Apportioning above- and below-ground effects of moss biocrusts on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical climate
Biocrusts affect soil detachment through above-ground (top crust’s surface covering) and below-ground (sub-crust’s binding and bonding, B&B) effects, which might vary with biocrust development or coverage. However, these effects in humid climates are still unclear. This study was conducted to ap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mountain science 2021-10, Vol.18 (10), p.2646-2655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2655 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2646 |
container_title | Journal of mountain science |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Zhang, Guan-hua Yi, Liang Ding, Wen-feng Lei, Xu Wang, Yi-ran Sun, Bao-yang Li, Jian-ming |
description | Biocrusts affect soil detachment through above-ground (top crust’s surface covering) and below-ground (sub-crust’s binding and bonding, B&B) effects, which might vary with biocrust development or coverage. However, these effects in humid climates are still unclear. This study was conducted to apportion and quantify the surface covering and B&B effects of moss biocrusts with five coverage levels (1%–20%, 20%–40%, 40%–60%, 60%–80%, and 80%–100%) on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical humid climate. Two treatments with one being intact moss crusts and one removing the above-ground moss tissues were designed for each coverage level, and bare soil was used as the baseline. The results indicated that soil detachment capacity (
D
c
) and rill erodibility (
K
r
) decreased with biocrust coverage. After removing the above-ground moss tissues, the impeding effect of biocrusts on soil detachment weakened, but still increasing soil erosion resistance relative to bare soil. For intact crust,
D
c
was reduced by 50%–95% compared with bare soil, wherein 36%–55% and 14%–40% were attributed to the surface covering and B&B, respectively. The top crust contributed more than sub-crust to the soil detachment reduction, which were related to but not linear with biocrust coverage. When biocrust coverage reached mid-to-higher level (40%–100%), both top crust and sub-crust steadily contributed to soil detachment reduction with 60% and 40%, respectively. The findings advance a better understanding of the influencing mechanism of biocrusts on soil erosion in humid climates and highlight the importance of saving biocrusts as ecosystem functions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11629-021-6888-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2586508268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586508268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb0a8557df63b3702374499095d8e520f62b3620ee9bb4394efe9a8aed4b9b743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYsoOI7-AHcB19E82jRZDoMvGHCj65C0N2OHTlOTVin-eVMquHKV5HLOd09Oll1TcksJKe8ipYIpTBjFQkqJp5NsRZXimHBGT9NdlAwLTsV5dhHjgRBRKklX2fem730YGt813R4Z6z8BI9PVyELrv_A--DE9wDmohoi8Q0cfI7KNr8IY50mHom9aVMNgqvcjdAOyE0qU0M4UlyCo6ZBBcbRD8H1TmRZVbXM0A1xmZ860Ea5-z3X29nD_un3Cu5fH5-1mh6uUd8BgiZFFUdZOcMtLwniZ50oRVdQSCkacYJYLRgCUtTlXOThQRhqoc6tsmfN1drNw--A_RoiDPvgxdGmlZoUUBZFMyKSii6oK6YsBnO5DihkmTYmeO9ZLxzp1rOeO9ZQ8bPHEpO32EP7I_5t-AJKbgXk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586508268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Apportioning above- and below-ground effects of moss biocrusts on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical climate</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Guan-hua ; Yi, Liang ; Ding, Wen-feng ; Lei, Xu ; Wang, Yi-ran ; Sun, Bao-yang ; Li, Jian-ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guan-hua ; Yi, Liang ; Ding, Wen-feng ; Lei, Xu ; Wang, Yi-ran ; Sun, Bao-yang ; Li, Jian-ming</creatorcontrib><description>Biocrusts affect soil detachment through above-ground (top crust’s surface covering) and below-ground (sub-crust’s binding and bonding, B&B) effects, which might vary with biocrust development or coverage. However, these effects in humid climates are still unclear. This study was conducted to apportion and quantify the surface covering and B&B effects of moss biocrusts with five coverage levels (1%–20%, 20%–40%, 40%–60%, 60%–80%, and 80%–100%) on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical humid climate. Two treatments with one being intact moss crusts and one removing the above-ground moss tissues were designed for each coverage level, and bare soil was used as the baseline. The results indicated that soil detachment capacity (
D
c
) and rill erodibility (
K
r
) decreased with biocrust coverage. After removing the above-ground moss tissues, the impeding effect of biocrusts on soil detachment weakened, but still increasing soil erosion resistance relative to bare soil. For intact crust,
D
c
