How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China
Based on daily data of 749 active online P2P lending platforms in Chinese market, this study explores the key factors affecting the net cash inflow rate of the platform which is vital for its operation and survival from the perspective of reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem. Internal...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Electronic commerce research 2021-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1055-1082 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1082 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1055 |
| container_title | Electronic commerce research |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Chen, Xueru Hu, Xiaoji Ben, Shenglin |
| description | Based on daily data of 749 active online P2P lending platforms in Chinese market, this study explores the key factors affecting the net cash inflow rate of the platform which is vital for its operation and survival from the perspective of reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem. Internal governance issues of P2P lending platforms are further discussed according to the model results. A positive U-shaped relationship has been found between the platform duration and its net cash inflow rate which proves the role of reputation in the long-term development of P2P lending platforms. In addition, we demonstrate that both capital and operational structure design of the platform (e.g. shareholders background, credit assignment, trusteeship and guarantee) have a significant impact on the platform’s net cash inflow rate. The cash flow level of the platform has also been affected by the regional FinTech ecosystem. Platforms in a medium-developing ecosystem may have the highest net cash inflow rate, while a backward ecosystem will lower the cash flows of the platforms located in this area on average. Some suggestions on cash flow management and internal governance of P2P lending platforms for both platform founders and governments are put forward in the end of the study. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2595783559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A718377650</galeid><sourcerecordid>A718377650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-aa8254750d356ec05970e55fdda21f17c7d81b21847f37df8aab586823a8628f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1rFTEQXUTBWv0DPg346tZ8bDbZJymX1hYK9qE-hzSZ3Juym1yTrNJXf7mpW-ibhCHD5Jwzkzld95GSM0qI_FIoGUfSE9ZiGgjpp1fdCRWS9RMf2euWczX1Qgr-tntXygNpSMmGk-7PVfoNLkHG41pNDSl-hlLzauuaERyWsI9gooPLEO_QHgBtKo-l4gLGe7QV6gEhYgVrygFC9HMTTB5u2S3MGF2IezjOpvqUl_IVLn4Fh9Ei-JwW2B1CNO-7N97MBT8836fdj8uLu91Vf_P92_Xu_Ka3AxW1N0YxMUhBHBcjWiImSVAI75xh1FNppVP0nlE1SM-l88qYe6FGxbhRI1Oen3afNt1jTj9XLFU_pDXH1lIzMQmpuBBTQ51tqL2ZUbf_pJqNbcfhEmyK6EOrn0uquJSjII3ANoLNqZSMXh9zWEx-1JToJ3P0Zo5uK9f_zNFPXWAjtXXGUF4oUjGmRJu3QfgGKe0x7jG_jPsf4b_KpZxX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595783559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chen, Xueru ; Hu, Xiaoji ; Ben, Shenglin</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xueru ; Hu, Xiaoji ; Ben, Shenglin</creatorcontrib><description>Based on daily data of 749 active online P2P lending platforms in Chinese market, this study explores the key factors affecting the net cash inflow rate of the platform which is vital for its operation and survival from the perspective of reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem. Internal governance issues of P2P lending platforms are further discussed according to the model results. A positive U-shaped relationship has been found between the platform duration and its net cash inflow rate which proves the role of reputation in the long-term development of P2P lending platforms. In addition, we demonstrate that both capital and operational structure design of the platform (e.g. shareholders background, credit assignment, trusteeship and guarantee) have a significant impact on the platform’s net cash inflow rate. The cash flow level of the platform has also been affected by the regional FinTech ecosystem. Platforms in a medium-developing ecosystem may have the highest net cash inflow rate, while a backward ecosystem will lower the cash flows of the platforms located in this area on average. Some suggestions on cash flow management and internal governance of P2P lending platforms for both platform founders and governments are put forward in the end of the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-5753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bank technology ; Business and Management ; Cash flow ; Computer Communication Networks ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; e-Commerce/e-business ; Ecosystems ; Inflow ; IT in Business ; Loans ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Peer to peer lending ; Platforms ; Regional development ; Reputations</subject><ispartof>Electronic commerce research, 2021-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1055-1082</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-aa8254750d356ec05970e55fdda21f17c7d81b21847f37df8aab586823a8628f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-aa8254750d356ec05970e55fdda21f17c7d81b21847f37df8aab586823a8628f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9014-9682</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xueru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben, Shenglin</creatorcontrib><title>How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China</title><title>Electronic commerce research</title><addtitle>Electron Commer Res</addtitle><description>Based on daily data of 749 active online P2P lending platforms in Chinese market, this study explores the key factors affecting the net cash inflow rate of the platform which is vital for its operation and survival from the perspective of reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem. Internal governance issues of P2P lending platforms are further discussed according to the model results. A positive U-shaped relationship has been found between the platform duration and its net cash inflow rate which proves the role of reputation in the long-term development of P2P lending platforms. In addition, we demonstrate that both capital and operational structure design of the platform (e.g. shareholders background, credit assignment, trusteeship and guarantee) have a significant impact on the platform’s net cash inflow rate. The cash flow level of the platform has also been affected by the regional FinTech ecosystem. Platforms in a medium-developing ecosystem may have the highest net cash inflow rate, while a backward ecosystem will lower the cash flows of the platforms located in this area on average. Some suggestions on cash flow management and internal governance of P2P lending platforms for both platform founders and governments are put forward in the end of the study.</description><subject>Bank technology</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>e-Commerce/e-business</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Peer to peer lending</subject><subject>Platforms</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><issn>1389-5753</issn><issn>1572-9362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1rFTEQXUTBWv0DPg346tZ8bDbZJymX1hYK9qE-hzSZ3Juym1yTrNJXf7mpW-ibhCHD5Jwzkzld95GSM0qI_FIoGUfSE9ZiGgjpp1fdCRWS9RMf2euWczX1Qgr-tntXygNpSMmGk-7PVfoNLkHG41pNDSl-hlLzauuaERyWsI9gooPLEO_QHgBtKo-l4gLGe7QV6gEhYgVrygFC9HMTTB5u2S3MGF2IezjOpvqUl_IVLn4Fh9Ei-JwW2B1CNO-7N97MBT8836fdj8uLu91Vf_P92_Xu_Ka3AxW1N0YxMUhBHBcjWiImSVAI75xh1FNppVP0nlE1SM-l88qYe6FGxbhRI1Oen3afNt1jTj9XLFU_pDXH1lIzMQmpuBBTQ51tqL2ZUbf_pJqNbcfhEmyK6EOrn0uquJSjII3ANoLNqZSMXh9zWEx-1JToJ3P0Zo5uK9f_zNFPXWAjtXXGUF4oUjGmRJu3QfgGKe0x7jG_jPsf4b_KpZxX</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Chen, Xueru</creator><creator>Hu, Xiaoji</creator><creator>Ben, Shenglin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-9682</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China</title><author>Chen, Xueru ; Hu, Xiaoji ; Ben, Shenglin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-aa8254750d356ec05970e55fdda21f17c7d81b21847f37df8aab586823a8628f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bank technology</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>e-Commerce/e-business</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Peer to peer lending</topic><topic>Platforms</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xueru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben, Shenglin</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Electronic commerce research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xueru</au><au>Hu, Xiaoji</au><au>Ben, Shenglin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Electronic commerce research</jtitle><stitle>Electron Commer Res</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1055</spage><epage>1082</epage><pages>1055-1082</pages><issn>1389-5753</issn><eissn>1572-9362</eissn><abstract>Based on daily data of 749 active online P2P lending platforms in Chinese market, this study explores the key factors affecting the net cash inflow rate of the platform which is vital for its operation and survival from the perspective of reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem. Internal governance issues of P2P lending platforms are further discussed according to the model results. A positive U-shaped relationship has been found between the platform duration and its net cash inflow rate which proves the role of reputation in the long-term development of P2P lending platforms. In addition, we demonstrate that both capital and operational structure design of the platform (e.g. shareholders background, credit assignment, trusteeship and guarantee) have a significant impact on the platform’s net cash inflow rate. The cash flow level of the platform has also been affected by the regional FinTech ecosystem. Platforms in a medium-developing ecosystem may have the highest net cash inflow rate, while a backward ecosystem will lower the cash flows of the platforms located in this area on average. Some suggestions on cash flow management and internal governance of P2P lending platforms for both platform founders and governments are put forward in the end of the study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-9682</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1389-5753 |
| ispartof | Electronic commerce research, 2021-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1055-1082 |
| issn | 1389-5753 1572-9362 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2595783559 |
| source | Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Bank technology Business and Management Cash flow Computer Communication Networks Data Structures and Information Theory e-Commerce/e-business Ecosystems Inflow IT in Business Loans Operations Research/Decision Theory Peer to peer lending Platforms Regional development Reputations |
| title | How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20reputation,%20structure%20design%20and%20FinTech%20ecosystem%20affect%20the%20net%20cash%20inflow%20of%20P2P%20lending%20platforms?%20Evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20commerce%20research&rft.au=Chen,%20Xueru&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1055&rft.epage=1082&rft.pages=1055-1082&rft.issn=1389-5753&rft.eissn=1572-9362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA718377650%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595783559&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A718377650&rfr_iscdi=true |