Fish composition, but not richness or abundance, differ among Phragmites, Typha, and Schoenoplectus zones during a high-water year
Phragmites australis (ssp australis ) is an aggressive colony-forming species that displaces emergent vegetation in North America, including native bulrushes ( Schoenoplectus sp.) and both native and invasive cattails ( Typha sp.). Phragmites expansion can alter habitat and negatively affect reptile...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2021-12, Vol.848 (21), p.4945-4963 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4963 |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 4945 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 848 |
creator | Croft-White, M. V. Budgell, E. Jacobs, C. Doka, S. E. Reddick, D. T. Gardner Costa, J. Midwood, J. D. |
description | Phragmites australis (ssp australis
) is an aggressive colony-forming species that displaces emergent vegetation in North America, including native bulrushes (
Schoenoplectus
sp.) and both native and invasive cattails (
Typha
sp.).
Phragmites
expansion can alter habitat and negatively affect reptiles, amphibians, and birds; less is known about
Phragmites’
utility as fish habitat and its impact on fish communities in freshwater coastal wetlands. To assess fish use of
Phragmites
in summer, we compared habitat characteristics, water quality, and fish community composition, diversity, and abundance among stands of flooded
Phragmites
,
Typha,
and
Schoenoplectus
at 16 sites across four regions of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Despite marked differences in water quality (higher pH and morning dissolved oxygen in
Schoenoplectus
) and habitat characteristics (higher stem density in
Phragmites
), there were no significant differences in fish species richness or catch per unit effort among vegetation types; there was a distinct fish assemblage in
Schoenoplectus
(more Cyprinids) compared to both
Phragmites
and
Typha
(more Centrarchids). This suggests that expansion of
Phragmites
or
Typha
at the expense of
Schoenoplectus
may alter wetland fish assemblages; however, with no clear differences in other fish community metrics, flooded
Phragmites
may provide habitat for some fishes during the summer, in the study wetlands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-021-04687-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2588179998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A680694546</galeid><sourcerecordid>A680694546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f755c9f4ce99f6fdf0ed824972e7153c37e1e442360f21b04d89c65b4e2027fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9A64CroQ7Nckkk2RZitVCQbF1HXIzJzMpd5IxyaDXpb_c1BGkG8kicHieNx9v07wm-JxgLN5lggXHLaakxayXohVPmh3homs5IeJps8OYyFYSLp83L3K-x1VSFO-aX1c-T8jGeYnZFx_DHh3WgkIsKHk7BcgZxYTMYQ2DCRb2aPDOQZ3MMYzo85TMOPsCeY_uTstk9siEAd3aKUKIyxFsWTP6GWsOGtbkq2LQ5Mep_W5KTTmBSS-bZ84cM7z6u581X6_e311-bG8-fbi-vLhpbce60jrBuVWOWVDK9W5wGAZJmRIUBOGd7QQQYIx2PXaUHDAbpLI9PzCgmAo3dGfNmy13SfHbCrno-7imUI_UlEtJhFJKVup8o0ZzBO2DiyUZW9cAs7f1Ic7X-UUvca8YZ30V3j4SKlPgRxnNmrO-vv3ymKUba1PMOYHTS_KzSSdNsH4oUm9F6lqk_lOkFlXqNikvDx8I6d-9_2P9BsgnoKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2588179998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fish composition, but not richness or abundance, differ among Phragmites, Typha, and Schoenoplectus zones during a high-water year</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Croft-White, M. V. ; Budgell, E. ; Jacobs, C. ; Doka, S. E. ; Reddick, D. T. ; Gardner Costa, J. ; Midwood, J. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Croft-White, M. V. ; Budgell, E. ; Jacobs, C. ; Doka, S. E. ; Reddick, D. T. ; Gardner Costa, J. ; Midwood, J. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Phragmites australis (ssp australis
) is an aggressive colony-forming species that displaces emergent vegetation in North America, including native bulrushes (
Schoenoplectus
sp.) and both native and invasive cattails (
Typha
sp.).
Phragmites
expansion can alter habitat and negatively affect reptiles, amphibians, and birds; less is known about
Phragmites’
utility as fish habitat and its impact on fish communities in freshwater coastal wetlands. To assess fish use of
Phragmites
in summer, we compared habitat characteristics, water quality, and fish community composition, diversity, and abundance among stands of flooded
Phragmites
,
Typha,
and
Schoenoplectus
at 16 sites across four regions of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Despite marked differences in water quality (higher pH and morning dissolved oxygen in
Schoenoplectus
) and habitat characteristics (higher stem density in
Phragmites
), there were no significant differences in fish species richness or catch per unit effort among vegetation types; there was a distinct fish assemblage in
Schoenoplectus
(more Cyprinids) compared to both
Phragmites
and
Typha
(more Centrarchids). This suggests that expansion of
Phragmites
or
Typha
at the expense of
Schoenoplectus
may alter wetland fish assemblages; however, with no clear differences in other fish community metrics, flooded
Phragmites
may provide habitat for some fishes during the summer, in the study wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-021-04687-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Amphibians ; Aquatic plants ; Aquatic reptiles ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Catch per unit effort ; Colonies ; Community composition ; Composition ; Dissolved oxygen ; Ecology ; Emergent aquatic plants ; Emergent vegetation ; Fish ; Fishes ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater fish ; Freshwater plants ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Herbivores ; Inland water environment ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Marshes ; Phragmites ; Primary Research Paper ; Reptiles ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Schoenoplectus ; Species richness ; Summer ; Typha ; Vegetation ; Water quality ; Wetlands ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2021-12, Vol.848 (21), p.4945-4963</ispartof><rights>Crown 2021. corrected publication 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Crown 2021. corrected publication 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f755c9f4ce99f6fdf0ed824972e7153c37e1e442360f21b04d89c65b4e2027fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6705-6920</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-021-04687-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-021-04687-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Croft-White, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budgell, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doka, S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddick, D. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner Costa, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midwood, J. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Fish composition, but not richness or abundance, differ among Phragmites, Typha, and Schoenoplectus zones during a high-water year</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Phragmites australis (ssp australis
) is an aggressive colony-forming species that displaces emergent vegetation in North America, including native bulrushes (
Schoenoplectus
sp.) and both native and invasive cattails (
Typha
sp.).
Phragmites
expansion can alter habitat and negatively affect reptiles, amphibians, and birds; less is known about
Phragmites’
utility as fish habitat and its impact on fish communities in freshwater coastal wetlands. To assess fish use of
Phragmites
in summer, we compared habitat characteristics, water quality, and fish community composition, diversity, and abundance among stands of flooded
Phragmites
,
Typha,
and
Schoenoplectus
at 16 sites across four regions of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Despite marked differences in water quality (higher pH and morning dissolved oxygen in
Schoenoplectus
) and habitat characteristics (higher stem density in
Phragmites
), there were no significant differences in fish species richness or catch per unit effort among vegetation types; there was a distinct fish assemblage in
Schoenoplectus
(more Cyprinids) compared to both
Phragmites
and
Typha
(more Centrarchids). This suggests that expansion of
Phragmites
or
Typha
at the expense of
Schoenoplectus
may alter wetland fish assemblages; however, with no clear differences in other fish community metrics, flooded
Phragmites
may provide habitat for some fishes during the summer, in the study wetlands.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Catch per unit effort</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Emergent aquatic plants</subject><subject>Emergent vegetation</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Phragmites</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Typha</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9A64CroQ7Nckkk2RZitVCQbF1HXIzJzMpd5IxyaDXpb_c1BGkG8kicHieNx9v07wm-JxgLN5lggXHLaakxayXohVPmh3homs5IeJps8OYyFYSLp83L3K-x1VSFO-aX1c-T8jGeYnZFx_DHh3WgkIsKHk7BcgZxYTMYQ2DCRb2aPDOQZ3MMYzo85TMOPsCeY_uTstk9siEAd3aKUKIyxFsWTP6GWsOGtbkq2LQ5Mep_W5KTTmBSS-bZ84cM7z6u581X6_e311-bG8-fbi-vLhpbce60jrBuVWOWVDK9W5wGAZJmRIUBOGd7QQQYIx2PXaUHDAbpLI9PzCgmAo3dGfNmy13SfHbCrno-7imUI_UlEtJhFJKVup8o0ZzBO2DiyUZW9cAs7f1Ic7X-UUvca8YZ30V3j4SKlPgRxnNmrO-vv3ymKUba1PMOYHTS_KzSSdNsH4oUm9F6lqk_lOkFlXqNikvDx8I6d-9_2P9BsgnoKQ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Croft-White, M. V.