Evaluation of Hammermill Tip Speed, Air Assist, and Screen Hole Diameter on Ground Corn Characteristics
This study was performed to evaluate hammermill tip speed, assistive airflow, and screen hole diameter on hammermill throughput and characteristics of ground corn. Corn was ground using two Andritz hammermills measuring 1 m in diameter each equipped with 72 hammers and 300 HP motors. Treatments were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2021-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1768 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Braun, Michaela Wecker, Haley Dunmire, Kara Evans, Caitlin Sodak, Michael W. Kapetanovich, Maks Shepherd, Jerry Fisher, Randy Coble, Kyle Stark, Charles Paulk, Chad |
description | This study was performed to evaluate hammermill tip speed, assistive airflow, and screen hole diameter on hammermill throughput and characteristics of ground corn. Corn was ground using two Andritz hammermills measuring 1 m in diameter each equipped with 72 hammers and 300 HP motors. Treatments were arranged in a 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design with three tip speeds (3774, 4975, and 6176 m/min), three screen hole diameters (2.3, 3.9, and 6.3 mm), and three air flow rates (1062, 1416, and 1770 fan revolutions per minute). Corn was ground on three separate days to create three replications and treatments were randomized within day. Samples were collected and analyzed for moisture, particle size, and flowability characteristics. There was a 3-way interaction (p = 0.029) for standard deviation (Sgw). There was a screen hole diameter × hammer tip speed interaction (p < 0.001) for geometric mean particle size dgw (p < 0.001) and composite flow index (CFI) (p < 0.001). When tip speed increased from 3774 to 6176 m/min, the rate of decrease in dgw was greater as screen hole diameter increased from 2.3 to 6.3 mm. For CFI, increasing tip speed decreased the CFI of ground corn when ground using the 3.9 and 6.3 mm screen. However, when grinding corn using the 2.3 mm screen, there was no evidence of difference in CFI when increasing tip speed. In conclusion, the air flow rate did not influence dgw of corn, but hammer tip speed and screen size were altered and achieved a range of dgw from 304 to 617 µm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr9101768 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584507599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584507599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-629bb67797ff022b90d054346f867086dd53d00480d858a74f250f5ce82bde813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUFtLwzAYDaLgmHvwHwR8ElZN0ub2OOouwsCHzeeSNolmtE1NWsF_b2Qifi_ng3ODA8AtRg95LtHjECRGmDNxAWaEEJ5Jjvnlv_8aLGI8oXQS54KyGXhbf6p2UqPzPfQW7lTXmdC5toVHN8DDYIxewpULcBWji-MSql7DQxOM6eHOtwY-OdWZ0QSYArbBT4kufehh-a6CahKRXK6JN-DKqjaaxS_OwetmfSx32f5l-1yu9llDJBkzRmRdM84ltxYRUkukES3yglnBOBJMa5prhAqBtKBC8cISiixtjCC1NgLnc3B3zh2C_5hMHKuTn0KfKitCRUERp1Im1f1Z1QQfYzC2GoLrVPiqMKp-pqz-psy_Adb7ZHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584507599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Hammermill Tip Speed, Air Assist, and Screen Hole Diameter on Ground Corn Characteristics</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Braun, Michaela ; Wecker, Haley ; Dunmire, Kara ; Evans, Caitlin ; Sodak, Michael W. ; Kapetanovich, Maks ; Shepherd, Jerry ; Fisher, Randy ; Coble, Kyle ; Stark, Charles ; Paulk, Chad</creator><creatorcontrib>Braun, Michaela ; Wecker, Haley ; Dunmire, Kara ; Evans, Caitlin ; Sodak, Michael W. ; Kapetanovich, Maks ; Shepherd, Jerry ; Fisher, Randy ; Coble, Kyle ; Stark, Charles ; Paulk, Chad</creatorcontrib><description>This study was performed to evaluate hammermill tip speed, assistive airflow, and screen hole diameter on hammermill throughput and characteristics of ground corn. Corn was ground using two Andritz hammermills measuring 1 m in diameter each equipped with 72 hammers and 300 HP motors. Treatments were arranged in a 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design with three tip speeds (3774, 4975, and 6176 m/min), three screen hole diameters (2.3, 3.9, and 6.3 mm), and three air flow rates (1062, 1416, and 1770 fan revolutions per minute). Corn was ground on three separate days to create three replications and treatments were randomized within day. Samples were collected and analyzed for moisture, particle size, and flowability characteristics. There was a 3-way interaction (p = 0.029) for standard deviation (Sgw). There was a screen hole diameter × hammer tip speed interaction (p < 0.001) for geometric mean particle size dgw (p < 0.001) and composite flow index (CFI) (p < 0.001). When tip speed increased from 3774 to 6176 m/min, the rate of decrease in dgw was greater as screen hole diameter increased from 2.3 to 6.3 mm. For CFI, increasing tip speed decreased the CFI of ground corn when ground using the 3.9 and 6.3 mm screen. However, when grinding corn using the 2.3 mm screen, there was no evidence of difference in CFI when increasing tip speed. In conclusion, the air flow rate did not influence dgw of corn, but hammer tip speed and screen size were altered and achieved a range of dgw from 304 to 617 µm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr9101768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Corn ; Diameters ; Evaluation ; Factorial design ; Flow velocity ; Hammers ; Particle size ; Tip speed</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2021-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1768</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-629bb67797ff022b90d054346f867086dd53d00480d858a74f250f5ce82bde813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-629bb67797ff022b90d054346f867086dd53d00480d858a74f250f5ce82bde813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6704-8736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braun, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wecker, Haley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunmire, Kara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodak, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapetanovich, Maks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coble, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulk, Chad</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Hammermill Tip Speed, Air Assist, and Screen Hole Diameter on Ground Corn Characteristics</title><title>Processes</title><description>This study was performed to evaluate hammermill tip speed, assistive airflow, and screen hole diameter on hammermill throughput and characteristics of ground corn. Corn was ground using two Andritz hammermills measuring 1 m in diameter each equipped with 72 hammers and 300 HP motors. Treatments were arranged in a 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design with three tip speeds (3774, 4975, and 6176 m/min), three screen hole diameters (2.3, 3.9, and 6.3 mm), and three air flow rates (1062, 1416, and 1770 fan revolutions per minute). Corn was ground on three separate days to create three replications and treatments were randomized within day. Samples were collected and analyzed for moisture, particle size, and flowability characteristics. There was a 3-way interaction (p = 0.029) for standard deviation (Sgw). There was a screen hole diameter × hammer tip speed interaction (p < 0.001) for geometric mean particle size dgw (p < 0.001) and composite flow index (CFI) (p < 0.001). When tip speed increased from 3774 to 6176 m/min, the rate of decrease in dgw was greater as screen hole diameter increased from 2.3 to 6.3 mm. For CFI, increasing tip speed decreased the CFI of ground corn when ground using the 3.9 and 6.3 mm screen. However, when grinding corn using the 2.3 mm screen, there was no evidence of difference in CFI when increasing tip speed. In conclusion, the air flow rate did not influence dgw of corn, but hammer tip speed and screen size were altered and achieved a range of dgw from 304 to 617 µm.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Factorial design</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Hammers</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Tip speed</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUFtLwzAYDaLgmHvwHwR8ElZN0ub2OOouwsCHzeeSNolmtE1NWsF_b2Qifi_ng3ODA8AtRg95LtHjECRGmDNxAWaEEJ5Jjvnlv_8aLGI8oXQS54KyGXhbf6p2UqPzPfQW7lTXmdC5toVHN8DDYIxewpULcBWji-MSql7DQxOM6eHOtwY-OdWZ0QSYArbBT4kufehh-a6CahKRXK6JN-DKqjaaxS_OwetmfSx32f5l-1yu9llDJBkzRmRdM84ltxYRUkukES3yglnBOBJMa5prhAqBtKBC8cISiixtjCC1NgLnc3B3zh2C_5hMHKuTn0KfKitCRUERp1Im1f1Z1QQfYzC2GoLrVPiqMKp-pqz-psy_Adb7ZHo</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Braun, Michaela</creator><creator>Wecker, Haley</creator><creator>Dunmire, Kara</creator><creator>Evans, Caitlin</creator><creator>Sodak, Michael W.</creator><creator>Kapetanovich, Maks</creator><creator>Shepherd, Jerry</creator><creator>Fisher, Randy</creator><creator>Coble, Kyle</creator><creator>Stark, Charles</creator><creator>Paulk, Chad</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-8736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Hammermill Tip Speed, Air Assist, and Screen Hole Diameter on Ground Corn Characteristics</title><author>Braun, Michaela ; Wecker, Haley ; Dunmire, Kara ; Evans, Caitlin ; Sodak, Michael W. ; Kapetanovich, Maks ; Shepherd, Jerry ; Fisher, Randy ; Coble, Kyle ; Stark, Charles ; Paulk, Chad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-629bb67797ff022b90d054346f867086dd53d00480d858a74f250f5ce82bde813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Factorial design</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Hammers</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Tip speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braun, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wecker, Haley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunmire, Kara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodak, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapetanovich, Maks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coble, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulk, Chad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braun, Michaela</au><au>Wecker, Haley</au><au>Dunmire, Kara</au><au>Evans, Caitlin</au><au>Sodak, Michael W.</au><au>Kapetanovich, Maks</au><au>Shepherd, Jerry</au><au>Fisher, Randy</au><au>Coble, Kyle</au><au>Stark, Charles</au><au>Paulk, Chad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Hammermill Tip Speed, Air Assist, and Screen Hole Diameter on Ground Corn Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1768</spage><pages>1768-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>This study was performed to evaluate hammermill tip speed, assistive airflow, and screen hole diameter on hammermill throughput and characteristics of ground corn. Corn was ground using two Andritz hammermills measuring 1 m in diameter each equipped with 72 hammers and 300 HP motors. Treatments were arranged in a 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design with three tip speeds (3774, 4975, and 6176 m/min), three screen hole diameters (2.3, 3.9, and 6.3 mm), and three air flow rates (1062, 1416, and 1770 fan revolutions per minute). Corn was ground on three separate days to create three replications and treatments were randomized within day. Samples were collected and analyzed for moisture, particle size, and flowability characteristics. There was a 3-way interaction (p = 0.029) for standard deviation (Sgw). There was a screen hole diameter × hammer tip speed interaction (p < 0.001) for geometric mean particle size dgw (p < 0.001) and composite flow index (CFI) (p < 0.001). When tip speed increased from 3774 to 6176 m/min, the rate of decrease in dgw was greater as screen hole diameter increased from 2.3 to 6.3 mm. For CFI, increasing tip speed decreased the CFI of ground corn when ground using the 3.9 and 6.3 mm screen. However, when grinding corn using the 2.3 mm screen, there was no evidence of difference in CFI when increasing tip speed. In conclusion, the air flow rate did not influence dgw of corn, but hammer tip speed and screen size were altered and achieved a range of dgw from 304 to 617 µm.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr9101768</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-8736</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2021-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1768 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2584507599 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Air flow Corn Diameters Evaluation Factorial design Flow velocity Hammers Particle size Tip speed |
title | Evaluation of Hammermill Tip Speed, Air Assist, and Screen Hole Diameter on Ground Corn Characteristics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A37%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Hammermill%20Tip%20Speed,%20Air%20Assist,%20and%20Screen%20Hole%20Diameter%20on%20Ground%20Corn%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Braun,%20Michaela&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1768&rft.pages=1768-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr9101768&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584507599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584507599&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |