Characterizing ambient nutrient concentrations and potential warning levels for surface water in natural forested wetlands in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of North Carolina, USA

Nearly thirty years ago the U.S. EPA directed states to begin developing water quality standards specific to wetlands; however, progress has been limited. This study presents an overview of ambient wetland water quality and the first step towards the development of numeric nutrient standards for for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological engineering 2021-12, Vol.172, p.106395, Article 106395
Hauptverfasser: Kurki-Fox, J. Jack, Burchell, Michael R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106395
container_title Ecological engineering
container_volume 172
creator Kurki-Fox, J. Jack
Burchell, Michael R.
description Nearly thirty years ago the U.S. EPA directed states to begin developing water quality standards specific to wetlands; however, progress has been limited. This study presents an overview of ambient wetland water quality and the first step towards the development of numeric nutrient standards for forested wetlands in North Carolina. Water quality samples were collected in 16 natural wetlands across the state for three years. The sites span a range of anthropogenic disturbance. The data was combined with historical data collected at these and other sites from 2005 to 2013. Concentration levels in wetlands without significant anthropogenic disturbance are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+, and likely lower than streams for NO3–-N. A method developed by the U.S. EPA to establish reference levels was modified to define draft nutrient warning levels that may indicate anthropogenic impacts. These warning levels were calculated as 0.06 mg/L, 0.14 mg/L, 0.34 mg/L and 2.8 mg/L for NO3–-N, NH4+-N, TP and TN, respectively. NO3–-N and NH4+-N concentrations were the best indicators of disturbance. Overall, despite the limitations imposed by the sampling frequency and inherent variability in wetland ecosystems, this research methodology presents a reasonable first attempt at defining nutrient warning levels for undisturbed natural forested wetlands in N.C., and may serve as a starting point in developing numeric nutrient criteria for wetlands. •A first step towards the development of nutrient concentration standards for natural wetlands.•Wetland standard concentration levels are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+-N, and lower for NO3N.•Proposed warning levels for NO3–N and NH4+-N were the best indicators of disturbance. TN, ON, and TP were not robust indicators.•Results could help identify disturbance in natural forested wetlands in North Carolina.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106395
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584776120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857421002500</els_id><sourcerecordid>2584776120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-8a30b52d5a96596936de34d259ff48ce3efb3c58ce125db83e38892eb61222283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRBILIWfgGSJK9k69jqxT6iK-KhUQSXo2XLsSderrL3YTiv4W_xBJmzv-DKjeW_ejOcR8rZl25a13eVhCy7NEO-3nPEWa53Q8hnZtKrnTac1f042THPZKNnvXpJXpRwYYz2XekP-DHubrauQw-8Q76k9jgFipXGp-V_iUnQYs60hxUJt9PSUKlaCnemjzXHtmuEB5kKnlGlZ8mQdIISaNEQabV0ychGEUsHTR6gzypQVrHugtwH8MeGoVXtItlRk384W4TTRrynXPR1sTnOI9j29-371mryY7FzgzVO8IHefPv4YvjQ33z5fD1c3jROir42ygo2Se2l1J3WnRedB7Dx-e5p2yoGAaRROYtZy6UclQCilOYxdy_EpcUHenXVPOf1ccHlzSEuOONJwqXZ9j0SGLHlmuZxKyTCZUw5Hm3-ZlpnVH3MwT_6Y1R9z9gf7Ppz78HLwECCb4vDiDnzI4KrxKfxH4S8aA59z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584776120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing ambient nutrient concentrations and potential warning levels for surface water in natural forested wetlands in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of North Carolina, USA</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack ; Burchell, Michael R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack ; Burchell, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly thirty years ago the U.S. EPA directed states to begin developing water quality standards specific to wetlands; however, progress has been limited. This study presents an overview of ambient wetland water quality and the first step towards the development of numeric nutrient standards for forested wetlands in North Carolina. Water quality samples were collected in 16 natural wetlands across the state for three years. The sites span a range of anthropogenic disturbance. The data was combined with historical data collected at these and other sites from 2005 to 2013. Concentration levels in wetlands without significant anthropogenic disturbance are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+, and likely lower than streams for NO3–-N. A method developed by the U.S. EPA to establish reference levels was modified to define draft nutrient warning levels that may indicate anthropogenic impacts. These warning levels were calculated as 0.06 mg/L, 0.14 mg/L, 0.34 mg/L and 2.8 mg/L for NO3–-N, NH4+-N, TP and TN, respectively. NO3–-N and NH4+-N concentrations were the best indicators of disturbance. Overall, despite the limitations imposed by the sampling frequency and inherent variability in wetland ecosystems, this research methodology presents a reasonable first attempt at defining nutrient warning levels for undisturbed natural forested wetlands in N.C., and may serve as a starting point in developing numeric nutrient criteria for wetlands. •A first step towards the development of nutrient concentration standards for natural wetlands.•Wetland standard concentration levels are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+-N, and lower for NO3N.•Proposed warning levels for NO3–N and NH4+-N were the best indicators of disturbance. TN, ON, and TP were not robust indicators.•Results could help identify disturbance in natural forested wetlands in North Carolina.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ambient water quality ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Coastal plains ; Disturbance ; Ecosystem disturbance ; Forested wetlands ; Historical account ; History ; Human influences ; Mineral nutrients ; Nutrient concentrations ; nutrients ; Quality standards ; Rivers ; Streams ; Surface water ; Warning ; Water quality ; Water quality standards ; wetland water quality ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2021-12, Vol.172, p.106395, Article 106395</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-8a30b52d5a96596936de34d259ff48ce3efb3c58ce125db83e38892eb61222283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-8a30b52d5a96596936de34d259ff48ce3efb3c58ce125db83e38892eb61222283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857421002500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burchell, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing ambient nutrient concentrations and potential warning levels for surface water in natural forested wetlands in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of North Carolina, USA</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>Nearly thirty years ago the U.S. EPA directed states to begin developing water quality standards specific to wetlands; however, progress has been limited. This study presents an overview of ambient wetland water quality and the first step towards the development of numeric nutrient standards for forested wetlands in North Carolina. Water quality samples were collected in 16 natural wetlands across the state for three years. The sites span a range of anthropogenic disturbance. The data was combined with historical data collected at these and other sites from 2005 to 2013. Concentration levels in wetlands without significant anthropogenic disturbance are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+, and likely lower than streams for NO3–-N. A method developed by the U.S. EPA to establish reference levels was modified to define draft nutrient warning levels that may indicate anthropogenic impacts. These warning levels were calculated as 0.06 mg/L, 0.14 mg/L, 0.34 mg/L and 2.8 mg/L for NO3–-N, NH4+-N, TP and TN, respectively. NO3–-N and NH4+-N concentrations were the best indicators of disturbance. Overall, despite the limitations imposed by the sampling frequency and inherent variability in wetland ecosystems, this research methodology presents a reasonable first attempt at defining nutrient warning levels for undisturbed natural forested wetlands in N.C., and may serve as a starting point in developing numeric nutrient criteria for wetlands. •A first step towards the development of nutrient concentration standards for natural wetlands.•Wetland standard concentration levels are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+-N, and lower for NO3N.•Proposed warning levels for NO3–N and NH4+-N were the best indicators of disturbance. TN, ON, and TP were not robust indicators.•Results could help identify disturbance in natural forested wetlands in North Carolina.</description><subject>ambient water quality</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Ecosystem disturbance</subject><subject>Forested wetlands</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>nutrients</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Warning</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality standards</subject><subject>wetland water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRBILIWfgGSJK9k69jqxT6iK-KhUQSXo2XLsSderrL3YTiv4W_xBJmzv-DKjeW_ejOcR8rZl25a13eVhCy7NEO-3nPEWa53Q8hnZtKrnTac1f042THPZKNnvXpJXpRwYYz2XekP-DHubrauQw-8Q76k9jgFipXGp-V_iUnQYs60hxUJt9PSUKlaCnemjzXHtmuEB5kKnlGlZ8mQdIISaNEQabV0ychGEUsHTR6gzypQVrHugtwH8MeGoVXtItlRk384W4TTRrynXPR1sTnOI9j29-371mryY7FzgzVO8IHefPv4YvjQ33z5fD1c3jROir42ygo2Se2l1J3WnRedB7Dx-e5p2yoGAaRROYtZy6UclQCilOYxdy_EpcUHenXVPOf1ccHlzSEuOONJwqXZ9j0SGLHlmuZxKyTCZUw5Hm3-ZlpnVH3MwT_6Y1R9z9gf7Ppz78HLwECCb4vDiDnzI4KrxKfxH4S8aA59z</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack</creator><creator>Burchell, Michael R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Characterizing ambient nutrient concentrations and potential warning levels for surface water in natural forested wetlands in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of North Carolina, USA</title><author>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack ; Burchell, Michael R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-8a30b52d5a96596936de34d259ff48ce3efb3c58ce125db83e38892eb61222283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ambient water quality</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Ecosystem disturbance</topic><topic>Forested wetlands</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Warning</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality standards</topic><topic>wetland water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burchell, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurki-Fox, J. Jack</au><au>Burchell, Michael R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing ambient nutrient concentrations and potential warning levels for surface water in natural forested wetlands in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of North Carolina, USA</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>172</volume><spage>106395</spage><pages>106395-</pages><artnum>106395</artnum><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>Nearly thirty years ago the U.S. EPA directed states to begin developing water quality standards specific to wetlands; however, progress has been limited. This study presents an overview of ambient wetland water quality and the first step towards the development of numeric nutrient standards for forested wetlands in North Carolina. Water quality samples were collected in 16 natural wetlands across the state for three years. The sites span a range of anthropogenic disturbance. The data was combined with historical data collected at these and other sites from 2005 to 2013. Concentration levels in wetlands without significant anthropogenic disturbance are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+, and likely lower than streams for NO3–-N. A method developed by the U.S. EPA to establish reference levels was modified to define draft nutrient warning levels that may indicate anthropogenic impacts. These warning levels were calculated as 0.06 mg/L, 0.14 mg/L, 0.34 mg/L and 2.8 mg/L for NO3–-N, NH4+-N, TP and TN, respectively. NO3–-N and NH4+-N concentrations were the best indicators of disturbance. Overall, despite the limitations imposed by the sampling frequency and inherent variability in wetland ecosystems, this research methodology presents a reasonable first attempt at defining nutrient warning levels for undisturbed natural forested wetlands in N.C., and may serve as a starting point in developing numeric nutrient criteria for wetlands. •A first step towards the development of nutrient concentration standards for natural wetlands.•Wetland standard concentration levels are likely higher than streams for TN, TP, similar for NH4+-N, and lower for NO3N.•Proposed warning levels for NO3–N and NH4+-N were the best indicators of disturbance. TN, ON, and TP were not robust indicators.•Results could help identify disturbance in natural forested wetlands in North Carolina.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106395</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-8574
ispartof Ecological engineering, 2021-12, Vol.172, p.106395, Article 106395
issn 0925-8574
1872-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2584776120
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ambient water quality
Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic ecosystems
Coastal plains
Disturbance
Ecosystem disturbance
Forested wetlands
Historical account
History
Human influences
Mineral nutrients
Nutrient concentrations
nutrients
Quality standards
Rivers
Streams
Surface water
Warning
Water quality
Water quality standards
wetland water quality
Wetlands
title Characterizing ambient nutrient concentrations and potential warning levels for surface water in natural forested wetlands in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of North Carolina, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20ambient%20nutrient%20concentrations%20and%20potential%20warning%20levels%20for%20surface%20water%20in%20natural%20forested%20wetlands%20in%20the%20Piedmont%20and%20Coastal%20Plain%20of%20North%20Carolina,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Kurki-Fox,%20J.%20Jack&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=172&rft.spage=106395&rft.pages=106395-&rft.artnum=106395&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106395&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584776120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584776120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925857421002500&rfr_iscdi=true