Making sense of the internet of things: a critical review of internet of things definitions between 2005 and 2019
PurposeThis paper aims to study the evolution of definitions of internet of things (IoT) through time, critically assess the knowledge these definitions contain and facilitate sensemaking by providing those unfamiliar with IoT with a theoretical definition and an extended framework.Design/methodolog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Internet research 2021-11, Vol.31 (5), p.1583-1610 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1610 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1583 |
container_title | Internet research |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Goumagias, Nikolaos Whalley, Jason Dilaver, Ozge Cunningham, James |
description | PurposeThis paper aims to study the evolution of definitions of internet of things (IoT) through time, critically assess the knowledge these definitions contain and facilitate sensemaking by providing those unfamiliar with IoT with a theoretical definition and an extended framework.Design/methodology/approach164 articles published between 2005 and 2019 are collected using snowball sampling. Further, 100 unique definitions are identified in the sample. Definitions are examined using content analysis and applying a theoretical framework of five knowledge dimensions.FindingsIn declarative/relational dimensions of knowledge, increasing levels of agreement are observed in the sample. Sources of tautological reasoning are identified. In conditional and causal dimensions, definitions of IoT remain underdeveloped. In the former, potential limitations of IoT related to resource scarcity, privacy and security are overlooked. In the latter, three main loci of agreement are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis study does not cover all published definitions of IoT. Some narratives may be omitted by our selection criteria and process.Practical implicationsThis study supports sensemaking of IoT. Main loci of agreement in definitions of IoT are identified. Avenues for further clarification and consensus are explored. A new framework that can facilitate further investigation and agreement is introduced.Originality/valueThis is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first study that examines the historical evolution of definitions of IoT vis-à-vis its technological features. This study introduces an updated framework to critically assess and compare definitions, identify ambiguities and resolve conflicts among different interpretations. The framework can be used to compare past and future definitions and help actors unfamiliar with IoT to make sense of it in a way to reduce adoption costs. It can also support researchers in studying early discussions of IoT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2588163373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2588163373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c0c2c4cef86b4071867154cad9a28cc57e33dda9d57fe3dd3f01f4390293456f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkVtLAzEQhYMoWKs_wLeAz9HJbS--SfFSqApSn0OanejWNtsmW4v_3l3WF9GnmeF8ZwbOEHLO4ZJzKK6mT_MXBpwJEMAAuDwgIwFaMZ3p_JCMOGQZE0LJY3KS0hI6pCzViGwf7Ucd3mjCkJA2nrbvSOvQYgzYDnMnp2tqqYt1Wzu7ohE_a9z34l-QVujr0IFNSHSB7R4xUAGgqQ1V1_DylBx5u0p49lPH5PXudj55YLPn--nkZsac1HnLHDjhlENfZAsFOS-ynGvlbFVaUTinc5SyqmxZ6dxj10kP3CtZgiil0pmXY3Ix7N3EZrvD1Jpls4uhO2mELgqeSZnLjuID5WKTUkRvNrFe2_hlOJg-WdMna4CbPlnTJ9t5YPDgGqNdVf9afj1DfgMU93lp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2588163373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making sense of the internet of things: a critical review of internet of things definitions between 2005 and 2019</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Goumagias, Nikolaos ; Whalley, Jason ; Dilaver, Ozge ; Cunningham, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Goumagias, Nikolaos ; Whalley, Jason ; Dilaver, Ozge ; Cunningham, James</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis paper aims to study the evolution of definitions of internet of things (IoT) through time, critically assess the knowledge these definitions contain and facilitate sensemaking by providing those unfamiliar with IoT with a theoretical definition and an extended framework.Design/methodology/approach164 articles published between 2005 and 2019 are collected using snowball sampling. Further, 100 unique definitions are identified in the sample. Definitions are examined using content analysis and applying a theoretical framework of five knowledge dimensions.FindingsIn declarative/relational dimensions of knowledge, increasing levels of agreement are observed in the sample. Sources of tautological reasoning are identified. In conditional and causal dimensions, definitions of IoT remain underdeveloped. In the former, potential limitations of IoT related to resource scarcity, privacy and security are overlooked. In the latter, three main loci of agreement are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis study does not cover all published definitions of IoT. Some narratives may be omitted by our selection criteria and process.Practical implicationsThis study supports sensemaking of IoT. Main loci of agreement in definitions of IoT are identified. Avenues for further clarification and consensus are explored. A new framework that can facilitate further investigation and agreement is introduced.Originality/valueThis is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first study that examines the historical evolution of definitions of IoT vis-à-vis its technological features. This study introduces an updated framework to critically assess and compare definitions, identify ambiguities and resolve conflicts among different interpretations. The framework can be used to compare past and future definitions and help actors unfamiliar with IoT to make sense of it in a way to reduce adoption costs. It can also support researchers in studying early discussions of IoT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-2243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Content analysis ; Definitions ; Educational Technology ; Evolution ; Internet ; Internet of Things ; Knowledge ; Loci ; Schemata (Cognition) ; Semiotics ; Social Environment ; Stakeholders ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Internet research, 2021-11, Vol.31 (5), p.1583-1610</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c0c2c4cef86b4071867154cad9a28cc57e33dda9d57fe3dd3f01f4390293456f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c0c2c4cef86b4071867154cad9a28cc57e33dda9d57fe3dd3f01f4390293456f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7799-1285</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0013/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,11626,27915,27916,52680</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goumagias, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilaver, Ozge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James</creatorcontrib><title>Making sense of the internet of things: a critical review of internet of things definitions between 2005 and 2019</title><title>Internet research</title><description>PurposeThis paper aims to study the evolution of definitions of internet of things (IoT) through time, critically assess the knowledge these definitions contain and facilitate sensemaking by providing those unfamiliar with IoT with a theoretical definition and an extended framework.Design/methodology/approach164 articles published between 2005 and 2019 are collected using snowball sampling. Further, 100 unique definitions are identified in the sample. Definitions are examined using content analysis and applying a theoretical framework of five knowledge dimensions.FindingsIn declarative/relational dimensions of knowledge, increasing levels of agreement are observed in the sample. Sources of tautological reasoning are identified. In conditional and causal dimensions, definitions of IoT remain underdeveloped. In the former, potential limitations of IoT related to resource scarcity, privacy and security are overlooked. In the latter, three main loci of agreement are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis study does not cover all published definitions of IoT. Some narratives may be omitted by our selection criteria and process.Practical implicationsThis study supports sensemaking of IoT. Main loci of agreement in definitions of IoT are identified. Avenues for further clarification and consensus are explored. A new framework that can facilitate further investigation and agreement is introduced.Originality/valueThis is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first study that examines the historical evolution of definitions of IoT vis-à-vis its technological features. This study introduces an updated framework to critically assess and compare definitions, identify ambiguities and resolve conflicts among different interpretations. The framework can be used to compare past and future definitions and help actors unfamiliar with IoT to make sense of it in a way to reduce adoption costs. It can also support researchers in studying early discussions of IoT.</description><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Loci</subject><subject>Schemata (Cognition)</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1066-2243</issn><issn>2054-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkVtLAzEQhYMoWKs_wLeAz9HJbS--SfFSqApSn0OanejWNtsmW4v_3l3WF9GnmeF8ZwbOEHLO4ZJzKK6mT_MXBpwJEMAAuDwgIwFaMZ3p_JCMOGQZE0LJY3KS0hI6pCzViGwf7Ucd3mjCkJA2nrbvSOvQYgzYDnMnp2tqqYt1Wzu7ohE_a9z34l-QVujr0IFNSHSB7R4xUAGgqQ1V1_DylBx5u0p49lPH5PXudj55YLPn--nkZsac1HnLHDjhlENfZAsFOS-ynGvlbFVaUTinc5SyqmxZ6dxj10kP3CtZgiil0pmXY3Ix7N3EZrvD1Jpls4uhO2mELgqeSZnLjuID5WKTUkRvNrFe2_hlOJg-WdMna4CbPlnTJ9t5YPDgGqNdVf9afj1DfgMU93lp</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Goumagias, Nikolaos</creator><creator>Whalley, Jason</creator><creator>Dilaver, Ozge</creator><creator>Cunningham, James</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-1285</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Making sense of the internet of things: a critical review of internet of things definitions between 2005 and 2019</title><author>Goumagias, Nikolaos ; Whalley, Jason ; Dilaver, Ozge ; Cunningham, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c0c2c4cef86b4071867154cad9a28cc57e33dda9d57fe3dd3f01f4390293456f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Loci</topic><topic>Schemata (Cognition)</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goumagias, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilaver, Ozge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goumagias, Nikolaos</au><au>Whalley, Jason</au><au>Dilaver, Ozge</au><au>Cunningham, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making sense of the internet of things: a critical review of internet of things definitions between 2005 and 2019</atitle><jtitle>Internet research</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1583</spage><epage>1610</epage><pages>1583-1610</pages><issn>1066-2243</issn><eissn>2054-5657</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis paper aims to study the evolution of definitions of internet of things (IoT) through time, critically assess the knowledge these definitions contain and facilitate sensemaking by providing those unfamiliar with IoT with a theoretical definition and an extended framework.Design/methodology/approach164 articles published between 2005 and 2019 are collected using snowball sampling. Further, 100 unique definitions are identified in the sample. Definitions are examined using content analysis and applying a theoretical framework of five knowledge dimensions.FindingsIn declarative/relational dimensions of knowledge, increasing levels of agreement are observed in the sample. Sources of tautological reasoning are identified. In conditional and causal dimensions, definitions of IoT remain underdeveloped. In the former, potential limitations of IoT related to resource scarcity, privacy and security are overlooked. In the latter, three main loci of agreement are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis study does not cover all published definitions of IoT. Some narratives may be omitted by our selection criteria and process.Practical implicationsThis study supports sensemaking of IoT. Main loci of agreement in definitions of IoT are identified. Avenues for further clarification and consensus are explored. A new framework that can facilitate further investigation and agreement is introduced.Originality/valueThis is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first study that examines the historical evolution of definitions of IoT vis-à-vis its technological features. This study introduces an updated framework to critically assess and compare definitions, identify ambiguities and resolve conflicts among different interpretations. The framework can be used to compare past and future definitions and help actors unfamiliar with IoT to make sense of it in a way to reduce adoption costs. It can also support researchers in studying early discussions of IoT.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0013</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-1285</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1066-2243 |
ispartof | Internet research, 2021-11, Vol.31 (5), p.1583-1610 |
issn | 1066-2243 2054-5657 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2588163373 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Content analysis Definitions Educational Technology Evolution Internet Internet of Things Knowledge Loci Schemata (Cognition) Semiotics Social Environment Stakeholders Technology |
title | Making sense of the internet of things: a critical review of internet of things definitions between 2005 and 2019 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A16%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20sense%20of%20the%20internet%20of%20things:%20a%20critical%20review%20of%20internet%20of%20things%20definitions%20between%202005%20and%202019&rft.jtitle=Internet%20research&rft.au=Goumagias,%20Nikolaos&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1583&rft.epage=1610&rft.pages=1583-1610&rft.issn=1066-2243&rft.eissn=2054-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2588163373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2588163373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |