Axial Fracture Initiation During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests and Its Impact on Interpretations
Diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFITs) have been performed extensively in unconventional reservoirs to derive reservoir properties such as pressure, permeability, and closure stress. Since most horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs are drilled in the direction of the minimum horizontal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rock mechanics and rock engineering 2021-11, Vol.54 (11), p.5845-5865 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5865 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5845 |
container_title | Rock mechanics and rock engineering |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Cai, Y. Dahi Taleghani, A. |
description | Diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFITs) have been performed extensively in unconventional reservoirs to derive reservoir properties such as pressure, permeability, and closure stress. Since most horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs are drilled in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress, prevailing studies typically presume that hydraulic fractures are oriented transverse to the wellbore direction. However, the near-wellbore stress concentration and perforation frictions may favor the initiation of fractures along the wellbore, which is perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress. The possibility for the initiation of an axial fracture increases, if the injection rate is high enough or having low differential stress. In this study, we investigate the effect of initiation of the axial fractures on a DFIT test and its interpretation, using a fully coupled geomechanics and fluid flow model. First, we provide a model for the initiation and closure of axial fractures and transverse fractures during DFITs by coupling geomechanics with fluid flow. Then, using numerical simulations, we demonstrate that estimated closure stress can be misleading in the presence of an axial fracture. Finally, we discuss a potential method to determine the maximum horizontal stress under such circumstances. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00603-021-02598-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2593954854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2593954854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e5f85f856c23726036c79bf1071d689f0194e72713eb9fa0ab3c5847af725013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWP98AU8Bz9FJspvsHktrdaHgpYK3kKZJSWl31yQL-u1Nu4KehISBzHtvMj-E7ig8UAD5GAEEcAKM5lvWFRFnaEILXpCi5O_naAKSccIEZ5foKsYdQG7KaoLc9NPrPV4EbdIQLG5an7xOvmvxfAi-3eK519u2i8mbv6qdNSfRysYUsW43uMm1OfRZgfN70yYb-mDTKSveoAun99He_tRr9LZ4Ws1eyPL1uZlNl8RwWicibemq4xGGccnySsLIeu0oSLoRVe2A1oWVTFJu17XToNfclFUhtZOsBMqv0f2Y24fuY8h_U7tuCG0eqTIWXpdFVRZZxUaVCV2MwTrVB3_Q4UtRUEeeauSpMk914qlENvHRFPsjFxt-o_9xfQN68HhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2593954854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Axial Fracture Initiation During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests and Its Impact on Interpretations</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Cai, Y. ; Dahi Taleghani, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Y. ; Dahi Taleghani, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFITs) have been performed extensively in unconventional reservoirs to derive reservoir properties such as pressure, permeability, and closure stress. Since most horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs are drilled in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress, prevailing studies typically presume that hydraulic fractures are oriented transverse to the wellbore direction. However, the near-wellbore stress concentration and perforation frictions may favor the initiation of fractures along the wellbore, which is perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress. The possibility for the initiation of an axial fracture increases, if the injection rate is high enough or having low differential stress. In this study, we investigate the effect of initiation of the axial fractures on a DFIT test and its interpretation, using a fully coupled geomechanics and fluid flow model. First, we provide a model for the initiation and closure of axial fractures and transverse fractures during DFITs by coupling geomechanics with fluid flow. Then, using numerical simulations, we demonstrate that estimated closure stress can be misleading in the presence of an axial fracture. Finally, we discuss a potential method to determine the maximum horizontal stress under such circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-2632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02598-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Axial stress ; Civil Engineering ; Crack initiation ; Diagnostic systems ; Direction ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fracture mechanics ; Geomechanics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Horizontal wells ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Injection ; Mathematical models ; Original Paper ; Permeability ; Reservoirs ; Stress concentration</subject><ispartof>Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2021-11, Vol.54 (11), p.5845-5865</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e5f85f856c23726036c79bf1071d689f0194e72713eb9fa0ab3c5847af725013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e5f85f856c23726036c79bf1071d689f0194e72713eb9fa0ab3c5847af725013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1111-2329</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00603-021-02598-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00603-021-02598-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahi Taleghani, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Axial Fracture Initiation During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests and Its Impact on Interpretations</title><title>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</title><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><description>Diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFITs) have been performed extensively in unconventional reservoirs to derive reservoir properties such as pressure, permeability, and closure stress. Since most horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs are drilled in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress, prevailing studies typically presume that hydraulic fractures are oriented transverse to the wellbore direction. However, the near-wellbore stress concentration and perforation frictions may favor the initiation of fractures along the wellbore, which is perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress. The possibility for the initiation of an axial fracture increases, if the injection rate is high enough or having low differential stress. In this study, we investigate the effect of initiation of the axial fractures on a DFIT test and its interpretation, using a fully coupled geomechanics and fluid flow model. First, we provide a model for the initiation and closure of axial fractures and transverse fractures during DFITs by coupling geomechanics with fluid flow. Then, using numerical simulations, we demonstrate that estimated closure stress can be misleading in the presence of an axial fracture. Finally, we discuss a potential method to determine the maximum horizontal stress under such circumstances.</description><subject>Axial stress</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Crack initiation</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Direction</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Geomechanics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Horizontal wells</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><issn>0723-2632</issn><issn>1434-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWP98AU8Bz9FJspvsHktrdaHgpYK3kKZJSWl31yQL-u1Nu4KehISBzHtvMj-E7ig8UAD5GAEEcAKM5lvWFRFnaEILXpCi5O_naAKSccIEZ5foKsYdQG7KaoLc9NPrPV4EbdIQLG5an7xOvmvxfAi-3eK519u2i8mbv6qdNSfRysYUsW43uMm1OfRZgfN70yYb-mDTKSveoAun99He_tRr9LZ4Ws1eyPL1uZlNl8RwWicibemq4xGGccnySsLIeu0oSLoRVe2A1oWVTFJu17XToNfclFUhtZOsBMqv0f2Y24fuY8h_U7tuCG0eqTIWXpdFVRZZxUaVCV2MwTrVB3_Q4UtRUEeeauSpMk914qlENvHRFPsjFxt-o_9xfQN68HhU</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Cai, Y.</creator><creator>Dahi Taleghani, A.</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-2329</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Axial Fracture Initiation During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests and Its Impact on Interpretations</title><author>Cai, Y. ; Dahi Taleghani, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7e5f85f856c23726036c79bf1071d689f0194e72713eb9fa0ab3c5847af725013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Axial stress</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Crack initiation</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Direction</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Geomechanics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Horizontal wells</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahi Taleghani, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Y.</au><au>Dahi Taleghani, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Axial Fracture Initiation During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests and Its Impact on Interpretations</atitle><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle><stitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5845</spage><epage>5865</epage><pages>5845-5865</pages><issn>0723-2632</issn><eissn>1434-453X</eissn><abstract>Diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFITs) have been performed extensively in unconventional reservoirs to derive reservoir properties such as pressure, permeability, and closure stress. Since most horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs are drilled in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress, prevailing studies typically presume that hydraulic fractures are oriented transverse to the wellbore direction. However, the near-wellbore stress concentration and perforation frictions may favor the initiation of fractures along the wellbore, which is perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress. The possibility for the initiation of an axial fracture increases, if the injection rate is high enough or having low differential stress. In this study, we investigate the effect of initiation of the axial fractures on a DFIT test and its interpretation, using a fully coupled geomechanics and fluid flow model. First, we provide a model for the initiation and closure of axial fractures and transverse fractures during DFITs by coupling geomechanics with fluid flow. Then, using numerical simulations, we demonstrate that estimated closure stress can be misleading in the presence of an axial fracture. Finally, we discuss a potential method to determine the maximum horizontal stress under such circumstances.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00603-021-02598-6</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-2329</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0723-2632 |
ispartof | Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2021-11, Vol.54 (11), p.5845-5865 |
issn | 0723-2632 1434-453X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2593954854 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Axial stress Civil Engineering Crack initiation Diagnostic systems Direction Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Fracture mechanics Geomechanics Geophysics/Geodesy Horizontal wells Hydraulic fracturing Injection Mathematical models Original Paper Permeability Reservoirs Stress concentration |
title | Axial Fracture Initiation During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests and Its Impact on Interpretations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Axial%20Fracture%20Initiation%20During%20Diagnostic%20Fracture%20Injection%20Tests%20and%20Its%20Impact%20on%20Interpretations&rft.jtitle=Rock%20mechanics%20and%20rock%20engineering&rft.au=Cai,%20Y.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5845&rft.epage=5865&rft.pages=5845-5865&rft.issn=0723-2632&rft.eissn=1434-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00603-021-02598-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2593954854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2593954854&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |