Differences between fundamental solutions of general higher order elliptic operators and of products of second order operators

We study fundamental solutions of elliptic operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 with constant coefficients in large dimensions n ≥ 2 m , where their singularities become unbounded. For compositions of second order operators these can be chosen as convolution products of positive singular functions, which are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mathematische annalen 2021-12, Vol.381 (3-4), p.1031-1084
Hauptverfasser: Grunau, Hans-Christoph, Romani, Giulio, Sweers, Guido
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1084
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 1031
container_title Mathematische annalen
container_volume 381
creator Grunau, Hans-Christoph
Romani, Giulio
Sweers, Guido
description We study fundamental solutions of elliptic operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 with constant coefficients in large dimensions n ≥ 2 m , where their singularities become unbounded. For compositions of second order operators these can be chosen as convolution products of positive singular functions, which are positive themselves. As soon as n ≥ 3 , the polyharmonic operator ( - Δ ) m may no longer serve as a prototype for the general elliptic operator. It is known from examples of Maz’ya and Nazarov (Math. Notes 39:14–16, 1986; Transl. of Mat. Zametki 39, 24–28, 1986) and Davies (J Differ Equ 135:83–102, 1997) that in dimensions n ≥ 2 m + 3 fundamental solutions of specific operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 may change sign near their singularities: there are “positive” as well as “negative” directions along which the fundamental solution tends to + ∞ and - ∞ respectively, when approaching its pole. In order to understand this phenomenon systematically we first show that existence of a “positive” direction directly follows from the ellipticity of the operator. We establish an inductive argument by space dimension which shows that sign change in some dimension implies sign change in any larger dimension for suitably constructed operators. Moreover, we deduce for n = 2 m , n = 2 m + 2 and for all odd dimensions an explicit closed expression for the fundamental solution in terms of its symbol. From such formulae it becomes clear that the sign of the fundamental solution for such operators depends on the dimension. Indeed, we show that we have even sign change for a suitable operator of order 2 m in dimension n = 2 m + 2 . On the other hand we show that in the dimensions n = 2 m and n = 2 m + 1 the fundamental solution of any such elliptic operator is always positive around its singularity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00208-020-02015-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2588419367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2588419367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-199cf7a559073a882694f656e024495cd33211db7e144fb965559b7821d094b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9V8NG1zlPUTFrzoObTpZLdLN6lJinjxt5tuRW8e8gZmnndmeBG6pOSaElLeBEIYqbIk06Mi40doQXPOMlqR8hgtUl9kouL0FJ2FsCOEcELEAn3ddcaAB6sh4AbiB4DFZrRtvQcb6x4H14-xczZgZ_AGLPhU3HabLXjsfJsU-r4bYqexG1IzOh9wbdsJH7xrRx0P1gDaTdWD5Zc8Ryem7gNc_PxL9PZw_7p6ytYvj8-r23WmecFjRqXUpqyFkKTkdVWxQuamEAUQludS6JZzRmnblEDz3DSyEAltyorRlsi8EXyJrua56aT3EUJUOzd6m1YqJqoqp5IXZaLYTGnvQvBg1OC7fe0_FSVqylnNOask6pCz4snEZ1NIsN2A_xv9j-sbAjqBdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2588419367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences between fundamental solutions of general higher order elliptic operators and of products of second order operators</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Grunau, Hans-Christoph ; Romani, Giulio ; Sweers, Guido</creator><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Hans-Christoph ; Romani, Giulio ; Sweers, Guido</creatorcontrib><description>We study fundamental solutions of elliptic operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 with constant coefficients in large dimensions n ≥ 2 m , where their singularities become unbounded. For compositions of second order operators these can be chosen as convolution products of positive singular functions, which are positive themselves. As soon as n ≥ 3 , the polyharmonic operator ( - Δ ) m may no longer serve as a prototype for the general elliptic operator. It is known from examples of Maz’ya and Nazarov (Math. Notes 39:14–16, 1986; Transl. of Mat. Zametki 39, 24–28, 1986) and Davies (J Differ Equ 135:83–102, 1997) that in dimensions n ≥ 2 m + 3 fundamental solutions of specific operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 may change sign near their singularities: there are “positive” as well as “negative” directions along which the fundamental solution tends to + ∞ and - ∞ respectively, when approaching its pole. In order to understand this phenomenon systematically we first show that existence of a “positive” direction directly follows from the ellipticity of the operator. We establish an inductive argument by space dimension which shows that sign change in some dimension implies sign change in any larger dimension for suitably constructed operators. Moreover, we deduce for n = 2 m , n = 2 m + 2 and for all odd dimensions an explicit closed expression for the fundamental solution in terms of its symbol. From such formulae it becomes clear that the sign of the fundamental solution for such operators depends on the dimension. Indeed, we show that we have even sign change for a suitable operator of order 2 m in dimension n = 2 m + 2 . On the other hand we show that in the dimensions n = 2 m and n = 2 m + 1 the fundamental solution of any such elliptic operator is always positive around its singularity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-5831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00208-020-02015-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Ellipticity ; Mathematics ; Mathematics and Statistics ; Operators (mathematics) ; Singularities</subject><ispartof>Mathematische annalen, 2021-12, Vol.381 (3-4), p.1031-1084</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-199cf7a559073a882694f656e024495cd33211db7e144fb965559b7821d094b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-199cf7a559073a882694f656e024495cd33211db7e144fb965559b7821d094b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0180-5890 ; 0000-0002-1563-3148 ; 0000-0002-5343-1934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00208-020-02015-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00208-020-02015-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Hans-Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romani, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweers, Guido</creatorcontrib><title>Differences between fundamental solutions of general higher order elliptic operators and of products of second order operators</title><title>Mathematische annalen</title><addtitle>Math. Ann</addtitle><description>We study fundamental solutions of elliptic operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 with constant coefficients in large dimensions n ≥ 2 m , where their singularities become unbounded. For compositions of second order operators these can be chosen as convolution products of positive singular functions, which are positive themselves. As soon as n ≥ 3 , the polyharmonic operator ( - Δ ) m may no longer serve as a prototype for the general elliptic operator. It is known from examples of Maz’ya and Nazarov (Math. Notes 39:14–16, 1986; Transl. of Mat. Zametki 39, 24–28, 1986) and Davies (J Differ Equ 135:83–102, 1997) that in dimensions n ≥ 2 m + 3 fundamental solutions of specific operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 may change sign near their singularities: there are “positive” as well as “negative” directions along which the fundamental solution tends to + ∞ and - ∞ respectively, when approaching its pole. In order to understand this phenomenon systematically we first show that existence of a “positive” direction directly follows from the ellipticity of the operator. We establish an inductive argument by space dimension which shows that sign change in some dimension implies sign change in any larger dimension for suitably constructed operators. Moreover, we deduce for n = 2 m , n = 2 m + 2 and for all odd dimensions an explicit closed expression for the fundamental solution in terms of its symbol. From such formulae it becomes clear that the sign of the fundamental solution for such operators depends on the dimension. Indeed, we show that we have even sign change for a suitable operator of order 2 m in dimension n = 2 m + 2 . On the other hand we show that in the dimensions n = 2 m and n = 2 m + 1 the fundamental solution of any such elliptic operator is always positive around its singularity.</description><subject>Ellipticity</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics and Statistics</subject><subject>Operators (mathematics)</subject><subject>Singularities</subject><issn>0025-5831</issn><issn>1432-1807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9V8NG1zlPUTFrzoObTpZLdLN6lJinjxt5tuRW8e8gZmnndmeBG6pOSaElLeBEIYqbIk06Mi40doQXPOMlqR8hgtUl9kouL0FJ2FsCOEcELEAn3ddcaAB6sh4AbiB4DFZrRtvQcb6x4H14-xczZgZ_AGLPhU3HabLXjsfJsU-r4bYqexG1IzOh9wbdsJH7xrRx0P1gDaTdWD5Zc8Ryem7gNc_PxL9PZw_7p6ytYvj8-r23WmecFjRqXUpqyFkKTkdVWxQuamEAUQludS6JZzRmnblEDz3DSyEAltyorRlsi8EXyJrua56aT3EUJUOzd6m1YqJqoqp5IXZaLYTGnvQvBg1OC7fe0_FSVqylnNOask6pCz4snEZ1NIsN2A_xv9j-sbAjqBdA</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Grunau, Hans-Christoph</creator><creator>Romani, Giulio</creator><creator>Sweers, Guido</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-5890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-3148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-1934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Differences between fundamental solutions of general higher order elliptic operators and of products of second order operators</title><author>Grunau, Hans-Christoph ; Romani, Giulio ; Sweers, Guido</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-199cf7a559073a882694f656e024495cd33211db7e144fb965559b7821d094b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ellipticity</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics and Statistics</topic><topic>Operators (mathematics)</topic><topic>Singularities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Hans-Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romani, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweers, Guido</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mathematische annalen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grunau, Hans-Christoph</au><au>Romani, Giulio</au><au>Sweers, Guido</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences between fundamental solutions of general higher order elliptic operators and of products of second order operators</atitle><jtitle>Mathematische annalen</jtitle><stitle>Math. Ann</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>381</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1031</spage><epage>1084</epage><pages>1031-1084</pages><issn>0025-5831</issn><eissn>1432-1807</eissn><abstract>We study fundamental solutions of elliptic operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 with constant coefficients in large dimensions n ≥ 2 m , where their singularities become unbounded. For compositions of second order operators these can be chosen as convolution products of positive singular functions, which are positive themselves. As soon as n ≥ 3 , the polyharmonic operator ( - Δ ) m may no longer serve as a prototype for the general elliptic operator. It is known from examples of Maz’ya and Nazarov (Math. Notes 39:14–16, 1986; Transl. of Mat. Zametki 39, 24–28, 1986) and Davies (J Differ Equ 135:83–102, 1997) that in dimensions n ≥ 2 m + 3 fundamental solutions of specific operators of order 2 m ≥ 4 may change sign near their singularities: there are “positive” as well as “negative” directions along which the fundamental solution tends to + ∞ and - ∞ respectively, when approaching its pole. In order to understand this phenomenon systematically we first show that existence of a “positive” direction directly follows from the ellipticity of the operator. We establish an inductive argument by space dimension which shows that sign change in some dimension implies sign change in any larger dimension for suitably constructed operators. Moreover, we deduce for n = 2 m , n = 2 m + 2 and for all odd dimensions an explicit closed expression for the fundamental solution in terms of its symbol. From such formulae it becomes clear that the sign of the fundamental solution for such operators depends on the dimension. Indeed, we show that we have even sign change for a suitable operator of order 2 m in dimension n = 2 m + 2 . On the other hand we show that in the dimensions n = 2 m and n = 2 m + 1 the fundamental solution of any such elliptic operator is always positive around its singularity.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00208-020-02015-3</doi><tpages>54</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-5890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-3148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-1934</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-5831
ispartof Mathematische annalen, 2021-12, Vol.381 (3-4), p.1031-1084
issn 0025-5831
1432-1807
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2588419367
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ellipticity
Mathematics
Mathematics and Statistics
Operators (mathematics)
Singularities
title Differences between fundamental solutions of general higher order elliptic operators and of products of second order operators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20between%20fundamental%20solutions%20of%20general%20higher%20order%20elliptic%20operators%20and%20of%20products%20of%20second%20order%20operators&rft.jtitle=Mathematische%20annalen&rft.au=Grunau,%20Hans-Christoph&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=381&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1031&rft.epage=1084&rft.pages=1031-1084&rft.issn=0025-5831&rft.eissn=1432-1807&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00208-020-02015-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2588419367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2588419367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true