The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence
The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1173-1185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1173 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Yu, Christine S.-P. McBeath, Michael K. Glenberg, Arthur M. |
description | The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xlm0001017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2593905854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516330513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFq3DAQBmBRUppN2kufQNBLSOpasiRLzi2YzbYQaA_bXIWsjIiDbG0lm2SfJe_UZ4rMlhZ6KNVFl2-Gn38Qek_JJ0qYLJ_8QAihhMpXaEUb1hS0UuIIrUglVSFZw47RSUoPZHlMvUHHjNcNV7xaoe32HvDGgxmKjZ8HvHYO7HSJy_6yxLcQ05xw-fO5xN_uwwgDJLyBEWJvjfd73JoY93g9hKkPo_H41ngYLbxFr53xCd79-k_R9-v1tv1c3HzdfGmvbgpTKTkVykJDneuss44LwWvKOilryyzUtmFMdZapqu7U3V1Vm4YCdYZXRnQdSK6UYKfo7LB3F8OPGdKkhz5Z8N6MEOakK6FqLmgjWaYf_qIPYY4586JyZUQowf-taM0YEXTZdX5QNoaUIji9i_1g4l5TopeL6D8XyfjigB-hCy7Zfino90BWkman5HIblbX6f932k1mKb8M8Tnn042HU7Izepb01ceqth2TnGGGcllCaSy01zbHYC640qnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516330513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Yu, Christine S.-P. ; McBeath, Michael K. ; Glenberg, Arthur M.</creator><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Christine S.-P. ; McBeath, Michael K. ; Glenberg, Arthur M. ; Benjamin, Aaron S</creatorcontrib><description>The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34694842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>WASHINGTON: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Affective Valence ; Articulation (Speech) ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Stimulation ; Cognition ; Comparative analysis ; Emotions ; English language ; Female ; Human ; Language ; Male ; Negative Emotions ; Phonemes ; Psychology ; Psychology, Experimental ; Social Sciences ; Sound ; Symbolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1173-1185</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>12</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000711018700008</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6329-4825 ; 0000-0002-9281-3687 ; 0000-0002-5428-2897</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,39262,39263</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Christine S.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBeath, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenberg, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN</addtitle><description>The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.</description><subject>Affective Valence</subject><subject>Articulation (Speech)</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Stimulation</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Negative Emotions</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Experimental</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cFq3DAQBmBRUppN2kufQNBLSOpasiRLzi2YzbYQaA_bXIWsjIiDbG0lm2SfJe_UZ4rMlhZ6KNVFl2-Gn38Qek_JJ0qYLJ_8QAihhMpXaEUb1hS0UuIIrUglVSFZw47RSUoPZHlMvUHHjNcNV7xaoe32HvDGgxmKjZ8HvHYO7HSJy_6yxLcQ05xw-fO5xN_uwwgDJLyBEWJvjfd73JoY93g9hKkPo_H41ngYLbxFr53xCd79-k_R9-v1tv1c3HzdfGmvbgpTKTkVykJDneuss44LwWvKOilryyzUtmFMdZapqu7U3V1Vm4YCdYZXRnQdSK6UYKfo7LB3F8OPGdKkhz5Z8N6MEOakK6FqLmgjWaYf_qIPYY4586JyZUQowf-taM0YEXTZdX5QNoaUIji9i_1g4l5TopeL6D8XyfjigB-hCy7Zfino90BWkman5HIblbX6f932k1mKb8M8Tnn042HU7Izepb01ceqth2TnGGGcllCaSy01zbHYC640qnY</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Yu, Christine S.-P.</creator><creator>McBeath, Michael K.</creator><creator>Glenberg, Arthur M.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>Amer Psychological Assoc</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-4825</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-3687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-2897</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</title><author>Yu, Christine S.-P. ; McBeath, Michael K. ; Glenberg, Arthur M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a287t-8ce91ffbcfcf4554613b776c3ce6c9338bc3826b8dd26a91e1fa42a5bbe748853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Affective Valence</topic><topic>Articulation (Speech)</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Stimulation</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Negative Emotions</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Experimental</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Christine S.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBeath, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenberg, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Christine S.-P.</au><au>McBeath, Michael K.</au><au>Glenberg, Arthur M.</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><stitle>J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN</stitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1173</spage><epage>1185</epage><pages>1173-1185</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>The gleam-glum effect is a novel sound symbolic finding that words with the /i:/-phoneme (like gleam) are perceived more positive emotionally than matched words with the /Λ/-phoneme (like glum). We provide data that not only confirm the effect but also are consistent with an explanation that /i:/ and /Λ/ articulation tend to co-occur with activation of positive versus negative emotional facial musculature respectively. Three studies eliminate selection bias by including all applicable English words from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) and the Warriner et al. (2013) database and every possible Mandarin Pinyin combination that differ only in the middle phoneme (/i:/ vs /Λ/). In Study 1, 61 U.S. undergraduates rated monosyllabic English /i:/ words as robustly more positive than matched /Λ/ words. Study 2 analyzed the Warriner et al. (2013) valence ratings, extending the gleam-glum effect to all applicable words in the database. In Study 3, 38 U.S. participants (using English) and 37 participants in China (using Mandarin Pinyin) rated word pairs under three conditions that moderate musculature activity: Read aloud (Enhance), read silently (Control), and read silently while chewing gum (Interfere). Indeed, the effect was both replicated and was significantly larger when facial musculature was enhanced than when interfered with, and the two language populations did not significantly differ. These findings confirm a robust gleam-glum effect, despite semantic noise, in English and Mandarin Pinyin. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that this type of sound symbolism arises from the overlap in muscles used both in articulation and emotion expression.</abstract><cop>WASHINGTON</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34694842</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0001017</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-4825</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-3687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-2897</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1173-1185 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2593905854 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Affective Valence Articulation (Speech) Auditory Perception Auditory Stimulation Cognition Comparative analysis Emotions English language Female Human Language Male Negative Emotions Phonemes Psychology Psychology, Experimental Social Sciences Sound Symbolism |
title | The Gleam-Glum Effect: /i:/ Versus /Λ/ Phonemes Generically Carry Emotional Valence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Gleam-Glum%20Effect:%20/i:/%20Versus%20/%CE%9B/%20Phonemes%20Generically%20Carry%20Emotional%20Valence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Yu,%20Christine%20S.-P.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1173&rft.epage=1185&rft.pages=1173-1185&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0001017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2516330513%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516330513&rft_id=info:pmid/34694842&rfr_iscdi=true |