The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving
It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001) England : 2001), 2021-11, Vol.53 (7), p.637-656 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 656 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 637 |
container_title | Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001) |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Fotios, S Robbins, CJ Fox, SR Cheal, C Rowe, R |
description | It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1477153520979011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2595964607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1477153520979011</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2595964607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Dnh1NWmSzeYoxS8oeKnnJc1OtintZk1SwX_vri0Igqd5zPuCR8g1o3eMKXXPhFJMcjmjWmnK2AmZjK-Cal6dHvHIn5OLlDaUsopyPiFfyzUCOoc2Q3DQ-JSjsdmH7hYipj50CWEXGgTTNWBahNBBj9H3a4xmC9nEFjM0mPHHBTmA71yIO0h533hMY-zWt-vsuxYGAproPwd8Sc6c2Sa8Ot4peX96XM5fisXb8-v8YVFYLlkuUHEmJOfUYsUtZ9IZwYUrHS01asGVVtZZy2hlhREoFFtVvNTNygpdzhzjU3JzyO1j-NhjyvUm7GM3VNYzqaUuRUnVoKIHlY0hpYiu7qPfmfhVM1qPA9d_Bx4sxcGShll-Q__VfwNiOHsp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595964607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fotios, S ; Robbins, CJ ; Fox, SR ; Cheal, C ; Rowe, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Fotios, S ; Robbins, CJ ; Fox, SR ; Cheal, C ; Rowe, R</creatorcontrib><description>It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-1535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1477153520979011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age ; Lighting ; Object recognition ; Target detection ; Visual observation ; Visual tasks</subject><ispartof>Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001), 2021-11, Vol.53 (7), p.637-656</ispartof><rights>The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6076-5983 ; 0000-0002-2410-7641</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477153520979011$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477153520979011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fotios, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, CJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, SR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheal, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, R</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</title><title>Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001)</title><description>It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Target detection</subject><subject>Visual observation</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><issn>1477-1535</issn><issn>1477-0938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Dnh1NWmSzeYoxS8oeKnnJc1OtintZk1SwX_vri0Igqd5zPuCR8g1o3eMKXXPhFJMcjmjWmnK2AmZjK-Cal6dHvHIn5OLlDaUsopyPiFfyzUCOoc2Q3DQ-JSjsdmH7hYipj50CWEXGgTTNWBahNBBj9H3a4xmC9nEFjM0mPHHBTmA71yIO0h533hMY-zWt-vsuxYGAproPwd8Sc6c2Sa8Ot4peX96XM5fisXb8-v8YVFYLlkuUHEmJOfUYsUtZ9IZwYUrHS01asGVVtZZy2hlhREoFFtVvNTNygpdzhzjU3JzyO1j-NhjyvUm7GM3VNYzqaUuRUnVoKIHlY0hpYiu7qPfmfhVM1qPA9d_Bx4sxcGShll-Q__VfwNiOHsp</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Fotios, S</creator><creator>Robbins, CJ</creator><creator>Fox, SR</creator><creator>Cheal, C</creator><creator>Rowe, R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-5983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-7641</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</title><author>Fotios, S ; Robbins, CJ ; Fox, SR ; Cheal, C ; Rowe, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Target detection</topic><topic>Visual observation</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fotios, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, CJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, SR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheal, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fotios, S</au><au>Robbins, CJ</au><au>Fox, SR</au><au>Cheal, C</au><au>Rowe, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</atitle><jtitle>Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>637-656</pages><issn>1477-1535</issn><eissn>1477-0938</eissn><abstract>It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1477153520979011</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-5983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-7641</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-1535 |
ispartof | Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001), 2021-11, Vol.53 (7), p.637-656 |
issn | 1477-1535 1477-0938 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2595964607 |
source | SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Age Lighting Object recognition Target detection Visual observation Visual tasks |
title | The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20distraction,%20response%20mode%20and%20age%20on%20peripheral%20target%20detection%20to%20inform%20studies%20of%20lighting%20for%20driving&rft.jtitle=Lighting%20research%20&%20technology%20(London,%20England%20:%202001)&rft.au=Fotios,%20S&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=637-656&rft.issn=1477-1535&rft.eissn=1477-0938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1477153520979011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2595964607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595964607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1477153520979011&rfr_iscdi=true |