The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency

The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency

This study analyses the differences in costs, profit, and feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency. Data were collected from 128 farmers taken by cluster sampling and analyzed quantitatively using profit analysis and R/C ratio. The results showed tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2021-10, Vol.883 (1), p.12070
Hauptverfasser: Kamardiani, D R, Fauzan, M, Riansyah, K S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cost analysis
Farming
Feasibility
Production costs
Traditional farming
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12070
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 883
creator Kamardiani, D R
Fauzan, M
Riansyah, K S
description This study analyses the differences in costs, profit, and feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency. Data were collected from 128 farmers taken by cluster sampling and analyzed quantitatively using profit analysis and R/C ratio. The results showed that the total production cost of environmentally friendly shallot farming was 12.29% higher than conventional shallot farming, but conventional shallot farming had a higher profit of 41.94%. Both environmentally friendly and conventional farming is feasible, but the R/C ratio of conventional shallot farming is higher by 0.7.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2591368072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2591368072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-b0f73d1461621997201c1bf1a17e52df027f33c74938e1479e96b36a9e6833fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQLeeDObk6xJc6ljfoAg6Lw1pG2yZXTJTLpB_70dk4kgeHVeeD84PAhdArkBUhQZiDwfAYM8KwqWQUaAEkGO0OBgHB80EafoLKUlIVyMmRygj9nCYGt0cqVrXNvhYLHxWxeDXxnf6qbpsI3O-LoX2te4Cn7bGy543eC06AOhxVbHlfNz7Dy-077dNPjVzI2vunN0YnWTzMX3HaL3--ls8jh6fnl4mtw-jyrKJRmVxApWw5gDpyCloAQqKC1oECantSVUWMYqMZasMDAW0kheMq6l4QVj1rAhutrvrmP43JjUqmXYxP7FpGgugfGCCNqn-D5VxZBSNFato1vp2CkgasdS7TCpHTLVs1Sg9iz7It0XXVj_LP9buv6jNJ2-_YqpdW3ZF6PQgrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2591368072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Kamardiani, D R ; Fauzan, M ; Riansyah, K S</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamardiani, D R ; Fauzan, M ; Riansyah, K S</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses the differences in costs, profit, and feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency. Data were collected from 128 farmers taken by cluster sampling and analyzed quantitatively using profit analysis and R/C ratio. The results showed that the total production cost of environmentally friendly shallot farming was 12.29% higher than conventional shallot farming, but conventional shallot farming had a higher profit of 41.94%. Both environmentally friendly and conventional farming is feasible, but the R/C ratio of conventional shallot farming is higher by 0.7.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Cost analysis ; Farming ; Feasibility ; Production costs ; Traditional farming</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-10, Vol.883 (1), p.12070</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-b0f73d1461621997201c1bf1a17e52df027f33c74938e1479e96b36a9e6833fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012070/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamardiani, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauzan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riansyah, K S</creatorcontrib><title>The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>This study analyses the differences in costs, profit, and feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency. Data were collected from 128 farmers taken by cluster sampling and analyzed quantitatively using profit analysis and R/C ratio. The results showed that the total production cost of environmentally friendly shallot farming was 12.29% higher than conventional shallot farming, but conventional shallot farming had a higher profit of 41.94%. Both environmentally friendly and conventional farming is feasible, but the R/C ratio of conventional shallot farming is higher by 0.7.</description><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Traditional farming</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQLeeDObk6xJc6ljfoAg6Lw1pG2yZXTJTLpB_70dk4kgeHVeeD84PAhdArkBUhQZiDwfAYM8KwqWQUaAEkGO0OBgHB80EafoLKUlIVyMmRygj9nCYGt0cqVrXNvhYLHxWxeDXxnf6qbpsI3O-LoX2te4Cn7bGy543eC06AOhxVbHlfNz7Dy-077dNPjVzI2vunN0YnWTzMX3HaL3--ls8jh6fnl4mtw-jyrKJRmVxApWw5gDpyCloAQqKC1oECantSVUWMYqMZasMDAW0kheMq6l4QVj1rAhutrvrmP43JjUqmXYxP7FpGgugfGCCNqn-D5VxZBSNFato1vp2CkgasdS7TCpHTLVs1Sg9iz7It0XXVj_LP9buv6jNJ2-_YqpdW3ZF6PQgrY</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Kamardiani, D R</creator><creator>Fauzan, M</creator><creator>Riansyah, K S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency</title><author>Kamardiani, D R ; Fauzan, M ; Riansyah, K S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-b0f73d1461621997201c1bf1a17e52df027f33c74938e1479e96b36a9e6833fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Traditional farming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamardiani, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauzan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riansyah, K S</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamardiani, D R</au><au>Fauzan, M</au><au>Riansyah, K S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>883</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12070</spage><pages>12070-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>This study analyses the differences in costs, profit, and feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency. Data were collected from 128 farmers taken by cluster sampling and analyzed quantitatively using profit analysis and R/C ratio. The results showed that the total production cost of environmentally friendly shallot farming was 12.29% higher than conventional shallot farming, but conventional shallot farming had a higher profit of 41.94%. Both environmentally friendly and conventional farming is feasible, but the R/C ratio of conventional shallot farming is higher by 0.7.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012070</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-10, Vol.883 (1), p.12070
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2591368072
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; IOPscience extra
subjects Cost analysis
Farming
Feasibility
Production costs
Traditional farming
title The feasibility of environmentally friendly and conventional shallot farming in Bantul Regency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20feasibility%20of%20environmentally%20friendly%20and%20conventional%20shallot%20farming%20in%20Bantul%20Regency&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Kamardiani,%20D%20R&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=883&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12070&rft.pages=12070-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2591368072%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2591368072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true