Predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients receiving devices following cardiac surgery
Introduction: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a well-recognised short-term complication after cardiac surgery; however, in some cases, conduction system function may recover, leaving the patient with an unnecessary device and its associated morbidity. Aims: In order to aid in decision-maki...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology 2021-01, Vol.7, p.28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Cranley, J Nye, T Omoniyi, O Cheung, J Hopley, E Bethell, M Kotecha, D Sarbjit-Singh, S Agarwal, S |
description | Introduction: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a well-recognised short-term complication after cardiac surgery; however, in some cases, conduction system function may recover, leaving the patient with an unnecessary device and its associated morbidity. Aims: In order to aid in decision-making process for PPM implantation post cardiac surgery, we sought to determine predictors of pacemaker dependency. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone PPM implant within 30 days of cardiac surgery (bypass grafting and/or valvular surgery) at our institution between May 2016 and December 2019. Parameters including pre-operative ECG, surgical details and device follow-up data were collected. Pacemaker dependency (PPM-D) was defined as any of the following at the initial post discharge device check: no underlying rhythm at VVI 40, underlying junctional rhythm, RV pace percentage >80% or underlying rhythm rate of 40 bpm or less. Using a stepwise approach, we constructed a series of logistic regression models to predict PPM-D, minimising the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and maximising the AUROC/C-statistic to optimise discriminative performance. Results: We identified 143 patients who had undergone PPM implantation for whom device follow-up information was available. Only seventy eight (54.5%) patients were PPM-D as defined. After multivariate logistic regression analysis two factors predicted PPM-D. The presence of post-operative complete AV block (OR 11.41; CI, 2.55–73.82; p=0.004) and QRS duration >120 ms on the post-operative ECG (OR 6.88; CI, 1.72–34.73; p=0.010) (Figure 1). Interestingly, neither surgery type (valve, bypass, etc.) nor any pre-operative ECG parameters were significantly associated in this cohort. A model incorporating just these factors had high discriminative capability with AUROC=0.749. Conclusions: In post cardiac surgical patients, pacemaker dependency was only present in approximately half of patients at the post-discharge device check. Although this data requires external validation, assessing for complete AV block or a broad QRS may be helpful in deciding whether to implant PPMs in this patient group. [Image Omitted] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2590045907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2590045907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25900459073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNij0LwjAURYMoWLT_IeBcqP1KO4vi6ODkUmLyWp7WpL60lf57K4izy72Xc8-MeVGY5kGcCzH_7axYMt85vIZJIuIsKbYeu5wINKrOkuO24q1U8JB3IK6hBaPBqJGjmXiHYDrHCRTggKaehAEVOF7ZprGvD1GSNErFXU810Lhmi0o2Dvxvr9jmsD_vjkFL9tmD68qb7clMVxmlRRgmU4j4P-sNhvxF3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2590045907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients receiving devices following cardiac surgery</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Cranley, J ; Nye, T ; Omoniyi, O ; Cheung, J ; Hopley, E ; Bethell, M ; Kotecha, D ; Sarbjit-Singh, S ; Agarwal, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Cranley, J ; Nye, T ; Omoniyi, O ; Cheung, J ; Hopley, E ; Bethell, M ; Kotecha, D ; Sarbjit-Singh, S ; Agarwal, S</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a well-recognised short-term complication after cardiac surgery; however, in some cases, conduction system function may recover, leaving the patient with an unnecessary device and its associated morbidity. Aims: In order to aid in decision-making process for PPM implantation post cardiac surgery, we sought to determine predictors of pacemaker dependency. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone PPM implant within 30 days of cardiac surgery (bypass grafting and/or valvular surgery) at our institution between May 2016 and December 2019. Parameters including pre-operative ECG, surgical details and device follow-up data were collected. Pacemaker dependency (PPM-D) was defined as any of the following at the initial post discharge device check: no underlying rhythm at VVI 40, underlying junctional rhythm, RV pace percentage >80% or underlying rhythm rate of 40 bpm or less. Using a stepwise approach, we constructed a series of logistic regression models to predict PPM-D, minimising the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and maximising the AUROC/C-statistic to optimise discriminative performance. Results: We identified 143 patients who had undergone PPM implantation for whom device follow-up information was available. Only seventy eight (54.5%) patients were PPM-D as defined. After multivariate logistic regression analysis two factors predicted PPM-D. The presence of post-operative complete AV block (OR 11.41; CI, 2.55–73.82; p=0.004) and QRS duration >120 ms on the post-operative ECG (OR 6.88; CI, 1.72–34.73; p=0.010) (Figure 1). Interestingly, neither surgery type (valve, bypass, etc.) nor any pre-operative ECG parameters were significantly associated in this cohort. A model incorporating just these factors had high discriminative capability with AUROC=0.749. Conclusions: In post cardiac surgical patients, pacemaker dependency was only present in approximately half of patients at the post-discharge device check. Although this data requires external validation, assessing for complete AV block or a broad QRS may be helpful in deciding whether to implant PPMs in this patient group. [Image Omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-3869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-3877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reading: Touch Medical Media Limited</publisher><subject>Heart surgery ; Pacemakers ; Patients</subject><ispartof>European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology, 2021-01, Vol.7, p.28</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.touchcardio.com/cardio-journals</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cranley, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nye, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omoniyi, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopley, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bethell, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotecha, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarbjit-Singh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, S</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients receiving devices following cardiac surgery</title><title>European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology</title><description>Introduction: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a well-recognised short-term complication after cardiac surgery; however, in some cases, conduction system function may recover, leaving the patient with an unnecessary device and its associated morbidity. Aims: In order to aid in decision-making process for PPM implantation post cardiac surgery, we sought to determine predictors of pacemaker dependency. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone PPM implant within 30 days of cardiac surgery (bypass grafting and/or valvular surgery) at our institution between May 2016 and December 2019. Parameters including pre-operative ECG, surgical details and device follow-up data were collected. Pacemaker dependency (PPM-D) was defined as any of the following at the initial post discharge device check: no underlying rhythm at VVI 40, underlying junctional rhythm, RV pace percentage >80% or underlying rhythm rate of 40 bpm or less. Using a stepwise approach, we constructed a series of logistic regression models to predict PPM-D, minimising the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and maximising the AUROC/C-statistic to optimise discriminative performance. Results: We identified 143 patients who had undergone PPM implantation for whom device follow-up information was available. Only seventy eight (54.5%) patients were PPM-D as defined. After multivariate logistic regression analysis two factors predicted PPM-D. The presence of post-operative complete AV block (OR 11.41; CI, 2.55–73.82; p=0.004) and QRS duration >120 ms on the post-operative ECG (OR 6.88; CI, 1.72–34.73; p=0.010) (Figure 1). Interestingly, neither surgery type (valve, bypass, etc.) nor any pre-operative ECG parameters were significantly associated in this cohort. A model incorporating just these factors had high discriminative capability with AUROC=0.749. Conclusions: In post cardiac surgical patients, pacemaker dependency was only present in approximately half of patients at the post-discharge device check. Although this data requires external validation, assessing for complete AV block or a broad QRS may be helpful in deciding whether to implant PPMs in this patient group. [Image Omitted]</description><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Pacemakers</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2058-3869</issn><issn>2058-3877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNij0LwjAURYMoWLT_IeBcqP1KO4vi6ODkUmLyWp7WpL60lf57K4izy72Xc8-MeVGY5kGcCzH_7axYMt85vIZJIuIsKbYeu5wINKrOkuO24q1U8JB3IK6hBaPBqJGjmXiHYDrHCRTggKaehAEVOF7ZprGvD1GSNErFXU810Lhmi0o2Dvxvr9jmsD_vjkFL9tmD68qb7clMVxmlRRgmU4j4P-sNhvxF3w</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Cranley, J</creator><creator>Nye, T</creator><creator>Omoniyi, O</creator><creator>Cheung, J</creator><creator>Hopley, E</creator><creator>Bethell, M</creator><creator>Kotecha, D</creator><creator>Sarbjit-Singh, S</creator><creator>Agarwal, S</creator><general>Touch Medical Media Limited</general><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients receiving devices following cardiac surgery</title><author>Cranley, J ; Nye, T ; Omoniyi, O ; Cheung, J ; Hopley, E ; Bethell, M ; Kotecha, D ; Sarbjit-Singh, S ; Agarwal, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25900459073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Pacemakers</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cranley, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nye, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omoniyi, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopley, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bethell, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotecha, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarbjit-Singh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, S</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cranley, J</au><au>Nye, T</au><au>Omoniyi, O</au><au>Cheung, J</au><au>Hopley, E</au><au>Bethell, M</au><au>Kotecha, D</au><au>Sarbjit-Singh, S</au><au>Agarwal, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients receiving devices following cardiac surgery</atitle><jtitle>European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>28</spage><pages>28-</pages><issn>2058-3869</issn><eissn>2058-3877</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a well-recognised short-term complication after cardiac surgery; however, in some cases, conduction system function may recover, leaving the patient with an unnecessary device and its associated morbidity. Aims: In order to aid in decision-making process for PPM implantation post cardiac surgery, we sought to determine predictors of pacemaker dependency. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone PPM implant within 30 days of cardiac surgery (bypass grafting and/or valvular surgery) at our institution between May 2016 and December 2019. Parameters including pre-operative ECG, surgical details and device follow-up data were collected. Pacemaker dependency (PPM-D) was defined as any of the following at the initial post discharge device check: no underlying rhythm at VVI 40, underlying junctional rhythm, RV pace percentage >80% or underlying rhythm rate of 40 bpm or less. Using a stepwise approach, we constructed a series of logistic regression models to predict PPM-D, minimising the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and maximising the AUROC/C-statistic to optimise discriminative performance. Results: We identified 143 patients who had undergone PPM implantation for whom device follow-up information was available. Only seventy eight (54.5%) patients were PPM-D as defined. After multivariate logistic regression analysis two factors predicted PPM-D. The presence of post-operative complete AV block (OR 11.41; CI, 2.55–73.82; p=0.004) and QRS duration >120 ms on the post-operative ECG (OR 6.88; CI, 1.72–34.73; p=0.010) (Figure 1). Interestingly, neither surgery type (valve, bypass, etc.) nor any pre-operative ECG parameters were significantly associated in this cohort. A model incorporating just these factors had high discriminative capability with AUROC=0.749. Conclusions: In post cardiac surgical patients, pacemaker dependency was only present in approximately half of patients at the post-discharge device check. Although this data requires external validation, assessing for complete AV block or a broad QRS may be helpful in deciding whether to implant PPMs in this patient group. [Image Omitted]</abstract><cop>Reading</cop><pub>Touch Medical Media Limited</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2058-3869 |
ispartof | European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology, 2021-01, Vol.7, p.28 |
issn | 2058-3869 2058-3877 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2590045907 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Heart surgery Pacemakers Patients |
title | Predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients receiving devices following cardiac surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A25%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20pacemaker%20dependency%20in%20patients%20receiving%20devices%20following%20cardiac%20surgery&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20arrhythmia%20&%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Cranley,%20J&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=28&rft.pages=28-&rft.issn=2058-3869&rft.eissn=2058-3877&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2590045907%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2590045907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |