The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence

The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1173-1185
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Christine S.-P., McBeath, Michael K., Glenberg, Arthur M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1185
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1173
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 47
creator Yu, Christine S.-P.
McBeath, Michael K.
Glenberg, Arthur M.
description The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0001017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2593905854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516330513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFq3DAQBmBRUppN2kufQNBLSOpasiRLzi2YzbYQaA_bXIWsjIiDbG0lm2SfJe_UZ4rMlhZ6KNVFl2-Gn38Qek_JJ0qYLJ_8QAihhMpXaEUb1hS0UuIIrUglVSFZw47RSUoPZHlMvUHHjNcNV7xaoe32HvDGgxmKjZ8HvHYO7HSJy_6yxLcQ05xw-fO5xN_uwwgDJLyBEWJvjfd73JoY93g9hKkPo_H41ngYLbxFr53xCd79-k_R9-v1tv1c3HzdfGmvbgpTKTkVykJDneuss44LwWvKOilryyzUtmFMdZapqu7U3V1Vm4YCdYZXRnQdSK6UYKfo7LB3F8OPGdKkhz5Z8N6MEOakK6FqLmgjWaYf_qIPYY4586JyZUQowf-taM0YEXTZdX5QNoaUIji9i_1g4l5TopeL6D8XyfjigB-hCy7Zfino90BWkman5HIblbX6f932k1mKb8M8Tnn042HU7Izepb01ceqth2TnGGGcllCaSy01zbHYC640qnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516330513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Yu, Christine S.-P. ; McBeath, Michael K. ; Glenberg, Arthur M.</creator><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Christine S.-P. ; McBeath, Michael K. ; Glenberg, Arthur M. ; Benjamin, Aaron S</creatorcontrib><description>The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34694842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>WASHINGTON: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Affective Valence ; Articulation (Speech) ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Stimulation ; Cognition ; Comparative analysis ; Emotions ; English language ; Female ; Human ; Language ; Male ; Negative Emotions ; Phonemes ; Psychology ; Psychology, Experimental ; Social Sciences ; Sound ; Symbolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1173-1185</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>12</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000711018700008</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6329-4825 ; 0000-0002-9281-3687 ; 0000-0002-5428-2897</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,39262,39263</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Christine S.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBeath, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenberg, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN</addtitle><description>The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.</description><subject>Affective Valence</subject><subject>Articulation (Speech)</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Stimulation</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Negative Emotions</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Experimental</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cFq3DAQBmBRUppN2kufQNBLSOpasiRLzi2YzbYQaA_bXIWsjIiDbG0lm2SfJe_UZ4rMlhZ6KNVFl2-Gn38Qek_JJ0qYLJ_8QAihhMpXaEUb1hS0UuIIrUglVSFZw47RSUoPZHlMvUHHjNcNV7xaoe32HvDGgxmKjZ8HvHYO7HSJy_6yxLcQ05xw-fO5xN_uwwgDJLyBEWJvjfd73JoY93g9hKkPo_H41ngYLbxFr53xCd79-k_R9-v1tv1c3HzdfGmvbgpTKTkVykJDneuss44LwWvKOilryyzUtmFMdZapqu7U3V1Vm4YCdYZXRnQdSK6UYKfo7LB3F8OPGdKkhz5Z8N6MEOakK6FqLmgjWaYf_qIPYY4586JyZUQowf-taM0YEXTZdX5QNoaUIji9i_1g4l5TopeL6D8XyfjigB-hCy7Zfino90BWkman5HIblbX6f932k1mKb8M8Tnn042HU7Izepb01ceqth2TnGGGcllCaSy01zbHYC640qnY</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Yu, Christine S.-P.</creator><creator>McBeath, Michael K.</creator><creator>Glenberg, Arthur M.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>Amer Psychological Assoc</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-4825</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-3687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-2897</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</title><author>Yu, Christine S.-P. ; McBeath, Michael K. ; Glenberg, Arthur M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Affective Valence</topic><topic>Articulation (Speech)</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Stimulation</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Negative Emotions</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Experimental</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Christine S.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBeath, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenberg, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Christine S.-P.</au><au>McBeath, Michael K.</au><au>Glenberg, Arthur M.</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><stitle>J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN</stitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1173</spage><epage>1185</epage><pages>1173-1185</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.</abstract><cop>WASHINGTON</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34694842</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0001017</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-4825</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-3687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-2897</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1173-1185
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2593905854
source APA PsycARTICLES; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Affective Valence
Articulation (Speech)
Auditory Perception
Auditory Stimulation
Cognition
Comparative analysis
Emotions
English language
Female
Human
Language
Male
Negative Emotions
Phonemes
Psychology
Psychology, Experimental
Social Sciences
Sound
Symbolism
title The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Gleam-Glum%20Effect:%20/i:/%20Versus%20/%CE%9B/%20Phonemes%20Generically%20Carry%20Emotional%20Valence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Yu,%20Christine%20S.-P.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1173&rft.epage=1185&rft.pages=1173-1185&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0001017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2516330513%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516330513&rft_id=info:pmid/34694842&rfr_iscdi=true