</creator><creator>Budgell, E.</creator><creator>Jacobs, C.</creator><creator>Doka, S. E.</creator><creator>Reddick, D. T.</creator><creator>Gardner Costa, J.</creator><creator>Midwood, J. D.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-6920</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Fish composition, but not richness or abundance, differ among Phragmites, Typha, and Schoenoplectus zones during a high-water year</title><author>Croft-White, M. V. ; Budgell, E. ; Jacobs, C. ; Doka, S. E. ; Reddick, D. T. ; Gardner Costa, J. ; Midwood, J. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-f755c9f4ce99f6fdf0ed824972e7153c37e1e442360f21b04d89c65b4e2027fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Catch per unit effort</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Emergent aquatic plants</topic><topic>Emergent vegetation</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Phragmites</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Typha</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Croft-White, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budgell, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doka, S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddick, D. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner Costa, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midwood, J. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Croft-White, M. V.</au><au>Budgell, E.</au><au>Jacobs, C.</au><au>Doka, S. E.</au><au>Reddick, D. T.</au><au>Gardner Costa, J.</au><au>Midwood, J. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fish composition, but not richness or abundance, differ among Phragmites, Typha, and Schoenoplectus zones during a high-water year</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>848</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4945</spage><epage>4963</epage><pages>4945-4963</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Phragmites australis (ssp australis
) is an aggressive colony-forming species that displaces emergent vegetation in North America, including native bulrushes (
Schoenoplectus
sp.) and both native and invasive cattails (
Typha
sp.).
Phragmites
expansion can alter habitat and negatively affect reptiles, amphibians, and birds; less is known about
Phragmites’
utility as fish habitat and its impact on fish communities in freshwater coastal wetlands. To assess fish use of
Phragmites
in summer, we compared habitat characteristics, water quality, and fish community composition, diversity, and abundance among stands of flooded
Phragmites
,
Typha,
and
Schoenoplectus
at 16 sites across four regions of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Despite marked differences in water quality (higher pH and morning dissolved oxygen in
Schoenoplectus
) and habitat characteristics (higher stem density in
Phragmites
), there were no significant differences in fish species richness or catch per unit effort among vegetation types; there was a distinct fish assemblage in
Schoenoplectus
(more Cyprinids) compared to both
Phragmites
and
Typha
(more Centrarchids). This suggests that expansion of
Phragmites
or
Typha
at the expense of
Schoenoplectus
may alter wetland fish assemblages; however, with no clear differences in other fish community metrics, flooded
Phragmites
may provide habitat for some fishes during the summer, in the study wetlands.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-021-04687-7</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-6920</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2021-12, Vol.848 (21), p.4945-4963 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2588179998 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abundance Amphibians Aquatic plants Aquatic reptiles Biomedical and Life Sciences Catch per unit effort Colonies Community composition Composition Dissolved oxygen Ecology Emergent aquatic plants Emergent vegetation Fish Fishes Fresh water Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater fish Freshwater plants Habitat selection Habitats Herbivores Inland water environment Lakes Life Sciences Marshes Phragmites Primary Research Paper Reptiles Reptiles & amphibians Schoenoplectus Species richness Summer Typha Vegetation Water quality Wetlands Zoology |
title | Fish composition, but not richness or abundance, differ among Phragmites, Typha, and Schoenoplectus zones during a high-water year |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fish%20composition,%20but%20not%20richness%20or%20abundance,%20differ%20among%20Phragmites,%20Typha,%20and%20Schoenoplectus%20zones%20during%20a%20high-water%20year&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Croft-White,%20M.%20V.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=848&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4945&rft.epage=4963&rft.pages=4945-4963&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-021-04687-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA680694546%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2588179998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A680694546&rfr_iscdi=true |