzWTexu6XTfLLG1SGvvNnT-Rpt2uQvRNxjOyUldrQNe_NUxmT9M3ydP2ez18XlyN8tsATpmhUifVCVHC4ulhAK4WOQLobWuFJeV1apksgJha5CsEEKDEKIWSjKLDFDxMbka5m69-95hiGbldr5NkSYvtQTGi1InVT6o0mYheKzN1jdpoc4wMD03M3AziZn55WZ4MtHB1LNowsEipdRcctWn80ESUrP9QH9I_2fwD9RSeOU</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Wu, Zhang</creator><creator>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</title><author>Wu, Zhang ; Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-46200853ec0bd704036b2b6999a837ac98517a06cf07146690666f6871ce10e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing starts</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Empirical economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Zhang</au><au>Chong, Terence Tai-Leung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries</atitle><jtitle>Empirical economics</jtitle><stitle>Empir Econ</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2931</spage><epage>2962</epage><pages>2931-2962</pages><issn>0377-7332</issn><eissn>1435-8921</eissn><abstract>The paper employs a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model to examine the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and US stock market volatility at the industry level, with three main findings. First, some macroeconomic factors, such as the term spread, the housing starts, the National Activity Index, the change in unemployment rate, and the default rate, have noticeable effects on industry volatility. Second, out-of-sample test results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model with macroeconomic series helps improve forecasting performance mainly in the consumer staples sector, but its performance is comparable to that of the GJR-GARCH(1,1) model in other sectors. Finally, on average, the term spread contributes the most to fluctuations during expansions, whereas the default rate assumes the most significant role during recessions. As for quantitative easing, although it seems to reduce the scale of stock volatility and to cause the volatilities across sectors associated with macroeconomic series to reach the values observed in expansions, the volatility attributed to the default rate is approaching its average level in recession periods.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-7332 |
ispartof | Empirical economics, 2021-12, Vol.61 (6), p.2931-2962 |
issn | 0377-7332 1435-8921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2597013459 |
source | Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Econometrics Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Finance Housing Housing starts Insurance Macroeconomics Management Recessions Securities markets Statistics for Business Unemployment Volatility |
title | Does the macroeconomy matter to market volatility? Evidence from US industries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20macroeconomy%20matter%20to%20market%20volatility?%20Evidence%20from%20US%20industries&rft.jtitle=Empirical%20economics&rft.au=Wu,%20Zhang&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2931&rft.epage=2962&rft.pages=2931-2962&rft.issn=0377-7332&rft.eissn=1435-8921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00181-020-02001-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597013459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597013459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |