Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation

One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agricultural science 2021-04, Vol.159 (3-4), p.177-187
Hauptverfasser: Murray, F. V. N., Cohen, J. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 187
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 177
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 159
creator Murray, F. V. N.
Cohen, J. E.
description One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859621000356
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2587544127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859621000356</cupid><sourcerecordid>2587544127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VM23z0KMvqCgse1HNJk3SbpW1q0i7svzdlFzyIlwxknveZYRC6B_IIBPjTByEpCFqwFAghGWUXaAE5KxIa30u0mNvJ3L9GNyHsI8NJIRaoWde1VVIdsatxaJwb8eCdntRoXT__KRmCPEg8Bdvv8NgY3E3taIfWnHFvOneQLR6Nanr7PRlcO4-9HKyeVYPcydl1i65q2QZzd65L9PWy_lxtku3769vqeZuoDPiYAC1AiQxynqtcCGDcUF1owSkBTXQqRMU5B1JVkRJKqVwzQ1LNGWeMiixbooeTN86Oy4Sx3LvJ93FkmdKoyXNIeaTgRCnvQvCmLgdvO-mPJZByPmj556Axk50zsqu81Tvzq_4_9QMH93er</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2587544127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Murray, F. V. N. ; Cohen, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, F. V. N. ; Cohen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859621000356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Age factors ; Agricultural production ; Cassava ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Cuttings ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Food security ; Hardwoods ; Nutrition ; Plant propagation ; Planting ; Potassium ; Propagation ; Research centers ; Shoots ; Stems</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-04, Vol.159 (3-4), p.177-187</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6503-1359</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859621000356/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, F. V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Cassava</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Cuttings</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Plant propagation</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Stems</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VM23z0KMvqCgse1HNJk3SbpW1q0i7svzdlFzyIlwxknveZYRC6B_IIBPjTByEpCFqwFAghGWUXaAE5KxIa30u0mNvJ3L9GNyHsI8NJIRaoWde1VVIdsatxaJwb8eCdntRoXT__KRmCPEg8Bdvv8NgY3E3taIfWnHFvOneQLR6Nanr7PRlcO4-9HKyeVYPcydl1i65q2QZzd65L9PWy_lxtku3769vqeZuoDPiYAC1AiQxynqtcCGDcUF1owSkBTXQqRMU5B1JVkRJKqVwzQ1LNGWeMiixbooeTN86Oy4Sx3LvJ93FkmdKoyXNIeaTgRCnvQvCmLgdvO-mPJZByPmj556Axk50zsqu81Tvzq_4_9QMH93er</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Murray, F. V. N.</creator><creator>Cohen, J. E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-1359</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</title><author>Murray, F. V. N. ; Cohen, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-1591c831474c488167e5d9d87501d0d288b77710bbc838ccc4d6e02d767665833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Cassava</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Cuttings</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Plant propagation</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Stems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, F. V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, F. V. N.</au><au>Cohen, J. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>177-187</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>One thrust in increasing food security in Jamaica is expansion of cassava production. The multiple shoot removal technique (MSRT) for rapid propagation of cassava can help address limitations in planting material. Shoots sprouting from cuttings of hardwood stem are severed in such a way as to induce further sprouting, and then put to root for subsequent transfer to the field. The effects of age and fertilization of parent plants and nodal age of stems were studied. Six Colombian varieties were planted in fertilized and unfertilized field plots with similar growing conditions to provide stems for MSRT propagation. Volume of two-node cuttings increased from apical to basal nodal age, but cutting density was a better predictor of shoot production. On average, three to six viable shoots were produced per cutting over 3 months in a greenhouse. All nodal ages of stems from parent plants aged 6, 7 and 9 months were suitable if the quality of the planting stakes producing parent plants was adequate. If stake quality is uncertain, it is recommended that apical pieces are not used from parents younger than 9 months. The variety CM 6119-5 consistently produced most shoots, suggesting a strong genotypic effect, but other varieties, particularly CM 849, were less consistent, indicating the role of environmental interactions. The physiological status of cuttings as influenced by stem maturity, parent plant age, nutrition and growing conditions of both grandparent and parent stems was as important as genotypic characteristics in determining shoot production from two-node cuttings of cassava stem.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859621000356</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-1359</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-04, Vol.159 (3-4), p.177-187
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2587544127
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Age
Age factors
Agricultural production
Cassava
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Cuttings
Fertilization
Fertilizers
Food security
Hardwoods
Nutrition
Plant propagation
Planting
Potassium
Propagation
Research centers
Shoots
Stems
title Efficacy of shoot production of cassava using the multiple shoot removal technique for rapid propagation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T10%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20shoot%20production%20of%20cassava%20using%20the%20multiple%20shoot%20removal%20technique%20for%20rapid%20propagation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Murray,%20F.%20V.%20N.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=177-187&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859621000356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2587544127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2587544127&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859621000356&rfr_iscdi=true