Selecting Markov chain orders for generating daily precipitation series across different Köppen climate regimes

Markov chain models are a commonly used statistical technique to generate realistic sequences of precipitation, but the choice of model order can strongly affect their performance. Although it is widely accepted that a first‐order Markov chain reproduces precipitation occurrence in temperate latitud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2021-11, Vol.41 (14), p.6223-6237
Hauptverfasser: Wilson Kemsley, Sarah, Osborn, Timothy J., Dorling, Stephen R., Wallace, Craig, Parker, Joanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6237
container_issue 14
container_start_page 6223
container_title International journal of climatology
container_volume 41
creator Wilson Kemsley, Sarah
Osborn, Timothy J.
Dorling, Stephen R.
Wallace, Craig
Parker, Joanne
description Markov chain models are a commonly used statistical technique to generate realistic sequences of precipitation, but the choice of model order can strongly affect their performance. Although it is widely accepted that a first‐order Markov chain reproduces precipitation occurrence in temperate latitudes quite well, it is also well known that first‐order models have several shortcomings. These include a limited memory of rare events and inaccurately reproducing the distribution of dry‐spell lengths, and their performance outside of temperate regions is less well understood. We present, therefore, the first assessment of model‐order optimization which is both global in extent and which uses four evaluation methods: the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and each model‐order's ability to reproduce wet‐ and dry‐spell lengths, and the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence. As well as a global analysis, we also assessed Markov chain performance and model‐order selection separately within five climate regimes based on the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar. These metrics were used to determine the best performing model‐order to generate realistic time series of precipitation across the five different climate regimes. We find that the choice of model order is most sensitive to the performance metric and less dependent on the climate regime. Across all regimes, we show that a first‐order model performs best when evaluated with BIC and for generating realistic wet‐spell distributions across all climate regimes except tropical, where third order performs best. We also find that a third‐order model reproduces observed dry‐spell distributions the best and second order commonly reproduces the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence across all regimes except tropical, where third order once again performs best. Our findings highlight the benefits of a flexible and tailored approach to the choice of Markov chain order for constructing precipitation series. Bayesian information criterion (BIC) used to evaluate the performance of four different Markov chain model orders at reproducing observed precipitation series, assessed on a 5° × 5° grid. BIC is one of four evaluative methods we used to globally assess model‐order performance, with results aggregated into five climate regimes using the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/joc.7175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2596933628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2596933628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-f0f13e5090151ac9a3bd23b173094ead7da8d0c24addadf1bca9f78b681c8a833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1OwzAMB_AIgcQYSDxCJC5cOpxmbZMjmmB8DO0AnKs0cUZG15SkA-3FeAFejG7jysmS9bP9lwk5ZzBiAOnV0utRwYrsgAwYyCIBEOKQDEBImYgxE8fkJMYlAEjJ8gFpn7FG3blmQZ9UePefVL8p11AfDIZIrQ90gQ0GtSNGuXpD24Data7re76hEYPDSJUOPkZqnLUYsOno489322JDde1WqkMacOFWGE_JkVV1xLO_OiSvtzcvk7tkNp_eT65nieZpkSUWLOOYgQSWMaWl4pVJecUKDnKMyhRGCQM6HStjlLGs0kraQlS5YFoowfmQXOz3tsF_rDF25dKvQ9OfLNNM5pLzPBW9utyrXfqAtmxDHzdsSgbl9p_9lC63_-xpsqdfrsbNv658mE92_hedrnnn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596933628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting Markov chain orders for generating daily precipitation series across different Köppen climate regimes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah ; Osborn, Timothy J. ; Dorling, Stephen R. ; Wallace, Craig ; Parker, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah ; Osborn, Timothy J. ; Dorling, Stephen R. ; Wallace, Craig ; Parker, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Markov chain models are a commonly used statistical technique to generate realistic sequences of precipitation, but the choice of model order can strongly affect their performance. Although it is widely accepted that a first‐order Markov chain reproduces precipitation occurrence in temperate latitudes quite well, it is also well known that first‐order models have several shortcomings. These include a limited memory of rare events and inaccurately reproducing the distribution of dry‐spell lengths, and their performance outside of temperate regions is less well understood. We present, therefore, the first assessment of model‐order optimization which is both global in extent and which uses four evaluation methods: the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and each model‐order's ability to reproduce wet‐ and dry‐spell lengths, and the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence. As well as a global analysis, we also assessed Markov chain performance and model‐order selection separately within five climate regimes based on the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar. These metrics were used to determine the best performing model‐order to generate realistic time series of precipitation across the five different climate regimes. We find that the choice of model order is most sensitive to the performance metric and less dependent on the climate regime. Across all regimes, we show that a first‐order model performs best when evaluated with BIC and for generating realistic wet‐spell distributions across all climate regimes except tropical, where third order performs best. We also find that a third‐order model reproduces observed dry‐spell distributions the best and second order commonly reproduces the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence across all regimes except tropical, where third order once again performs best. Our findings highlight the benefits of a flexible and tailored approach to the choice of Markov chain order for constructing precipitation series. Bayesian information criterion (BIC) used to evaluate the performance of four different Markov chain model orders at reproducing observed precipitation series, assessed on a 5° × 5° grid. BIC is one of four evaluative methods we used to globally assess model‐order performance, with results aggregated into five climate regimes using the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.7175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Climate ; Climate models ; Daily precipitation ; global &lt; 2.scale ; Interannual variability ; Markov analysis ; Markov chain ; Markov chains ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Precipitation ; Probability theory ; Sequences ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; stochastic weather generator ; Tropical climate ; Tropical climates ; Variability</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2021-11, Vol.41 (14), p.6223-6237</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Meteorological Society.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-f0f13e5090151ac9a3bd23b173094ead7da8d0c24addadf1bca9f78b681c8a833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-f0f13e5090151ac9a3bd23b173094ead7da8d0c24addadf1bca9f78b681c8a833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7652-5060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.7175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.7175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorling, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting Markov chain orders for generating daily precipitation series across different Köppen climate regimes</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>Markov chain models are a commonly used statistical technique to generate realistic sequences of precipitation, but the choice of model order can strongly affect their performance. Although it is widely accepted that a first‐order Markov chain reproduces precipitation occurrence in temperate latitudes quite well, it is also well known that first‐order models have several shortcomings. These include a limited memory of rare events and inaccurately reproducing the distribution of dry‐spell lengths, and their performance outside of temperate regions is less well understood. We present, therefore, the first assessment of model‐order optimization which is both global in extent and which uses four evaluation methods: the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and each model‐order's ability to reproduce wet‐ and dry‐spell lengths, and the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence. As well as a global analysis, we also assessed Markov chain performance and model‐order selection separately within five climate regimes based on the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar. These metrics were used to determine the best performing model‐order to generate realistic time series of precipitation across the five different climate regimes. We find that the choice of model order is most sensitive to the performance metric and less dependent on the climate regime. Across all regimes, we show that a first‐order model performs best when evaluated with BIC and for generating realistic wet‐spell distributions across all climate regimes except tropical, where third order performs best. We also find that a third‐order model reproduces observed dry‐spell distributions the best and second order commonly reproduces the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence across all regimes except tropical, where third order once again performs best. Our findings highlight the benefits of a flexible and tailored approach to the choice of Markov chain order for constructing precipitation series. Bayesian information criterion (BIC) used to evaluate the performance of four different Markov chain model orders at reproducing observed precipitation series, assessed on a 5° × 5° grid. BIC is one of four evaluative methods we used to globally assess model‐order performance, with results aggregated into five climate regimes using the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>global &lt; 2.scale</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>Markov chain</subject><subject>Markov chains</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>stochastic weather generator</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical climates</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1OwzAMB_AIgcQYSDxCJC5cOpxmbZMjmmB8DO0AnKs0cUZG15SkA-3FeAFejG7jysmS9bP9lwk5ZzBiAOnV0utRwYrsgAwYyCIBEOKQDEBImYgxE8fkJMYlAEjJ8gFpn7FG3blmQZ9UePefVL8p11AfDIZIrQ90gQ0GtSNGuXpD24Data7re76hEYPDSJUOPkZqnLUYsOno489322JDde1WqkMacOFWGE_JkVV1xLO_OiSvtzcvk7tkNp_eT65nieZpkSUWLOOYgQSWMaWl4pVJecUKDnKMyhRGCQM6HStjlLGs0kraQlS5YFoowfmQXOz3tsF_rDF25dKvQ9OfLNNM5pLzPBW9utyrXfqAtmxDHzdsSgbl9p_9lC63_-xpsqdfrsbNv658mE92_hedrnnn</recordid><startdate>20211130</startdate><enddate>20211130</enddate><creator>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah</creator><creator>Osborn, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Dorling, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Wallace, Craig</creator><creator>Parker, Joanne</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-5060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211130</creationdate><title>Selecting Markov chain orders for generating daily precipitation series across different Köppen climate regimes</title><author>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah ; Osborn, Timothy J. ; Dorling, Stephen R. ; Wallace, Craig ; Parker, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-f0f13e5090151ac9a3bd23b173094ead7da8d0c24addadf1bca9f78b681c8a833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>global &lt; 2.scale</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>Markov chain</topic><topic>Markov chains</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>stochastic weather generator</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical climates</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorling, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson Kemsley, Sarah</au><au>Osborn, Timothy J.</au><au>Dorling, Stephen R.</au><au>Wallace, Craig</au><au>Parker, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting Markov chain orders for generating daily precipitation series across different Köppen climate regimes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2021-11-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6223</spage><epage>6237</epage><pages>6223-6237</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>Markov chain models are a commonly used statistical technique to generate realistic sequences of precipitation, but the choice of model order can strongly affect their performance. Although it is widely accepted that a first‐order Markov chain reproduces precipitation occurrence in temperate latitudes quite well, it is also well known that first‐order models have several shortcomings. These include a limited memory of rare events and inaccurately reproducing the distribution of dry‐spell lengths, and their performance outside of temperate regions is less well understood. We present, therefore, the first assessment of model‐order optimization which is both global in extent and which uses four evaluation methods: the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and each model‐order's ability to reproduce wet‐ and dry‐spell lengths, and the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence. As well as a global analysis, we also assessed Markov chain performance and model‐order selection separately within five climate regimes based on the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar. These metrics were used to determine the best performing model‐order to generate realistic time series of precipitation across the five different climate regimes. We find that the choice of model order is most sensitive to the performance metric and less dependent on the climate regime. Across all regimes, we show that a first‐order model performs best when evaluated with BIC and for generating realistic wet‐spell distributions across all climate regimes except tropical, where third order performs best. We also find that a third‐order model reproduces observed dry‐spell distributions the best and second order commonly reproduces the interannual variability of precipitation occurrence across all regimes except tropical, where third order once again performs best. Our findings highlight the benefits of a flexible and tailored approach to the choice of Markov chain order for constructing precipitation series. Bayesian information criterion (BIC) used to evaluate the performance of four different Markov chain model orders at reproducing observed precipitation series, assessed on a 5° × 5° grid. BIC is one of four evaluative methods we used to globally assess model‐order performance, with results aggregated into five climate regimes using the Köppen classification system: tropical, dry, temperate, continental and polar.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.7175</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-5060</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8418
ispartof International journal of climatology, 2021-11, Vol.41 (14), p.6223-6237
issn 0899-8418
1097-0088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2596933628
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bayesian analysis
Climate
Climate models
Daily precipitation
global < 2.scale
Interannual variability
Markov analysis
Markov chain
Markov chains
Mathematical models
Optimization
Precipitation
Probability theory
Sequences
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
stochastic weather generator
Tropical climate
Tropical climates
Variability
title Selecting Markov chain orders for generating daily precipitation series across different Köppen climate regimes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A50%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20Markov%20chain%20orders%20for%20generating%20daily%20precipitation%20series%20across%20different%20K%C3%B6ppen%20climate%20regimes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Wilson%20Kemsley,%20Sarah&rft.date=2021-11-30&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6223&rft.epage=6237&rft.pages=6223-6237&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.7175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2596933628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596933628&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true