Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus
Recent work on Region Innovation Systems (RIS) has emphasised the importance of universities. Until recently, however, related insights into the dynamics of this relationship in respect of the specific role of the science park have been limited. This paper presents a systematic review identifying th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of technology transfer 2021-12, Vol.46 (6), p.2017-2050 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2050 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2017 |
container_title | The Journal of technology transfer |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Theeranattapong, T. Pickernell, D. Simms, C. |
description | Recent work on Region Innovation Systems (RIS) has emphasised the importance of universities. Until recently, however, related insights into the dynamics of this relationship in respect of the specific role of the science park have been limited. This paper presents a systematic review identifying the key roles of each actor in relation to innovation. We link the dynamic roles performed by the university between science parks and the RIS. Our results enable us to identify how the key activities performed by the university change during its interrelations within the RIS and with the science park. Our analysis of the literature distinguishes between three sets of relationships through which the university plays differing roles: RIS-university, RIS-university-science park, and university-science park. Respectively, the University’s relationships between these different RIS actors focuses on: resource sharing, brokerage, and commercialisation-exploitation. Secondly, we find that within each of these relationship types the university can perform three types of roles: on knowledge co-creation, acting as conduit, and inter-organisational relationship building. Distinguishing between these differing relationships and roles enables us to identify a total of nine dynamic roles performed by the University, which include: provision of information, channels of communication, infrastructure, regional networking, building research collaboration, acting as knowledge intermediaries, economic development, technological change and commercialisation processes, and start up creation and commercialisation. The review identifies several gaps in the literature in need of further research, and suggests that university relationships with RIS, interlinked with those between the university and science park itself, are important factors affecting science park innovation performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2596813882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2596813882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-56d841106f13eea185031de9187dd8fa853e1cc46e2bb35762023e494fafe4033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwA6wisTaMH0kcdqjiJVViAUjsjJtMikvrFNsp5O9xGyRYsbJln3NndJPklMI5BSguPIUypwQYECglL0i_l4xAloyUJWX7f-6HyZH3CwAQwIpR8vrY-4ArHUyVLk1Ap0PnMHW4MfiZrvUa3WUa3rYvc9NavUyNte0m8q1N_c4lnTUbdN6EnvjKoK0wiu49tfjV-ePkoNFLjyc_5zh5vrl-mtyR6cPt_eRqSirBaCBZXktBKeQN5Yiaygw4rbGksqhr2WiZcaRVJXJksxnPipwB4yhK0egGBXA-Ts6G3LVrPzr0QS3azsWFvWJZmUvKpWSRYgNVudZ7h41aO7PSrlcU1LZJNTSpYpNq16Tqo5QOElatNf5XKaTIZJ5nLxHhA-Ljp52j-53-T_A37gCDVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596813882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Theeranattapong, T. ; Pickernell, D. ; Simms, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Theeranattapong, T. ; Pickernell, D. ; Simms, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent work on Region Innovation Systems (RIS) has emphasised the importance of universities. Until recently, however, related insights into the dynamics of this relationship in respect of the specific role of the science park have been limited. This paper presents a systematic review identifying the key roles of each actor in relation to innovation. We link the dynamic roles performed by the university between science parks and the RIS. Our results enable us to identify how the key activities performed by the university change during its interrelations within the RIS and with the science park. Our analysis of the literature distinguishes between three sets of relationships through which the university plays differing roles: RIS-university, RIS-university-science park, and university-science park. Respectively, the University’s relationships between these different RIS actors focuses on: resource sharing, brokerage, and commercialisation-exploitation. Secondly, we find that within each of these relationship types the university can perform three types of roles: on knowledge co-creation, acting as conduit, and inter-organisational relationship building. Distinguishing between these differing relationships and roles enables us to identify a total of nine dynamic roles performed by the University, which include: provision of information, channels of communication, infrastructure, regional networking, building research collaboration, acting as knowledge intermediaries, economic development, technological change and commercialisation processes, and start up creation and commercialisation. The review identifies several gaps in the literature in need of further research, and suggests that university relationships with RIS, interlinked with those between the university and science park itself, are important factors affecting science park innovation performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0892-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7047</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Colleges & universities ; Commercial Law ; Commercialization ; Economic development ; Economic Growth ; Exploitation ; Industrial Organization ; Information technology ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Innovations ; Literature reviews ; Management ; Regional development ; Regions ; Roles ; Science ; Science parks ; Start up ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>The Journal of technology transfer, 2021-12, Vol.46 (6), p.2017-2050</ispartof><rights>Crown 2021</rights><rights>Crown 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-56d841106f13eea185031de9187dd8fa853e1cc46e2bb35762023e494fafe4033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-56d841106f13eea185031de9187dd8fa853e1cc46e2bb35762023e494fafe4033</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5172-4453 ; 0000-0003-0912-095X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theeranattapong, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickernell, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus</title><title>The Journal of technology transfer</title><addtitle>J Technol Transf</addtitle><description>Recent work on Region Innovation Systems (RIS) has emphasised the importance of universities. Until recently, however, related insights into the dynamics of this relationship in respect of the specific role of the science park have been limited. This paper presents a systematic review identifying the key roles of each actor in relation to innovation. We link the dynamic roles performed by the university between science parks and the RIS. Our results enable us to identify how the key activities performed by the university change during its interrelations within the RIS and with the science park. Our analysis of the literature distinguishes between three sets of relationships through which the university plays differing roles: RIS-university, RIS-university-science park, and university-science park. Respectively, the University’s relationships between these different RIS actors focuses on: resource sharing, brokerage, and commercialisation-exploitation. Secondly, we find that within each of these relationship types the university can perform three types of roles: on knowledge co-creation, acting as conduit, and inter-organisational relationship building. Distinguishing between these differing relationships and roles enables us to identify a total of nine dynamic roles performed by the University, which include: provision of information, channels of communication, infrastructure, regional networking, building research collaboration, acting as knowledge intermediaries, economic development, technological change and commercialisation processes, and start up creation and commercialisation. The review identifies several gaps in the literature in need of further research, and suggests that university relationships with RIS, interlinked with those between the university and science park itself, are important factors affecting science park innovation performance.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science parks</subject><subject>Start up</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>0892-9912</issn><issn>0892-9912</issn><issn>1573-7047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwA6wisTaMH0kcdqjiJVViAUjsjJtMikvrFNsp5O9xGyRYsbJln3NndJPklMI5BSguPIUypwQYECglL0i_l4xAloyUJWX7f-6HyZH3CwAQwIpR8vrY-4ArHUyVLk1Ap0PnMHW4MfiZrvUa3WUa3rYvc9NavUyNte0m8q1N_c4lnTUbdN6EnvjKoK0wiu49tfjV-ePkoNFLjyc_5zh5vrl-mtyR6cPt_eRqSirBaCBZXktBKeQN5Yiaygw4rbGksqhr2WiZcaRVJXJksxnPipwB4yhK0egGBXA-Ts6G3LVrPzr0QS3azsWFvWJZmUvKpWSRYgNVudZ7h41aO7PSrlcU1LZJNTSpYpNq16Tqo5QOElatNf5XKaTIZJ5nLxHhA-Ljp52j-53-T_A37gCDVg</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Theeranattapong, T.</creator><creator>Pickernell, D.</creator><creator>Simms, C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-4453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-095X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus</title><author>Theeranattapong, T. ; Pickernell, D. ; Simms, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-56d841106f13eea185031de9187dd8fa853e1cc46e2bb35762023e494fafe4033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science parks</topic><topic>Start up</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theeranattapong, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickernell, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of technology transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theeranattapong, T.</au><au>Pickernell, D.</au><au>Simms, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of technology transfer</jtitle><stitle>J Technol Transf</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2017</spage><epage>2050</epage><pages>2017-2050</pages><issn>0892-9912</issn><eissn>0892-9912</eissn><eissn>1573-7047</eissn><abstract>Recent work on Region Innovation Systems (RIS) has emphasised the importance of universities. Until recently, however, related insights into the dynamics of this relationship in respect of the specific role of the science park have been limited. This paper presents a systematic review identifying the key roles of each actor in relation to innovation. We link the dynamic roles performed by the university between science parks and the RIS. Our results enable us to identify how the key activities performed by the university change during its interrelations within the RIS and with the science park. Our analysis of the literature distinguishes between three sets of relationships through which the university plays differing roles: RIS-university, RIS-university-science park, and university-science park. Respectively, the University’s relationships between these different RIS actors focuses on: resource sharing, brokerage, and commercialisation-exploitation. Secondly, we find that within each of these relationship types the university can perform three types of roles: on knowledge co-creation, acting as conduit, and inter-organisational relationship building. Distinguishing between these differing relationships and roles enables us to identify a total of nine dynamic roles performed by the University, which include: provision of information, channels of communication, infrastructure, regional networking, building research collaboration, acting as knowledge intermediaries, economic development, technological change and commercialisation processes, and start up creation and commercialisation. The review identifies several gaps in the literature in need of further research, and suggests that university relationships with RIS, interlinked with those between the university and science park itself, are important factors affecting science park innovation performance.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-4453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-095X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-9912 |
ispartof | The Journal of technology transfer, 2021-12, Vol.46 (6), p.2017-2050 |
issn | 0892-9912 0892-9912 1573-7047 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2596813882 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Business and Management Colleges & universities Commercial Law Commercialization Economic development Economic Growth Exploitation Industrial Organization Information technology Innovation/Technology Management Innovations Literature reviews Management Regional development Regions Roles Science Science parks Start up Technological change |
title | Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A30%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20literature%20review%20paper:%20the%20regional%20innovation%20system-university-science%20park%20nexus&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20technology%20transfer&rft.au=Theeranattapong,%20T.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2017&rft.epage=2050&rft.pages=2017-2050&rft.issn=0892-9912&rft.eissn=0892-9912&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2596813882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596813882&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |