What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions
In recent years, the person–environment fit framework has become increasingly popular as a lens for understanding the work–family interface. However, the mechanisms that link objective work–family person–environment fit to individual outcomes are poorly understood, and little person–environment fit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 2021-12, Vol.94 (4), p.866-889 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 889 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 866 |
container_title | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Piszczek, Matthew M. Martin, James E. Pimputkar, Avani S. Laulié, Lyonel |
description | In recent years, the person–environment fit framework has become increasingly popular as a lens for understanding the work–family interface. However, the mechanisms that link objective work–family person–environment fit to individual outcomes are poorly understood, and little person–environment fit research has focused on work schedules despite their importance for employee management of work and family roles. Moreover, it is unclear whether schedule fit contributes to individual outcomes over and beyond schedule characteristics such as flexibility and control. The present study explains how employee objective schedule fit relates to individual turnover intentions through work‐to‐family conflict and schedule satisfaction in a study of 608 retail employees. Results show that objective work–family schedule fit has statistically significant relationships with employee outcomes independent of the effects of schedule control and flexibility, but that these relationships are relatively weak. These results establish that schedule fit is a facet of work–family person–environment fit beyond more generally desirable schedule characteristics, but that it may be useful to examine only in limited contexts. The results also contribute to the understanding of the cognitive mechanisms linking objective environmental characteristics to employee outcomes.
Practitioner points
The ability to work a schedule that meets preferences for days and shifts (hours) is related to better worker outcomes.
This effect holds even when considering employees’ control over their schedule and its flexibility.
Employees’ schedules are a starting point for forming their attitudes and behaviours related to the work–family interface, which may shape future turnover cognitions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joop.12367 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2590074298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2590074298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-81b5cc8d341705eb4ab77d3e90ab29a3157b1a795a55c2937d2a924617ec4fea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9KAzEQxoMoWP9cfIKAN3F1k-w2m5OI-JdCPVQ8LrPZCd263dQktfTmO_gOPphPYmoF0YNzGRh-833DfIQcsPSExTqdWDs7YVz05Qbp8TTLkkLwfJP0UtUXCZOq2CY73k_SWDKTPfL-OIZAa4ueej3Get4iNU2gUNc0WLqw7unj9c3AtGmX1KFHcHp8RkdjpE2nHU6xC9BSNAZ1oNb8VrHdHwVtO9M2Ohz_cB5C4w3o0NjumEIXfeeusy_ookOI8nHu98iWgdbj_nffJQ9Xl6OLm2QwvL69OB8kWqRMJgWrcq2LWmRMpjlWGVRS1gJVChVXIFguKwZS5ZDnmishaw6KZ30mUWcGQeySw7XuzNnnOfpQTmy8JlqWPFern3FVROpoTWlnvXdoyplrpuCWJUvLVQ7lKofyK4cIszW8aFpc_kOWd8Ph_XrnEzH5kFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2590074298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Piszczek, Matthew M. ; Martin, James E. ; Pimputkar, Avani S. ; Laulié, Lyonel</creator><creatorcontrib>Piszczek, Matthew M. ; Martin, James E. ; Pimputkar, Avani S. ; Laulié, Lyonel</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the person–environment fit framework has become increasingly popular as a lens for understanding the work–family interface. However, the mechanisms that link objective work–family person–environment fit to individual outcomes are poorly understood, and little person–environment fit research has focused on work schedules despite their importance for employee management of work and family roles. Moreover, it is unclear whether schedule fit contributes to individual outcomes over and beyond schedule characteristics such as flexibility and control. The present study explains how employee objective schedule fit relates to individual turnover intentions through work‐to‐family conflict and schedule satisfaction in a study of 608 retail employees. Results show that objective work–family schedule fit has statistically significant relationships with employee outcomes independent of the effects of schedule control and flexibility, but that these relationships are relatively weak. These results establish that schedule fit is a facet of work–family person–environment fit beyond more generally desirable schedule characteristics, but that it may be useful to examine only in limited contexts. The results also contribute to the understanding of the cognitive mechanisms linking objective environmental characteristics to employee outcomes.
Practitioner points
The ability to work a schedule that meets preferences for days and shifts (hours) is related to better worker outcomes.
This effect holds even when considering employees’ control over their schedule and its flexibility.
Employees’ schedules are a starting point for forming their attitudes and behaviours related to the work–family interface, which may shape future turnover cognitions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joop.12367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leicester: British Psychological Society</publisher><subject>Employees ; Environmental aspects ; Family conflict ; Family roles ; Flexibility ; Occupational psychology ; Schedules ; Work ; Work life balance</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2021-12, Vol.94 (4), p.866-889</ispartof><rights>2021 British Psychological Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-81b5cc8d341705eb4ab77d3e90ab29a3157b1a795a55c2937d2a924617ec4fea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-81b5cc8d341705eb4ab77d3e90ab29a3157b1a795a55c2937d2a924617ec4fea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6089-1843 ; 0000-0001-9817-4110 ; 0000-0002-6581-406X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoop.12367$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoop.12367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,30990,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piszczek, Matthew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimputkar, Avani S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laulié, Lyonel</creatorcontrib><title>What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions</title><title>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</title><description>In recent years, the person–environment fit framework has become increasingly popular as a lens for understanding the work–family interface. However, the mechanisms that link objective work–family person–environment fit to individual outcomes are poorly understood, and little person–environment fit research has focused on work schedules despite their importance for employee management of work and family roles. Moreover, it is unclear whether schedule fit contributes to individual outcomes over and beyond schedule characteristics such as flexibility and control. The present study explains how employee objective schedule fit relates to individual turnover intentions through work‐to‐family conflict and schedule satisfaction in a study of 608 retail employees. Results show that objective work–family schedule fit has statistically significant relationships with employee outcomes independent of the effects of schedule control and flexibility, but that these relationships are relatively weak. These results establish that schedule fit is a facet of work–family person–environment fit beyond more generally desirable schedule characteristics, but that it may be useful to examine only in limited contexts. The results also contribute to the understanding of the cognitive mechanisms linking objective environmental characteristics to employee outcomes.
Practitioner points
The ability to work a schedule that meets preferences for days and shifts (hours) is related to better worker outcomes.
This effect holds even when considering employees’ control over their schedule and its flexibility.
Employees’ schedules are a starting point for forming their attitudes and behaviours related to the work–family interface, which may shape future turnover cognitions.</description><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Family conflict</subject><subject>Family roles</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><issn>0963-1798</issn><issn>2044-8325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9KAzEQxoMoWP9cfIKAN3F1k-w2m5OI-JdCPVQ8LrPZCd263dQktfTmO_gOPphPYmoF0YNzGRh-833DfIQcsPSExTqdWDs7YVz05Qbp8TTLkkLwfJP0UtUXCZOq2CY73k_SWDKTPfL-OIZAa4ueej3Get4iNU2gUNc0WLqw7unj9c3AtGmX1KFHcHp8RkdjpE2nHU6xC9BSNAZ1oNb8VrHdHwVtO9M2Ohz_cB5C4w3o0NjumEIXfeeusy_ookOI8nHu98iWgdbj_nffJQ9Xl6OLm2QwvL69OB8kWqRMJgWrcq2LWmRMpjlWGVRS1gJVChVXIFguKwZS5ZDnmishaw6KZ30mUWcGQeySw7XuzNnnOfpQTmy8JlqWPFern3FVROpoTWlnvXdoyplrpuCWJUvLVQ7lKofyK4cIszW8aFpc_kOWd8Ph_XrnEzH5kFA</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Piszczek, Matthew M.</creator><creator>Martin, James E.</creator><creator>Pimputkar, Avani S.</creator><creator>Laulié, Lyonel</creator><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6089-1843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-4110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6581-406X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions</title><author>Piszczek, Matthew M. ; Martin, James E. ; Pimputkar, Avani S. ; Laulié, Lyonel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-81b5cc8d341705eb4ab77d3e90ab29a3157b1a795a55c2937d2a924617ec4fea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Family conflict</topic><topic>Family roles</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piszczek, Matthew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimputkar, Avani S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laulié, Lyonel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piszczek, Matthew M.</au><au>Martin, James E.</au><au>Pimputkar, Avani S.</au><au>Laulié, Lyonel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>866</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>866-889</pages><issn>0963-1798</issn><eissn>2044-8325</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the person–environment fit framework has become increasingly popular as a lens for understanding the work–family interface. However, the mechanisms that link objective work–family person–environment fit to individual outcomes are poorly understood, and little person–environment fit research has focused on work schedules despite their importance for employee management of work and family roles. Moreover, it is unclear whether schedule fit contributes to individual outcomes over and beyond schedule characteristics such as flexibility and control. The present study explains how employee objective schedule fit relates to individual turnover intentions through work‐to‐family conflict and schedule satisfaction in a study of 608 retail employees. Results show that objective work–family schedule fit has statistically significant relationships with employee outcomes independent of the effects of schedule control and flexibility, but that these relationships are relatively weak. These results establish that schedule fit is a facet of work–family person–environment fit beyond more generally desirable schedule characteristics, but that it may be useful to examine only in limited contexts. The results also contribute to the understanding of the cognitive mechanisms linking objective environmental characteristics to employee outcomes.
Practitioner points
The ability to work a schedule that meets preferences for days and shifts (hours) is related to better worker outcomes.
This effect holds even when considering employees’ control over their schedule and its flexibility.
Employees’ schedules are a starting point for forming their attitudes and behaviours related to the work–family interface, which may shape future turnover cognitions.</abstract><cop>Leicester</cop><pub>British Psychological Society</pub><doi>10.1111/joop.12367</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6089-1843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-4110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6581-406X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-1798 |
ispartof | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2021-12, Vol.94 (4), p.866-889 |
issn | 0963-1798 2044-8325 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2590074298 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Employees Environmental aspects Family conflict Family roles Flexibility Occupational psychology Schedules Work Work life balance |
title | What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A25%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20does%20schedule%20fit%20add%20to%20work%E2%80%93family%20research?%20The%20incremental%20effect%20of%20schedule%20fit%20on%20work%E2%80%93family%20conflict,%20schedule%20satisfaction,%20and%20turnover%20intentions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Piszczek,%20Matthew%20M.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=866-889&rft.issn=0963-1798&rft.eissn=2044-8325&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joop.12367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2590074298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2590074298&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |