Can ground-penetrating radar detect adjacent roots and rock fragments in forest soil?

Aim Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used for estimating root biomass, estimating pull-out resistance force of roots, and reconstructing root system architecture. Although GPR can estimate the diameter of a single root, it has not yet been verified whether it can successfully estimate the dia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant and soil 2021-11, Vol.468 (1/2), p.239-257
Hauptverfasser: Tanikawa, Toko, Ikeno, Hidetoshi, Yamase, Keitaro, Dannoura, Masako, Aono, Kenji, Hirano, Yasuhiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 239
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 468
creator Tanikawa, Toko
Ikeno, Hidetoshi
Yamase, Keitaro
Dannoura, Masako
Aono, Kenji
Hirano, Yasuhiro
description Aim Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used for estimating root biomass, estimating pull-out resistance force of roots, and reconstructing root system architecture. Although GPR can estimate the diameter of a single root, it has not yet been verified whether it can successfully estimate the diameters of adjacent roots or whether rock fragments occurring in the soil matrix can be misidentified as roots. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the visual properties of GPR images of root bundles and rock fragments, and (2) clarify whether they have the potential to create non-negligible errors in GPR surveys. Methods Root bundle samples buried in a sandy soil bed were scanned using 900 MHz and 1500 MHz antennas. Sole roots of Cryptomeria japonica and rock fragments in the bed were also scanned. Results A bundle of root formed one hyperbola with an apex in the radar profile, like a sole root. However, the contrast of the hyperbolas was weak and GPR indices relating to diameter were reduced compared to those of the comparably sized sole root. Stones did not form clear images, but boulders were faintly visible with non-negligible GPR indices. Conclusions For evaluation of root biomass, adjacent roots had the potential to lead to significant errors. Similarly, in reconstructions of root system architecture, adjacent roots might lead to incorrect modelling of root point connections, because of incorrect diameters. For pull-out resistance force, adjacent roots could lead to only underestimation, i.e., safe-side error. Misidentification of rock fragments as roots depends on their sizes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11104-021-05116-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2595783984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A682031631</galeid><jstor_id>48695069</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A682031631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-464ee8f3e2bf85d6b7439f53db39db413611a909524166ddaf28d09222b5df443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxcPiwo7ufoEFIeA5bir_unMSGXRdELwo7C2kO0nTszPJmGQOfnsz26I3yaGS4v3qpR5CP4FeAqXdrwIAVBDKgFAJoAj_glYgO04k5eoErSjljNBO__2GTkvZ0OMb1Ao9rW3EU06H6MjeR1-zrXOccLbOZux89WPF1m3s6GPFOaVasI2u3cZ_OGQ77Vq_4DnikLIvFZc0b6--o6_Bbov_8VbP0NPtzeP6jtw__P6zvr4noxCqEqGE933gng2hl04NneA6SO4Grt0ggCsAq6mWTIBSztnAekc1Y2yQLgjBz9DFMnef0_Oh2ZtNOuTYLA2TWnY91_1RdbmoJrv1Zo4htS3HdpzfzWOKPsytf616RjkoDg1gCzDmVEr2wezzvLP5xQA1x7zNkrdpeZv_eRveIL5ApYnj5PPHXz6lzhdqU2rK7z6iV1pSpfkrdrSLtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595783984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can ground-penetrating radar detect adjacent roots and rock fragments in forest soil?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tanikawa, Toko ; Ikeno, Hidetoshi ; Yamase, Keitaro ; Dannoura, Masako ; Aono, Kenji ; Hirano, Yasuhiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanikawa, Toko ; Ikeno, Hidetoshi ; Yamase, Keitaro ; Dannoura, Masako ; Aono, Kenji ; Hirano, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used for estimating root biomass, estimating pull-out resistance force of roots, and reconstructing root system architecture. Although GPR can estimate the diameter of a single root, it has not yet been verified whether it can successfully estimate the diameters of adjacent roots or whether rock fragments occurring in the soil matrix can be misidentified as roots. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the visual properties of GPR images of root bundles and rock fragments, and (2) clarify whether they have the potential to create non-negligible errors in GPR surveys. Methods Root bundle samples buried in a sandy soil bed were scanned using 900 MHz and 1500 MHz antennas. Sole roots of Cryptomeria japonica and rock fragments in the bed were also scanned. Results A bundle of root formed one hyperbola with an apex in the radar profile, like a sole root. However, the contrast of the hyperbolas was weak and GPR indices relating to diameter were reduced compared to those of the comparably sized sole root. Stones did not form clear images, but boulders were faintly visible with non-negligible GPR indices. Conclusions For evaluation of root biomass, adjacent roots had the potential to lead to significant errors. Similarly, in reconstructions of root system architecture, adjacent roots might lead to incorrect modelling of root point connections, because of incorrect diameters. For pull-out resistance force, adjacent roots could lead to only underestimation, i.e., safe-side error. Misidentification of rock fragments as roots depends on their sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-05116-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analysis ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Computer architecture ; Ecology ; Errors ; Forest soils ; Fragments ; Ground penetrating radar ; Habitat fragmentation ; Hyperbolas ; Life Sciences ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Pull-out resistance ; Radar ; Regular Article ; Rocks ; Roots ; Roots (Botany) ; Sandy soils ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2021-11, Vol.468 (1/2), p.239-257</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-464ee8f3e2bf85d6b7439f53db39db413611a909524166ddaf28d09222b5df443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-464ee8f3e2bf85d6b7439f53db39db413611a909524166ddaf28d09222b5df443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5134-5485 ; 0000-0002-6042-8071 ; 0000-0002-9983-670X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-021-05116-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11104-021-05116-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanikawa, Toko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeno, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamase, Keitaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannoura, Masako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aono, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><title>Can ground-penetrating radar detect adjacent roots and rock fragments in forest soil?</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Aim Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used for estimating root biomass, estimating pull-out resistance force of roots, and reconstructing root system architecture. Although GPR can estimate the diameter of a single root, it has not yet been verified whether it can successfully estimate the diameters of adjacent roots or whether rock fragments occurring in the soil matrix can be misidentified as roots. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the visual properties of GPR images of root bundles and rock fragments, and (2) clarify whether they have the potential to create non-negligible errors in GPR surveys. Methods Root bundle samples buried in a sandy soil bed were scanned using 900 MHz and 1500 MHz antennas. Sole roots of Cryptomeria japonica and rock fragments in the bed were also scanned. Results A bundle of root formed one hyperbola with an apex in the radar profile, like a sole root. However, the contrast of the hyperbolas was weak and GPR indices relating to diameter were reduced compared to those of the comparably sized sole root. Stones did not form clear images, but boulders were faintly visible with non-negligible GPR indices. Conclusions For evaluation of root biomass, adjacent roots had the potential to lead to significant errors. Similarly, in reconstructions of root system architecture, adjacent roots might lead to incorrect modelling of root point connections, because of incorrect diameters. For pull-out resistance force, adjacent roots could lead to only underestimation, i.e., safe-side error. Misidentification of rock fragments as roots depends on their sizes.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer architecture</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Ground penetrating radar</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Hyperbolas</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Pull-out resistance</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Roots (Botany)</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxcPiwo7ufoEFIeA5bir_unMSGXRdELwo7C2kO0nTszPJmGQOfnsz26I3yaGS4v3qpR5CP4FeAqXdrwIAVBDKgFAJoAj_glYgO04k5eoErSjljNBO__2GTkvZ0OMb1Ao9rW3EU06H6MjeR1-zrXOccLbOZux89WPF1m3s6GPFOaVasI2u3cZ_OGQ77Vq_4DnikLIvFZc0b6--o6_Bbov_8VbP0NPtzeP6jtw__P6zvr4noxCqEqGE933gng2hl04NneA6SO4Grt0ggCsAq6mWTIBSztnAekc1Y2yQLgjBz9DFMnef0_Oh2ZtNOuTYLA2TWnY91_1RdbmoJrv1Zo4htS3HdpzfzWOKPsytf616RjkoDg1gCzDmVEr2wezzvLP5xQA1x7zNkrdpeZv_eRveIL5ApYnj5PPHXz6lzhdqU2rK7z6iV1pSpfkrdrSLtQ</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Tanikawa, Toko</creator><creator>Ikeno, Hidetoshi</creator><creator>Yamase, Keitaro</creator><creator>Dannoura, Masako</creator><creator>Aono, Kenji</creator><creator>Hirano, Yasuhiro</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-5485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-670X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Can ground-penetrating radar detect adjacent roots and rock fragments in forest soil?</title><author>Tanikawa, Toko ; Ikeno, Hidetoshi ; Yamase, Keitaro ; Dannoura, Masako ; Aono, Kenji ; Hirano, Yasuhiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-464ee8f3e2bf85d6b7439f53db39db413611a909524166ddaf28d09222b5df443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer architecture</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Ground penetrating radar</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Hyperbolas</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Pull-out resistance</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Roots (Botany)</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanikawa, Toko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeno, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamase, Keitaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannoura, Masako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aono, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanikawa, Toko</au><au>Ikeno, Hidetoshi</au><au>Yamase, Keitaro</au><au>Dannoura, Masako</au><au>Aono, Kenji</au><au>Hirano, Yasuhiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can ground-penetrating radar detect adjacent roots and rock fragments in forest soil?</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>468</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>239-257</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Aim Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used for estimating root biomass, estimating pull-out resistance force of roots, and reconstructing root system architecture. Although GPR can estimate the diameter of a single root, it has not yet been verified whether it can successfully estimate the diameters of adjacent roots or whether rock fragments occurring in the soil matrix can be misidentified as roots. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the visual properties of GPR images of root bundles and rock fragments, and (2) clarify whether they have the potential to create non-negligible errors in GPR surveys. Methods Root bundle samples buried in a sandy soil bed were scanned using 900 MHz and 1500 MHz antennas. Sole roots of Cryptomeria japonica and rock fragments in the bed were also scanned. Results A bundle of root formed one hyperbola with an apex in the radar profile, like a sole root. However, the contrast of the hyperbolas was weak and GPR indices relating to diameter were reduced compared to those of the comparably sized sole root. Stones did not form clear images, but boulders were faintly visible with non-negligible GPR indices. Conclusions For evaluation of root biomass, adjacent roots had the potential to lead to significant errors. Similarly, in reconstructions of root system architecture, adjacent roots might lead to incorrect modelling of root point connections, because of incorrect diameters. For pull-out resistance force, adjacent roots could lead to only underestimation, i.e., safe-side error. Misidentification of rock fragments as roots depends on their sizes.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-021-05116-3</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-5485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-670X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 2021-11, Vol.468 (1/2), p.239-257
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2595783984
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agriculture
Analysis
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Computer architecture
Ecology
Errors
Forest soils
Fragments
Ground penetrating radar
Habitat fragmentation
Hyperbolas
Life Sciences
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Pull-out resistance
Radar
Regular Article
Rocks
Roots
Roots (Botany)
Sandy soils
Soil Science & Conservation
title Can ground-penetrating radar detect adjacent roots and rock fragments in forest soil?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A25%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20ground-penetrating%20radar%20detect%20adjacent%20roots%20and%20rock%20fragments%20in%20forest%20soil?&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Tanikawa,%20Toko&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=468&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=239-257&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-021-05116-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA682031631%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595783984&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A682031631&rft_jstor_id=48695069&rfr_iscdi=true