Evaluating Pointing Strategies for Future Solar Flare Missions

Solar flares are events of intense scientific interest. Although certain solar conditions are known to be associated with flare activity, the exact location and timing of an individual flare on the Sun cannot as yet be predicted with certainty. Missions whose science objectives depend on observing s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar physics 2021-10, Vol.296 (10), Article 153
Hauptverfasser: Inglis, Andrew R., Ireland, Jack, Shih, Albert Y., Christe, Steven D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Solar physics
container_volume 296
creator Inglis, Andrew R.
Ireland, Jack
Shih, Albert Y.
Christe, Steven D.
description Solar flares are events of intense scientific interest. Although certain solar conditions are known to be associated with flare activity, the exact location and timing of an individual flare on the Sun cannot as yet be predicted with certainty. Missions whose science objectives depend on observing solar flares must often make difficult decisions on where to target their observations if they do not observe the full solar disk. Yet, there is little analysis in the literature that might guide these mission operations to maximize their opportunities to observe flares. In this study, we analyze and simulate the performance of different observation strategies using historical flare and active region data from 2011 to 2014. We test a number of different target selection strategies based on active region complexity and recent flare activity, each of which is examined under a range of operational assumptions. In each case, we investigate various metrics such as the number of flares observed, the size of flares observed, and operational considerations such as the number of instrument repoints required. Overall, target selection methods based on recent flare activity showed the best overall performance but required more repointings than other methods. The mission responsiveness to new information is identified as another strong factor determining flare observation performance. It is also shown that target selection methods based on active region complexities show a significant pointing bias toward the western solar hemisphere. As expected, the number of flares observed grows quickly with field-of-view size until the approximate size of an active region is reached, but further improvements beyond the active region size are much more incremental. These results provide valuable performance estimates for a future mission focused on solar flares and inform the requirements that would ensure mission success.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11207-021-01896-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2586194373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586194373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2868904d7f826ef04f1a7d5fd01e07626b83dbf1345cc0614d60fb5d6ec06593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4BTwueo-8lm4-9CFJaFSoKVfAW0t2kbKm7NdkV_Pdmu4I3L-_NwMw83hByiXCNAOomIjJQFBhSQF1ICkdkgkJxCgV_PyYTAK4HrE_JWYxbgMEmJuR2_mV3ve3qZpO9tHVzAKsu2M5tahcz34Zs0Xd9cNmq3dlE0nDZUx1j3TbxnJx4u4vu4ndPydti_jp7oMvn-8fZ3ZKWHIuOlkxLXUBeKa-ZdB5yj1ZVwleADpRkcq15tfbIc1GWIDGvJPi1qKRLTBR8Sq7G3H1oP3sXO7Nt-9Ckk4YJLbHIueJJxUZVGdoYg_NmH-oPG74NghkeNmNPJvVkDj0ZSCY-mmISNxsX_qL_cf0AxvBqFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586194373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Pointing Strategies for Future Solar Flare Missions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Inglis, Andrew R. ; Ireland, Jack ; Shih, Albert Y. ; Christe, Steven D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Inglis, Andrew R. ; Ireland, Jack ; Shih, Albert Y. ; Christe, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><description>Solar flares are events of intense scientific interest. Although certain solar conditions are known to be associated with flare activity, the exact location and timing of an individual flare on the Sun cannot as yet be predicted with certainty. Missions whose science objectives depend on observing solar flares must often make difficult decisions on where to target their observations if they do not observe the full solar disk. Yet, there is little analysis in the literature that might guide these mission operations to maximize their opportunities to observe flares. In this study, we analyze and simulate the performance of different observation strategies using historical flare and active region data from 2011 to 2014. We test a number of different target selection strategies based on active region complexity and recent flare activity, each of which is examined under a range of operational assumptions. In each case, we investigate various metrics such as the number of flares observed, the size of flares observed, and operational considerations such as the number of instrument repoints required. Overall, target selection methods based on recent flare activity showed the best overall performance but required more repointings than other methods. The mission responsiveness to new information is identified as another strong factor determining flare observation performance. It is also shown that target selection methods based on active region complexities show a significant pointing bias toward the western solar hemisphere. As expected, the number of flares observed grows quickly with field-of-view size until the approximate size of an active region is reached, but further improvements beyond the active region size are much more incremental. These results provide valuable performance estimates for a future mission focused on solar flares and inform the requirements that would ensure mission success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-093X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11207-021-01896-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Field of view ; Missions ; Observatories ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Solar flares ; Solar physics ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Sun</subject><ispartof>Solar physics, 2021-10, Vol.296 (10), Article 153</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2868904d7f826ef04f1a7d5fd01e07626b83dbf1345cc0614d60fb5d6ec06593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2868904d7f826ef04f1a7d5fd01e07626b83dbf1345cc0614d60fb5d6ec06593</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0656-2437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-021-01896-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-021-01896-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inglis, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Albert Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christe, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Pointing Strategies for Future Solar Flare Missions</title><title>Solar physics</title><addtitle>Sol Phys</addtitle><description>Solar flares are events of intense scientific interest. Although certain solar conditions are known to be associated with flare activity, the exact location and timing of an individual flare on the Sun cannot as yet be predicted with certainty. Missions whose science objectives depend on observing solar flares must often make difficult decisions on where to target their observations if they do not observe the full solar disk. Yet, there is little analysis in the literature that might guide these mission operations to maximize their opportunities to observe flares. In this study, we analyze and simulate the performance of different observation strategies using historical flare and active region data from 2011 to 2014. We test a number of different target selection strategies based on active region complexity and recent flare activity, each of which is examined under a range of operational assumptions. In each case, we investigate various metrics such as the number of flares observed, the size of flares observed, and operational considerations such as the number of instrument repoints required. Overall, target selection methods based on recent flare activity showed the best overall performance but required more repointings than other methods. The mission responsiveness to new information is identified as another strong factor determining flare observation performance. It is also shown that target selection methods based on active region complexities show a significant pointing bias toward the western solar hemisphere. As expected, the number of flares observed grows quickly with field-of-view size until the approximate size of an active region is reached, but further improvements beyond the active region size are much more incremental. These results provide valuable performance estimates for a future mission focused on solar flares and inform the requirements that would ensure mission success.</description><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Field of view</subject><subject>Missions</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Solar flares</subject><subject>Solar physics</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Sun</subject><issn>0038-0938</issn><issn>1573-093X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4BTwueo-8lm4-9CFJaFSoKVfAW0t2kbKm7NdkV_Pdmu4I3L-_NwMw83hByiXCNAOomIjJQFBhSQF1ICkdkgkJxCgV_PyYTAK4HrE_JWYxbgMEmJuR2_mV3ve3qZpO9tHVzAKsu2M5tahcz34Zs0Xd9cNmq3dlE0nDZUx1j3TbxnJx4u4vu4ndPydti_jp7oMvn-8fZ3ZKWHIuOlkxLXUBeKa-ZdB5yj1ZVwleADpRkcq15tfbIc1GWIDGvJPi1qKRLTBR8Sq7G3H1oP3sXO7Nt-9Ckk4YJLbHIueJJxUZVGdoYg_NmH-oPG74NghkeNmNPJvVkDj0ZSCY-mmISNxsX_qL_cf0AxvBqFQ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Inglis, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Ireland, Jack</creator><creator>Shih, Albert Y.</creator><creator>Christe, Steven D.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-2437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Evaluating Pointing Strategies for Future Solar Flare Missions</title><author>Inglis, Andrew R. ; Ireland, Jack ; Shih, Albert Y. ; Christe, Steven D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2868904d7f826ef04f1a7d5fd01e07626b83dbf1345cc0614d60fb5d6ec06593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Field of view</topic><topic>Missions</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Solar flares</topic><topic>Solar physics</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Sun</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inglis, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Albert Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christe, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Solar physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inglis, Andrew R.</au><au>Ireland, Jack</au><au>Shih, Albert Y.</au><au>Christe, Steven D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Pointing Strategies for Future Solar Flare Missions</atitle><jtitle>Solar physics</jtitle><stitle>Sol Phys</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>296</volume><issue>10</issue><artnum>153</artnum><issn>0038-0938</issn><eissn>1573-093X</eissn><abstract>Solar flares are events of intense scientific interest. Although certain solar conditions are known to be associated with flare activity, the exact location and timing of an individual flare on the Sun cannot as yet be predicted with certainty. Missions whose science objectives depend on observing solar flares must often make difficult decisions on where to target their observations if they do not observe the full solar disk. Yet, there is little analysis in the literature that might guide these mission operations to maximize their opportunities to observe flares. In this study, we analyze and simulate the performance of different observation strategies using historical flare and active region data from 2011 to 2014. We test a number of different target selection strategies based on active region complexity and recent flare activity, each of which is examined under a range of operational assumptions. In each case, we investigate various metrics such as the number of flares observed, the size of flares observed, and operational considerations such as the number of instrument repoints required. Overall, target selection methods based on recent flare activity showed the best overall performance but required more repointings than other methods. The mission responsiveness to new information is identified as another strong factor determining flare observation performance. It is also shown that target selection methods based on active region complexities show a significant pointing bias toward the western solar hemisphere. As expected, the number of flares observed grows quickly with field-of-view size until the approximate size of an active region is reached, but further improvements beyond the active region size are much more incremental. These results provide valuable performance estimates for a future mission focused on solar flares and inform the requirements that would ensure mission success.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11207-021-01896-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-2437</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0938
ispartof Solar physics, 2021-10, Vol.296 (10), Article 153
issn 0038-0938
1573-093X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2586194373
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Astrophysics and Astroparticles
Atmospheric Sciences
Field of view
Missions
Observatories
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Solar flares
Solar physics
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
Sun
title Evaluating Pointing Strategies for Future Solar Flare Missions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A34%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Pointing%20Strategies%20for%20Future%20Solar%20Flare%20Missions&rft.jtitle=Solar%20physics&rft.au=Inglis,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=296&rft.issue=10&rft.artnum=153&rft.issn=0038-0938&rft.eissn=1573-093X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11207-021-01896-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586194373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586194373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true