Study of uncertainty of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products and their impact on hydrological simulation
Satellite and reanalysis precipitation products are potential alternatives in hydrological studies, and it is very important to evaluate their accuracy and potential use for reliable simulations. In this study, three precipitation products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B43 Version 7 (TRMM 3B...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2021-11, Vol.28 (43), p.60935-60953 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 60953 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 43 |
| container_start_page | 60935 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Miao, Yuexi Liu, Ruimin Wang, Qingrui Jiao, Lijun Wang, Yifan Li, Lin Cao, Leiping |
| description | Satellite and reanalysis precipitation products are potential alternatives in hydrological studies, and it is very important to evaluate their accuracy and potential use for reliable simulations. In this study, three precipitation products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B43 Version 7 (TRMM 3B43), spatial interpolation grid data based on 2472 national meteorological observation stations in China (GRID_0.5), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (NCEP-CFSR)) were evaluated against gauge observations in the Xiangxi River watershed of Hubei Province. The performance results indicated that the results of the three precipitation products were correlated with those of the rain gauges; however, there were differences among the three products. TRMM 3B43 tended to overestimate precipitation with the highest correlation coefficient, while NCEP-CFSR tended to underestimate precipitation with the least satisfactory performance, and the performance of GRID_0.5 ranked between them. However, the annual and monthly mean errors differed, as the errors of most of the results driven by NCEP-CFSR were lowest. The errors varied at different time scales. During years with high precipitation, the results were often underestimated, while the results are often overestimated during years with low precipitation. According to the average monthly results, the GRID_0.5 results were closest to the gauge observations for most months. During the wet season, TRMM 3B43 performed better, while NCEP-CFSR precipitation performed better during the dry season. The errors from precipitation to streamflow, NPS pollution, and water environmental capacity (WEC) driven by the three precipitation products increased gradually, ranging from 10% for precipitation to over 20% for NPS pollution and almost 100% for WEC. The error increase for NCEP-CFSR was lower than that of the other two products. Although the simulation error from precipitation to the WEC results driven by the three precipitation products gradually increased, the degree of overestimation and underestimation became smaller. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-021-14847-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2595783714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2595783714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e281e3960b80ed88ca53f1aaa9c3837bd71a2448e6a24ea3831dbdf7fc02aed33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQJNYBO3biZIkqXlIlFsDamtiT1lWaFNtR1b_HpDx2rEYzc-615xJyyegNo1TeesZ4XqQ0YykTpZDp7ohMWcFEKkVVHZMprYRIGRdiQs68X1Oa0SqTp2TCBStyKfIp8a9hMPukb5Kh0-gC2C6MrYeAbWsDJtCZxCF00O699cnWobZbGyDYvotdbwYd_EiFFVqX2M0WdEjicrU3rm_7pdXQJt5uhnYUnZOTBlqPF991Rt4f7t_mT-ni5fF5frdINZd5SDErGfKqoHVJ0ZSlhpw3DAAqzUsuayMZZEKUWMSCEGfM1KaRjaYZoOF8Rq4PvvGTHwP6oNb94OIdXmV5lctowkSksgOlXe-9w0Ztnd2A2ytG1VfO6pCzijmrMWe1i6Krb-uh3qD5lfwEGwF-AHxcdUt0f2__Y_sJi9OMew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595783714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study of uncertainty of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products and their impact on hydrological simulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Miao, Yuexi ; Liu, Ruimin ; Wang, Qingrui ; Jiao, Lijun ; Wang, Yifan ; Li, Lin ; Cao, Leiping</creator><creatorcontrib>Miao, Yuexi ; Liu, Ruimin ; Wang, Qingrui ; Jiao, Lijun ; Wang, Yifan ; Li, Lin ; Cao, Leiping</creatorcontrib><description>Satellite and reanalysis precipitation products are potential alternatives in hydrological studies, and it is very important to evaluate their accuracy and potential use for reliable simulations. In this study, three precipitation products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B43 Version 7 (TRMM 3B43), spatial interpolation grid data based on 2472 national meteorological observation stations in China (GRID_0.5), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (NCEP-CFSR)) were evaluated against gauge observations in the Xiangxi River watershed of Hubei Province. The performance results indicated that the results of the three precipitation products were correlated with those of the rain gauges; however, there were differences among the three products. TRMM 3B43 tended to overestimate precipitation with the highest correlation coefficient, while NCEP-CFSR tended to underestimate precipitation with the least satisfactory performance, and the performance of GRID_0.5 ranked between them. However, the annual and monthly mean errors differed, as the errors of most of the results driven by NCEP-CFSR were lowest. The errors varied at different time scales. During years with high precipitation, the results were often underestimated, while the results are often overestimated during years with low precipitation. According to the average monthly results, the GRID_0.5 results were closest to the gauge observations for most months. During the wet season, TRMM 3B43 performed better, while NCEP-CFSR precipitation performed better during the dry season. The errors from precipitation to streamflow, NPS pollution, and water environmental capacity (WEC) driven by the three precipitation products increased gradually, ranging from 10% for precipitation to over 20% for NPS pollution and almost 100% for WEC. The error increase for NCEP-CFSR was lower than that of the other two products. Although the simulation error from precipitation to the WEC results driven by the three precipitation products gradually increased, the degree of overestimation and underestimation became smaller.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14847-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34165745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Climate ; Climate prediction ; Climate system ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Dry season ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Errors ; Hydrology ; Interpolation ; Meteorology ; Pollution ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rain gauges ; Rainfall ; Rainy season ; Research Article ; Simulation ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; TRMM satellite ; Uncertainty ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water pollution ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-11, Vol.28 (43), p.60935-60953</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e281e3960b80ed88ca53f1aaa9c3837bd71a2448e6a24ea3831dbdf7fc02aed33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e281e3960b80ed88ca53f1aaa9c3837bd71a2448e6a24ea3831dbdf7fc02aed33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3690-4178</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-021-14847-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-021-14847-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miao, Yuexi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qingrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Leiping</creatorcontrib><title>Study of uncertainty of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products and their impact on hydrological simulation</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Satellite and reanalysis precipitation products are potential alternatives in hydrological studies, and it is very important to evaluate their accuracy and potential use for reliable simulations. In this study, three precipitation products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B43 Version 7 (TRMM 3B43), spatial interpolation grid data based on 2472 national meteorological observation stations in China (GRID_0.5), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (NCEP-CFSR)) were evaluated against gauge observations in the Xiangxi River watershed of Hubei Province. The performance results indicated that the results of the three precipitation products were correlated with those of the rain gauges; however, there were differences among the three products. TRMM 3B43 tended to overestimate precipitation with the highest correlation coefficient, while NCEP-CFSR tended to underestimate precipitation with the least satisfactory performance, and the performance of GRID_0.5 ranked between them. However, the annual and monthly mean errors differed, as the errors of most of the results driven by NCEP-CFSR were lowest. The errors varied at different time scales. During years with high precipitation, the results were often underestimated, while the results are often overestimated during years with low precipitation. According to the average monthly results, the GRID_0.5 results were closest to the gauge observations for most months. During the wet season, TRMM 3B43 performed better, while NCEP-CFSR precipitation performed better during the dry season. The errors from precipitation to streamflow, NPS pollution, and water environmental capacity (WEC) driven by the three precipitation products increased gradually, ranging from 10% for precipitation to over 20% for NPS pollution and almost 100% for WEC. The error increase for NCEP-CFSR was lower than that of the other two products. Although the simulation error from precipitation to the WEC results driven by the three precipitation products gradually increased, the degree of overestimation and underestimation became smaller.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate prediction</subject><subject>Climate system</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>TRMM satellite</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQJNYBO3biZIkqXlIlFsDamtiT1lWaFNtR1b_HpDx2rEYzc-615xJyyegNo1TeesZ4XqQ0YykTpZDp7ohMWcFEKkVVHZMprYRIGRdiQs68X1Oa0SqTp2TCBStyKfIp8a9hMPukb5Kh0-gC2C6MrYeAbWsDJtCZxCF00O699cnWobZbGyDYvotdbwYd_EiFFVqX2M0WdEjicrU3rm_7pdXQJt5uhnYUnZOTBlqPF991Rt4f7t_mT-ni5fF5frdINZd5SDErGfKqoHVJ0ZSlhpw3DAAqzUsuayMZZEKUWMSCEGfM1KaRjaYZoOF8Rq4PvvGTHwP6oNb94OIdXmV5lctowkSksgOlXe-9w0Ztnd2A2ytG1VfO6pCzijmrMWe1i6Krb-uh3qD5lfwEGwF-AHxcdUt0f2__Y_sJi9OMew</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Miao, Yuexi</creator><creator>Liu, Ruimin</creator><creator>Wang, Qingrui</creator><creator>Jiao, Lijun</creator><creator>Wang, Yifan</creator><creator>Li, Lin</creator><creator>Cao, Leiping</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-4178</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Study of uncertainty of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products and their impact on hydrological simulation</title><author>Miao, Yuexi ; Liu, Ruimin ; Wang, Qingrui ; Jiao, Lijun ; Wang, Yifan ; Li, Lin ; Cao, Leiping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e281e3960b80ed88ca53f1aaa9c3837bd71a2448e6a24ea3831dbdf7fc02aed33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate prediction</topic><topic>Climate system</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>TRMM satellite</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miao, Yuexi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qingrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Leiping</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miao, Yuexi</au><au>Liu, Ruimin</au><au>Wang, Qingrui</au><au>Jiao, Lijun</au><au>Wang, Yifan</au><au>Li, Lin</au><au>Cao, Leiping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Study of uncertainty of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products and their impact on hydrological simulation</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>43</issue><spage>60935</spage><epage>60953</epage><pages>60935-60953</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Satellite and reanalysis precipitation products are potential alternatives in hydrological studies, and it is very important to evaluate their accuracy and potential use for reliable simulations. In this study, three precipitation products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B43 Version 7 (TRMM 3B43), spatial interpolation grid data based on 2472 national meteorological observation stations in China (GRID_0.5), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (NCEP-CFSR)) were evaluated against gauge observations in the Xiangxi River watershed of Hubei Province. The performance results indicated that the results of the three precipitation products were correlated with those of the rain gauges; however, there were differences among the three products. TRMM 3B43 tended to overestimate precipitation with the highest correlation coefficient, while NCEP-CFSR tended to underestimate precipitation with the least satisfactory performance, and the performance of GRID_0.5 ranked between them. However, the annual and monthly mean errors differed, as the errors of most of the results driven by NCEP-CFSR were lowest. The errors varied at different time scales. During years with high precipitation, the results were often underestimated, while the results are often overestimated during years with low precipitation. According to the average monthly results, the GRID_0.5 results were closest to the gauge observations for most months. During the wet season, TRMM 3B43 performed better, while NCEP-CFSR precipitation performed better during the dry season. The errors from precipitation to streamflow, NPS pollution, and water environmental capacity (WEC) driven by the three precipitation products increased gradually, ranging from 10% for precipitation to over 20% for NPS pollution and almost 100% for WEC. The error increase for NCEP-CFSR was lower than that of the other two products. Although the simulation error from precipitation to the WEC results driven by the three precipitation products gradually increased, the degree of overestimation and underestimation became smaller.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34165745</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-021-14847-w</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-4178</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-11, Vol.28 (43), p.60935-60953 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2595783714 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Climate Climate prediction Climate system Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Dry season Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Errors Hydrology Interpolation Meteorology Pollution Precipitation Rain Rain gauges Rainfall Rainy season Research Article Simulation Stream discharge Stream flow TRMM satellite Uncertainty Waste Water Technology Water Management Water pollution Water Pollution Control |
| title | Study of uncertainty of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products and their impact on hydrological simulation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Study%20of%20uncertainty%20of%20satellite%20and%20reanalysis%20precipitation%20products%20and%20their%20impact%20on%20hydrological%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Miao,%20Yuexi&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=43&rft.spage=60935&rft.epage=60953&rft.pages=60935-60953&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-021-14847-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2595783714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595783714&rft_id=info:pmid/34165745&rfr_iscdi=true |