ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?

IntroductionLiver biopsy carries significant risks, including bleeding and death. It is routinely undertaken to confirm imaging evidence of hepatic metastases. However, establishing a cancer diagnosis beyond doubt is of limited benefit if a patient is not suitable for oncological therapy. We have th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2021-11, Vol.70 (Suppl 4), p.A26-A27
Hauptverfasser: King, Dominic, Coupland, Benjamin, Lock, Anna, Nanton, Veronica, Patel, Prashant, Trudgill, Nigel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A27
container_issue Suppl 4
container_start_page A26
container_title Gut
container_volume 70
creator King, Dominic
Coupland, Benjamin
Lock, Anna
Nanton, Veronica
Patel, Prashant
Trudgill, Nigel
description IntroductionLiver biopsy carries significant risks, including bleeding and death. It is routinely undertaken to confirm imaging evidence of hepatic metastases. However, establishing a cancer diagnosis beyond doubt is of limited benefit if a patient is not suitable for oncological therapy. We have therefore examined outcomes in patients undergoing liver biopsy for metastatic cancer.MethodsHospital Episode statistics were examined to identify patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy between 2010 and 2019 and diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Multivariable logistic regression examined risk factors for mortality at 14 and 30 days and receiving chemotherapy.Results30992 patients underwent liver biopsy for metastatic cancer (median age of 67 (IQR 59-74) years, 52% female). 28% underwent biopsy during an emergency inpatient stay and 9% died within 14 days and 27.6% within 30 days of their biopsy. In contrast, only 2.2% of patients having an outpatient biopsy died within 14 days and 8.6% within 30 days.Increased 30 day mortality was associated with: inpatient biopsy (odds ratio 3.37 (95%CI 3.15-3.61)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4: 1.21 (1.11-1.32)). Lower 30 day mortality was associated with all ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 0.35 (0.20-0.63)), a lymphoma diagnosis (0.69 (0.51-0.93)) and biopsy at a radiotherapy centre (0.89 (0.83-0.96)).14,244 (46%) patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of liver biopsy; 53% of those undergoing outpatient biopsy but only 33% of those biopsied as an inpatient. 18% of patients received only one dose of chemotherapy and 18% died within 14 days of chemotherapy. Receiving chemotherapy was negatively associated with biopsy as an inpatient (0.45 (0.42-0.47)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4 0.85 (0.80-0.91)). All ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 3.79 (2.67-5.39)) and female sex (1.06 (1.01-1.11)) were associated with receiving chemotherapy. Medium and high volume providers of biopsies were also associated with receiving chemotherapy compared to the lowest volume providers (1.13 (1.04-1.22) and 1.51 (1.39-1.64), respectively).ConclusionsMortality is high following liver biopsy to confirm metastatic cancer in patients admitted as an emergency. Only a third of such patients go on to receive chemotherapy. Clinicians should carefully consider the benefit of invasive diagnostics in those with metastatic cancer who are elderly, com-morbid or of poor performance status and multidisciplinary discu
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BSG.46
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2594957782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2594957782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1116-80e64a878abaa0421c2b13b423210b58142cb4f7b32038bf15bdf9f8119e5c313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1KAzEYRYMoWKsv4CrgOjVffmYybqQWrUJBwRbcDUmakRnaSU0yBXdufFGfxBkquLpwOdwLB6FLoBMAnl2_d6lpN4RRBuTudT4R2REagcgU4UypYzSiFHIic1GcorMYG0qpUgWM0Nt0uSLy5-v7xQXbJd0630W8qfcuYFP7XfzEyWPr26oOW6zXe91at8Zbl3RMOtUW26EJN3iKY3K7nva40uH2HJ1UehPdxV-O0erhfjl7JIvn-dNsuiAGADKiqMuEVrnSRmsqGFhmgBvBOANqpALBrBFVbjijXJkKpFlXRaUACictBz5GV4fdXfAfnYupbHwX2v6yZLIQhcxzxXpqcqDMtvkHgJaDvfJgrxzslb29UmT8F3s1ZFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2594957782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>King, Dominic ; Coupland, Benjamin ; Lock, Anna ; Nanton, Veronica ; Patel, Prashant ; Trudgill, Nigel</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Dominic ; Coupland, Benjamin ; Lock, Anna ; Nanton, Veronica ; Patel, Prashant ; Trudgill, Nigel</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionLiver biopsy carries significant risks, including bleeding and death. It is routinely undertaken to confirm imaging evidence of hepatic metastases. However, establishing a cancer diagnosis beyond doubt is of limited benefit if a patient is not suitable for oncological therapy. We have therefore examined outcomes in patients undergoing liver biopsy for metastatic cancer.MethodsHospital Episode statistics were examined to identify patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy between 2010 and 2019 and diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Multivariable logistic regression examined risk factors for mortality at 14 and 30 days and receiving chemotherapy.Results30992 patients underwent liver biopsy for metastatic cancer (median age of 67 (IQR 59-74) years, 52% female). 28% underwent biopsy during an emergency inpatient stay and 9% died within 14 days and 27.6% within 30 days of their biopsy. In contrast, only 2.2% of patients having an outpatient biopsy died within 14 days and 8.6% within 30 days.Increased 30 day mortality was associated with: inpatient biopsy (odds ratio 3.37 (95%CI 3.15-3.61)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4: 1.21 (1.11-1.32)). Lower 30 day mortality was associated with all ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 0.35 (0.20-0.63)), a lymphoma diagnosis (0.69 (0.51-0.93)) and biopsy at a radiotherapy centre (0.89 (0.83-0.96)).14,244 (46%) patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of liver biopsy; 53% of those undergoing outpatient biopsy but only 33% of those biopsied as an inpatient. 18% of patients received only one dose of chemotherapy and 18% died within 14 days of chemotherapy. Receiving chemotherapy was negatively associated with biopsy as an inpatient (0.45 (0.42-0.47)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4 0.85 (0.80-0.91)). All ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 3.79 (2.67-5.39)) and female sex (1.06 (1.01-1.11)) were associated with receiving chemotherapy. Medium and high volume providers of biopsies were also associated with receiving chemotherapy compared to the lowest volume providers (1.13 (1.04-1.22) and 1.51 (1.39-1.64), respectively).ConclusionsMortality is high following liver biopsy to confirm metastatic cancer in patients admitted as an emergency. Only a third of such patients go on to receive chemotherapy. Clinicians should carefully consider the benefit of invasive diagnostics in those with metastatic cancer who are elderly, com-morbid or of poor performance status and multidisciplinary discussion including palliative care input may help such decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BSG.46</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Abstracts of distinction ; Biopsy ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Comorbidity ; Decision making ; Diagnosis ; Invasiveness ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Lymphoma ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Mortality ; Patients ; Radiation therapy ; Risk factors</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2021-11, Vol.70 (Suppl 4), p.A26-A27</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanton, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudgill, Nigel</creatorcontrib><title>ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>IntroductionLiver biopsy carries significant risks, including bleeding and death. It is routinely undertaken to confirm imaging evidence of hepatic metastases. However, establishing a cancer diagnosis beyond doubt is of limited benefit if a patient is not suitable for oncological therapy. We have therefore examined outcomes in patients undergoing liver biopsy for metastatic cancer.MethodsHospital Episode statistics were examined to identify patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy between 2010 and 2019 and diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Multivariable logistic regression examined risk factors for mortality at 14 and 30 days and receiving chemotherapy.Results30992 patients underwent liver biopsy for metastatic cancer (median age of 67 (IQR 59-74) years, 52% female). 28% underwent biopsy during an emergency inpatient stay and 9% died within 14 days and 27.6% within 30 days of their biopsy. In contrast, only 2.2% of patients having an outpatient biopsy died within 14 days and 8.6% within 30 days.Increased 30 day mortality was associated with: inpatient biopsy (odds ratio 3.37 (95%CI 3.15-3.61)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4: 1.21 (1.11-1.32)). Lower 30 day mortality was associated with all ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 0.35 (0.20-0.63)), a lymphoma diagnosis (0.69 (0.51-0.93)) and biopsy at a radiotherapy centre (0.89 (0.83-0.96)).14,244 (46%) patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of liver biopsy; 53% of those undergoing outpatient biopsy but only 33% of those biopsied as an inpatient. 18% of patients received only one dose of chemotherapy and 18% died within 14 days of chemotherapy. Receiving chemotherapy was negatively associated with biopsy as an inpatient (0.45 (0.42-0.47)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4 0.85 (0.80-0.91)). All ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 3.79 (2.67-5.39)) and female sex (1.06 (1.01-1.11)) were associated with receiving chemotherapy. Medium and high volume providers of biopsies were also associated with receiving chemotherapy compared to the lowest volume providers (1.13 (1.04-1.22) and 1.51 (1.39-1.64), respectively).ConclusionsMortality is high following liver biopsy to confirm metastatic cancer in patients admitted as an emergency. Only a third of such patients go on to receive chemotherapy. Clinicians should carefully consider the benefit of invasive diagnostics in those with metastatic cancer who are elderly, com-morbid or of poor performance status and multidisciplinary discussion including palliative care input may help such decision making.</description><subject>Abstracts of distinction</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1KAzEYRYMoWKsv4CrgOjVffmYybqQWrUJBwRbcDUmakRnaSU0yBXdufFGfxBkquLpwOdwLB6FLoBMAnl2_d6lpN4RRBuTudT4R2REagcgU4UypYzSiFHIic1GcorMYG0qpUgWM0Nt0uSLy5-v7xQXbJd0630W8qfcuYFP7XfzEyWPr26oOW6zXe91at8Zbl3RMOtUW26EJN3iKY3K7nva40uH2HJ1UehPdxV-O0erhfjl7JIvn-dNsuiAGADKiqMuEVrnSRmsqGFhmgBvBOANqpALBrBFVbjijXJkKpFlXRaUACictBz5GV4fdXfAfnYupbHwX2v6yZLIQhcxzxXpqcqDMtvkHgJaDvfJgrxzslb29UmT8F3s1ZFA</recordid><startdate>20211107</startdate><enddate>20211107</enddate><creator>King, Dominic</creator><creator>Coupland, Benjamin</creator><creator>Lock, Anna</creator><creator>Nanton, Veronica</creator><creator>Patel, Prashant</creator><creator>Trudgill, Nigel</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211107</creationdate><title>ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?</title><author>King, Dominic ; Coupland, Benjamin ; Lock, Anna ; Nanton, Veronica ; Patel, Prashant ; Trudgill, Nigel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1116-80e64a878abaa0421c2b13b423210b58142cb4f7b32038bf15bdf9f8119e5c313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abstracts of distinction</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanton, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudgill, Nigel</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Dominic</au><au>Coupland, Benjamin</au><au>Lock, Anna</au><au>Nanton, Veronica</au><au>Patel, Prashant</au><au>Trudgill, Nigel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><stitle>Gut</stitle><date>2021-11-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>Suppl 4</issue><spage>A26</spage><epage>A27</epage><pages>A26-A27</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionLiver biopsy carries significant risks, including bleeding and death. It is routinely undertaken to confirm imaging evidence of hepatic metastases. However, establishing a cancer diagnosis beyond doubt is of limited benefit if a patient is not suitable for oncological therapy. We have therefore examined outcomes in patients undergoing liver biopsy for metastatic cancer.MethodsHospital Episode statistics were examined to identify patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy between 2010 and 2019 and diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Multivariable logistic regression examined risk factors for mortality at 14 and 30 days and receiving chemotherapy.Results30992 patients underwent liver biopsy for metastatic cancer (median age of 67 (IQR 59-74) years, 52% female). 28% underwent biopsy during an emergency inpatient stay and 9% died within 14 days and 27.6% within 30 days of their biopsy. In contrast, only 2.2% of patients having an outpatient biopsy died within 14 days and 8.6% within 30 days.Increased 30 day mortality was associated with: inpatient biopsy (odds ratio 3.37 (95%CI 3.15-3.61)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4: 1.21 (1.11-1.32)). Lower 30 day mortality was associated with all ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 0.35 (0.20-0.63)), a lymphoma diagnosis (0.69 (0.51-0.93)) and biopsy at a radiotherapy centre (0.89 (0.83-0.96)).14,244 (46%) patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of liver biopsy; 53% of those undergoing outpatient biopsy but only 33% of those biopsied as an inpatient. 18% of patients received only one dose of chemotherapy and 18% died within 14 days of chemotherapy. Receiving chemotherapy was negatively associated with biopsy as an inpatient (0.45 (0.42-0.47)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4 0.85 (0.80-0.91)). All ages under 70 (for 18-29 yr olds: 3.79 (2.67-5.39)) and female sex (1.06 (1.01-1.11)) were associated with receiving chemotherapy. Medium and high volume providers of biopsies were also associated with receiving chemotherapy compared to the lowest volume providers (1.13 (1.04-1.22) and 1.51 (1.39-1.64), respectively).ConclusionsMortality is high following liver biopsy to confirm metastatic cancer in patients admitted as an emergency. Only a third of such patients go on to receive chemotherapy. Clinicians should carefully consider the benefit of invasive diagnostics in those with metastatic cancer who are elderly, com-morbid or of poor performance status and multidisciplinary discussion including palliative care input may help such decision making.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BSG.46</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2021-11, Vol.70 (Suppl 4), p.A26-A27
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2594957782
source PubMed Central
subjects Abstracts of distinction
Biopsy
Cancer
Chemotherapy
Comorbidity
Decision making
Diagnosis
Invasiveness
Liver
Liver cancer
Lymphoma
Metastases
Metastasis
Mortality
Patients
Radiation therapy
Risk factors
title ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ATU-5%E2%80%85Percutaneous%20liver%20biopsy%20to%20confirm%20advanced%20metastatic%20cancer:%20A%20step%20too%20far?&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=King,%20Dominic&rft.date=2021-11-07&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=Suppl%204&rft.spage=A26&rft.epage=A27&rft.pages=A26-A27&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BSG.46&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2594957782%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2594957782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true