The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving

It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001) England : 2001), 2021-11, Vol.53 (7), p.637-656
Hauptverfasser: Fotios, S, Robbins, CJ, Fox, SR, Cheal, C, Rowe, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 656
container_issue 7
container_start_page 637
container_title Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001)
container_volume 53
creator Fotios, S
Robbins, CJ
Fox, SR
Cheal, C
Rowe, R
description It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1477153520979011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2595964607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1477153520979011</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2595964607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Dnh1NWmSzeYoxS8oeKnnJc1OtintZk1SwX_vri0Igqd5zPuCR8g1o3eMKXXPhFJMcjmjWmnK2AmZjK-Cal6dHvHIn5OLlDaUsopyPiFfyzUCOoc2Q3DQ-JSjsdmH7hYipj50CWEXGgTTNWBahNBBj9H3a4xmC9nEFjM0mPHHBTmA71yIO0h533hMY-zWt-vsuxYGAproPwd8Sc6c2Sa8Ot4peX96XM5fisXb8-v8YVFYLlkuUHEmJOfUYsUtZ9IZwYUrHS01asGVVtZZy2hlhREoFFtVvNTNygpdzhzjU3JzyO1j-NhjyvUm7GM3VNYzqaUuRUnVoKIHlY0hpYiu7qPfmfhVM1qPA9d_Bx4sxcGShll-Q__VfwNiOHsp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595964607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fotios, S ; Robbins, CJ ; Fox, SR ; Cheal, C ; Rowe, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Fotios, S ; Robbins, CJ ; Fox, SR ; Cheal, C ; Rowe, R</creatorcontrib><description>It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-1535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1477153520979011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age ; Lighting ; Object recognition ; Target detection ; Visual observation ; Visual tasks</subject><ispartof>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001), 2021-11, Vol.53 (7), p.637-656</ispartof><rights>The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6076-5983 ; 0000-0002-2410-7641</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477153520979011$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477153520979011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fotios, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, CJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, SR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheal, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, R</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</title><title>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001)</title><description>It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Target detection</subject><subject>Visual observation</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><issn>1477-1535</issn><issn>1477-0938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Dnh1NWmSzeYoxS8oeKnnJc1OtintZk1SwX_vri0Igqd5zPuCR8g1o3eMKXXPhFJMcjmjWmnK2AmZjK-Cal6dHvHIn5OLlDaUsopyPiFfyzUCOoc2Q3DQ-JSjsdmH7hYipj50CWEXGgTTNWBahNBBj9H3a4xmC9nEFjM0mPHHBTmA71yIO0h533hMY-zWt-vsuxYGAproPwd8Sc6c2Sa8Ot4peX96XM5fisXb8-v8YVFYLlkuUHEmJOfUYsUtZ9IZwYUrHS01asGVVtZZy2hlhREoFFtVvNTNygpdzhzjU3JzyO1j-NhjyvUm7GM3VNYzqaUuRUnVoKIHlY0hpYiu7qPfmfhVM1qPA9d_Bx4sxcGShll-Q__VfwNiOHsp</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Fotios, S</creator><creator>Robbins, CJ</creator><creator>Fox, SR</creator><creator>Cheal, C</creator><creator>Rowe, R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-5983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-7641</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</title><author>Fotios, S ; Robbins, CJ ; Fox, SR ; Cheal, C ; Rowe, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e73145330ce83c315fa434f6f069e943797cfcc108c4a4e471b8369dbc4962f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Target detection</topic><topic>Visual observation</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fotios, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, CJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, SR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheal, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fotios, S</au><au>Robbins, CJ</au><au>Fox, SR</au><au>Cheal, C</au><au>Rowe, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving</atitle><jtitle>Lighting research &amp; technology (London, England : 2001)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>637-656</pages><issn>1477-1535</issn><eissn>1477-0938</eissn><abstract>It is expected that the detection of peripheral objects, a key visual task for safe driving, is affected by cognitive distraction, by observer age and by the manner in which action is undertaken following detection. An experiment was conducted to measure these effects, using a fixation cross and peripheral target discs displayed on a screen. The experiment was repeated with young (18–25 years) and old (60+years) age groups, with six distraction tasks, and with simple and choice response modes. The older group was found to respond more slowly than the younger group and detected fewer targets. The results suggest that distraction impairs detection, with the degree of impairment depending on the difficulty of the distraction task. Participants were generally slower at responding with choice response but this did not lead to a greater number of missed targets. Where lighting standards are informed by the ability to detect peripheral hazards, the research should represent older people, choice responses and impaired detection due to distraction.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1477153520979011</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-5983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-7641</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-1535
ispartof Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001), 2021-11, Vol.53 (7), p.637-656
issn 1477-1535
1477-0938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2595964607
source SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Lighting
Object recognition
Target detection
Visual observation
Visual tasks
title The effect of distraction, response mode and age on peripheral target detection to inform studies of lighting for driving
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20distraction,%20response%20mode%20and%20age%20on%20peripheral%20target%20detection%20to%20inform%20studies%20of%20lighting%20for%20driving&rft.jtitle=Lighting%20research%20&%20technology%20(London,%20England%20:%202001)&rft.au=Fotios,%20S&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=637-656&rft.issn=1477-1535&rft.eissn=1477-0938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1477153520979011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2595964607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595964607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1477153520979011&rfr_iscdi=true