Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations
Most organizational researchers understand the detrimental effects of measurement errors in testing relationships among latent variables and hence adopt structural equation modeling (SEM) to control for measurement errors. Nonetheless, many of them revert to regression-based approaches, such as mode...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business and psychology 2021-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1009-1033 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1033 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1009 |
container_title | Journal of business and psychology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Cheung, Gordon W. Cooper-Thomas, Helena D. Lau, Rebecca S. Wang, Linda C. |
description | Most organizational researchers understand the detrimental effects of measurement errors in testing relationships among latent variables and hence adopt structural equation modeling (SEM) to control for measurement errors. Nonetheless, many of them revert to regression-based approaches, such as moderated multiple regression (MMR), when testing for moderating and other nonlinear effects. The predominance of MMR is likely due to the limited evidence showing the superiority of latent interaction approaches over regression-based approaches combined with the previous complicated procedures for testing latent interactions. In this teaching note, we first briefly explain the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach, which estimates latent interaction effects while controlling for measurement errors. Then we explain the reliability-corrected single-indicator LMS (RCSLMS) approach to testing latent interactions with summated scales and correcting for measurement errors, yielding results which approximate those from LMS. Next, we report simulation results illustrating that LMS and RCSLMS outperform MMR in terms of accuracy of point estimates and confidence intervals for interaction effects under various conditions. Then, we show how LMS and RCSLMS can be implemented with Mplus, providing an example-based tutorial to demonstrate a 4-step procedure for testing a range of latent interactions, as well as the decisions at each step. Finally, we conclude with answers to some frequently asked questions when testing latent interactions. As supplementary files to support researchers, we provide a narrated PowerPoint presentation, all Mplus syntax and output files, data sets for numerical examples, and Excel files for conducting the loglikelihood values difference test and plotting the latent interaction effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2596816247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48763605</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48763605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-5ee43d699044ffda10640d3847ca2e41cf9b5f3072297886971551180d520ddb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LXDEUhoNU6HTsHygIga5ve5LcfC1bUVuYoqBCd-FOkjtmGBNNcin-e-NcP3ZdncV5nvdwXoS-EPhGAOT3QkAJ3QGFDrQksoMDtCBcso5x9vcDWoBSumNUqI_oUylbAOBEwALZa19qiBv8JzmfhxpSxCHin1MJ0ZeCh-jwZXm0t2mXNsEOO3xVJxd8wf9CvcWrofpYX2Xv2jZPtk65gacP0z6vHKHDcdgV__llLtHN2en1ya9udXH---THqrNMq9px73vmhNbQ9-PoBgKiB8dUL-1AfU_sqNd8ZCAp1VK1dyXhnBAFjlNwbs2W6Ouce5_Tw9T-Mts05dhOGsq1UETQXjaKzpTNqZTsR3Ofw92QHw0B81ymmcs0rUyzL9NAk_AseZtiKO-KVC2ackkawmaktGXc-Px-_b_Bx7O1LTXlt9xeScEEcPYEojeLuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596816247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cheung, Gordon W. ; Cooper-Thomas, Helena D. ; Lau, Rebecca S. ; Wang, Linda C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Gordon W. ; Cooper-Thomas, Helena D. ; Lau, Rebecca S. ; Wang, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><description>Most organizational researchers understand the detrimental effects of measurement errors in testing relationships among latent variables and hence adopt structural equation modeling (SEM) to control for measurement errors. Nonetheless, many of them revert to regression-based approaches, such as moderated multiple regression (MMR), when testing for moderating and other nonlinear effects. The predominance of MMR is likely due to the limited evidence showing the superiority of latent interaction approaches over regression-based approaches combined with the previous complicated procedures for testing latent interactions. In this teaching note, we first briefly explain the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach, which estimates latent interaction effects while controlling for measurement errors. Then we explain the reliability-corrected single-indicator LMS (RCSLMS) approach to testing latent interactions with summated scales and correcting for measurement errors, yielding results which approximate those from LMS. Next, we report simulation results illustrating that LMS and RCSLMS outperform MMR in terms of accuracy of point estimates and confidence intervals for interaction effects under various conditions. Then, we show how LMS and RCSLMS can be implemented with Mplus, providing an example-based tutorial to demonstrate a 4-step procedure for testing a range of latent interactions, as well as the decisions at each step. Finally, we conclude with answers to some frequently asked questions when testing latent interactions. As supplementary files to support researchers, we provide a narrated PowerPoint presentation, all Mplus syntax and output files, data sets for numerical examples, and Excel files for conducting the loglikelihood values difference test and plotting the latent interaction effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-353X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Business and Management ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Industrial and Organizational Psychology ; ORIGINAL PAPER ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Psychology ; Researchers ; Simulation ; Social Sciences ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of business and psychology, 2021-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1009-1033</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-5ee43d699044ffda10640d3847ca2e41cf9b5f3072297886971551180d520ddb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-5ee43d699044ffda10640d3847ca2e41cf9b5f3072297886971551180d520ddb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4080-9704</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Gordon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations</title><title>Journal of business and psychology</title><addtitle>J Bus Psychol</addtitle><description>Most organizational researchers understand the detrimental effects of measurement errors in testing relationships among latent variables and hence adopt structural equation modeling (SEM) to control for measurement errors. Nonetheless, many of them revert to regression-based approaches, such as moderated multiple regression (MMR), when testing for moderating and other nonlinear effects. The predominance of MMR is likely due to the limited evidence showing the superiority of latent interaction approaches over regression-based approaches combined with the previous complicated procedures for testing latent interactions. In this teaching note, we first briefly explain the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach, which estimates latent interaction effects while controlling for measurement errors. Then we explain the reliability-corrected single-indicator LMS (RCSLMS) approach to testing latent interactions with summated scales and correcting for measurement errors, yielding results which approximate those from LMS. Next, we report simulation results illustrating that LMS and RCSLMS outperform MMR in terms of accuracy of point estimates and confidence intervals for interaction effects under various conditions. Then, we show how LMS and RCSLMS can be implemented with Mplus, providing an example-based tutorial to demonstrate a 4-step procedure for testing a range of latent interactions, as well as the decisions at each step. Finally, we conclude with answers to some frequently asked questions when testing latent interactions. As supplementary files to support researchers, we provide a narrated PowerPoint presentation, all Mplus syntax and output files, data sets for numerical examples, and Excel files for conducting the loglikelihood values difference test and plotting the latent interaction effects.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</subject><subject>ORIGINAL PAPER</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0889-3268</issn><issn>1573-353X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LXDEUhoNU6HTsHygIga5ve5LcfC1bUVuYoqBCd-FOkjtmGBNNcin-e-NcP3ZdncV5nvdwXoS-EPhGAOT3QkAJ3QGFDrQksoMDtCBcso5x9vcDWoBSumNUqI_oUylbAOBEwALZa19qiBv8JzmfhxpSxCHin1MJ0ZeCh-jwZXm0t2mXNsEOO3xVJxd8wf9CvcWrofpYX2Xv2jZPtk65gacP0z6vHKHDcdgV__llLtHN2en1ya9udXH---THqrNMq9px73vmhNbQ9-PoBgKiB8dUL-1AfU_sqNd8ZCAp1VK1dyXhnBAFjlNwbs2W6Ouce5_Tw9T-Mts05dhOGsq1UETQXjaKzpTNqZTsR3Ofw92QHw0B81ymmcs0rUyzL9NAk_AseZtiKO-KVC2ackkawmaktGXc-Px-_b_Bx7O1LTXlt9xeScEEcPYEojeLuA</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Cheung, Gordon W.</creator><creator>Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.</creator><creator>Lau, Rebecca S.</creator><creator>Wang, Linda C.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-9704</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations</title><author>Cheung, Gordon W. ; Cooper-Thomas, Helena D. ; Lau, Rebecca S. ; Wang, Linda C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-5ee43d699044ffda10640d3847ca2e41cf9b5f3072297886971551180d520ddb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</topic><topic>ORIGINAL PAPER</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Gordon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheung, Gordon W.</au><au>Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.</au><au>Lau, Rebecca S.</au><au>Wang, Linda C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Psychol</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1009</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1009-1033</pages><issn>0889-3268</issn><eissn>1573-353X</eissn><abstract>Most organizational researchers understand the detrimental effects of measurement errors in testing relationships among latent variables and hence adopt structural equation modeling (SEM) to control for measurement errors. Nonetheless, many of them revert to regression-based approaches, such as moderated multiple regression (MMR), when testing for moderating and other nonlinear effects. The predominance of MMR is likely due to the limited evidence showing the superiority of latent interaction approaches over regression-based approaches combined with the previous complicated procedures for testing latent interactions. In this teaching note, we first briefly explain the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach, which estimates latent interaction effects while controlling for measurement errors. Then we explain the reliability-corrected single-indicator LMS (RCSLMS) approach to testing latent interactions with summated scales and correcting for measurement errors, yielding results which approximate those from LMS. Next, we report simulation results illustrating that LMS and RCSLMS outperform MMR in terms of accuracy of point estimates and confidence intervals for interaction effects under various conditions. Then, we show how LMS and RCSLMS can be implemented with Mplus, providing an example-based tutorial to demonstrate a 4-step procedure for testing a range of latent interactions, as well as the decisions at each step. Finally, we conclude with answers to some frequently asked questions when testing latent interactions. As supplementary files to support researchers, we provide a narrated PowerPoint presentation, all Mplus syntax and output files, data sets for numerical examples, and Excel files for conducting the loglikelihood values difference test and plotting the latent interaction effects.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-9704</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-3268 |
ispartof | Journal of business and psychology, 2021-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1009-1033 |
issn | 0889-3268 1573-353X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2596816247 |
source | Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Business and Management Community and Environmental Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology ORIGINAL PAPER Personality and Social Psychology Psychology Researchers Simulation Social Sciences Variables |
title | Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A52%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20Moderation%20in%20Business%20and%20Psychological%20Studies%20with%20Latent%20Moderated%20Structural%20Equations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Cheung,%20Gordon%20W.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1009&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1009-1033&rft.issn=0889-3268&rft.eissn=1573-353X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48763605%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596816247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48763605&rfr_iscdi=true |