Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere

Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Space Weather 2021-10, Vol.19 (10), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Cordell, Darcy, Unsworth, Martyn J., Lee, Benjamin, Hanneson, Cedar, Milling, David K., Mann, Ian R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Space Weather
container_volume 19
creator Cordell, Darcy
Unsworth, Martyn J.
Lee, Benjamin
Hanneson, Cedar
Milling, David K.
Mann, Ian R.
description Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis. Plain Language Summary Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductiv
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021SW002803
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2586413231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586413231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJEphxwNYYtsU_00yYVelaYmUCqSkdDm6Y99JXHnsYHtUdccj8Iw8BUtsAqgrVr46-u65xzpV9ZbRc0b5_D2nnG3uKOUNFc-qE1ZLPpmJOX3-ZH5ZvYrxPjOy5vKk-rmMyQyQjNuRtEdyjR4tqhSMIlcGrSbgNFn-lT77BwxkG8DFwcRovCNr45B88TbBDsnlGIoTFJ8Bdg5TXtokHwZiHLmwHYYEZ2QBDjSQ21jgG4Q4BtTk5veCT2jtWI6thgNqcCrbQoIPZJvzrVxvRyya77MQEH98-35pBnQlDNh_UfO4SWFUKVvHcrz8bm3S3sfDHgO-rl70YCO--fOeVrdXy-3i42T96Xq1uFhPlJCSTvSMA-eaTTtJZac71Qk-FWIqaE_nveqwl0L0uhE1w1ndKcUkrRVv5lo3WkkmTqt3R99D8F9HjKm992PISWPL62aaCS4KdXakVPAxBuzbQ8i1hMeW0bZ02z7tNuP8iD8Yi4__ZdvN3ZIzzqj4BXXHq04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586413231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Cordell, Darcy ; Unsworth, Martyn J. ; Lee, Benjamin ; Hanneson, Cedar ; Milling, David K. ; Mann, Ian R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Darcy ; Unsworth, Martyn J. ; Lee, Benjamin ; Hanneson, Cedar ; Milling, David K. ; Mann, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis. Plain Language Summary Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductivity related to (a) ancient tectonics in southern Alberta and (b) sedimentary basin thickness in northeastern Alberta lead to differences in geoelectric fields and transmission line voltages when comparing the two methods. In particular, incorporating 3‐D information results in geoelectric fields preferentially oriented northwest‐southeast across southern Alberta due to a well‐known conductive anomaly 20 km underground. This suggests that deep geological structures can influence the risks associated with geoelectric hazards. Key Points Measured impedances and a 1‐D conductivity model are used separately to estimate geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm Differences are found when comparing the two methods which are linked to known geological variations in conductivity via forward modeling Transmission lines in northern Alberta and lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta show the largest discrepancies in induced voltage</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1539-4964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021SW002803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Canadian Shield ; Charged particles ; Conductors ; Damage ; Earth ; Electric currents ; Electric fields ; Electric power ; Electric power grids ; Electric power transmission ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Electricity distribution ; Estimation ; Geoelectric fields ; Geoelectricity ; Geological structures ; Geology ; Geomagnetic disturbances ; Geomagnetic effects ; Geomagnetic field ; geomagnetic storm ; Geomagnetic storms ; geomagnetically induced currents ; Geomagnetism ; Hazards ; Impedance ; Induced voltage ; Line voltage ; Lithosphere ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic storms ; magnetotellurics ; Modelling ; Outcrops ; Perturbation ; Power lines ; Sedimentary basins ; Solar activity ; Storms ; Tectonic processes ; Tectonics ; three‐dimensional conductivity ; Transmission lines ; Underground structures</subject><ispartof>Space Weather, 2021-10, Vol.19 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8252-1173 ; 0000-0002-4059-4152 ; 0000-0003-1004-7841 ; 0000-0002-8685-1935</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021SW002803$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021SW002803$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Darcy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Martyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanneson, Cedar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milling, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</title><title>Space Weather</title><description>Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis. Plain Language Summary Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductivity related to (a) ancient tectonics in southern Alberta and (b) sedimentary basin thickness in northeastern Alberta lead to differences in geoelectric fields and transmission line voltages when comparing the two methods. In particular, incorporating 3‐D information results in geoelectric fields preferentially oriented northwest‐southeast across southern Alberta due to a well‐known conductive anomaly 20 km underground. This suggests that deep geological structures can influence the risks associated with geoelectric hazards. Key Points Measured impedances and a 1‐D conductivity model are used separately to estimate geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm Differences are found when comparing the two methods which are linked to known geological variations in conductivity via forward modeling Transmission lines in northern Alberta and lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta show the largest discrepancies in induced voltage</description><subject>Canadian Shield</subject><subject>Charged particles</subject><subject>Conductors</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Electric currents</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power grids</subject><subject>Electric power transmission</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Geoelectric fields</subject><subject>Geoelectricity</subject><subject>Geological structures</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geomagnetic disturbances</subject><subject>Geomagnetic effects</subject><subject>Geomagnetic field</subject><subject>geomagnetic storm</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>geomagnetically induced currents</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Impedance</subject><subject>Induced voltage</subject><subject>Line voltage</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>magnetotellurics</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Outcrops</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Power lines</subject><subject>Sedimentary basins</subject><subject>Solar activity</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Tectonic processes</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>three‐dimensional conductivity</subject><subject>Transmission lines</subject><subject>Underground structures</subject><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><issn>1542-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJEphxwNYYtsU_00yYVelaYmUCqSkdDm6Y99JXHnsYHtUdccj8Iw8BUtsAqgrVr46-u65xzpV9ZbRc0b5_D2nnG3uKOUNFc-qE1ZLPpmJOX3-ZH5ZvYrxPjOy5vKk-rmMyQyQjNuRtEdyjR4tqhSMIlcGrSbgNFn-lT77BwxkG8DFwcRovCNr45B88TbBDsnlGIoTFJ8Bdg5TXtokHwZiHLmwHYYEZ2QBDjSQ21jgG4Q4BtTk5veCT2jtWI6thgNqcCrbQoIPZJvzrVxvRyya77MQEH98-35pBnQlDNh_UfO4SWFUKVvHcrz8bm3S3sfDHgO-rl70YCO--fOeVrdXy-3i42T96Xq1uFhPlJCSTvSMA-eaTTtJZac71Qk-FWIqaE_nveqwl0L0uhE1w1ndKcUkrRVv5lo3WkkmTqt3R99D8F9HjKm992PISWPL62aaCS4KdXakVPAxBuzbQ8i1hMeW0bZ02z7tNuP8iD8Yi4__ZdvN3ZIzzqj4BXXHq04</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Cordell, Darcy</creator><creator>Unsworth, Martyn J.</creator><creator>Lee, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hanneson, Cedar</creator><creator>Milling, David K.</creator><creator>Mann, Ian R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-4152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-7841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-1935</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</title><author>Cordell, Darcy ; Unsworth, Martyn J. ; Lee, Benjamin ; Hanneson, Cedar ; Milling, David K. ; Mann, Ian R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3440-d72a22d16b404bdbcb32633630f09fcbef433fd8351e75bcc1405c289dd8dc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Canadian Shield</topic><topic>Charged particles</topic><topic>Conductors</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Electric currents</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power grids</topic><topic>Electric power transmission</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Geoelectric fields</topic><topic>Geoelectricity</topic><topic>Geological structures</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geomagnetic disturbances</topic><topic>Geomagnetic effects</topic><topic>Geomagnetic field</topic><topic>geomagnetic storm</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>geomagnetically induced currents</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Impedance</topic><topic>Induced voltage</topic><topic>Line voltage</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>magnetotellurics</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Outcrops</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Power lines</topic><topic>Sedimentary basins</topic><topic>Solar activity</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Tectonic processes</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>three‐dimensional conductivity</topic><topic>Transmission lines</topic><topic>Underground structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Darcy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Martyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanneson, Cedar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milling, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Ian R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cordell, Darcy</au><au>Unsworth, Martyn J.</au><au>Lee, Benjamin</au><au>Hanneson, Cedar</au><au>Milling, David K.</au><au>Mann, Ian R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere</atitle><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><eissn>1542-7390</eissn><abstract>Estimating the effect of geomagnetic disturbances on power grid infrastructure is an important problem since they can induce damaging currents in electric power transmission lines. In this study, an array of magnetotelluric (MT) impedance measurements in Alberta and southeastern British Columbia are used to estimate the geoelectric field resulting from a magnetic storm on September 8, 2017. The resulting geoelectric field is compared to the geoelectric field modeled using the more common method that uses a piecewise‐continuous 1‐D conductivity model. The 1‐D model assumes horizontal layers, which result in orthogonal induced electric fields while the measured MT impedance data can account for fully 3‐D conductivity structure. The geoelectric field derived from measured MT impedance data is partially polarized in southern Alberta, and the geoelectric field magnitude is largest in northeastern Alberta where the resistive Canadian Shield outcrops. The induced voltage in the Alberta transmission network is estimated to be ∼120 V larger in northeastern Alberta when using the measured MT impedances compared to the piecewise‐continuous 1‐D model. Estimated voltages on transmission lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta are 10%–20% larger when using the MT impedances due to the polarized geoelectric field. As shown with forward modeling tests, the polarization is due to a feature in the lower crust (20–30 km depth) called the Southern Alberta British Columbia conductor that is associated with a Proterozoic tectonic suture zone. This forms an important link between ancient tectonic processes and modern‐day geoelectric hazards that cannot be modeled with a 1‐D analysis. Plain Language Summary Solar activity creates a stream of charged particles that perturb the Earth's magnetic field leading to phenomena such as the Northern Lights. These perturbations in the geomagnetic field create geoelectric fields in the Earth. During periods of intense solar activity, strong geoelectric fields result in electric currents in power transmission lines which can cause power outages and damage to transformers. In this study, the geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm are estimated using two different methods. The more common method assumes that the Earth consists of conductive layers while the other method incorporates the effects of 3‐D geological structures and lateral variations in conductivity. Results indicate that lateral variations in electrical conductivity related to (a) ancient tectonics in southern Alberta and (b) sedimentary basin thickness in northeastern Alberta lead to differences in geoelectric fields and transmission line voltages when comparing the two methods. In particular, incorporating 3‐D information results in geoelectric fields preferentially oriented northwest‐southeast across southern Alberta due to a well‐known conductive anomaly 20 km underground. This suggests that deep geological structures can influence the risks associated with geoelectric hazards. Key Points Measured impedances and a 1‐D conductivity model are used separately to estimate geoelectric fields in Alberta during a geomagnetic storm Differences are found when comparing the two methods which are linked to known geological variations in conductivity via forward modeling Transmission lines in northern Alberta and lines oriented NW‐SE in southern Alberta show the largest discrepancies in induced voltage</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021SW002803</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-4152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-7841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-1935</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-7390
ispartof Space Weather, 2021-10, Vol.19 (10), p.n/a
issn 1542-7390
1539-4964
1542-7390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2586413231
source Wiley Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Canadian Shield
Charged particles
Conductors
Damage
Earth
Electric currents
Electric fields
Electric power
Electric power grids
Electric power transmission
Electrical conductivity
Electrical resistivity
Electricity distribution
Estimation
Geoelectric fields
Geoelectricity
Geological structures
Geology
Geomagnetic disturbances
Geomagnetic effects
Geomagnetic field
geomagnetic storm
Geomagnetic storms
geomagnetically induced currents
Geomagnetism
Hazards
Impedance
Induced voltage
Line voltage
Lithosphere
Magnetic fields
Magnetic storms
magnetotellurics
Modelling
Outcrops
Perturbation
Power lines
Sedimentary basins
Solar activity
Storms
Tectonic processes
Tectonics
three‐dimensional conductivity
Transmission lines
Underground structures
title Estimating the Geoelectric Field and Electric Power Transmission Line Voltage During a Geomagnetic Storm in Alberta, Canada Using Measured Magnetotelluric Impedance Data: The Influence of Three‐Dimensional Electrical Structures in the Lithosphere
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A44%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20Geoelectric%20Field%20and%20Electric%20Power%20Transmission%20Line%20Voltage%20During%20a%20Geomagnetic%20Storm%20in%20Alberta,%20Canada%20Using%20Measured%20Magnetotelluric%20Impedance%20Data:%20The%20Influence%20of%20Three%E2%80%90Dimensional%20Electrical%20Structures%20in%20the%20Lithosphere&rft.jtitle=Space%20Weather&rft.au=Cordell,%20Darcy&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1542-7390&rft.eissn=1542-7390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021SW002803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586413231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586413231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true