Selection Tool Use in Canadian Tech Companies: Assessing and Explaining the Research-Practice Gap

Hiring the right people at the right time is essential for the successful growth of any organization. Although organizational researchers have identified the most reliable and valid methods for selecting employees, many companies are not following these recommendations and are missing out on top tal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of behavioural science 2021-10, Vol.53 (4), p.445-455
Hauptverfasser: Risavy, Stephen D., Robie, Chet, Fisher, Peter A., Komar, Jennifer, Perossa, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 455
container_issue 4
container_start_page 445
container_title Canadian journal of behavioural science
container_volume 53
creator Risavy, Stephen D.
Robie, Chet
Fisher, Peter A.
Komar, Jennifer
Perossa, Andrew
description Hiring the right people at the right time is essential for the successful growth of any organization. Although organizational researchers have identified the most reliable and valid methods for selecting employees, many companies are not following these recommendations and are missing out on top talent as a result. In the present research we focus on the selection methods of tech companies using a two-study, mixed-methods design. In Study 1 we surveyed 120 tech company representatives who were knowledgeable about their company's hiring practices (e.g., HR professionals, CEOs, COOs). It was found that tech companies are far behind the science and tend to use selection practices known to be poor predictors of performance. In Study 2 we interviewed 18 tech company representatives (17 of which were from organizations that participated in Study 1) about the reasons their company uses their selection practices. We found that tech companies are not particularly concerned with reliability or validity and, instead, value efficiency and maintaining the status quo. Future research directions and practical advice to help tech companies better acquire talent are provided. Embaucher les bonnes personnes au bon moment est essentiel à la croissance soutenue de toute organisation. Bien que les chercheurs en gestion organisationnelle aient déterminé les méthodes valables les plus fiables pour la sélection du personnel, nombre d'entreprises ne suivent pas leurs recommandations et ratent ainsi l'occasion d'acquérir les meilleurs talents. Dans la présente recherche, nous examinons les méthodes de sélection d'entreprises de technologie dans le cadre de deux études reposant sur une méthodologie mixte. Dans l'Étude 1, nous avons interrogé 120 représentants d'entreprises de technologie qui connaissaient les pratiques de recrutement de leur entreprise (par ex., les professionnels des RH, les DG, les CO). Il a été déterminé que les entreprises de technologie sont très en retard sur la science et tendent à se servir de pratiques de sélection connues comme étant de piètres prédicteurs du rendement. Dans l'Étude 2, nous avons interviewé 18 représentants d'entreprises de technologie (17 d'entre eux provenaient d'organisations ayant participé à l'Étude 1) au sujet des raisons qui motivent le choix des pratiques de sélection. Nous avons constaté que les entreprises de technologie ne se soucient pas particulièrement de la fiabilité ou de la viabilité des méthodes; elles valorisent plutôt l
doi_str_mv 10.1037/cbs0000263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2594202834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512837677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-995ad03599838b359a3339b647e56cbe315906de588fdac1979ce6f541270d203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsX_4KAN2U137vxVkqtgqD4Ad7CNDu1K9vsmmxB_3tTKnhzLo_3-PGGGUJOObvkTJZXfpFYHmHkHhnxqrSFMMbuk1EOq0Ix9nZIjlL6yNZorUYEnrFFPzRdoC9d19LXhLQJdAoB6gZyiH5Fp926h9BguqaTlDClJrxTCDWdffUtNGFrhxXSJ0wI0a-Kxwi50yOdQ39MDpbQJjz51TF5vZm9TG-L-4f53XRyX4DgYiis1VAzqa2tZLXIClJKuzCqRG38AiXXlpkadVUta_DcltajWWrFRclqweSYnO16-9h9bjAN7qPbxJBXOqGtEkxUUv1P8YyUpiwzdb6jfOxSirh0fWzWEL8dZ277aPf36Axf7GDowfXp20PMt7eY_CZGDMOWdVo65ZTS8gcZV32z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512837677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection Tool Use in Canadian Tech Companies: Assessing and Explaining the Research-Practice Gap</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Risavy, Stephen D. ; Robie, Chet ; Fisher, Peter A. ; Komar, Jennifer ; Perossa, Andrew</creator><contributor>Roy-Charland, Annie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Risavy, Stephen D. ; Robie, Chet ; Fisher, Peter A. ; Komar, Jennifer ; Perossa, Andrew ; Roy-Charland, Annie</creatorcontrib><description>Hiring the right people at the right time is essential for the successful growth of any organization. Although organizational researchers have identified the most reliable and valid methods for selecting employees, many companies are not following these recommendations and are missing out on top talent as a result. In the present research we focus on the selection methods of tech companies using a two-study, mixed-methods design. In Study 1 we surveyed 120 tech company representatives who were knowledgeable about their company's hiring practices (e.g., HR professionals, CEOs, COOs). It was found that tech companies are far behind the science and tend to use selection practices known to be poor predictors of performance. In Study 2 we interviewed 18 tech company representatives (17 of which were from organizations that participated in Study 1) about the reasons their company uses their selection practices. We found that tech companies are not particularly concerned with reliability or validity and, instead, value efficiency and maintaining the status quo. Future research directions and practical advice to help tech companies better acquire talent are provided. Embaucher les bonnes personnes au bon moment est essentiel à la croissance soutenue de toute organisation. Bien que les chercheurs en gestion organisationnelle aient déterminé les méthodes valables les plus fiables pour la sélection du personnel, nombre d'entreprises ne suivent pas leurs recommandations et ratent ainsi l'occasion d'acquérir les meilleurs talents. Dans la présente recherche, nous examinons les méthodes de sélection d'entreprises de technologie dans le cadre de deux études reposant sur une méthodologie mixte. Dans l'Étude 1, nous avons interrogé 120 représentants d'entreprises de technologie qui connaissaient les pratiques de recrutement de leur entreprise (par ex., les professionnels des RH, les DG, les CO). Il a été déterminé que les entreprises de technologie sont très en retard sur la science et tendent à se servir de pratiques de sélection connues comme étant de piètres prédicteurs du rendement. Dans l'Étude 2, nous avons interviewé 18 représentants d'entreprises de technologie (17 d'entre eux provenaient d'organisations ayant participé à l'Étude 1) au sujet des raisons qui motivent le choix des pratiques de sélection. Nous avons constaté que les entreprises de technologie ne se soucient pas particulièrement de la fiabilité ou de la viabilité des méthodes; elles valorisent plutôt l'efficience et le maintien du statu quo. Des suggestions de recherches futures et des conseils pratiques sont présentés en vue d'aider les entreprises de technologie à améliorer leurs modes de sélection des talents. Intérêt public (a) There is a substantial gap between the practices that tech companies are using to hire employees and the best available advice from the research literature; (b) tech companies can likely increase their chances of surviving and thriving by adopting more evidence-based selection tools and methods; and (c) many of the reasons that tech company representatives provide for using their chosen selection devices may be preventing them from seeking out better practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-400X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/cbs0000263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Ability ; Ability tests ; Business Organizations ; Emotional intelligence ; Employment interviews ; Evidence-based practice ; Female ; Hiring ; Human ; Human capital ; Intelligence tests ; Job performance ; Male ; Personnel Selection ; Practice ; Research and Development ; Sciences ; Technology Acceptance Model ; Tool Use ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2021-10, Vol.53 (4), p.445-455</ispartof><rights>2021 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6737-8794 ; 0000-0003-3293-8549 ; 0000-0003-4521-6924 ; 0000-0001-9116-9917 ; 0000-0002-6845-109X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Roy-Charland, Annie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Risavy, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robie, Chet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komar, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perossa, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Selection Tool Use in Canadian Tech Companies: Assessing and Explaining the Research-Practice Gap</title><title>Canadian journal of behavioural science</title><description>Hiring the right people at the right time is essential for the successful growth of any organization. Although organizational researchers have identified the most reliable and valid methods for selecting employees, many companies are not following these recommendations and are missing out on top talent as a result. In the present research we focus on the selection methods of tech companies using a two-study, mixed-methods design. In Study 1 we surveyed 120 tech company representatives who were knowledgeable about their company's hiring practices (e.g., HR professionals, CEOs, COOs). It was found that tech companies are far behind the science and tend to use selection practices known to be poor predictors of performance. In Study 2 we interviewed 18 tech company representatives (17 of which were from organizations that participated in Study 1) about the reasons their company uses their selection practices. We found that tech companies are not particularly concerned with reliability or validity and, instead, value efficiency and maintaining the status quo. Future research directions and practical advice to help tech companies better acquire talent are provided. Embaucher les bonnes personnes au bon moment est essentiel à la croissance soutenue de toute organisation. Bien que les chercheurs en gestion organisationnelle aient déterminé les méthodes valables les plus fiables pour la sélection du personnel, nombre d'entreprises ne suivent pas leurs recommandations et ratent ainsi l'occasion d'acquérir les meilleurs talents. Dans la présente recherche, nous examinons les méthodes de sélection d'entreprises de technologie dans le cadre de deux études reposant sur une méthodologie mixte. Dans l'Étude 1, nous avons interrogé 120 représentants d'entreprises de technologie qui connaissaient les pratiques de recrutement de leur entreprise (par ex., les professionnels des RH, les DG, les CO). Il a été déterminé que les entreprises de technologie sont très en retard sur la science et tendent à se servir de pratiques de sélection connues comme étant de piètres prédicteurs du rendement. Dans l'Étude 2, nous avons interviewé 18 représentants d'entreprises de technologie (17 d'entre eux provenaient d'organisations ayant participé à l'Étude 1) au sujet des raisons qui motivent le choix des pratiques de sélection. Nous avons constaté que les entreprises de technologie ne se soucient pas particulièrement de la fiabilité ou de la viabilité des méthodes; elles valorisent plutôt l'efficience et le maintien du statu quo. Des suggestions de recherches futures et des conseils pratiques sont présentés en vue d'aider les entreprises de technologie à améliorer leurs modes de sélection des talents. Intérêt public (a) There is a substantial gap between the practices that tech companies are using to hire employees and the best available advice from the research literature; (b) tech companies can likely increase their chances of surviving and thriving by adopting more evidence-based selection tools and methods; and (c) many of the reasons that tech company representatives provide for using their chosen selection devices may be preventing them from seeking out better practices.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Ability tests</subject><subject>Business Organizations</subject><subject>Emotional intelligence</subject><subject>Employment interviews</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Research and Development</subject><subject>Sciences</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model</subject><subject>Tool Use</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0008-400X</issn><issn>1879-2669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsX_4KAN2U137vxVkqtgqD4Ad7CNDu1K9vsmmxB_3tTKnhzLo_3-PGGGUJOObvkTJZXfpFYHmHkHhnxqrSFMMbuk1EOq0Ix9nZIjlL6yNZorUYEnrFFPzRdoC9d19LXhLQJdAoB6gZyiH5Fp926h9BguqaTlDClJrxTCDWdffUtNGFrhxXSJ0wI0a-Kxwi50yOdQ39MDpbQJjz51TF5vZm9TG-L-4f53XRyX4DgYiis1VAzqa2tZLXIClJKuzCqRG38AiXXlpkadVUta_DcltajWWrFRclqweSYnO16-9h9bjAN7qPbxJBXOqGtEkxUUv1P8YyUpiwzdb6jfOxSirh0fWzWEL8dZ277aPf36Axf7GDowfXp20PMt7eY_CZGDMOWdVo65ZTS8gcZV32z</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Risavy, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Robie, Chet</creator><creator>Fisher, Peter A.</creator><creator>Komar, Jennifer</creator><creator>Perossa, Andrew</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-8794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-8549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-6924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-9917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-109X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Selection Tool Use in Canadian Tech Companies: Assessing and Explaining the Research-Practice Gap</title><author>Risavy, Stephen D. ; Robie, Chet ; Fisher, Peter A. ; Komar, Jennifer ; Perossa, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-995ad03599838b359a3339b647e56cbe315906de588fdac1979ce6f541270d203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Ability tests</topic><topic>Business Organizations</topic><topic>Emotional intelligence</topic><topic>Employment interviews</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Research and Development</topic><topic>Sciences</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model</topic><topic>Tool Use</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Risavy, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robie, Chet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komar, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perossa, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Risavy, Stephen D.</au><au>Robie, Chet</au><au>Fisher, Peter A.</au><au>Komar, Jennifer</au><au>Perossa, Andrew</au><au>Roy-Charland, Annie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection Tool Use in Canadian Tech Companies: Assessing and Explaining the Research-Practice Gap</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>445-455</pages><issn>0008-400X</issn><eissn>1879-2669</eissn><abstract>Hiring the right people at the right time is essential for the successful growth of any organization. Although organizational researchers have identified the most reliable and valid methods for selecting employees, many companies are not following these recommendations and are missing out on top talent as a result. In the present research we focus on the selection methods of tech companies using a two-study, mixed-methods design. In Study 1 we surveyed 120 tech company representatives who were knowledgeable about their company's hiring practices (e.g., HR professionals, CEOs, COOs). It was found that tech companies are far behind the science and tend to use selection practices known to be poor predictors of performance. In Study 2 we interviewed 18 tech company representatives (17 of which were from organizations that participated in Study 1) about the reasons their company uses their selection practices. We found that tech companies are not particularly concerned with reliability or validity and, instead, value efficiency and maintaining the status quo. Future research directions and practical advice to help tech companies better acquire talent are provided. Embaucher les bonnes personnes au bon moment est essentiel à la croissance soutenue de toute organisation. Bien que les chercheurs en gestion organisationnelle aient déterminé les méthodes valables les plus fiables pour la sélection du personnel, nombre d'entreprises ne suivent pas leurs recommandations et ratent ainsi l'occasion d'acquérir les meilleurs talents. Dans la présente recherche, nous examinons les méthodes de sélection d'entreprises de technologie dans le cadre de deux études reposant sur une méthodologie mixte. Dans l'Étude 1, nous avons interrogé 120 représentants d'entreprises de technologie qui connaissaient les pratiques de recrutement de leur entreprise (par ex., les professionnels des RH, les DG, les CO). Il a été déterminé que les entreprises de technologie sont très en retard sur la science et tendent à se servir de pratiques de sélection connues comme étant de piètres prédicteurs du rendement. Dans l'Étude 2, nous avons interviewé 18 représentants d'entreprises de technologie (17 d'entre eux provenaient d'organisations ayant participé à l'Étude 1) au sujet des raisons qui motivent le choix des pratiques de sélection. Nous avons constaté que les entreprises de technologie ne se soucient pas particulièrement de la fiabilité ou de la viabilité des méthodes; elles valorisent plutôt l'efficience et le maintien du statu quo. Des suggestions de recherches futures et des conseils pratiques sont présentés en vue d'aider les entreprises de technologie à améliorer leurs modes de sélection des talents. Intérêt public (a) There is a substantial gap between the practices that tech companies are using to hire employees and the best available advice from the research literature; (b) tech companies can likely increase their chances of surviving and thriving by adopting more evidence-based selection tools and methods; and (c) many of the reasons that tech company representatives provide for using their chosen selection devices may be preventing them from seeking out better practices.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/cbs0000263</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-8794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-8549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-6924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-9917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-109X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-400X
ispartof Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2021-10, Vol.53 (4), p.445-455
issn 0008-400X
1879-2669
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2594202834
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Ability
Ability tests
Business Organizations
Emotional intelligence
Employment interviews
Evidence-based practice
Female
Hiring
Human
Human capital
Intelligence tests
Job performance
Male
Personnel Selection
Practice
Research and Development
Sciences
Technology Acceptance Model
Tool Use
Validity
title Selection Tool Use in Canadian Tech Companies: Assessing and Explaining the Research-Practice Gap
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection%20Tool%20Use%20in%20Canadian%20Tech%20Companies:%20Assessing%20and%20Explaining%20the%20Research-Practice%20Gap&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20behavioural%20science&rft.au=Risavy,%20Stephen%20D.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=445-455&rft.issn=0008-400X&rft.eissn=1879-2669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/cbs0000263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512837677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512837677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true