Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere
Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Space Weather 2021-10, Vol.19 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Space Weather |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Cordell, Darcy Unsworth, Martyn J. Lee, Benjamin Hanneson, Cedar Milling, David K. Mann, Ian R. |
description | Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis.
Plain Language Summary
Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductiv |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2021SW002803 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2586413231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586413231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJEphxwNYYtsU_00yYVelaYmUCqSkdDm6Y99JXHnsYHtUdccj8Iw8BUtsAqgrVr46-u65xzpV9ZbRc0b5_D2nnG3uKOUNFc-qE1ZLPpmJOX3-ZH5ZvYrxPjOy5vKk-rmMyQyQjNuRtEdyjR4tqhSMIlcGrSbgNFn-lT77BwxkG8DFwcRovCNr45B88TbBDsnlGIoTFJ8Bdg5TXtokHwZiHLmwHYYEZ2QBDjSQ21jgG4Q4BtTk5veCT2jtWI6thgNqcCrbQoIPZJvzrVxvRyya77MQEH98-35pBnQlDNh_UfO4SWFUKVvHcrz8bm3S3sfDHgO-rl70YCO--fOeVrdXy-3i42T96Xq1uFhPlJCSTvSMA-eaTTtJZac71Qk-FWIqaE_nveqwl0L0uhE1w1ndKcUkrRVv5lo3WkkmTqt3R99D8F9HjKm992PISWPL62aaCS4KdXakVPAxBuzbQ8i1hMeW0bZ02z7tNuP8iD8Yi4__ZdvN3ZIzzqj4BXXHq04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586413231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Cordell, Darcy ; Unsworth, Martyn J. ; Lee, Benjamin ; Hanneson, Cedar ; Milling, David K. ; Mann, Ian R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Darcy ; Unsworth, Martyn J. ; Lee, Benjamin ; Hanneson, Cedar ; Milling, David K. ; Mann, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis.
Plain Language Summary
Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductivity related to (a) ancient tectonics in southern Alberta and (b) sedimentary basin thickness in northeastern Alberta lead to differences in geoelectric fields and transmission line voltages when comparing the two methods. In particular, incorporating 3‐D information results in geoelectric fields preferentially oriented northwest‐southeast across southern Alberta due to a well‐known conductive anomaly 20 km underground. This suggests that deep geological structures can influence the risks associated with geoelectric hazards.
Key Points
Measured impedances and a 1‐D conductivity model are used separately to estimate geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm
Differences are found when comparing the two methods which are linked to known geological variations in conductivity via forward modeling
Transmission lines in northern Alberta and lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta show the largest discrepancies in induced voltage</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1539-4964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021SW002803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Canadian Shield ; Charged particles ; Conductors ; Damage ; Earth ; Electric currents ; Electric fields ; Electric power ; Electric power grids ; Electric power transmission ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Electricity distribution ; Estimation ; Geoelectric fields ; Geoelectricity ; Geological structures ; Geology ; Geomagnetic disturbances ; Geomagnetic effects ; Geomagnetic field ; geomagnetic storm ; Geomagnetic storms ; geomagnetically induced currents ; Geomagnetism ; Hazards ; Impedance ; Induced voltage ; Line voltage ; Lithosphere ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic storms ; magnetotellurics ; Modelling ; Outcrops ; Perturbation ; Power lines ; Sedimentary basins ; Solar activity ; Storms ; Tectonic processes ; Tectonics ; three‐dimensional conductivity ; Transmission lines ; Underground structures</subject><ispartof>Space Weather, 2021-10, Vol.19 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8252-1173 ; 0000-0002-4059-4152 ; 0000-0003-1004-7841 ; 0000-0002-8685-1935</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021SW002803$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021SW002803$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Darcy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Martyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanneson, Cedar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milling, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</title><title>Space Weather</title><description>Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis.
Plain Language Summary
Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductivity related to (a) ancient tectonics in southern Alberta and (b) sedimentary basin thickness in northeastern Alberta lead to differences in geoelectric fields and transmission line voltages when comparing the two methods. In particular, incorporating 3‐D information results in geoelectric fields preferentially oriented northwest‐southeast across southern Alberta due to a well‐known conductive anomaly 20 km underground. This suggests that deep geological structures can influence the risks associated with geoelectric hazards.
Key Points
Measured impedances and a 1‐D conductivity model are used separately to estimate geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm
Differences are found when comparing the two methods which are linked to known geological variations in conductivity via forward modeling
Transmission lines in northern Alberta and lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta show the largest discrepancies in induced voltage</description><subject>Canadian Shield</subject><subject>Charged particles</subject><subject>Conductors</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Electric currents</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power grids</subject><subject>Electric power transmission</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Geoelectric fields</subject><subject>Geoelectricity</subject><subject>Geological structures</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geomagnetic disturbances</subject><subject>Geomagnetic effects</subject><subject>Geomagnetic field</subject><subject>geomagnetic storm</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>geomagnetically induced currents</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Impedance</subject><subject>Induced voltage</subject><subject>Line voltage</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>magnetotellurics</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Outcrops</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Power lines</subject><subject>Sedimentary basins</subject><subject>Solar activity</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Tectonic processes</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>three‐dimensional conductivity</subject><subject>Transmission lines</subject><subject>Underground structures</subject><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><issn>1542-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJEphxwNYYtsU_00yYVelaYmUCqSkdDm6Y99JXHnsYHtUdccj8Iw8BUtsAqgrVr46-u65xzpV9ZbRc0b5_D2nnG3uKOUNFc-qE1ZLPpmJOX3-ZH5ZvYrxPjOy5vKk-rmMyQyQjNuRtEdyjR4tqhSMIlcGrSbgNFn-lT77BwxkG8DFwcRovCNr45B88TbBDsnlGIoTFJ8Bdg5TXtokHwZiHLmwHYYEZ2QBDjSQ21jgG4Q4BtTk5veCT2jtWI6thgNqcCrbQoIPZJvzrVxvRyya77MQEH98-35pBnQlDNh_UfO4SWFUKVvHcrz8bm3S3sfDHgO-rl70YCO--fOeVrdXy-3i42T96Xq1uFhPlJCSTvSMA-eaTTtJZac71Qk-FWIqaE_nveqwl0L0uhE1w1ndKcUkrRVv5lo3WkkmTqt3R99D8F9HjKm992PISWPL62aaCS4KdXakVPAxBuzbQ8i1hMeW0bZ02z7tNuP8iD8Yi4__ZdvN3ZIzzqj4BXXHq04</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Cordell, Darcy</creator><creator>Unsworth, Martyn J.</creator><creator>Lee, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hanneson, Cedar</creator><creator>Milling, David K.</creator><creator>Mann, Ian R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-4152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-7841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-1935</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</title><author>Cordell, Darcy ; Unsworth, Martyn J. ; Lee, Benjamin ; Hanneson, Cedar ; Milling, David K. ; Mann, Ian R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Canadian Shield</topic><topic>Charged particles</topic><topic>Conductors</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Electric currents</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power grids</topic><topic>Electric power transmission</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Geoelectric fields</topic><topic>Geoelectricity</topic><topic>Geological structures</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geomagnetic disturbances</topic><topic>Geomagnetic effects</topic><topic>Geomagnetic field</topic><topic>geomagnetic storm</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>geomagnetically induced currents</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Impedance</topic><topic>Induced voltage</topic><topic>Line voltage</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>magnetotellurics</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Outcrops</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Power lines</topic><topic>Sedimentary basins</topic><topic>Solar activity</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Tectonic processes</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>three‐dimensional conductivity</topic><topic>Transmission lines</topic><topic>Underground structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Darcy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Martyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanneson, Cedar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milling, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cordell, Darcy</au><au>Unsworth, Martyn J.</au><au>Lee, Benjamin</au><au>Hanneson, Cedar</au><au>Milling, David K.</au><au>Mann, Ian R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</atitle><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><eissn>1542-7390</eissn><abstract>Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis.
Plain Language Summary
Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductivity related to (a) ancient tectonics in southern Alberta and (b) sedimentary basin thickness in northeastern Alberta lead to differences in geoelectric fields and transmission line voltages when comparing the two methods. In particular, incorporating 3‐D information results in geoelectric fields preferentially oriented northwest‐southeast across southern Alberta due to a well‐known conductive anomaly 20 km underground. This suggests that deep geological structures can influence the risks associated with geoelectric hazards.
Key Points
Measured impedances and a 1‐D conductivity model are used separately to estimate geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm
Differences are found when comparing the two methods which are linked to known geological variations in conductivity via forward modeling
Transmission lines in northern Alberta and lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta show the largest discrepancies in induced voltage</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021SW002803</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-4152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-7841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-1935</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1542-7390 |
ispartof | Space Weather, 2021-10, Vol.19 (10), p.n/a |
issn | 1542-7390 1539-4964 1542-7390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2586413231 |
source | Wiley Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles |
subjects | Canadian Shield Charged particles Conductors Damage Earth Electric currents Electric fields Electric power Electric power grids Electric power transmission Electrical conductivity Electrical resistivity Electricity distribution Estimation Geoelectric fields Geoelectricity Geological structures Geology Geomagnetic disturbances Geomagnetic effects Geomagnetic field geomagnetic storm Geomagnetic storms geomagnetically induced currents Geomagnetism Hazards Impedance Induced voltage Line voltage Lithosphere Magnetic fields Magnetic storms magnetotellurics Modelling Outcrops Perturbation Power lines Sedimentary basins Solar activity Storms Tectonic processes Tectonics three‐dimensional conductivity Transmission lines Underground structures |
title | Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A44%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20Geoelectric%20Field%20and%20Electric%20Power%20Transmission%20Line%20Voltage%20During%20a%20Geomagnetic%20Storm%20in%20Alberta,%20Canada%20Using%20Measured%20Magnetotelluric%20Impedance%20Data:%20The%20Influence%20of%20Three%E2%80%90Dimensional%20Electrical%20Structures%20in%20the%20Lithosphere&rft.jtitle=Space%20Weather&rft.au=Cordell,%20Darcy&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1542-7390&rft.eissn=1542-7390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021SW002803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586413231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586413231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |