Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation
One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of agricultural science 2021-04, Vol.159 (3-4), p.177-187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 187 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | The Journal of agricultural science |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Murray, F. V. N. Cohen, J. E. |
description | One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0021859621000356 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2587544127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859621000356</cupid><sourcerecordid>2587544127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VM23z0KMvqCgse1HNJk3SbpW1q0i7svzdlFzyIlwxknveZYRC6B_IIBPjTByEpCFqwFAghGWUXaAE5KxIa30u0mNvJ3L9GNyHsI8NJIRaoWde1VVIdsatxaJwb8eCdntRoXT__KRmCPEg8Bdvv8NgY3E3taIfWnHFvOneQLR6Nanr7PRlcO4-9HKyeVYPcydl1i65q2QZzd65L9PWy_lxtku3769vqeZuoDPiYAC1AiQxynqtcCGDcUF1owSkBTXQqRMU5B1JVkRJKqVwzQ1LNGWeMiixbooeTN86Oy4Sx3LvJ93FkmdKoyXNIeaTgRCnvQvCmLgdvO-mPJZByPmj556Axk50zsqu81Tvzq_4_9QMH93er</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2587544127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Murray, F. V. N. ; Cohen, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, F. V. N. ; Cohen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859621000356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Age factors ; Agricultural production ; Cassava ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Cuttings ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Food security ; Hardwoods ; Nutrition ; Plant propagation ; Planting ; Potassium ; Propagation ; Research centers ; Shoots ; Stems</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-04, Vol.159 (3-4), p.177-187</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6503-1359</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859621000356/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, F. V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Cassava</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Cuttings</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Plant propagation</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Stems</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VM23z0KMvqCgse1HNJk3SbpW1q0i7svzdlFzyIlwxknveZYRC6B_IIBPjTByEpCFqwFAghGWUXaAE5KxIa30u0mNvJ3L9GNyHsI8NJIRaoWde1VVIdsatxaJwb8eCdntRoXT__KRmCPEg8Bdvv8NgY3E3taIfWnHFvOneQLR6Nanr7PRlcO4-9HKyeVYPcydl1i65q2QZzd65L9PWy_lxtku3769vqeZuoDPiYAC1AiQxynqtcCGDcUF1owSkBTXQqRMU5B1JVkRJKqVwzQ1LNGWeMiixbooeTN86Oy4Sx3LvJ93FkmdKoyXNIeaTgRCnvQvCmLgdvO-mPJZByPmj556Axk50zsqu81Tvzq_4_9QMH93er</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Murray, F. V. N.</creator><creator>Cohen, J. E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-1359</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</title><author>Murray, F. V. N. ; Cohen, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Cassava</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Cuttings</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Plant propagation</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Stems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, F. V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, F. V. N.</au><au>Cohen, J. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>177-187</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859621000356</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-1359</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8596 |
ispartof | The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-04, Vol.159 (3-4), p.177-187 |
issn | 0021-8596 1469-5146 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2587544127 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Age Age factors Agricultural production Cassava Crops and Soils Research Paper Cuttings Fertilization Fertilizers Food security Hardwoods Nutrition Plant propagation Planting Potassium Propagation Research centers Shoots Stems |
title | Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T10%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20shoot%20production%20of%20cassava%20using%20the%20multiple%20shoot%20removal%20technique%20for%20rapid%20propagation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Murray,%20F.%20V.%20N.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=177-187&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859621000356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2587544127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2587544127&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859621000356&rfr_iscdi=true |