was reduced by 50%–95% compared with bare soil, wherein 36%–55% and 14%–40% were attributed to the surface covering and B&B, respectively. The top crust contributed more than sub-crust to the soil detachment reduction, which were related to but not linear with biocrust coverage. When biocrust coverage reached mid-to-higher level (40%–100%), both top crust and sub-crust steadily contributed to soil detachment reduction with 60% and 40%, respectively. The findings advance a better understanding of the influencing mechanism of biocrusts on soil erosion in humid climates and highlight the importance of saving biocrusts as ecosystem functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-6316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1008-2786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11629-021-6888-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Science Press</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate effects ; Concretions ; Crusts ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological function ; Ecology ; Environment ; Erosion resistance ; Geography ; Humid climates ; Mosses ; Original Article ; Overland flow ; Reduction ; Soil erosion ; Soil resistance ; Surface runoff ; Tissue</subject><ispartof>Journal of mountain science, 2021-10, Vol.18 (10), p.2646-2655</ispartof><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb0a8557df63b3702374499095d8e520f62b3620ee9bb4394efe9a8aed4b9b743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb0a8557df63b3702374499095d8e520f62b3620ee9bb4394efe9a8aed4b9b743</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8004-5214 ; 0000-0001-6011-7495 ; 0000-0002-5139-5992 ; 0000-0003-2346-1494 ; 0000-0002-4366-788X ; 0000-0001-5229-8097 ; 0000-0001-5888-7351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11629-021-6888-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11629-021-6888-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guan-hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Wen-feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Bao-yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jian-ming</creatorcontrib><title>Apportioning above- and below-ground effects of moss biocrusts on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical climate</title><title>Journal of mountain science</title><addtitle>J. Mt. Sci</addtitle><description>Biocrusts affect soil detachment through above-ground (top crust’s surface covering) and below-ground (sub-crust’s binding and bonding, B&B) effects, which might vary with biocrust development or coverage. However, these effects in humid climates are still unclear. This study was conducted to apportion and quantify the surface covering and B&B effects of moss biocrusts with five coverage levels (1%–20%, 20%–40%, 40%–60%, 60%–80%, and 80%–100%) on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical humid climate. Two treatments with one being intact moss crusts and one removing the above-ground moss tissues were designed for each coverage level, and bare soil was used as the baseline. The results indicated that soil detachment capacity (
D
c
) and rill erodibility (
K
r
) decreased with biocrust coverage. After removing the above-ground moss tissues, the impeding effect of biocrusts on soil detachment weakened, but still increasing soil erosion resistance relative to bare soil. For intact crust,
D
c
was reduced by 50%–95% compared with bare soil, wherein 36%–55% and 14%–40% were attributed to the surface covering and B&B, respectively. The top crust contributed more than sub-crust to the soil detachment reduction, which were related to but not linear with biocrust coverage. When biocrust coverage reached mid-to-higher level (40%–100%), both top crust and sub-crust steadily contributed to soil detachment reduction with 60% and 40%, respectively. The findings advance a better understanding of the influencing mechanism of biocrusts on soil erosion in humid climates and highlight the importance of saving biocrusts as ecosystem functions.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Concretions</subject><subject>Crusts</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Erosion resistance</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Humid climates</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Overland flow</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil resistance</subject><subject>Surface runoff</subject><subject>Tissue</subject><issn>1672-6316</issn><issn>1993-0321</issn><issn>1008-2786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYsoOI7-AHcB19E82jRZDoMvGHCj65C0N2OHTlOTVin-eVMquHKV5HLOd09Oll1TcksJKe8ipYIpTBjFQkqJp5NsRZXimHBGT9NdlAwLTsV5dhHjgRBRKklX2fem730YGt813R4Z6z8BI9PVyELrv_A--DE9wDmohoi8Q0cfI7KNr8IY50mHom9aVMNgqvcjdAOyE0qU0M4UlyCo6ZBBcbRD8H1TmRZVbXM0A1xmZ860Ea5-z3X29nD_un3Cu5fH5-1mh6uUd8BgiZFFUdZOcMtLwniZ50oRVdQSCkacYJYLRgCUtTlXOThQRhqoc6tsmfN1drNw--A_RoiDPvgxdGmlZoUUBZFMyKSii6oK6YsBnO5DihkmTYmeO9ZLxzp1rOeO9ZQ8bPHEpO32EP7I_5t-AJKbgXk</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Zhang, Guan-hua</creator><creator>Yi, Liang</creator><creator>Ding, Wen-feng</creator><creator>Lei, Xu</creator><creator>Wang, Yi-ran</creator><creator>Sun, Bao-yang</creator><creator>Li, Jian-ming</creator><general>Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-5214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-7495</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-5992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-1494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-788X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-8097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-7351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Apportioning above- and below-ground effects of moss biocrusts on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical climate</title><author>Zhang, Guan-hua ; Yi, Liang ; Ding, Wen-feng ; Lei, Xu ; Wang, Yi-ran ; Sun, Bao-yang ; Li, Jian-ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb0a8557df63b3702374499095d8e520f62b3620ee9bb4394efe9a8aed4b9b743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Concretions</topic><topic>Crusts</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Erosion resistance</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Humid climates</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Overland flow</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil resistance</topic><topic>Surface runoff</topic><topic>Tissue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guan-hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Wen-feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Bao-yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jian-ming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Guan-hua</au><au>Yi, Liang</au><au>Ding, Wen-feng</au><au>Lei, Xu</au><au>Wang, Yi-ran</au><au>Sun, Bao-yang</au><au>Li, Jian-ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Apportioning above- and below-ground effects of moss biocrusts on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical climate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle><stitle>J. Mt. Sci</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2646</spage><epage>2655</epage><pages>2646-2655</pages><issn>1672-6316</issn><eissn>1993-0321</eissn><eissn>1008-2786</eissn><abstract>Biocrusts affect soil detachment through above-ground (top crust’s surface covering) and below-ground (sub-crust’s binding and bonding, B&B) effects, which might vary with biocrust development or coverage. However, these effects in humid climates are still unclear. This study was conducted to apportion and quantify the surface covering and B&B effects of moss biocrusts with five coverage levels (1%–20%, 20%–40%, 40%–60%, 60%–80%, and 80%–100%) on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical humid climate. Two treatments with one being intact moss crusts and one removing the above-ground moss tissues were designed for each coverage level, and bare soil was used as the baseline. The results indicated that soil detachment capacity (
D
c
) and rill erodibility (
K
r
) decreased with biocrust coverage. After removing the above-ground moss tissues, the impeding effect of biocrusts on soil detachment weakened, but still increasing soil erosion resistance relative to bare soil. For intact crust,
D
c
was reduced by 50%–95% compared with bare soil, wherein 36%–55% and 14%–40% were attributed to the surface covering and B&B, respectively. The top crust contributed more than sub-crust to the soil detachment reduction, which were related to but not linear with biocrust coverage. When biocrust coverage reached mid-to-higher level (40%–100%), both top crust and sub-crust steadily contributed to soil detachment reduction with 60% and 40%, respectively. The findings advance a better understanding of the influencing mechanism of biocrusts on soil erosion in humid climates and highlight the importance of saving biocrusts as ecosystem functions.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Science Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11629-021-6888-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-5214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-7495</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-5992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-1494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-788X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-8097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-7351</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1672-6316 |
ispartof | Journal of mountain science, 2021-10, Vol.18 (10), p.2646-2655 |
issn | 1672-6316 1993-0321 1008-2786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2586508268 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Climate Climate effects Concretions Crusts Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Ecological function Ecology Environment Erosion resistance Geography Humid climates Mosses Original Article Overland flow Reduction Soil erosion Soil resistance Surface runoff Tissue |
title | Apportioning above- and below-ground effects of moss biocrusts on soil detachment by overland flow in a subtropical climate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Apportioning%20above-%20and%20below-ground%20effects%20of%20moss%20biocrusts%20on%20soil%20detachment%20by%20overland%20flow%20in%20a%20subtropical%20climate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mountain%20science&rft.au=Zhang,%20Guan-hua&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2646&rft.epage=2655&rft.pages=2646-2655&rft.issn=1672-6316&rft.eissn=1993-0321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11629-021-6888-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586508268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586508268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |