Land use change: the barrier for sugarcane sustainability
Bioethanol production in Brazil gained momentum in the 1970s and 1980s as an energy security and energy sufficiency measure due to the well‐known world oil crisis. However, the increase in bioethanol production and consumption in the past couple of decades has been backed by the country's effor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1591-1603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1603 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1591 |
container_title | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Picoli, Michelle C. A. Machado, Pedro G. |
description | Bioethanol production in Brazil gained momentum in the 1970s and 1980s as an energy security and energy sufficiency measure due to the well‐known world oil crisis. However, the increase in bioethanol production and consumption in the past couple of decades has been backed by the country's efforts and measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport sector. Brazil is the second largest producer of biofuels, and its production continues to increase because of the commitments made in the Paris Agreement in 2015. This study reviews several key policies designed to develop Brazilian bioethanol production and to protect the environment. It is argued that many of these policies do not consider land use change or encourage land protection to achieve sustainable land use and agricultural production. Thus, this work aims to understand the importance and impacts of public policies in expanding sugarcane in Brazil in the past 34 years, with regard to land use and native vegetation. The discussion in this paper addresses the inadequacy of current policies to avoid direct and indirect land use change caused by sugarcane expansion, despite incentives such as 17 Sustainable Development Goals from the United Nations and certification schemes. The data presented indicate an indirect effect caused by the expansion of sugarcane over pasture areas, which leads to further clearing of natural vegetation to establish new pasture areas. Ultimately, this study addresses the importance of zero deforestation in Brazil, regardless of the crop that causes the conversion. Without conjoint efforts by all sectors of the economy to curtail deforestation, the sustainability of producing biofuels is not guaranteed, as the emissions caused by deforestation will not be offset by the lower GHG emissions obtained by using ethanol as a transport fuel. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bbb.2270 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2590846353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2590846353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-70a9c6920b82a2e6b0260c318c455fe781706c39961093bbcd865a42f59a466e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgR1jwIsjWSbLJJt7s4j8oeFHwFpI026bUbE12kf32bm3pTXAu8w6_N_N4CF1imGAAcmuMmRBSwhEaYUlJjoHi44MuPk7RWUorAMZZwUZIznSYZ11ymV3qsHB3Wbt0mdExehezuolZ6hY6Wh3coFKrfdDGr33bn6OTWq-Tu9jvMXp_fHirnvPZ69NLdT_LLZEU8hK0tFwSMIJo4rgBwsFSLGzBWO1KgUvglkrJMUhqjJ0LznRBaiZ1wbmjY3S1u7uJzVfnUqtWTRfD8FIRJkEUnDI6UNc7ysYmpehqtYn-U8deYVDbYtRQjNoWM6A3O_TbmaZO1rtg3QEHAF4WggvYDh5o8X-68q1ufROqpgvtYM33Vr92_Z-B1HQ6_Q32A7y0gig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2590846353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land use change: the barrier for sugarcane sustainability</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Picoli, Michelle C. A. ; Machado, Pedro G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Picoli, Michelle C. A. ; Machado, Pedro G.</creatorcontrib><description>Bioethanol production in Brazil gained momentum in the 1970s and 1980s as an energy security and energy sufficiency measure due to the well‐known world oil crisis. However, the increase in bioethanol production and consumption in the past couple of decades has been backed by the country's efforts and measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport sector. Brazil is the second largest producer of biofuels, and its production continues to increase because of the commitments made in the Paris Agreement in 2015. This study reviews several key policies designed to develop Brazilian bioethanol production and to protect the environment. It is argued that many of these policies do not consider land use change or encourage land protection to achieve sustainable land use and agricultural production. Thus, this work aims to understand the importance and impacts of public policies in expanding sugarcane in Brazil in the past 34 years, with regard to land use and native vegetation. The discussion in this paper addresses the inadequacy of current policies to avoid direct and indirect land use change caused by sugarcane expansion, despite incentives such as 17 Sustainable Development Goals from the United Nations and certification schemes. The data presented indicate an indirect effect caused by the expansion of sugarcane over pasture areas, which leads to further clearing of natural vegetation to establish new pasture areas. Ultimately, this study addresses the importance of zero deforestation in Brazil, regardless of the crop that causes the conversion. Without conjoint efforts by all sectors of the economy to curtail deforestation, the sustainability of producing biofuels is not guaranteed, as the emissions caused by deforestation will not be offset by the lower GHG emissions obtained by using ethanol as a transport fuel. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Biodiesel fuels ; Bioethanol ; Biofuels ; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology ; Deforestation ; Emission measurements ; Energy & Fuels ; Energy policy ; Energy security ; Environmental protection ; Ethanol ; good practices ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Incentives ; indirect land‐use change ; International organizations ; land policies ; Land use ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Momentum ; Natural vegetation ; Paris Agreement ; Pasture ; Public policy ; Science & Technology ; Security ; Sugarcane ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable Development Goals ; Sustainable use ; Technology ; Transport ; Transportation industry ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1591-1603</ispartof><rights>2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>13</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000674868000001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-70a9c6920b82a2e6b0260c318c455fe781706c39961093bbcd865a42f59a466e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-70a9c6920b82a2e6b0260c318c455fe781706c39961093bbcd865a42f59a466e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9855-2046 ; 0000-0001-9834-9697</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbbb.2270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbbb.2270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Picoli, Michelle C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Pedro G.</creatorcontrib><title>Land use change: the barrier for sugarcane sustainability</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><addtitle>BIOFUEL BIOPROD BIOR</addtitle><description>Bioethanol production in Brazil gained momentum in the 1970s and 1980s as an energy security and energy sufficiency measure due to the well‐known world oil crisis. However, the increase in bioethanol production and consumption in the past couple of decades has been backed by the country's efforts and measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport sector. Brazil is the second largest producer of biofuels, and its production continues to increase because of the commitments made in the Paris Agreement in 2015. This study reviews several key policies designed to develop Brazilian bioethanol production and to protect the environment. It is argued that many of these policies do not consider land use change or encourage land protection to achieve sustainable land use and agricultural production. Thus, this work aims to understand the importance and impacts of public policies in expanding sugarcane in Brazil in the past 34 years, with regard to land use and native vegetation. The discussion in this paper addresses the inadequacy of current policies to avoid direct and indirect land use change caused by sugarcane expansion, despite incentives such as 17 Sustainable Development Goals from the United Nations and certification schemes. The data presented indicate an indirect effect caused by the expansion of sugarcane over pasture areas, which leads to further clearing of natural vegetation to establish new pasture areas. Ultimately, this study addresses the importance of zero deforestation in Brazil, regardless of the crop that causes the conversion. Without conjoint efforts by all sectors of the economy to curtail deforestation, the sustainability of producing biofuels is not guaranteed, as the emissions caused by deforestation will not be offset by the lower GHG emissions obtained by using ethanol as a transport fuel. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Bioethanol</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Energy & Fuels</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy security</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>good practices</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>indirect land‐use change</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>land policies</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Momentum</subject><subject>Natural vegetation</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable Development Goals</subject><subject>Sustainable use</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Transportation industry</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgR1jwIsjWSbLJJt7s4j8oeFHwFpI026bUbE12kf32bm3pTXAu8w6_N_N4CF1imGAAcmuMmRBSwhEaYUlJjoHi44MuPk7RWUorAMZZwUZIznSYZ11ymV3qsHB3Wbt0mdExehezuolZ6hY6Wh3coFKrfdDGr33bn6OTWq-Tu9jvMXp_fHirnvPZ69NLdT_LLZEU8hK0tFwSMIJo4rgBwsFSLGzBWO1KgUvglkrJMUhqjJ0LznRBaiZ1wbmjY3S1u7uJzVfnUqtWTRfD8FIRJkEUnDI6UNc7ysYmpehqtYn-U8deYVDbYtRQjNoWM6A3O_TbmaZO1rtg3QEHAF4WggvYDh5o8X-68q1ufROqpgvtYM33Vr92_Z-B1HQ6_Q32A7y0gig</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Picoli, Michelle C. A.</creator><creator>Machado, Pedro G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-2046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9834-9697</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Land use change: the barrier for sugarcane sustainability</title><author>Picoli, Michelle C. A. ; Machado, Pedro G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-70a9c6920b82a2e6b0260c318c455fe781706c39961093bbcd865a42f59a466e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Bioethanol</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Energy & Fuels</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy security</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>good practices</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>indirect land‐use change</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>land policies</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Momentum</topic><topic>Natural vegetation</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable Development Goals</topic><topic>Sustainable use</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Transportation industry</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Picoli, Michelle C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Pedro G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Picoli, Michelle C. A.</au><au>Machado, Pedro G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land use change: the barrier for sugarcane sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><stitle>BIOFUEL BIOPROD BIOR</stitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1591</spage><epage>1603</epage><pages>1591-1603</pages><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>Bioethanol production in Brazil gained momentum in the 1970s and 1980s as an energy security and energy sufficiency measure due to the well‐known world oil crisis. However, the increase in bioethanol production and consumption in the past couple of decades has been backed by the country's efforts and measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport sector. Brazil is the second largest producer of biofuels, and its production continues to increase because of the commitments made in the Paris Agreement in 2015. This study reviews several key policies designed to develop Brazilian bioethanol production and to protect the environment. It is argued that many of these policies do not consider land use change or encourage land protection to achieve sustainable land use and agricultural production. Thus, this work aims to understand the importance and impacts of public policies in expanding sugarcane in Brazil in the past 34 years, with regard to land use and native vegetation. The discussion in this paper addresses the inadequacy of current policies to avoid direct and indirect land use change caused by sugarcane expansion, despite incentives such as 17 Sustainable Development Goals from the United Nations and certification schemes. The data presented indicate an indirect effect caused by the expansion of sugarcane over pasture areas, which leads to further clearing of natural vegetation to establish new pasture areas. Ultimately, this study addresses the importance of zero deforestation in Brazil, regardless of the crop that causes the conversion. Without conjoint efforts by all sectors of the economy to curtail deforestation, the sustainability of producing biofuels is not guaranteed, as the emissions caused by deforestation will not be offset by the lower GHG emissions obtained by using ethanol as a transport fuel. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.2270</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-2046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9834-9697</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-104X |
ispartof | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1591-1603 |
issn | 1932-104X 1932-1031 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2590846353 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural production Biodiesel fuels Bioethanol Biofuels Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology Deforestation Emission measurements Energy & Fuels Energy policy Energy security Environmental protection Ethanol good practices Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Incentives indirect land‐use change International organizations land policies Land use Life Sciences & Biomedicine Momentum Natural vegetation Paris Agreement Pasture Public policy Science & Technology Security Sugarcane Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable Development Goals Sustainable use Technology Transport Transportation industry Vegetation |
title | Land use change: the barrier for sugarcane sustainability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A34%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20use%20change:%20the%20barrier%20for%20sugarcane%20sustainability&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Picoli,%20Michelle%20C.%20A.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1591&rft.epage=1603&rft.pages=1591-1603&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.2270&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2590846353%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2590846353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |